Crisis-hit marketing group Next 15 approached about £200m break-up
A London-listed marketing conglomerate which sacked three of its top executives this week has been approached about a £200m break-up.
Sky News has learnt that Next 15 has been holding talks about a sale of its "legacy" assets, which include the financial public relations agency MHP, with an unnamed bidder.
That would leave the rump of the business focused on technology and data-driven client businesses.
One industry source said the prospective buyer was believed to be a private equity firm.
Next 15 issued a profit warning and changed its leadership this week as it disclosed "potential serious misconduct" related to Mach49, a Silicon Valley advisory business it owns.
"As a consequence, Next 15 has terminated the employment of three members of the senior management at Mach49 - Linda Yates, Russ Lampert and Paul Holland. David Charpie, currently co-CEO of Mach49, will become sole CEO with immediate effect," it said in a stock exchange statement on Wednesday.
"Next 15, on behalf of Mach49, is in the process of reporting the matters to relevant law enforcement agencies.
"It is too early to know the outcome, but Next 15 will ensure that full co-operation is provided to those agencies."
The company, which has a market value of about £210m after seeing its stock slump by nearly 75% over the last year.
It also announced this week that Tim Dyson, its chief executive for over three decades, would retire and be replaced by Sam Knights, the boss of Shopper Media Group, a subsidiary of Next 15.
A person close to Next 15 insisted that any potential break-up would reflect the "simplification strategy" to which it had publicly alluded.
Next 15 declined to comment on the approach for some of its assets, which are also thought to include the creative agency Elvis and Outcast, another PR firm.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gun range could become skatepark or energy centre
A former rifle range and undercroft by Blackfriars Bridge could find a new use as a skatepark or energy centre. The site has been occupied since 2017 by Bazalgette Tunnel Ltd for the construction of the Thames Tideway tunnel. It will now return to either the City of London Corporation or Transport for London once it is determined which of the two bodies is the legal owner. Thames Water will manage the foreshore, which will include a café. The shooting range was shut down to allow for the construction of the tunnel and sits beneath the undercroft. A report by the corporation noted the undercroft was "historically associated with antisocial behaviour" and has been inaccessible, with hoardings around it for decades. Three proposals have been put forward for the redevelopment of the site: A dedicated space for skateboarding and wheeled sports An energy centre delivering low-carbon heat Commercial options, such as kiosks and food and drink outlets A corporation spokesperson said the site was still being used to store materials related to the Tideway Tunnel. A further report detailing costs for each of the reuse options is to be presented to the City of London Corporation committee in early 2026. Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU green claims law shelved amid political backlash
The European Commission has announced its intention to withdraw the Green Claims Directive proposal, a key element of the EU's efforts to regulate greenwashing. The move follows pressure from the European People's Party (EPP), which deemed the draft law too complex and burdensome, especially for small companies. Negotiations have been paused and the final trilogue session cancelled ahead of the planned meeting on 23 June 2025. The EPP, the largest group in the European Parliament, raised concerns in a letter dated 18 June 2025. Shadow rapporteurs warned that mandatory third‑party verification for environmental claims—known as 'ex‑ante' checks—could hamper companies' competitiveness and add excessive administrative cost. The Commission echoed this reasoning, highlighting that extending the scope to around 30 million micro‑enterprises would undermine its simplification agenda. The trilogue scheduled for 23 June 2025 was called off by the Council in response to the Commission's announcement. Though the Commission has yet to provide a formal justification, EU law requires both Parliament and Council support before a fully adopted draft law can be withdrawn. Rapporteurs Sandro Gozi and Tiemo Wölken have said they remain ready to resume talks if the disputed amendment affecting micro‑businesses is dropped. Despite headlines suggesting the EU is scrapping its anti‑greenwashing efforts, existing rules remain in place. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive continues to support enforcement against misleading environmental claims. Furthermore, the Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive, adopted in February 2024, is unaffected by the withdrawal. It will take effect on 27 September 2026 and explicitly prohibits vague or unsupported eco‑claims. Other related regulations such as the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the Right to Repair Directive also continue to operate. Environmental NGOs including ECOS, ClientEarth and the European Environmental Bureau have criticised the decision and urged policymakers to respect EU legislative procedures. They highlighted that up to 76 % of products in the EU carry explicit or implicit green claims, with over half being misleading. The Commission has left open the possibility of reconsidering the directive if the Council retracts the micro‑enterprises amendment. As the ESG policy landscape evolves, stakeholders will be watching whether the EU moves forward with a revised Green Claims Directive or strengthens its existing frameworks. "EU green claims law shelved amid political backlash" was originally created and published by Packaging Gateway, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gelsenwasser (FRA:WWG) Is Reinvesting At Lower Rates Of Return
Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. Put simply, these types of businesses are compounding machines, meaning they are continually reinvesting their earnings at ever-higher rates of return. However, after investigating Gelsenwasser (FRA:WWG), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Gelsenwasser: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.019 = €40m ÷ (€3.0b - €867m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024). Thus, Gelsenwasser has an ROCE of 1.9%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Integrated Utilities industry average of 7.5%. Check out our latest analysis for Gelsenwasser While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you'd like to look at how Gelsenwasser has performed in the past in other metrics, you can view this free graph of Gelsenwasser's past earnings, revenue and cash flow. On the surface, the trend of ROCE at Gelsenwasser doesn't inspire confidence. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 2.9%, but since then they've fallen to 1.9%. Given the business is employing more capital while revenue has slipped, this is a bit concerning. If this were to continue, you might be looking at a company that is trying to reinvest for growth but is actually losing market share since sales haven't increased. From the above analysis, we find it rather worrisome that returns on capital and sales for Gelsenwasser have fallen, meanwhile the business is employing more capital than it was five years ago. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 56% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. That being the case, unless the underlying trends revert to a more positive trajectory, we'd consider looking elsewhere. If you want to continue researching Gelsenwasser, you might be interested to know about the 1 warning sign that our analysis has discovered. While Gelsenwasser may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here. — Investing narratives with Fair Values A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
