The FDA rolls out its own AI to speed up clinical reviews and scientific evaluations
Elsa — yes, weirdly like the snow queen from Frozen — completed a "very successful pilot program with FDA's scientific reviewers." According to the FDA, the AI tool can help with reading, writing and summarizing everything from adverse events to assessments. Elsa can also do label comparisons and generate code. It's already being used to speed up clinical protocol reviews and scientific evaluations, along with finding "high-priority inspection targets."
Elsa should be a secure platform, the FDA states. It's not clear how exactly the agency trained Elsa, but the FDA claims it's not through "data submitted by regulated industry." The information exists in Amazon Web Services' GovCloud that, again, should keep all information internal.
The FDA calls Elsa the first step in its AI journey. "Today marks the dawn of the AI era at the FDA with the release of Elsa, AI is no longer a distant promise but a dynamic force enhancing and optimizing the performance and potential of every employee," said FDA Chief AI Officer Jeremy Walsh. "As we learn how employees are using the tool, our development team will be able to add capabilities and grow with the needs of employees and the agency." If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
FDA Suspends Muscular Dystrophy Drug After 3 Patient Deaths
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed an immediate clinical hold on Sarepta Therapeutics' investigational gene therapy trials for limb girdle muscular dystrophy following three patient deaths potentially linked to the company's treatments. The agency announced the action on Friday, citing serious safety concerns and "unreasonable and significant risk" to study participants. The FDA also revoked the company's platform technology designation and requested Sarepta voluntarily halt shipments of its approved drug Elevidys, which the company refused to do. Newsweek reached out to Sarepta Therapeutics via email on Sunday after normal business hours for comment. Why It Matters This regulatory intervention represents a significant safety measure in the gene therapy field, affecting both ongoing clinical trials and an already approved treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The decision could impact treatment options for families dealing with these devastating muscle-wasting diseases. Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare and serious genetic condition that worsens over time, leading to weakness and wasting away of the body's muscles. What To Know The three deaths resulted from acute liver failure in patients treated with either Elevidys or investigational therapies using the same AAVrh74 viral vector technology. One fatality occurred during a clinical trial for limb girdle muscular dystrophy treatment. Elevidys is an adeno-associated virus vector-based gene therapy designed to deliver a gene that leads to production of a shortened protein that contains selected domains of the dystrophin protein present in normal muscle cells. The disease occurs due to a defective gene that results in abnormalities in, or absence of, dystrophin, a protein that helps keep the body's muscle cells intact. The drug received traditional approval for ambulatory DMD patients aged 4 and older on June 20, 2024, while maintaining accelerated approval for non-ambulatory patients since June 22, 2023. Under accelerated approval, companies must conduct confirmatory studies to verify clinical benefit. Given the new safety concerns, the FDA has notified Sarepta that the drug's indication should be restricted to ambulatory patients only. The FDA revoked the platform technology designation for Sarepta's AAVrh74 Platform Technology because the preliminary evidence is insufficient to demonstrate that the technology has the potential to be incorporated in multiple drugs without adverse safety effects. What People Are Saying FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H.: "Today, we've shown that this FDA takes swift action when patient safety is at risk. We believe in access to drugs for unmet medical needs but are not afraid to take immediate action when a serious safety signal emerges." Dr. Vinay Prasad, Director of FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research: "Protecting patient safety is our highest priority, and the FDA will not allow products whose harms are greater than benefits. The FDA will halt any clinical trial of an investigational product if clinical trial participants would be exposed to an unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury." FILE - The Food and Drug Administration seal is seen at the Hubert Humphrey Building Auditorium in Washington, Tuesday, April 22, 2025. FILE - The Food and Drug Administration seal is seen at the Hubert Humphrey Building Auditorium in Washington, Tuesday, April 22, 2025. AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File What Happens Next The FDA will continue investigating the risk of acute liver failure and other serious outcomes following gene therapies using Sarepta's AAVrh74 platform technology. The agency has committed to taking additional regulatory actions as needed to protect patients. For current Elevidys patients, the FDA is focusing its safety investigation on ambulatory patients while restricting the drug's use in non-ambulatory patients.
The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
We can't win the fight to end HIV if we cut funding and access to medication
The fight to end HIV in our lifetimes just received a game-changing innovation. In June, the FDA approved Yeztugo (lenacapavir), a groundbreaking HIV prevention treatment that requires just two injections per year — and scored 99 percent effectiveness in trials. This monumental scientific breakthrough is poised to transform the lives of people who have found it hard to keep up with daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis, providing an option that fits better into their everyday lives. But as exciting as this development is, it could be undermined by the Trump administration's proposal to cut nearly $1 billion from federal HIV prevention programs. Innovations like lenacapavir could be a key tool to ending the epidemic, but only if we have the resources and policy to deliver it directly to those who need them most. Although lenacapavir's efficacy is groundbreaking, access remains another story. With a price tag hovering around $28,000 a year, this medication risks being out of reach for the very communities who need it most. We're still waiting to see how programs managed by Gilead Sciences, which developed the treatments, and the broader insurance markets will step up. And it's not just the cost of the drug itself. It's the labs, the provider visits, the follow-ups — each one a potential roadblock for someone trying to stay safe. Federal leadership is essential to ensuring this new HIV prevention tool reaches the communities who need it most. This includes updating clinical guidelines, funding support services and supporting the infrastructure that makes access possible. Unfortunately, the Trump administration and the Republican majorities in Congress are putting access to lifesaving innovations at risk. The administration's attacks on HIV prevention, including its proposals to eliminate the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's HIV budget and efforts to dismantle public health systems, threaten progress. The Republican budget reconciliation bill that President Trump signed over the July 4 weekend includes deep cuts to Medicaid — the largest payer for HIV care in the U.S. Without strong federal investment and coordination, expanding access to new tools and ending the HIV epidemic is at serious risk. Despite the real strides we have made in HIV prevention, those of us in the lesbian, gay, and transgender community — especially non-white Southerners in rural areas or navigating poverty — know that not every prevention strategy reaches us, works for us, or is built with us in mind. Our realities demand options that reflect the full truth of who we are and how we live. Lenacapavir offers real, powerful hope, but let's be clear: Science alone won't save us. What will make the difference is equitable and intentional policies that center our communities and a public health infrastructure that doesn't leave us behind. These numbers don't shift on their own. Yes, we have made progress over time. But the hard truth is that Black Americans still account for 43 percent of all new HIV diagnoses in the U.S., despite being just 13 percent of the population. The data is even more stark for Black transgender women: 44 percent are living with HIV, and their lifetime risk remains unacceptably high. And we cannot ignore the geography of this epidemic. The South accounts for 52 percent of all new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. That's not a coincidence — it is the result of systemic failures: limited access to healthcare, persistent stigma, lack of comprehensive sex education and the absence of strong non-discrimination protections. These barriers don't just prevent care — they trap people in cycles where prevention tools are out of reach. Among gay and bisexual Black men, the risk of contracting HIV is still 50 percent over a lifetime. Prevention tools like pre-exposure prophylaxis and lenacapavir hold promise, but they only matter if people can actually access them, without fear, shame or coercion. Ending this epidemic means creating environments where people are safe to make informed choices about their own health. The fight to end the HIV epidemic is not just about what happens in labs — it's about how we make these innovations real for our communities. Science is doing its part. Now is the time to urge Congress to reject any cuts to CDC HIV prevention efforts and to fully fund the HIV response. We have the tools to end this epidemic, but not if we dismantle the very systems our communities rely on to survive. The promise of lenacapavir, and the hope it represents, is too great to let fall through the cracks of policy neglect. The question is, will we make the choice to ensure that this breakthrough reaches all of us? Science has given us the tools. Now, we must ensure that everyone has the opportunity to use them.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
12,000 pounds of organic blueberries recalled over Listeria risk — here's what to know
The frozen berries were shipped to a single customer in North Carolina, but the FDA has issued its highest-level health warning. A frozen fruit recall is drawing national attention, but it all comes down to one state. North Carolina is the only area affected by a new FDA blueberry recall, after a batch of frozen organic fruit tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes during finished product testing. The fruit came from Alma Pak International, a Georgia-based supplier, and was shipped on or before June 9, 2025, to a single commercial customer. The FDA has since elevated the recall to Class I — the agency's highest risk category for products that pose a serious health threat if consumed. What's the Recall? Here are the details of the recall so that you can check for affected product in foodservice settings or repackaged goods. Alma Pak Organic Blueberries (frozen) Shipped in 30-pound bulk boxes Lot numbers: 13325 G1060 and 13325 G1096 The recalled blueberries were shipped to a single commercial customer in North Carolina. The FDA has not issued a consumer-facing press release, and the buyer has not been named. These berries were not sold directly to consumers, but could potentially have been used in food service, commercial baking, or other large-batch applications. No other Alma Pak products or lots are included in this recall. Why This Recall Matters Listeria monocytogenes is one of the most dangerous foodborne pathogens, and frozen fruit, while often considered lower risk, has been the source of several high-profile recalls in recent years. Unlike many other bacteria, Listeria can survive freezing temperatures, meaning contaminated fruit remains hazardous even straight from the freezer. While most healthy individuals may experience only mild symptoms, Listeria infections can be life-threatening for pregnant people, newborns, older adults, and immunocompromised individuals. This recall is especially concerning because the blueberries were shipped in bulk, unlabeled boxes. While there's no confirmed evidence the product reached consumers, it's possible the fruit was used in prepared foods like baked goods, smoothies, or frozen blends sold regionally. The Class I designation is not limited to E. coli or meat contamination. It applies to any situation where the FDA sees a 'reasonable probability' that exposure could cause serious illness, including Listeria, undeclared allergens, and other high-risk threats. What to Do If you operate a foodservice business or grocery in North Carolina, check with your distributor to determine whether the affected lot codes were received. The FDA recommends discarding any impacted product and thoroughly sanitizing any prep surfaces, containers, or equipment that may have come into contact with the berries. If you're a consumer who recently bought bulk or repackaged organic frozen blueberries, especially from a small grocer, farmers market, or co-op, ask whether they source fruit from Alma Pak. If you're not sure, it's safest to throw it out. Even frozen fruit isn't immune from contamination. A Class I recall means the risk is real and worth taking seriously, even in just one state. Solve the daily Crossword
