Hungary seeks to strip leading opposition MEP Péter Magyar's immunity again
Hungarian authorities have asked the European Parliament to lift the immunity of MEP Péter Magyar, a key political opponent of Viktor Orbán, Parliament President Roberta Metsola announced on Monday evening.
It's the third such request from Budapest related to Magyar, who was elected as an MEP last year, after founding his opposition Tisza party. If Magyar were to lose his immunity, Hungarian authorities could investigate and charge him for different suspected offences, all viewed as politically motivated by the opposition. The European Parliament did not comment further on the matter.
Legal war against the opposition leader intensifies
It's not clear what alleged offences underlie the latest request, as Metsola's office cited the request as made by "relevant Hungarian authorities" in her announcement, without elaborating. It's also unclear which Hungarian authorities sent the request to Brussels. Hungarian media has connected the issue to accusations of insider trading against Magyar, but this was denied by a spokesperson of the Central Investigative Prosecutor's (CIP) office.
The spokesperson that CIP prosecutors usually take the lead in processes related to MEPS.
CIP made an earlier request to the European Parliament to waive Magyar's immunity, the spokesperson said, in a case related to allegations that Magyar threw a man's phone into the Danube river after an incident at a Budapest night club. Two later requests - including that tabled this week - may result from private prosecutions such as defamation cases.
In February, CIP started an investigation into an alleged stock market transaction by Péter Magyar in 2023. At the time, Magyar was a close ally of Viktor Orbán's Fidesz party. Hungarian media has reported that Magyar profited to the tune of several million Hungarian Forints from sale of a stake in Opus, a company related to Hungary's richest man, Lőrinc Mészáros, just hours before Mészáros announced a share buyback campaign, pushing up prices significantly. Magyar has categorically denied the allegations, describing them as totally fake. In this case, Hungarian prosecutors have not made a prosecution yet and therefore did not send any requests to Brussels to waive the immunity of Péter Magyar.
In March this year, the Hungarian Parliament adopted
a new transparency law
which, as reported, has been viewed as targeting Magyar. According to the provisions, if an MEP fails to comply with the provisions, their European mandate can be withdrawn.
Magyar thinks Orbán is trying to block him from running in the elections
The aim of the Hungarian proceedings is to prevent him from running at elections, Tisza leader Péter Magyar told Euronews.
"All the attacks against me so far have failed in civil court. I am still preparing to defeat Orbán in the elections, and he is still trying to prevent me from doing so by official means," Magyar said, adding that he stands ready to waive his immunity "as soon as Hungary joins the European Public Prosecutor's Office".
Parliamentary elections are slated to take place in Hungary next year. According to a Republicon Institute poll published today, Tisza is leading Viktor Orbán's Fidesz party by 4% points. The poll found Tisza would get 32% of the votes of the whole population, with the ruling Fidesz-KDNP coalition on 28%.
A lengthy procedure is expected at the European Parliament
The Hungarian authorities cannot charge Péter Magyar while he continues to be covered by his MEP immunity.
Following President Metsola's communication of the request to lift immunity, the issue will be discussed in the Parliament's legal affairs (or JURI) committee, which must appoint a rapporteur and arrange for two rounds of discussion on the issue, inviting the MEP in question to a hearing. Later, the members of the committee will vote on its recommendation, followed by a vote in the plenary of the Parliament. Earlier requests connected to Magyar have already been discussed at the committee, without publishing details. As a general rule, the European Parliament does not comply with any requests viewed as overtly political.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Zelenskyy proposes new round of peace talks with Russia
Kyiv has proposed a new round of peace talks to be held next week with Russia, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Saturday. In a video message posted on X, Zelenskyy urged "the pace of negotiations must be increased" to ensure lasting peace. "A meeting at the level of leaders is needed," he said, emphasising Ukraine's willingness to do so. Ukraine's newly appointed Secretary of National Security and Defence, Rustem Umerov, was the one who sent Moscow the invitation, Zelenskyy said. He also previously lead the delegation talks held in Istanbul last month. The previous negotations held in June failed to lead to a ceasefire agreement, but did result in a new prisoner of war exchange. The first round of negotiations held on 16 May also resulted in a prisoner exchange, the largest one yet, but hadn't yielded much result either regarding putting an end to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In his video address, Zelenskyy also urged Western allies to further toughen their sanctions against Russia. "It is very important that the new EU sanctions package is also supported by other free European countries that are currently not part of the European Union," Zelenskyy said. "We are also working on the American track, there are agreements with President Trump that must be implemented as soon as possible," he added. A day prior to Zelenskyy's address, the EU imposed new sanctions on Russia, targeting its oil and banks. It marks the 18th package of sanctions imposed by the EU since February 2022. Earlier this month, the US President also threatened harsher sanctions on Russia if a peace agreement was not reached within 50 days. Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump framed the threat as a response to Russia "absolutely 'pounding' Ukraine on the battlefield right now." "To Russia and Ukraine, get to the table right now, before it is too late. Thank you," the US president said.
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
The EU must assert itself in its trade relationship with the US
"Trump always chickens out." The phrase, coined by a columnist at the Financial Times, has been circulating widely in recent weeks. The idea that the US president speaks loudly but does not always follow through on his threats has fueled complacency among stock markets regarding the risks his trade war poses to the global economy. However, accusations of cowardice may not apply to Donald Trump alone. The European Union's hesitance in the face of Trump's maneuvering has also raised questions about whether the 27 member states can truly engage in the kind of power struggle that is now essential. While Brussels believed it was on track to minimize the tariffs on European exports to the United States, Trump dashed the EU's hopes by announcing on July 12 that he would unilaterally impose a 30% tax starting August 1. Is this a final bluff to extract further concessions, or a definitive move that could deal a severe blow to European growth? In any case, as the American president ramps up the pressure, the EU continues to waver, trying to salvage what it still can. European leaders have responded with lackluster retaliatory measures that have done little to deter Trump, who seems indifferent to the economic consequences of his actions. This game of high-stakes bluffing is likely to benefit the party setting the rules, to the detriment of those who are forced to adapt, always a step behind and uncertain of the game's true objective. Setting ambitious goals The confrontation appears to be based on a misunderstanding. The EU seeks to negotiate in good faith, aiming for fair trade based on the principle of comparative advantage between countries. But the US president has little interest in this quest for a mutually beneficial, purely commercial agreement. His ambitions go further. He aims to undermine Europe by any means, because he despises everything it stands for: supranationalism, multilateralism, progressivism and the primacy of law. Yet the EU has no reason to apologize for what it represents, nor to make concessions on its tax policy or the regulatory framework it has established for digital services. In this final stretch of negotiations, Europe must give the talks a political dimension, moving beyond the technical aspects that have dominated the debate so far. The EU should clearly set out its red lines and aim high. Settling for a compromise as unfavorable as the one the United Kingdom accepted in May would be unacceptable. If the 27 member states, as the US's top trading partner, fail to demonstrate that they carry more weight than a single country, it would send a disastrous message about the purpose of the European project. The EU's strategy of absorbing American provocations without actually implementing the retaliatory measures at its disposal has shown its limitations. The "proportionate, robust, and well-calibrated" reprisals promoted by the 27 member states do not measure up to what is a clear act of aggression, one whose aim goes beyond simply rebalancing the US trade deficit – its goal is to subordinate Europe. If Europe were to "chicken out," the consequences would not be purely economic.
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Is von der Leyen ready for bruising budget battles?
It was a lacklustre victory for Ursula von der Leyen in the European Parliament. Many of those who supported her in the no-confidence vote did so without enthusiasm and to avoid a crisis. The Commission president's challenge now is to advance her agenda with a fragile majority and against an energized opposition. And with bruising battles ahead over the next long-term budget and a looming trade war with the US the pressure is only mounting. Can von der Leyen deliver? Questions for our guests this week: Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Irish member of the European Parliament for the Renew Europe Group, Philipp Lausberg, senior analyst at the European Policy Centre and Klaus Welle, chairman of the Academic Council at the Wilfried Martens Centre. On the surface, it was a good day for Ursula von der Leyen. A solid majority of members of the European Parliament expressed their trust in her. To achieve this result, however, the German Christian Democrat had to expend considerable political capital to buy concessions from the Socialists and Democrats to keep them on board. It worked this time, but her center-left allies made it clear that, from now on, they expect her to stick to agreed policies, for example on climate. A policy that has put von der Leyen increasingly at odds with her own EPP led by her nemesis Manfred Weber. Brussels watchers predict lively discussions on the fate of the 2040 emission targets as well as laborious budget negotiations in the months to come. The question is: how messy will it get? The second topic: The surge in migration flows from Libya that Greece is currently experiencing could easily evolve into the EU's crisis of the summer. Last week, on the island of Crete alone, almost 500 migrants arrived per day. Athens announced stricter measures, suspending asylum requests for three months. The government's goal is to discourage people in Libya from beginning the dangerous journey across the sea. But for that you need the cooperation of the Libyans. That's what an EU delegation was trying to accomplish when they were kicked out of the country by a local warlord over protocol issues. That begs the question: how serious a partner is Libya for Europe and how to deal with a failed state? Finally, the panel discussed the relationship between the EU and China that caught in a cycle of disgruntlement - and it doesn't appear to be getting any better. Restricted market access, trade imbalances or China's support of Russia in its war against Ukraine: pick your favorite dispute. That's the backdrop against the upcoming EU-China summit in Beijing next week. But as Donald Trump's shadow is looming large, some suggest Brussels should work toward a reset of relations with the Chinese. Initially, the summit was planned to run for two days in Brussels, now it's only one day in Beijing. Xi Jinping refused to come to Brussels and he will most likely not participate in the summit. Also, no joint statement is planned. What needs to be done to overcome years of frustration and scepticism?
