
Toobin: Suspending habeas corpus would be ‘such a wild step'
In an appearance on CNN Friday evening, Toobin said pausing the legal principle would be 'such a wild step,' despite significant losses the Trump administration has faced in court over its efforts to speed up deportations of illegal immigrants.
'Talking about suspending habeas corpus is such a wild step. The only time a president has done it unilaterally without the authorization of Congress was Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, when Congress wasn't even in session and couldn't ratify what he was doing,' Toobin said on CNN's 'AC360.'
He was reacting to remarks by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller earlier Friday, when Trump's chief immigration policy architect told reporters that the White House is 'actively looking at' suspending the principle.
'Well, the Constitution is clear — and that of course is the supreme law of the land — that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus can be suspended in a time of invasion,' Miller said at the time. 'So, it's an option we're actively looking at. Look, a lot of it depends on whether the courts do the right thing or not.'
Toobin said on Friday that habeas corpus 'goes back to the Magna Carta in the 13th century. The idea that someone in custody has the right to go to court to challenge their incarceration, that is so basic to Anglo-American law.'
'And that's one reason why suspending habeas corpus is considered such an extreme, extreme step,' he told host Anderson Cooper the interview, first highlighted by Mediaite. 'This is an example of how losses in court is causing this administration to escalate its rhetoric. And we'll see where it goes.'
The Constitution says the legal principle may not be suspended 'unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.'
The principle allows those who are in custody to challenge the legality of being held in custody — helping prevent indefinite and unlawful imprisonment. Habeas corpus has allowed migrants to challenge their forthcoming deportations that the administration has instituted under the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th-century wartime law.
The writ of habeas corpus has been suspended four times: during the Civil War, in eleven South Carolina counties overrun by the Ku Klux Klan during Reconstruction, in two Philippines provinces during a 1905 insurrection and in Hawaii following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, according to the National Constitution Center.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
7 minutes ago
- CNBC
Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would "likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'" Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data," Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. "Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data." Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. "Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another," Gallego said. "If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news." Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of "the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares." Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. "This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking," Isom said on an earnings call, adding "talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do." Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found "retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage." The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. "Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics," Delta's letter said.


NBC News
7 minutes ago
- NBC News
Federal officials launch investigation into former Trump prosecutor
Federal officials are investigating former special counsel Jack Smith after President Trump and other prominent Republicans alleged that his investigations into then-candidate Trump amounted to illegal political activity. It comes as protesters demonstrated against the Trump administration on Saturday. NBC News' Vaughn Hillyard 2, 2025


The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Smithsonian slated to restore Trump impeachment exhibit
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History said it is slated to restore the placard with information about President Trump's two impeachments after removing it from the exhibit last month. The museum said in a Saturday statement that the section will be 'updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history.' The Washington Post reported on Thursday, citing an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans, that the removal of the placard occurred as part of an internal content review the institution agreed to after pressure from President Trump's administration to get rid of the art museum director. The Smithsonian said on Saturday that the placard, part of the exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,' did not meet the institution's standards and argued no one within the administration asked the museum to remove the information. 'The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation. It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 'For these reasons, we removed the placard. We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the museum added. The placard, before being removed last month, detailed Trump's two impeachments and was featured as part of the exhibit since September 2021, the Smithsonian previously told The Hill. 'It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025,' a Smithsonian spokesperson said. 'The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion,' the spokesperson added. 'Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance.' The president was impeached two times during his first White House term: once over a phone call where he allegedly asked Ukraine to investigate then-ex-President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, and the other over his alleged role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. He was acquitted by the Senate in both instances. The removal of the placard drew backlash from Democratic Party lawmakers. Trump signed an executive order in March, ordering the removal of 'divisive narratives' from the Smithsonian museums that are not compatible with the administration's views and 'remind' Americans 'of our extraordinary heritage.' 'As the keeper of memory for the nation, it is our privilege and responsibility to tell accurate and complete histories. As has been recently reported, in July, a placard was removed from the National Museum of American History's exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,'' the Smithsonian said on Saturday. 'The intent of the Impeachment section of the exhibit is to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history,' the institution added.