logo
Britain's shattered trust

Britain's shattered trust

Photo byWestminster loves a good piece of polling research, and the latest offering from More In Common – dramatically entitled Shattered Britain – has captured imaginations as Parliament limps towards the summer recess.
There is loads in the report to pore over and squabble about – not least the quiz segmenting the British public into seven strata of voter, from Progressive Activists and Rooted Patriots to Dissenting Disruptors and Sceptical Scrollers (which is, incidentally, a great name for a Nineties indie band). The arguments about how these fit into traditional notions of both class and party politics will go on for days.
Key to the analysis is not what separates Brits, but what unites us. And somewhat terrifyingly, that unifying theme seems to be a sense of mistrust. A staggering 87 per cent of people trust politicians not very much or not at all, with net negative trust among all seven groups. This tallies with the latest annual British Social Attitudes survey, published last month, which found that 'Just 12 per cent trust governments to put the interests of the nation above those of their own party just about always or most of the time, a record low'.
This lack of trust cuts across a range of different policy areas. On the economy, for example, the cost of living crisis is a key voter concern, with half the public believing it will never get better. This pessimism is understandable, given we have now had 17 years of post-crash politicians telling us that better times (or, if you prefer, sunlit uplands) are just around the corner, if we can only batten down the hatches and make 'tough choices' now.
On immigration, a decade and a half of governments promising to bring numbers down while doing the opposite has had a corrosive effect. More In Common's director Luke Tryl has some thoughts on why the issue of small boats crossing the Channel is so potent: it symbolises governments that have lost control. The inability of a country to enforce its own borders will be disturbing in and of itself to many voters – but even to people who are less concerned about the issue itself, it is symptomatic of a state that is struggling to function.
MPs, by the way, are not blind to this accusation. Conservatives used to lament that ministers would pull a lever to enact change only to find that nothing happened. Labour MPs had little sympathy – but now they've been in power for a year, you'll increasingly hear them say exactly the same. Twice now, from MPs of different parties, I've been told that if you pull a lever it could well come off in your hand. On everything from reforming welfare to resolving public sector pay disputes, cutting NHS waiting lists to building new homes, investing in infrastructure to stopping the boats, a sense of stasis pervades. Try to kick the Whitehall machine into gear, I was told, and the machine has a tendency to kick back.
The public, quite reasonably, is not in the mood for excuses. Back in October, barely 100 days since Labour got into power, I sat in on a focus group of people in Sittingbourne, Essex, who had voted for Boris Johnson in 2019 and Keir Starmer in 2024. I was taken aback (as were the organisers) by just how quickly patience with the new government had evaporated – but in a way it made sense. These people had been promised that their lives would get better while things instead got markedly worse for over a decade. They were tired of giving the politicians who had disappointed them the benefit of the doubt.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
This exhaustion helps explain why Labour has been so unsuccessful in blaming their present challenges on the last government, as David Cameron and George Osborne managed to do effectively for years with their line that 'Labour crashed the economy.'
It also goes some way to explaining the rise of Reform – or rather why the criticism that Reform is not a serious party with serious policies is failing to land. (If you're curious about what attack lines Labour could use against Nigel Farage that might actually work, check out the latest NS podcast where polling analyst Steve Akehurst shares his latest research on exactly this topic.)
'The sense that Britain is broken, and that none of the traditional parties or institutions can fix it, is leading more people to think that we need to roll the dice on something new,' reads the Shattered Britain report. Polling from last month ahead of the Spending Review, also by More In Common, found a similar sentiment in the increasing willingness to gamble – to hell with the consequences. As I wrote at the time: 'While 46 per cent of people believe Reform would indeed be a risk to the economy (compared to 29 per cent who don't), almost as many (40 per cent) believe the risk is worth it as 'Reform can't be worse than the other parties when it comes to managing the economy'.'
It's unclear how politicians from mainstream parties can possibly respond to all this, given the scale of the challenge and how rapidly the public expects solutions. But tucked away at the very end of the report is the line that 'Britain's political map is fundamentally changing as frustration with the status quo is leading to traditional two-party loyalties collapsing into a volatile multi-party system'. We can debate whether the fact that the last election was the most disproportional ever in terms of how the number of votes related to the number the seats, and whether this is a driver or a symptom of the decline in trust in politics (are voters abandoning traditional parties because they feel let down, or do they feel let down because their votes for non-traditional parties aren't properly counted?). But it's hardly a sign of a democracy in good health.
The pithily named voter segments don't just suggest a realignment in politics, but a degree of fragmentation that is difficult to map onto a two-party system. Does 'difficult' in fact mean 'impossible'? Something for MPs to chew over as they prepare for their summer holidays.
This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here
[See also: The OBR is always wrong]
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer hails ‘historic day' as Modi visits for signing of UK-India trade deal
Starmer hails ‘historic day' as Modi visits for signing of UK-India trade deal

Leader Live

time15 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Starmer hails ‘historic day' as Modi visits for signing of UK-India trade deal

At the Prime Minister's country residence Chequers, Sir Keir said the deal marked a 'step change' in relations. Mr Modi said they were 'writing a new chapter' in the UK and India's shared history. The deal is set to be worth £6 billion in investment from Indian and UK companies into the British economy, and is expected to have a £4.8 billion impact on the UK's gross domestic product (GDP). The two leaders have also agreed to increase efforts to tackle illegal migration and organised crime. Sir Keir said: 'I'm really pleased and privileged to welcome you here today on what I consider to be a historic day for both of our countries, and the delivery of the commitment that we made to each other.' Mr Modi, speaking via a translator, described the UK and India as 'natural partners'. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and his Indian counterpart Piyush Goyal then formally signed the trade agreement in the great hall of Chequers. At a joint press conference in the hall, Sir Keir was invited by Mr Modi to visit India in the near future. The Indian prime minister also paid tribute to the British victims of the June plane crash outside of Ahmedabad airport, and described Britons of Indian origin as a 'living bridge' between the two countries. The ongoing England-India Test cricket clash is a 'great metaphor for our partnership', Mr Modi said, adding: 'There may be a swing and a miss at times, but we always play with a straight bat.' A brief translation error resulted in Sir Keir asking if he needed to repeat a section of his speech. But Mr Modi indicated he understood, with Sir Keir replying: 'I think we understand each other well.' As their statements drew to a close and the two leaders began to leave the room, Mr Modi jokingly asked if Sir Keir would play the grand piano next to them in the room. Sir Keir, who is known to have played several musical instruments including the piano, laughed at the suggestion. The UK-India trade deal is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. It will see tariffs on an array of British goods reduced from an average of 15% to 3%, with the aim of boosting the £11 billion of imports into the south Asian nation. Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. The deal is expected to result in 2,200 jobs across the country and £6 billion investment by British and Indian businesses. The UK and India are also bolstering co-operation on tackling corruption, fraud, organised crime and illegal migration, by sharing criminal records and other intelligence. But the deal has not given the UK as much access as it would have liked to India's financial and legal services industries. The agreement promises some benefits for the UK's financial services, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves understood to have pushed on behalf of the sector in discussions with her Indian counterpart. But more wide-ranging access was not agreed, and talks continue on a bilateral investment treaty aimed at protecting British investments in India and vice versa. The two nations also continue to discuss UK plans for a tax on high-carbon industries, which India believes could hit its imports unfairly. Negotiations on the deal began when Boris Johnson was prime minister in 2022, and were concluded in May this year. Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it had only been made possible 'because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives'. The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has said that the signing 'sends a powerful signal that the UK is open for business and remains resolute in its commitment to free and fair trade'. Chief executive Rain Newton-Smith added: 'A trade agreement with India – one of the world's fastest-growing economies – is a springboard for long-term partnership and prosperity. UK firms can take advantage of this new platform to scale, diversify and compete on the global stage.'

Map shows Thailand-Cambodia border where UK tourists warned to 'take extra care'
Map shows Thailand-Cambodia border where UK tourists warned to 'take extra care'

Metro

time15 minutes ago

  • Metro

Map shows Thailand-Cambodia border where UK tourists warned to 'take extra care'

Fighting is again raging along the long-disputed border region between Thailand and Cambodia, raising concerns for British tourists. As many as 12 people, including an eight-year-old boy, have been killed in the armed clashes – centred in the Thai Surin province and the Cambodian Oddar Meanchey province – with both sides blaming each other for firing the first shot. An F-16 jet has been deployed by Thailand, firing into Cambodia multiple times and destroying a military target. Meanwhile, artillery and rockets have been fired from the Cambodian side. This conflict has been simmering for months – with diplomatic relations deteriorating – and in fact the dispute over the region goes back almost a century. Clashes have again erupted between Thailand and Cambodia over a long-running border dispute. The Foreign Office has issued further travel advice to British citizens in Thailand. A dozen people have been killed, including a boy, aged eight, and a teenager, aged 15, in Thailand. Both sides have accused the other of firing the first shot. No one knows if it will boil over and into a full-blown war – but Cambodia has confirmed that it will start military conscription as early as next year. With scarce information available about the situation, Metro has prepared an explainer for those on the ground and those monitoring it from far away. At the heart of the conflict are differing interpretations of the colonial-era maps drawn more than a century ago by the French – who once colonised Cambodia – and by Siam (modern-day Thailand). Cambodia has been using the 1907 map as a reference to claim territory, but Thailand has argued it was never officially accepted. This ambiguity led to a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1962, which awarded the land and the 11th-century temple Preah Vihear to Cambodia. Border disputes have long caused tensions between the two neighbours – but nationalist movements have further inflamed them. Relations hit rock-bottom in May after a Cambodian soldier was killed in an armed confrontation in a disputed border area. On Thursday, Cambodia downgraded diplomatic relations with Thailand to their lowest level, expelling the Thai ambassador and recalling Cambodian staff from its embassy in Bangkok. The day before, its neighbour also withdrew its ambassador and expelled the top Cambodian diplomat in protest after five Thai soldiers who were wounded in a land mine blast, one of whom lost part of a leg. Thailand has since shut all its border points with its neighbour. Fighting first broke out near the Khmer Hindu temple Ta Muen Thom, along the border of Thailand's Surin province and Cambodia's Oddar Meanchey province. The Thai military said Cambodian soldiers had opened fire near the temple, and deployed a surveillance drone. Additional forces – armed with heavy weapons, including BM-21 rocket launchers and artillery – were deployed shortly after. Both sides claimed they were acting in self-defence and blamed the other for the skirmish. So far, 11 Thai civilians and one soldier have been killed, including a boy, aged eight, and a teenager, aged 15. Most people were killed in a rocket attack near a supermarket and a gas station in Sisaket province. Another 14 people have also been injured. It remains unclear if there are any fatalities on the Cambodian side as the government has remained tight-lipped about its losses. Both nations attract large numbers of British tourists every year, but it is unclear how many citizens are in each country currently. The Foreign Office has urged travellers from the UK to 'take extra care and stay alert in border areas', saying: 'Take extra care and stay alert in border areas and follow the instructions of local authorities, especially at tourist destinations such as the Preah Vihear temple, the Ta Kwai temple and the Ta Muen Thom temple. More Trending 'There are also unexploded landmines in the border area. Stay on marked paths, especially around Ta Krabey.' The FCDO confirmed that land borders and crossings between Cambodia and Thailand are temporarily suspended. Separately, the UK advises against all but essential travel to parts of the south, near the Thailand-Malaysia border, including the Pattani Province, Yala Province, Narathiwat Province and southern Songkhla Province – south of the A43 road between Hat Yai and Sakom, and south of the train line which runs between Hat Yai and Padang Besar. FCDO also advises against all but essential travel on the Hat Yai to Padang Besar train line that runs through these provinces. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Is it safe to travel to Tunisia? Latest advice as UK Foreign Office issues tourist warning MORE: Nine bar staff arrested for beating on British tourist over £460 bill MORE: Woman 'filmed herself having sex with Buddhist monks and blackmailed them for £9,000,000'

Why the India trade deal is good for Labour
Why the India trade deal is good for Labour

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

Why the India trade deal is good for Labour

A nice fillip for the government today as it settles into the summer recess. After three and a half years of negotiation, the UK has signed a free trade deal with India. It will open up trade for cars, whisky, clothing and food products, with ministers claiming it will boost the British economy by £4.8 billion. For Keir Starmer, it offers a much-needed economic and political boost. For Narendra Modi, it shows that the £3 trillion Indian economy is willing to shake off its protectionist tradition and open up to international investors. The trade deal is an all-too-rare example of Labour getting things right in opposition. Jonathan Reynolds, the Trade Secretary, met with his Indian counterpart, Piyush Goyal, in February last year. He made it clear that Labour would support the Conservative government if it finalised a trade deal with India – and would pick up the negotiations after the election if it didn't. Despite much ground being covered, Rishi Sunak could not succeed where Boris Johnson and Liz Truss failed and get the talks over the line by July 2024. At that point, Reynolds took over, wrapping up the deal in just 12 months. Talks have been protracted for multiple reasons. India's average tariff rate is 13 per cent, compared with the UK's 1.5 per cent. Immigration has previously been a major sticking point, according to Kemi Badenoch, with today's deal facilitating some 1,800 annual extra visas for Indian yogis, chefs and musicians. Then there was the exemption on national insurance contributions: a subject of some controversy back in May. Today's agreement means staff from Indian companies who are temporarily transferred to the UK, and staff from British firms who are temporarily working in India, will only pay social security contributions in their home country, rather than in both places. The UK already has similar reciprocal 'double contribution convention' agreements with 17 other countries including the EU and the US. But that reaction was one reason why few in London and New Delhi expected this deal to be done so soon. The best testament to Labour's success is evidenced in the reaction of the opposition. In his reaction, Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, admitted today's agreement is 'a step in the right direction' – before claiming that Labour's Employment Rights' Bill will outweigh any potential wins. For the government, securing this deal offers a winning narrative. Starmer will cite it as proof that hard work and careful planning can produce results in office. It also can help build relations between his party and British Indians, following the 2019 outcry over Jeremy Corbyn's perceived support for Pakistan over Kashmir.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store