&w=3840&q=100)
'Impossible to cover up': Iran threatens 'decisive' response after Trump vows to 'wipe out' nuclear programme
Iran has issued a stern warning, vowing to respond 'in a more decisive manner' if the United States or Israel carries out another strike on its nuclear facilities in the near future.
The warning came on Monday from Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, in response to US President Donald Trump's threat to 'wipe out' Iran's nuclear programme if it resumes atomic activity.
'If aggression is repeated, we will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner and in a way that will be IMPOSSIBLE to cover up,' Araghchi said in a post on X.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Araghchi also stressed that diplomacy, not threats, is the only effective solution to concerns surrounding Iran's nuclear programme.
'If there are concerns about the possible diversion of our nuclear program into non-peaceful purposes, the 'military option' proved incapable, but a negotiated solution may work,' he added.
The full extent of damage from the US strikes remains unclear. These strikes followed a surprise Israeli bombing campaign, which Israel claimed was aimed at halting Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions. The twin assaults have disrupted nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington that had only recently resumed in April.
During a visit to Scotland on Monday, Trump defended the earlier airstrikes and issued fresh warnings.
'They can start again. If they do, we'll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it,' he said.
Iran had earlier retaliated with missile attacks on Israeli cities and a U.S. base in Qatar, though Trump previously downplayed the severity of those responses.
Just a month ago, fierce clashes erupted between Iran and Israel, with Tel Aviv targeting nuclear facilities and killing top Iranian generals and scientists.
At the heart of the standoff remains the issue of uranium enrichment. While Tehran insists it has the sovereign right to enrich uranium, Washington sees that as a 'red line.' According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons enriching uranium to 60 per cent, just below the 90 per cent needed for weapons-grade material.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Iran has repeatedly denied pursuing nuclear weapons and has shown willingness to negotiate enrichment levels, but not to relinquish its right to enrichment entirely.
'No one in their right mind would abandon the fruits of tremendous investment in homegrown and peaceful technology just because of foreign bullying,' Araghchi said in his post.
Israel's Op Rising Lion
Meanwhile, Israeli forces launched a large-scale military operation, codenamed 'Operation Rising Lion,' targeting Iran's key nuclear sites including Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. Nearly 200 warplanes dropped more than 330 bombs and missiles on over 100 locations—including enrichment facilities, centrifuge workshops, missile systems, and command centres.
US strikes on Iranian facilities
Following that, on June 22, the United States carried out its own high-impact strike under 'Operation Midnight Hammer.' B-2 stealth bombers and Tomahawk missiles delivered 14 powerful bunker-buster bombs, severely damaging all three of the targeted nuclear sites.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
US appeals court keeps bar on Los Angeles federal immigration arrests
Aug 2 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court late on Friday affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring U.S. government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled that the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on peoples' appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge last month blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity," speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc." The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, welcomed the ruling in statement: "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region." (Reporting by Chandni Shah in Bengaluru; Editing by William Mallard)
India Today
13 minutes ago
- India Today
Explained: Why India shouldn't lose sleep over Trump's 25% tariffs
When Donald Trump announced a sweeping 25% tariff order targeting Indian exports, effective August 1, it had all the hallmarks of a trade provocation. Yet in Delhi's ministries and Mumbai's market floors, the response was consensus across policy circles is clear: Trump's move is less about trade policy and more about leverage. A pressure from threatening retaliation, India is opting for dialogue. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal told Parliament that the government would 'safeguard the interests of our farmers, workers, and small entrepreneurs".The Ministry of External Affairs reaffirmed that the broader US–India partnership 'has weathered transitions and challenges' and should not be derailed by short-term frictions.25% TARIFF TO HAVE LIMITED IMPACTStrategic affairs expert Brahma Chellaney has been one of the few voices raising alarm over what he calls the "lopsided" nature of the trade expectations coming from pointed out that even under a new trade accord, the United States would retain relatively high tariffs on Indian goods—comparable to what it maintains on Vietnam and the Philippines, around 19–20%. In return, India would be expected to impose zero tariffs on most US imports, a clearly uneven 25% tariff order, while headline-grabbing, is unlikely to trigger major macroeconomic tremors. According to estimates by ICRA, Nomura, and ANZ, the GDP impact is expected to be modest, around 0.2 to 0.4 percentage points. India exports roughly $87 billion worth of goods to the US annually—just 2 to 3% of its total likely to take a near-term hit include traditional export mainstays: textiles, gems and jewellery, auto components, and seafood. But core sectors like pharmaceuticals, IT services, and high-end engineering remain relatively INDIA A 'DEAD ECONOMY'? ASK AMERICAN CONSUMERSStill, the frustration behind the tariff move isn't rooted in deficit calculations alone. Trump has publicly derided India's economy as a 'dead economy,' but data tells another story, especially when it comes to what American consumers depend top four exports to the US—pharmaceuticals, textiles, electricals and electronics, and jewellery—form a critical part of American supply chains. India ranks among the top five import destinations for the US in pharma, textiles, and jewellery. In electronics, India is one of the fastest-growing exporters to the US.'The total volume of 'Made-in-India' smartphones grew 240% year-on-year and now accounts for 44% of smartphones imported into the US, up from only 13% of smartphone shipments in Q2 2024,' according to Canalys data cited in this India Today DIU report. In the last quarter, India emerged as the dominant player in mobile handset shipments to the tariffs on key import destinations such as India could push up domestic prices for American consumers, especially in sectors where substitution is neither immediate nor HOLDING UP THE INDIA–US TRADE DEAL?The underlying tensions go beyond tariffs. Chellaney warns that the United States is not just demanding better market access but is pushing India to rewrite domestic policy in ways that could have long-term noted that India would be expected to open its agricultural and dairy markets, even though industrial-scale American imports could shatter India's family farms and undermine its food United States also expects India to ramp up purchases of American energy products by tens of billions of dollars annually. And despite already being a growing buyer of US arms, India would be nudged to increase its defence imports expectations haven't been officially acknowledged by Indian negotiators. But several of these themes have surfaced in earlier trade talks between the two countries, and officials say regulatory changes are already being quietly evaluated, including customs streamlining and possible tariff rationalisation on select capital INDIA MUST STAND ITS GROUNDExporters, meanwhile, are not standing still. Many are pivoting toward the EU, ASEAN, and Middle East markets, especially in sectors like engineering goods and climate-aligned manufacturing. The recently signed India–UK free trade agreement is expected to generate over Rs 500 billion annually and contribute 0.06% to India's GDP in the long term, signalling new avenues for growth.'A 25% US tariff may put some pressure on India's export-driven sectors like engineering goods, textiles, and jewellery. This move underscores the growing trend of protectionism and may compel India to diversify export markets, push for FTA negotiations, and accelerate domestic value addition to maintain global competitiveness,' said Ajay Garg, CEO, SMC Global Securities.'While Trump's trade policies unsettle global supply chains, India's resilience and economic agility are emerging as key differentiators. Notably, regional competitors like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are still facing steeper tariffs, weakening their edge,' Garg added. 'Amid global uncertainty, India remains one of the fastest-growing major economies, poised to lead the next phase of emerging market growth.'Still, the deeper concern lies not in tariffs themselves, but in what they represent. Chellaney argues that this isn't merely about trade, it's about shaping the architecture of India's future economic dependencies. 'Conceding quietly,' he says, 'can become a pattern.'Opposition parties have accused the government of being too passive in the face of what they see as a coercive gambit. But export bodies and trade associations have largely backed New Delhi's calm approach. They have urged exporters to renegotiate contracts directly with US buyers, share cost burdens, and reinforce India's reputation as a reliable trade insist that India's sovereignty on food security, defence procurement, and digital trade remains non-negotiable, regardless of tariff TARIFF PLAYBOOKIt may be noted that the 25% tariff order isn't about economics; it's Trump playing the same old game. Trump's tariff playbook thrives on calibrated disruption: loud threats, sudden reversals, and pressure designed to unsettle rather than resolve. Sometimes he calls India a close ally. The next moment, it's a 'dead economy.' The inconsistency is the now, India is not retaliating, but there's little reason to lose sleep over what may well be another of Trump's arm-twisting theatrics.- Ends advertisement
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russia Claims Ukraine Has No Tank Brigades Left, Mocks Vanishing NATO Armour
'Heard India Will Stop?' Trump Reacts After India Defends Buying Russian Oil Amid 25% US Tariff Bomb In a bold claim, US President Donald Trump has said India is 'no longer going to be buying oil from Russia'. He called it a 'good step,' though he wasn't sure of its accuracy. His remark follows Washington's 25% tariff blow and veiled threats of penalties. But India has pushed back with clarity. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal reaffirmed New Delhi's 'time-tested' partnership with Moscow and clarified that India's choices are market-driven and sovereign. While state refiners reportedly paused Russian oil purchases last week, officials say no final decision has been made. Is this a shift in India's energy policy or a short-term pause due to changing prices? As Trump dials up the pressure, New Delhi remains focused on balancing strategic ties with national interest. Watch this detailed analysis of diplomacy, oil politics, and the future of Indo-US-Russia equations.#donaldtrump #india #russia #usindiarelations #russianoil #moditrump #trumptariff #indiaoilimport #energytrade #foreignpolicy #externalaffairs #randhirjaiswal #modigovernment #trumpnews #russiaukrainewar #globaldiplomacy #indiarussia #useconomy #indiaeconomy #breakingnews #trending #bharat #toi #toibharat #indianews 30.4K views | 3 hours ago
