logo
Careless People: Inside Facebook's Failures and Ethics Crisis

Careless People: Inside Facebook's Failures and Ethics Crisis

The Hindu27-06-2025
Published : Jun 27, 2025 15:46 IST - 5 MINS READ
Sarah Wynn-Williams' Careless People is a closely observed account of Facebook's ascent to global prominence and the persistent failure of its leadership to recognise or address the implications of that growth. The book avoids the tone of sensational exposé. Its focus is institutional, procedural, and grounded in lived experience. Wynn-Williams served as Facebook's Director of Global Public Policy from 2011 to 2017 and worked directly with Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg on issues relating to foreign governments, regulation, and strategic political risk.
Her entry into the company was self-initiated. At the time, Facebook had no international policy team and no meaningful engagement with foreign state actors. Wynn-Williams identified this as a critical gap, given the company's growing influence over speech, access to information, and political mobilisation. Her proposal was met with limited interest. Executives dismissed the need for a diplomatic or policy-oriented function. Facebook operated with the assumption that global politics would remain peripheral to its business.
Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism
By Sarah Wynn-Williams Flatiron Books, 2025 Pages: 400 Price: Rs.899
This assumption came under strain as the platform became a site for organising political movements and circulating disinformation. The Arab Spring marked a turning point in Facebook's visibility on the international stage. Despite this, Wynn-Williams describes a consistent pattern of reactive decision-making. Policy frameworks were created in response to controversy or regulatory pressure, rather than through internal forecasting or principled planning.
Also Read | Facebook owner Meta is planning a potential Twitter rival
Wynn-Williams presents Mark Zuckerberg as technically capable and highly focused on engineering outcomes, but uninterested in public governance or the ethical consequences of platform decisions. Sheryl Sandberg emerges as more attuned to external perception, although her interventions were framed in communications language and had limited operational impact. There was no sustained effort within the company to develop ethical guidelines for speech, privacy, or civic disruption. Decisions about platform rules were delegated to teams with minimal institutional memory and limited understanding of regional political dynamics.
A controlled, clear account of institutional decay
The book contains an extended reflection on Wynn-Williams' attempts to introduce early-warning systems for geopolitical flashpoints, including proposals for structured risk review processes. Most of these proposals were rejected or deferred. Her colleagues considered them unnecessary, or believed that they would slow the company's capacity to scale. She identifies this tendency as part of a broader problem. The firm viewed growth metrics as the primary indicator of success. Political considerations were treated as reputation management rather than structural concerns. This becomes particularly visible in her account of Myanmar, where Facebook ignored sustained internal warnings about the platform's role in amplifying anti-Rohingya hate speech. Efforts to improve moderation or restrict ethnic slurs were deprioritised, even as user growth accelerated and offline targeted violence intensified.
The narrative is interspersed with personal reflections. Wynn-Williams recounts a near-fatal shark attack at the age of thirteen, an experience that shaped her instinct for survival and confrontation with authority. This personal history informs her view of institutional passivity and her frustration with a corporate culture that consistently deprioritised accountability. Her tone remains composed. She avoids self-pity or moral grandstanding. The result is a controlled and clear account of institutional decay.
The title, drawn from the American writer F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 novel The Great Gatsby, is used here to describe the behaviour of actors who possess influence without consequences. The carelessness that Wynn-Williams identifies is not incidental. It results from a structural configuration that separates decisions from responsibility. Facebook's platform design encouraged maximal engagement. It offered limited tools for transparency or independent oversight. The leadership considered these conditions necessary for innovation and user retention.
The book advances several contributions to the understanding of global platform governance. First, it documents the internal barriers to reform that exist even when individual employees raise ethical concerns. Second, it describes how private infrastructure has become the default venue for political discourse in many parts of the world. In the absence of external constraints, private platforms make decisions that affect public life without mechanisms for appeal, justification, or contestation. Third, it presents an insider's account of how international policy work is subordinated to domestic business interests, even when the company operates in hundreds of jurisdictions.
No exaggerated conclusions
The book avoids exaggerated conclusions. It presents Facebook as an organisation structured around product development and growth, with limited interest in democratic accountability. It also resists attributing systemic failure to individual malice. Wynn-Williams shows how institutional culture, incentives, and habits of leadership produced outcomes that were difficult to challenge from within.
Careless People contributes to the literature on platform power, digital governance, and institutional design. It complements academic and journalistic work on surveillance capitalism and algorithmic governance by supplying a primary source account of how decision-making unfolded inside a dominant technology firm. It will be of interest to policymakers, scholars, and others concerned with the interaction between corporate platforms and the public sphere.
Also Read | Hire and fire at will: What do global tech lay-offs mean for India?
Wynn-Williams presents no theory of reform. Her aim is to document what happened, how decisions were made, and what structures prevented accountability. The narrative closes without prescriptions. The book serves as evidence of the limits of voluntary ethics in private institutions and the consequences of permitting firms to mediate public communication on a global scale without enforceable obligations.
What Careless People ultimately reveals is how a generation that built the most powerful communication system in human history chose, at every turn, to treat that power as someone else's problem.
John Simte is an advocate based in New Delhi.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This businessman has earned maximum money in world this year so far, his name is…, Mukesh Ambani also in Top 10
This businessman has earned maximum money in world this year so far, his name is…, Mukesh Ambani also in Top 10

India.com

time12 minutes ago

  • India.com

This businessman has earned maximum money in world this year so far, his name is…, Mukesh Ambani also in Top 10

Home Business This businessman has earned maximum money in world this year so far, his name is…, Mukesh Ambani also in Top 10 This businessman has earned maximum money in world this year so far, his name is…, Mukesh Ambani also in Top 10 Not Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, or Mark Zuckerberg but Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison has become the world's highest-earning businessman. This year, Mukesh Ambani is also included in the top 10 in terms of earnings. This businessman has earned maximum money in world this year so far, his name is..., Mukesh Ambani also in Top 10 Top 10 Richest People In The World As Of July 2025 List: Oracle's Larry Ellison has left everyone behind and topped the list of the world's highest-earning billionaires. He even left behind billionaires like – Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, who always dominated the list. However, Ellison is in second place when it comes to the world's billionaires list. His wealth has increased to more than USD70 billion this year. Meanwhile, Mukesh Ambani is in 16th place on the billionaires list with a whopping wealth of USD 106.9 billion, as per Forbes' real-time billionaires list. According to the latest ranking of the Bloomberg Billionaire Index, the Oracle co-founder is in the second position with a wealth of USD262 billion. interestingly, Mukesh Ambani also made it to the top 10 list in terms of earnings this year. Mark Zuckerberg Is On The Second Position Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is second with earnings of USD40.3 billion. His net worth is USD248 billion. The third place in the list is secured by Jensen Huang, who is the world's ninth richest person. He has earned USD35.8 billion this year. Huang's net worth is USd150 billion. Steve Ballmer is in fourth position. This year his wealth has increased by USD28.5 billion and total wealth is USd175 billion. Thomas Peterffy is ranked fifth in terms of earnings this year. He is the 22nd richest man in the world, with a wealth USD99.9 billion. This year he has earned USD23.5 billion. He is followed by Carlos Slim. His wealth has jumped by USD20.5 billion in 2025. What Is Special In The Top 10 Billionaire List? Notably, this year's list is dominated by tech giants, whether its Larry Ellison or Mark Zuckerberg, everyone runs a tech company. Larry Ellison's Oracle earns its profits from cloud computing and AI infrastructure investments. Whereas Mark Zuckerberg's Meta earns a major portion of its earnings from the metaverse and AI research. Jensen Huang's Nvidia earned big from global demand for AI chips. Steve Ballmer earned USD 28.5 billion from Microsoft's cloud services and OpenAI partnership. Global diversity also plays a major role for these companies in earning major profits. Carlos Slim's company has diversified investments in telecommunications and infrastructure. On the other hand, Mukesh Ambani's Reliance earns a major portion of its profits from renewable energy and 5G expansion. Françoise Bettencourt Meyers's L'Oréal earned billions from Asian demand for its luxury beauty products. For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest Business News on

Stalking case accused, son of BJP ex-state chief, named Haryana assistant advocate general
Stalking case accused, son of BJP ex-state chief, named Haryana assistant advocate general

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Stalking case accused, son of BJP ex-state chief, named Haryana assistant advocate general

Vikas Barala (File photo) CHANDIGARH: The Nayab Singh Saini-led BJP govt in Haryana has appointed Vikas Barala , accused of the stalking and attempted abduction of the daughter of a former Haryana bureaucrat, as assistant advocate general in the office of advocate general (AG), Haryana. The AG Haryana-headed screening committee that recommended his appointment included Mani Ram Sharma, special secretary, home department, as nominee of additional chief secretary (home), legal remembrancer Ritu Garg, and two retired judges - Darshan Singh and H S Bhalla. Son of former Haryana BJP chief and RS MP Subhash Barala, Vikas will be representing Haryana's govt before judicial platforms in Delhi, including SC. The appointment order was issued by Haryana home secretary on July 18. He is among seven law officers appointed by Haryana's govt for state's legal cell in Delhi. A total of 96 law officers of the rank of additional advocate general, senior deputy advocates general, deputy advocate general and assistant advocates general, were appointed by the state on July 18 to represent the state before Punjab and Haryana HC at Chandigarh and in Delhi. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Vikas did not respond to TOI's calls for his comments. The criminal trial against Vikas is on before a Chandigarh court, with the next hearing on Aug 2. Prosecution evidence is being recorded at this stage. According to the complaint, on Aug 5, 2017, Vikas and his friend Ashish had allegedly followed a bureaucrat's daughter and tried to stop the car of a senior Haryana bureaucrat. The girl called Chandigarh police, who apprehended the youths and filed a case against them under IPC 354D (stalking) and the Motor Vehicle Act. Vikas's father, Subhash Barala, was then Haryana BJP president.

Can't keep occupying govt bungalow indefinitely: SC
Can't keep occupying govt bungalow indefinitely: SC

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Can't keep occupying govt bungalow indefinitely: SC

Supreme Court NEW DELHI: After activating the process to wrest the Chief Justice of India's official residence from overstaying ex-CJI D Y Chandrachud, Supreme Court Tuesday said no one can occupy official residence indefinitely and dismissed a former Bihar MLA's plea against Rs 21 lakh penal rent for staying in an upscale bungalow for two years after resigning as a legislator. Appearing before a bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria was former Bihar MLA Avinash Kumar Singh, who was ordered to pay a penal rent of Rs 21 lakh for overstaying at his govt bungalow on Taylor Road, Patna, for two years from April 2014 till May 2016. He argued against the "illegal demand of huge sum" and said he was entitled to a govt accommodation after being nominated to 'State Legislature Research and Training Bureau' as a 2009 govt notification entitled members of the bureau to MLA-level perks, including a house. The apex court bench dismissed his petition and said, "Once you resigned as a legislator, you should have vacated the govt bungalow within the stipulated time. No one can hold on to a govt bungalow indefinitely." The MLA's counsel Anil Mishra told SC that the rent demand for two years at Rs 21 lakh was exorbitant and requested the court to examine this issue. But the bench remained firm, forcing him to withdraw the petition to avail other remedies available in accordance with law. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Singh, a five-time MLA from Dhaka constituency, resigned in March 2014 to contest Lok Sabha elections, which he lost. He was later nominated to the bureau. His petition against the demand of rent was dismissed by Patna HC, which had said the 2009 notification did not entitle him to continue in the bungalow earmarked for legislators. "It nowhere provides that a former MLA can retain the same quarters. The notification only allows general benefits such as accommodation, not a specific entitlement to a previous allocation," HC had said. It had asked Singh to pay 6% interest per annum on the amount due as rent to Bihar govt. The SC in two renowned judgments - 'Lok Prahari' and 'S D Bandi' cases - had ruled that public figures cannot unauthorisedly occupy govt bungalows using their clout and had ordered all govts to take eviction action against such occupants.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store