Oakland schools superintendent says farewell after her firing from OUSD
Her tenure officially ends on June 30, marking eight years at the helm of the second largest school district in the San Francisco Bay Area.
During the news conference, Dr. Johnson-Trammell highlighted accomplishments of her administration, including:
Paying off $100 million in loans and exited a State Receivership after 22 years.
Raising OUSD's graduation rate to its highest level in decades.
Navigating schools through the COVID pandemic.
Sparking public-private partnerships with Eat. Learn. Play. Foundation, KABOOM!, and Trust for Public Land to improve nearly two dozen school yards.
Launching an all-electric school district bus fleet.
Following a tense school board meeting when tempers flared in April, board trustees narrowly voted 4-3 in favor of firing Johnson-Trammell. Trustees offered zero explanations for why they decided to get rid of their superintendent.
Johnson-Trammell did not attend the April meeting. However, she published a thank you letter writing, 'The last eight years have brought some of the most challenging and most defining moments in our district's history. Through it all, Oakland has shown what's possible when we stay grounded in our mission and vision and work in partnership for our students.'
OUSD officials have not yet announced who their next superintendent will be. Trustees held a closed-door meeting Wednesday night.
The NAACP Education Committee Oakland Branch wrote a letter to the school board raising alarms that OUSD is entering the summer in a 'leadership vacuum.'
The letter stated, 'We are deeply troubled by the Board's April 23rd vote to terminate Superintendent Kyla Johnson-Trammell—an abrupt and destabilizing decision that has left a leadership vacuum in our district. Superintendent Johnson-Trammell's contributions were not only historic but stabilizing. She successfully led OUSD out of 22 years of state receivership and oversaw a $100 million state loan repayment—an extraordinary accomplishment for our district. Her removal, two years before her contract was set to end, was executed without a clear succession plan and has triggered widespread concern throughout our community for the past few weeks.'
NAACP leaders questioned whether the board's decision was made in the best interests of students, or influenced by political agendas and 'behind-the-scenes union maneuvering.'
Earlier this May, the school board voted fully reverse its plans to make sweeping cuts to afterschool, before-school, and summer programs. The planned cuts would have hacked expanded learning programs by up to 80% and impacted thousands of students who rely on the programs for academic support, mentorship, meals, and safety, advocates with Youth Together said. The board's reversal came after weeks of mounting public pressure.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Forget trade wars — the future isn't about physical goods, but data, ideas and services
Despite a U.S.-driven trade war with China, voters turning to populism across the globe and the risk of a recession, reports of globalization's demise are — at least for now — overblown. Washington's trade hawks would do well to read the signs. True, that may seem like pie in the sky. Messages from Washington are all about reshoring and decoupling of trade. As President Trump's reciprocal tariffs aims to reindustrialize the American economy, his vision is one of the manufacture of cars and smartphones moving away from Asia to assembly lines of obedient workers in America. But the chief engine of the U.S. economy is no longer found in physical factories. Instead, it lies in intangible investments, such as research and development, software, organizational structures and intellectual capital. These immaterial assets eclipse physical capital such as machinery and equipment, now accounting for over 60 percent of corporate capital investment and, by some estimates, 90 percent of the S&P 500's market value. This has led to new patterns of globalization, defined by invisible items — data, ideas, modern services and cross-border teams. As trade in physical goods began to sputter in the beginning of the 21st century, these invisible flows have soared over the past decade. They are largely immune to tariffs, decoupling and attacks of populist politicians. Even with chips nearshored, global U.S. companies like Qualcomm still earn a quarter of their profits by licensing ideas globally. Although the U.S. may start soon a full-blown trade war with the European Union, data flows between the two trade giants are set to soar in the next decade, according to the European Commission. And as U.S. multinationals exit China, they remain reliant on cross-border teams within these companies. Meanwhile, modern services trade has continued to grow by 10 percent well into 2024 without interruption. Contrary to common belief, intangible flows span both manufacturing and services. Take Coca-Cola. The multinational rarely produces any of its famous beverages anymore. Instead, it licenses its recipe to non-affiliated contract producers called bottlers, from whom it receives property income. Google runs on worldwide data flows to power its services globally. McKinsey predicts that by 2040, modern sectors such as cloud computing, shared autonomous vehicles, AI, space and biotechnology will account for 16 percent of global GDP, nearly double the share of today's leading sectors like industrial electronics and semiconductors, which currently make up 9 percent. These emerging sectors fuse manufacturing and services. These sectors are also rife with global intangible flows. Consider BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine. The underlying mRNA technology was licensed from the biochemist Katalin Karikó. Cloud‑based trial data zipped across borders and Pfizer's partnership turbo‑charged the research and development and scale‑up. The same blueprint was later licensed to Moderna for its vaccine. Intangible flows like these are powering modern U.S. multinational production networks and their supply chains. Just as a quarter to half of the trade in U.S. goods in the 20th century occurred within multinationals, so too will U.S. intangible flows mostly take place within global firms this century. These new flows clash with Trump's trade narrative. For starters, the American economy is well positioned to benefit, as it holds strong comparative advantages in these emerging industries. Second, they don't fit with populist views on the evils of trade deficits. Data, for instance, transcends borders as a global commodity, contributing neither to a country's trade deficit nor surplus. U.S. cross-border research and development and global teams remain largely unnoticed as an international flow. But their output has surged by respectively 95 and 30 percent since 2009, boosting income at home. Meanwhile, the U.S. has held the world's largest trade surplus in modern services for years, backing both high- and low-skilled jobs at home. The overall U.S. trade deficit in goods is not the problem, but rather the byproduct of America's greatest modern globalization success. These new globalization flows are difficult to grasp, hard to monetize and challenging to rein in behind countries' borders. They do not rely on ships, airplanes and trucks, but instead on the internet, human minds and collaboration. The paradox is that they have continued to grow despite the ongoing global turmoil, and they could put the U.S. in the driver's seat this century. The outlook for globalization is more positive than the populist doomsayers in Washington are claiming. However, new intangible flows rely on attracting the world's top talent, without undermining universities; on maintaining a predictable environment for global business, without disregarding court rulings; and on avoiding questionable policy initiatives, without blindsiding allies. If the U.S. truly wants to capitalize on its strengths, policymakers should change their global engagement strategy and embrace the next wave of globalization before it's too late.
CNBC
a minute ago
- CNBC
Kelly Evans: How do you "fix" the Fed?
The irony of having this whole discussion right now about how to "fix" the Federal Reserve is that the critics have actually gone pretty quiet lately. "We must give credit where credit is due: after a significant inflationary policy error during 2021 and early 2022, the Powell-led FOMC has effectively nailed the immaculate disinflation/soft landing," Roth MKM economist Michael Darda wrote in late May. That achievement, he added, is "something unprecedented after more than a two-year inflation surge." Similar acknowledgements are being heard from investors and money managers. "The Fed is actually doing a pretty good job right now," Andres Garcia-Amaya of Zoe Financial told us on air last month. "The market's at all-time highs, inflation is below 3%, and the economy is doing just fine." Which is partly why the market gets so jittery about Fed Chair Powell's potential replacement now, whenever the issue is raised. But even those who critical of Fed policy right now are critical in both directions: some, like Barry Knapp of Ironsides Macro, think they are running policy too tight and should cut rates; and others, like Larry Lindsey, warn rate cuts would be a mistake if inflation rises towards year-end. The larger issue, as Lindsey discussed on our show earlier this week, is how to make the Fed less error-prone in general. Even excluding Covid, the Fed's growth forecasts have been off by 63% on average, he noted. If the Fed instead had simply assumed 2% annual GDP growth over the past fifteen-plus years that they've been issuing projections, they would have been much closer to the mark. And the Covid episode itself--when inflation hit 9% before the Fed finally began hiking dramatically--remains a major point of concern about the institution's lack of intellectual diversity. The Fed's hundreds of economists and staffers are too one-sided, according to Lindsey, because they are hired from a small handful of "elite" schools. Not only should that be broadened, but the board itself, which decides monetary policy, should have at least a couple of non-economists from the business world, he added. Those are not the kinds of changes that would necessarily unnerve markets. In fact, such ideas might even be as part of a message that says the new Fed chair isn't just coming in to run policy more loosely at the margin. Otherwise, the market is left to conjecture about just what exactly the new Fed chair's plans for monetary policy or institutional change might actually be. Some more specificity on both fronts could go a long way towards keeping the current positivity about the Fed going, for once. See you at 1 p.m! Kelly Twitter: @KellyCNBC Instagram: @realkellyevans
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Too close for comfort: Residents encounter coyotes this summer
Coyotes have long been part of Niagara-on-the-Lake's landscape, but recent sightings have some residents on edge, saying the animals are venturing too close for comfort. Wandering through gardens, stalking pets, and lingering in tourist areas, coyotes are leaving some too afraid to walk their dogs or let pets outside. But the Humane Society of Greater Niagara says more sightings don't necessarily mean there are more coyotes — and the Ministry of Natural Resources says it hasn't received any recent reports from the area. The town says it has received one service request related to coyotes and directs all complaints to the humane society. Cortnie Welychka, senior manager of operations at the humane society, said the rise in sightings is likely due to growing public awareness, more homes near natural corridors like the Niagara Escarpment, and faster information-sharing through social media and 'neighbourhood networks.' 'Coyotes have always been present in Niagara,' she said. As agencies and the town aim to balance coexistence with safety, officials stress the importance of not feeding coyotes — intentionally or not — as this can cause them to lose their fear of people and become aggressive. Meanwhile, some residents are calling for stronger measures to keep coyotes out of urban areas and are urging people to stay educated on risks to prevent conflict. NOTL makes ideal habitat for coyotes, Welychka says Welychka said NOTL presents 'a unique environment for coyotes.' Its mix of residential neighbourhoods, farmland and tourist areas provides them with easy access to food, shelter and safety from natural predators, she said. And they're not picky eaters either. Coyotes will happily grab whatever curbside takeout is available. Unsecured garbage, compost, pet food, bird seed and fallen fruit all make for an easy meal — the rodents they attract are just a bonus on the menu. Properties in town with thick brush, vineyards, and green spaces give coyotes the cover they need, creating cozy spots to den and quiet routes to slip through neighbourhoods. Welychka said they are smart and adaptable, hence why they can thrive in suburbs and urban areas. The town's steady stream of visitors doesn't help, she said — with more food scraps left behind and less caution around pets, coyotes are more likely to venture closer. Encounters leave residents feeling unsafe Old Town resident Sheryl Johnson said she will not take her three Yorkies, Mia, Portia and Pandora, for a walk — or let them into her backyard. One time, Johnson encountered a coywolf — a coyote-wolf hybrid — that stalked her while she was walking the two Yorkie-Havanese mixes she had at the time, Parker and Pennelope. 'I picked up both dogs and I ran,' she said. Johnson grew up on a Niagara farm and is used to seeing coyotes, but as more subdivisions go up, she said the animals are being pushed closer to town — human behaviour, including neighbours feeding them, is making the problem worse. 'They're even coming out in the daytime in a way they have never come out before,' she said. Some coyotes in the neighbourhood, including a mother and her two cubs, have started to appear almost tame, she said, a change she's noticed more in recent months. 'But they never can be tamed,' she said. 'They're wild animals. They have wild instincts for a reason. It's what keeps them alive.' 'It's not up to us.' Johnson most often sees coyotes on Ball, Delater, Ricardo and sometimes Front streets: Busy areas near hotels, beaches and tourist foot traffic. She even saw coyotes take down a deer at Parkway and Ricardo once. 'One of my first concerns was, kids are unpredictable. Kids will try to pet something that looks like a dog. How do they know any different?' she said, adding there are lots of children nearby. Last fall, a friend of Johnson was devastated after a coyote killed her chihuahua. 'All (the owners) heard was a little tiny rustling of the leaves and then a small whimper,' said Johnson, emphasizing how quickly and quietly an attack can happen. Resident Barbara Worthy said she's seen coyotes around for years, but never this many. Their growing presence has left her feeling like she's living in 'watchful cautiousness,' she said. 'I can't go out walking down the street at night anymore outside my house,' she said, calling the issue 'an inevitable problem of nature and urbanites.' Worthy once had a close encounter in Old Town when a coyote came around the corner and up her driveway, just as she was getting into her car. She quickly scooped up her dog, Louie — a 10-year-old, six-pound white multi-poo and beloved museum mascot — and got him inside. Though she didn't feel in danger, the moment was 'a bit nerve-wracking,' she said. Last week, she spotted five coyotes playing in the street, right outside her front door, around 1 a.m. 'My dog was barking his head off,' said Worthy. 'It's not like they're just walking down the street. They're walking the scene — going in and out of gardens,' she added. Marah Minor, the town's communications co-ordinator, said that while the town does not intervene in routine sightings, it may step in if a coyote poses a public safety risk, working with the humane society and provincial wildlife authorities to assess the situation. Feeding coyotes increases risks Purposefully or not, feeding wildlife is 'one of the greatest risks when it comes to coyote habituation,' said Welychka. And not only is it dangerous, but Welychka said it's prohibited under NOTL bylaws and enforceable with fines. Mike Fenn, spokesperson for the Ministry of Natural Resources, said attractants like pet food left outside, excess bird or squirrel feed, and food scraps should be removed, as they can teach coyotes to associate humans with easy meals. 'They are also opportunistic feeders,' said Fenn. Over time, this can condition them to 'become aggressive and dependent on humans for food,' he said, leading them to return more often and lose their caution around people. 'Once coyotes lose their fear of humans, the risk of conflict rises,' said Welychka. Johnson said this dependency isn't good for coyotes either — it disrupts their natural behaviour. Coyotes not naturally dangerous, experts say Welychka said one of the biggest misconceptions about coyotes is that they are 'inherently dangerous to people.' 'In reality, coyotes are naturally shy and try to avoid human contact,' she said. Native to Niagara and having adapted to life near people, coyotes are not normally aggressive toward humans. It's actually rare, said Welychka, often tied to being fed or getting too comfortable around humans. 'Lethal control measures are often misguided,' said Welychka. 'Removing coyotes typically creates a territorial vacancy, prompting new coyotes to move in and sometimes causing an increase in reproduction rates.' Johnson said even when bred with domestic animals, coyotes remain wild. On a farm near where Johnson grew up, a coyote bred with a dog. The family tried to keep one of the pups, but Johnson said it couldn't be domesticated and was turned over to a conservation area for safety reasons. Co-existence involves careful measures and 'hazing' To get coyotes to keep a distance, Welychka said to make some noise. 'It's important for residents to act assertively during an encounter, never turning their back or running,' she said. Clapping, yelling, banging pots or blasting an air horn can scare them off, and waving your arms, flapping a garbage bag, opening umbrellas or spraying water helps send the message too, Welychka said. In the past, residents were seen carrying large sticks and baseball bats to stay safe. 'Hazing should be practiced consistently,' she said. Welychka advised pet owners to take extra precautions, especially when protecting small pets that can look like prey to coyotes. Never leave dogs or cats unattended outside, she said, 'particularly during early morning and evening hours when coyotes are most active.' People should also walk dogs on short — not retractable — leashes, keep cats indoors, bring pet food inside after feeding, clean up outdoor food sources like compost or bird seed, and consider motion lights, fencing, and other deterrents to help keep properties safer, she said. The ministry's advice is straightforward: 'If you encounter an aggressive coyote, remain calm, use a flashlight, make a lot of noise, avoid turning your back, and never approach it. Once at a safe distance, contact 911,' said Fenn. Worthy said the goal is for people and coyotes to be able to co-exist:'We don't want to eradicate these wonderful animals.' 'They have their right to be here too,' she added. 'But we don't need them to be urbanized like this.' Johnson said the town's approach seems 'problematic' to her. 'The town said they couldn't do anything until the coyotes became a nuisance. So it's like, what, they have to bite somebody before the town can do anything?' she said. Johnson said the town should post signs to warn residents and visitors where coyotes are most active — and enforce property standards in those areas. It should also explore how to relocate coyotes to safer, non-urban areas. 'I don't want to cause (coyotes) harm,' she said. 'I also don't think they should be where we have all the tourists.' Coyotes aren't pets and shouldn't be treated like them, said Johnson — food sources need to be limited and wildlife kept out of urban areas, much like how bears are managed. Johnson said educating residents on risks and prevention is key. With so many tourists, dogs and small children, 'in Old Town, it's just too dangerous,' she said. 'I find it very disconcerting.' Minor said the town's approach focuses on public education, with tips, reporting guidance, and safety info available on its website at . paigeseburn@ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
