10% for Bushmills, 15% for Jameson: Businesses struggle with the North-South tariff gap
United States
, and operate across the two jurisdictions on the island of
Ireland
, now must figure with two different sets of
US tariff
rates.
Businesses in the Republic without a presence in the
North
will now peer enviously across the Border at the lower rate to be applied there. This is the first year since Ireland – both parts – joined the European Economic Community in 1973 that such a differential has been in play.
In the Republic, under the terms of the European Union's framework agreement with Donald Trump, a 15 per cent tariff will be put on exports as of today.
In Northern Ireland, businesses can export to the US at 10 per cent – as per the terms of the agreement reached between London and Washington in May.
READ MORE
This differential is perhaps best illustrated by Irish whiskey. While Jameson and other whiskey brands in the Republic will be subject to a 15 per cent tariff rate, Bushmills and others in the North will face a 10 per cent hit.
[
Why did the EU sign a tariff deal overwhelmingly favourable to the US?
Opens in new window
]
This competitive advantage for northern exporters comes with the bonus that EU countermeasures against the US have also been avoided.
Under the Brexit protocol arrangement, Northern Ireland remains essentially part of the European single market for goods. This means that while northern businesses can still export at UK rates, EU tariffs apply on any imports they acquire.
Had the EU gone down the road of aggressively countering US tariffs with targeted measures against American imports, those tariffs would have been applied at the ports of Belfast and Larne.
Brexit laid bare the constant Border-hopping required to keep the Irish dairy industry going. This comes into focus again as a result of Trump's tariffs, which will be lower for the UK than for the EU. Photograph: Charles McQuillan/Getty
As it turned out, political tensions around the protocol, for now, have abated.
However, the nature of operating a business in Ireland is not always neatly confined to one jurisdiction or another. Supply chains and production can criss-cross the Border multiple times.
For example; Brexit laid bare the constant Border-hopping required to keep the Irish dairy industry going.
In April, the chief executive of Lakeland Dairies, Colin Kelly, said moving some butter exports to Northern Ireland to avail of a lower US tariff was something it might consider. The Co Cavan headquartered co-op is the country's second largest dairy producer, with 3,200 members.
At the time Kelly made his remarks, Donald Trump was threatening the EU with a 20 per cent general tariff.
The Lakeland boss said moving elements of its production process to the North could be an option if rates there remained lower than in the Republic. He said Lakeland continuously looks to make its operation as efficient as possible – but its customers would ultimately have a big say on where produce was sourced from.
Colin Kelly, chief executive of Co Cavan-based Lakeland Dairies. Photograph: Orla Murray/Coalesce
When asked by The Irish Times this week if Lakeland was still considering such a move, a spokesperson said the co-op could not comment.
Industry observers believe Lakeland would be unwise not to explore its options. They note that Kelly is vastly experienced – he joined from Kerrygold owner Ornua – and is someone who understands the US market very well. Kerrygold is a big player at the premium end of the US butter market.
[
Tariffs: as new regime kicks in, what does it mean for Europe and for Ireland?
Opens in new window
]
The Irish Farmers Association (IFA) is critical of the deal struck by the European Union. The US market accounts for almost €2 billion in Irish food and drink exports – around 11 per cent in total.
According to the IFA's chief economist, Tadgh Buckley, if different tariff rates materialise it could give dairy producers in the North a clear edge.
He believes that Northern Ireland-based dairy suppliers to the US market could take advantage of their lower-tariff advantage.
'A difference in rates between the EU and the UK would give them a capacity to adjust their price points against Irish dairy products in the US market and remain at similar margins,' he said.
With the 10 per cent over the Border, do you set up a subsidiary in the North? Is that a loophole? I don't know
—
Seamus McMahon
Lakeland Dairies currently supplies butter to the US market under the Vital Farms brand, and it is thought that 50 per cent of Lakeland's milk comes from farmers in the North.
The Kerrygold brand could very much be in Lakeland's sights.
Its reputation as a premium product should insulate it from increased competition to an extent, but it is now at a definite disadvantage, according to industry experts.
Seamus McMahon, founder of Brehon BrewHouse in Co Monaghan, straddles the worlds of dairy and beer production. He has provided milk to Baileys for more than 40 years from his farm in Killanny, while also running a successful microbrewery in Carrickmacross. Brehon beers are currently available in 12 US states.
'We sent a container of beer out at 10 per cent last week – it will arrive in the US at 15 per cent. Breweries in the North are definitely working at an advantage to us,' he says.
His mind is already turning to ways of perhaps using Brehon's location to minimise the financial impact.
'With the 10 per cent over the Border, do you set up a subsidiary in the North? Is that a loophole? I don't know,' he says.
Brehon already collaborates with the Two Stacks whiskey company in Newry – operating a 'casemates' programme. This involves producing beer in whiskey casks to make 'whiskey-aged porter'.
[
Bracing for a trade war: the Irish whiskey, cheese and sweet makers sweating Trump's tariff plans
Opens in new window
]
'They supply a blend of whiskey products to markets around the world including America – maybe we end up collaborating more with them,' says McMahon. 'Do we produce it with them and avail of the 10 per cent? It's not something we have spoken a lot about yet – but it is something we will have to consider.'
McMahon says Brehon has invested too much time and money in the US market to simply walk away. It accounts for around 20 per cent of all the brewery's sales. But there is little doubt that the 15 per cent is a painful blow.
'We operate on 25 per cent margins and are competing with beers from all around the world – 15 per cent is more than half your profits whatever way you look at it.'
He is also considering teaming up with a brewery based in the US and producing some beer there.
Separately, as an experienced dairy farmer, he too notes the incentive now on offer for companies connected to the industry to consider shifting North.
His relationship with Baileys is a case in point. Owned by British drinks giant Diageo, it is another all-Ireland operator. Milk from farmers on both sides of the Border is used in its cream liqueur – which is produced in Dublin and at its global supply facility in Mallusk, Co Antrim. Should Diageo want to, it certainly has options to shift some of that production.
Seamus McMahon runs a dairy farm in Co Monaghan as well as a microbrewery. Photograph: Philip Fitzpatrick
Whatever about dairy and beer, whiskey producers in the Republic – and the farmers who supply them with barley – are faced with an even bigger challenge, says the IFA's Buckley.
The Irish whiskey industry is not dissimilar to its dairy industry in that the production process can be split across the two jurisdictions. Whiskey can be distilled in one location but bonded and bottled in another. In other words, it can be distilled in Dundalk, only to spend much of its life maturing in a warehouse in Newry. Or vice versa.
Unlike butter, which already had a tariff rate of 16 per cent at the turn of the year, Irish whiskey enjoyed the zero-for-zero regime that had done so much to boost its presence in the US.
Buckley says how country of origin is defined for whiskey and dairy production will be critical to determining the impact on the IFA's members – and there is still a lack of clarity around that.
Stephen Kelly is chief executive of Manufacturing Northern Ireland, the representative body that has had to guide its members through the Brexit mess of recent years and now Trump's tariffs. He does not believe there will be a huge shift North but the better tariff rate applied to goods entering the US from that part of Ireland could certainly affect some investment decisions.
'A 5 per cent difference is not going to see companies in the Republic closing a multimillion-euro operation and moving to the North,' Kelly says. 'Five per cent is essentially a currency differential – we have seen the dollar move 5 per cent in the past week alone. Instead, what you might see is companies in the South acquiring some assets in Northern Ireland.'
He doesn't expect individual companies to close operations on the basis of these tariffs – rates that could be around for three weeks or three-and-a-half years.
Kelly describes the behaviour of US buyers over recent months as 'constipated'. The uncertainty around exact tariff rates has meant that investment and purchasing decisions have been stalled. He says, at the very least, there is now an element of clarity on tariff rates – whatever that is worth given Trump's at times erratic behaviour.
In Magherafelt, Co Derry, Bloc Blinds – which designs and builds window blinds for the lucrative US consumer market – had been adjusting operations in advance of the trade agreements.
Cormac Diamond, Bloc Blinds: 'The stability that will hopefully come with [the US trade agreements] will give consumers more confidence'
It was fully ready to shift some additional production to a plant it acquired in Fort Worth, Texas, last year. The apparent end of trade hostilities means managing director Cormac Diamond can now plan with greater conviction.
'As we are operating in the consumer goods sector in the UK, European and US markets, the stability that will hopefully come with this will give consumers more confidence,' Diamond says.
'The next big thing is the high likelihood that US interest rates will reduce and drive a boom in consumer spending. The increased consumer demand from this will hopefully offset any of the tariff challenges facing us in the US and also for exports from the UK and EU to the US.'
One thing noted by all of the above is that the deal struck by the EU and the US last week is just a framework agreement. While it offers apparent certainty after months of Trumpian chaos, there is still work to be done by negotiators.
The spirits industry here remains hopeful that a carveout may yet happen and that trading on a zero-for-zero basis may some day return. And there are questions about the agreement's longevity. Who can say whether Trump will change his mind again and reopen hostilities with Brussels?
As McMahon puts it: 'We are going to keep going anyway – you can't pull back. There is a regime there that might be gone in three years – common sense could still prevail, like it did with Brexit.'
The world waits to see whether the good old days of relatively free trade with the US will return. Meanwhile, those with businesses on the Border will see what they can claw back with the sort of ingenuity that has typified that region for decades.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Moves to revive referendum on joining EU patent court as business groups contacted on timing
There have been tentative moves to revive the delayed referendum on Ireland's participation in the European Union's Unified Patent Court (UPC), with the Government seeking views of business groups on the timing of a rescheduled vote. The referendum on Ireland joining the 18 other EU member states that have signed up to the UPC system was originally pencilled in for June 2024 on the same day as the local and European elections. However, the holding of the UPC referendum was thrown into doubt amid the fallout from the defeat of the family and care referendums three months earlier. Soon afterwards the then-government announced it would be deferring the vote. Peter Burke , then minister for enterprise, said at the time: 'While the government continues to believe that joining the UPC is essential and that the referendum should be pursued, it is clear to me that more time is needed for public discourse and engagement on the matter to help inform the debate.' READ MORE The UPC is designed to provide a one-stop shop court for litigation on patents. The court's decisions will be binding on participating EU member states. Ireland joining in the UPC has been long called for by business groups and sectors such as the pharmaceutical industry. The Department of Enterprise has contacted business organisations and government departments about the referendum. Records released under the Freedom of Information Act include a letter from senior Department of Enterprise official John Newham to the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland (AmCham). The March 28th letter set out how the legislation on the UPC referendum was pending committee and final stages in the Seanad. Mr Newham, the assistant secretary general, wrote that 'once the legislative process has been concluded an order setting a date for the referendum will issue'. He wrote that the timing of any further advancement of the Bill would be subject to a decision by Government and it would decide a referendum date 'in due course'. He noted the last government 'had concluded that a broader public conversation' on the UPC 'was essential before a referendum was held' and he sought feedback 'in order to assess if sufficient engagement is being held on the matter'. Mr Newham asked for information on 'any initiatives undertaken or planned to assist public understanding of this critical issue'. He also sought 'views on the appropriate timing of a referendum'. Enterprise Ireland , IDA Ireland and Research Ireland were among government agencies contacted by the department as it sought feedback on public awareness of the UPC referendum. The Department of Enterprise confirmed that other organisations contacted included Chambers Ireland , Ibec , the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and BioPharmaChem Ireland, all of which, like AmCham sent responses. AmCham, which represents US companies in Ireland, responded on April 30th, saying: 'It is of the utmost importance that an informed discussion occurs to generate public engagement with the topic.' It said it would work with its members to advance discussion and consideration of the UPC. AmCham said a member survey from 2024 showed that 41 per cent of respondents supported Ireland joining the UPC and 58 per cent were neutral on the matter. The organisation said it would be holding a webinar 'outlining the impact for Ireland, with key expert and member perspectives' and it would also be developing a fact sheet on the UPC for dissemination among members. In response to queries AmCham told The Irish Times: 'While we continue to work with members on this topic, a webinar has not taken place.' It said that the timing of the referendum was 'a matter for Government'. A Department of Enterprise statement said: 'While the Government remains committed to holding the referendum, the timing remains under consideration at this juncture.'


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on funding for nature: not an optional extra
Two developments, one national and one at EU level, have caused legitimate alarm and anger among environmental NGOs. They regard them both as 'gutting' commitments to green measures at the very moment when we should be supporting the development of coherent nature recovery plans under the flagship Nature Restoration Law. It is understandable that such measures slip down the priority list, given the multiple challenges our societies are facing. But this is not acceptable. The existential threats of climate change and biodiversity collapses remain. So it is disturbing that the European Commission's proposal for its next budget indicates that the EU Life Programme – the dedicated fund for environment, nature and climate action – is likely to be repealed. Life's proven return on investment can be seen in many Irish rural communities, exemplified by the Burren Programme. 'It would gut one of the EU's most effective tools just when we need it most,' according to the European Environmental Bureau, which represents 190 member organisations and 30 million individual supporters. It should be listened to. READ MORE Meanwhile, the Environmental Pillar, the national platform for environmental charities, uses similar language to describe the Government's revised National Development Plan: 'the gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming' the group says, as it undermines guarantees on nature restoration. It certainly seems to make nonsense of the current consultations on developing and implementing the National Nature Restoration Plan with farmers, fishers and environmentalists. Funding for this plan is naturally a key concern for all involved, and if it is not ring-fenced it will inevitably shift to areas of more immediate concern. We cannot continue to consider the health of our natural landscape and climate as an optional extra in planning; if it does not inform the core of our thinking, everything else is undermined.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
John Mulqueen on Ireland's influential role in fighting anti-Semitism and Franco's fascists
In rejecting the allegation by a powerful Trump ally that the Occupied Territories Bill illustrates how Ireland is heading down an 'anti-Semitic path' (Republican Senator Jim Risch), the Taoiseach might be tempted to explain that Irish and American anti-fascists fought together against anti-Semitism during the Spanish Civil War. Additionally, in October 1936, ten weeks after the generals rebelled against the elected government in Spain, Irish and Jewish immigrants in London defeated Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists in the Battle of Cable Street. As the Blackshirts prepared to march from the Tower of London through what Mosley described as a 'Jew-ridden and communistic' East End, barricades were erected to block them at Cable Street. The large Jewish community in the area, mostly refugees from pogroms in Tsarist Russia, lived alongside Irish immigrants, who were mainly dockers. The anti-fascists, locals and reinforcements, chanted 'they shall not pass' – the slogan of the Spanish Republic – and prevented mounted police from forcing a way through for the march. Mosley, a rising star in British politics, with influential backing from the Daily Mail, never recovered from this. READ MORE Max Levitas, a Dubliner who grew up in Portobello, known as 'Little Jerusalem', participated in the Cable Street engagement, with his trade unionist father and older brother Maurice. The Jewish Levitas family had moved to London during the Great Depression, and Maurice joined the Irish unit in the International Brigades – which recruited young people around the world to serve in the armed forces of the Spanish government. The Irish initially joined the British battalion, and some later transferred to the American Abraham Lincoln battalion. About one in three of these US volunteers were Jewish. Writing home to his mother, one volunteer wrote: 'In Spain there are thousands of mothers like yourself who never had a fair shake in life. They got together and elected a government that really gave meaning to their life. But a bunch of bullies decided to crush this wonderful thing.' This letter summarised the motives behind the international struggle against Franco's fascists. Both the American and British battalions suffered heavy casualties at the Battle of Jarama in 1937. Frank Ryan, the Irish unit's commander, was wounded and travelled home to convalesce. But, as others did, he went back to Spain, knowing that the war could not be won. Following Franco's victory in 1939 – military assistance from Hitler and Mussolini proved to be crucial – Ryan remained a prisoner when almost all of the British and American prisoners were repatriated. Condemned to death, Ryan had a stroke of luck when a New York Times correspondent mentioned him in two reports. In prison with fellow 'Internationals', American comrades remembered him as an 'inspiring figure' with a 'commanding personality'. Lou Ornitz, moved from prison to prison, and lucky to be alive as so many others had been executed, remembered Ryan's courage. 'One night he was taken out and as we said good-bye he told us to sing Kevin Barry, and we did as he was led away. He came back a few hours later and I thought he was a ghost.' Ireland's brigadistas were not welcomed home as heroes, and a few, such as Michael O'Riordan, were interned in the Curragh. Following the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, O'Riordan and Neil Goold made a controversial – to IRA ears – argument about the war: Irish republicans should join the British forces to defeat Hitler-led fascism. O'Riordan opposed any reliance by the IRA on Germany, and followed Ryan in taking issue with those who believed in all circumstances that 'England's difficulty is Ireland's opportunity'. Some of his former comrades in Spain joined the Allied armed forces. Maurice Levitas enlisted in the Royal Army Medical Corps and served in Burma (Myanmar) and India. Michael Lehane, a Kerry republican, who returned to fight in Spain twice, could not wear a British uniform, and instead joined the Norwegian Merchant Marine. He perished when his ship was sunk by a U-boat in the North Atlantic. When he went home to Cork, O'Riordan and other former IRA internees set up a new branch of the Labour Party named after Liam Mellows. Within weeks they infuriated the local party. When a Labour councillor made anti-Semitic remarks, O'Riordan organised a public meeting on the 'Jewish question' and dispelled anti-Semitic prejudices so effectively that Jewish people in the audience felt they had no need to speak. One of them, the lawyer Gerald Goldberg, later donated £5 to the Mellows branch, which led to O'Riordan being accused of attempting 'to subvert the party with Jewish money'. In February 1944, O'Riordan and another Cork comrade were expelled ahead of four others in Dublin as part of Labour's crackdown on left-wing entryists. Standing as a socialist he narrowly missed a seat in the 1945 local elections, and came third in a by-election the following year. Goldberg became the first Jewish lord mayor of Cork in June 1977 – the same month post-Franco Spain held its first general election since 1936.