logo
Look Back: Jewelry thief attempts prison escape in 1884

Look Back: Jewelry thief attempts prison escape in 1884

Yahoo6 hours ago
Jul. 14—Among the many storefronts circling Public Square in Wilkes-Barre was Oscar Heyer's, a jewelry store that sold, well ... jewelry, along with French and American clocks, solid silver utensils and plates, and revolvers and fishing tackle.
Oscar Heyer's, in the 1880s, was located at 81 West Side Public Square before moving to the corner of North Franklin and West Market streets in the early 1900s.
On May 11, 1884, John Shultz, 20, left his home at 415 Broadway St., Williamsburg, N.Y., and disembarked a Lehigh Valley passenger train in Wilkes-Barre. Shultz took the name John Schuler when he boarded at a house on South Franklin Street, and took a job at Oscar Heyer's as a salesman under the alias.
At at time when background checks for employment were non-existent, Shultz fled New York as he was wanted for being a thief.
It did not take long for Shultz to resume his thievery.
"John Schuler and Charles Rapps were before the mayor yesterday, in connection with the robbery of Oscar Heyer's store. Schuler pleaded total ignorance of the matter. He did not know how the valuables came to be in his possession," reported the Wilkes-Barre Record on May 22, 1884.
Oscar Heyer reported more than $1,000 worth of jewelry and watches were stolen from his store and named Schuler as the suspect.
Rapps told policemen he had recently met Schuler.
"Charles Rapps said he had only known Schuler for a few days. He met him on the street with a satchel in each hand and assisted him in carrying them to the train depot. Further than this, he knew nothing of the affair and was discharged from custody," the Record reported.
Schuler was jailed on $1,000 bail.
Policemen did their due diligence and learned Schuler's real identity and the New York warrant by telegraph.
"It turned out that Schuler's real name is John Shultz, for in the evening the mayor received a telegram from Williamsburg, N.Y.," reported the Record.
After Schuler was jailed at the Luzerne County Prison on Water Street, the jail watchman found a postcard in Schuler's belongings that had the name, "John Shultz, 415 Broadway, Williamsburg, N.Y."
Justice was quick and swift inside the Luzerne County Courthouse, which once stood in Public Square Park, as Schuler was convicted of larceny during a trial held Saturday, June 21, 1884.
Judge Stanley Woodward sentenced Schuler a day after he was convicted.
"John Shultz, alias John Schuler, for the taking of jewelry from the store of Oscar Heyer, to pay a fine of $25 to the Commonwealth, pay the cost of prosecution, restore the property stolen, and undergo an imprisonment by separate and solitary confinement at labor in the Luzerne County Prison for a term and period of eight months," the Sunday News reported June 22, 1884.
About a month after being sentenced, Schuler attempted to escape from prison by climbing out a window on July 15, 1884.
"Schuler was in the watchman's room and raising a loose window bar, made his way into the jail yard. He then commenced scaling the high wall, surrounding the building, but, when almost to the top, he fell down and was somewhat injured. Schuler tried again to climb the high wall but was discovered by the watchman making his second effort and the watchmen leveled a gun at him. Schuler immediately surrendered and was put back into his cell," the Sunday News reported July 20, 1884.
Schuler remained in solitary confinement inside Cell 10 at the Luzerne County Prison and was released Feb. 8, 1885. Prior to being released, he was given a train ticket and was told never to return to Luzerne County, the Record reported Feb. 9, 1885.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bernard Kerik: 9/11 police commissioner later imprisoned and pardoned dies aged 69
Bernard Kerik: 9/11 police commissioner later imprisoned and pardoned dies aged 69

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bernard Kerik: 9/11 police commissioner later imprisoned and pardoned dies aged 69

Bernie Kerik, who led the New York City Police Department on 9/11, has died aged 69. Kash Patel, former FBI director, confirmed Kerik's death on social media on Thursday. He said Kerik had suffered from a 'private battle with illness' before his death. Kerik had a controversial career after his service as police commissioner, pleading guilty to tax fraud and other charges. He was later pardoned. Rudy Giuliani, former New York City Mayor, spoke on his show on Thursday, reflecting on his long relationship with Kerik. 'We've been together since the beginning. He's like my brother,' Giuliani said through tears. 'I was a better man for having known Bernie. I certainly was a braver and stronger man.' Kerik, an Army veteran, rose to the pinnacle of law enforcement before a fall so steep that even a city jail named after him was renamed. In 2010, he pleaded guilty to federal tax fraud and false statement charges, partially stemming from over $250,000 in apartment renovations he received from a construction firm that authorities say counted on Kerik to convince New York officials it had no organized crime links. He served three years in prison before his release in 2013. President Donald Trump pardoned Kerik during a 2020 clemency blitz. Kerik was among the guests feting Trump after his first appearance in federal court in Florida in a case related to his handling of classified documents, attending the former president's remarks at his Bedminster, New Jersey, club. Kerik was appointed by Rudy Giuliani to serve as police commissioner in 2000 and was in the position during the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. He later worked for the former major of New York City surrounding the efforts to overturn Trump's 2020 loss.

Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations

By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -Mark Zuckerberg is expected to appear as a star witness in an unusual $8 billion trial that kicks off this week at which the Meta CEO is accused of operating Facebook as an illegal enterprise that allowed users' data to be harvested without their consent. Shareholders of Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, sued Zuckerberg and other current and former company leaders, saying they continually violated a 2012 agreement between Facebook and the Federal Trade Commission to protect users' data. The case dates back to 2018, after it emerged that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful campaign for U.S. president in 2016. Shareholders want Zuckerberg and the other defendants to reimburse the company for more than $8 billion in fines and other costs paid by Meta after the Cambridge Analytica scandal came to light, including a record $5 billion fine imposed on Facebook by the FTC in 2019 for violating the 2012 agreement. Defendants in the case include former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen, as well as former board members Peter Thiel, the Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, the co-founder of Netflix. Zuckerberg and the other defendants, who declined to comment, have dismissed the allegations in court filings as "extreme claims." Meta, which is not a defendant, also declined to comment. The non-jury trial in Wilmington, Delaware, is scheduled to last eight days. It will mostly focus on decade-old events and board meetings to determine how Facebook leaders implemented the 2012 agreement. While the trial will cover long-ago policies, it comes as privacy concerns continue to dog Meta, which is under scrutiny for its training of AI models. The company says it has invested billions of dollars since 2019 in its program to safeguard users' privacy. Jason Kint, the head of Digital Content Next, a trade group for content providers, said the case will fill in details about what the board knew - and when - regarding the data of users, who now total more than 3 billion daily across Meta's platforms. "There's an argument we can't avoid Facebook and Instagram in our lives," he said. "Can we trust Mark Zuckerberg?" MOST DIFFICULT CLAIMS Two years ago, the defendants sought to dismiss the case before trial, which the judge declined. "This is a case involving alleged wrongdoing on a truly colossal scale," said Travis Laster, the judge handling the case at the time. The trial in the Court of Chancery will be overseen by Kathaleen McCormick. Now the plaintiffs, individual investors and union pension funds including California's State Teachers' Retirement System, must prove what is often described as the most difficult claim in corporate law - showing that directors utterly failed in their duty of oversight. Legal experts said it appears to be the first trial on such a claim. Zuckerberg and Sandberg are alleged to have knowingly caused the company to violate the law. While Delaware law protects directors and officers for bad business decisions, it does not protect them from illegal ones, even if they are profitable. Defendants said in court filings that plaintiffs cannot deliver the evidence. The shareholders in pretrial court papers said they can prove that after the 2012 agreement, Facebook continued deceptive privacy practices, at the direction of Zuckerberg. The defendants said the evidence will show that the company built a team to oversee privacy and hired an outside compliance firm and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica's "studied deceit." In addition to the central privacy claims, plaintiffs also allege that when Zuckerberg could see that the Cambridge Analytica scandal was about break and send company stock lower, he was motivated to offload his stock and reaped at least $1 billion in profit. Defendants said evidence will show he used a stock-trading plan that can protect against insider-trading allegations. They also said the motivation was to benefit his charitable pursuits. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store