logo
Action plan, constitutional protection needed to uphold Orang Asli rights, says Suhakam

Action plan, constitutional protection needed to uphold Orang Asli rights, says Suhakam

The Star16-06-2025
THE Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) is urgently calling on the government to develop and implement a comprehensive national action plan, alongside explicit constitutional recognition, to safeguard the rights of indigenous peoples.
'These communities have for decades endured systemic neglect, marginalisation and violations of their fundamental rights, particularly concerning land, identity and socioeconomic inclusion,' the commission says in a statement.
As a core recommendation, Suhakam reiterates its calls for the establishment of an independent national commission on indigenous peoples, in line with recommendation 18 of the National Inquiry into the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
This proposed commission must be empowered to advise the government on laws and policies relating to indigenous people.
In addition, this commission, as recommended, must propose and monitor sustainable development programmes on indigenous peoples' land, promote participation of indigenous peoples at all levels, and conduct research on issues related to the wellbeing of indigenous peoples.
The commission must be composed predominantly of representatives from indigenous communities, selected through transparent consultation and with the endorsement of indigenous people across Malaysia. This will ensure that the commission reflects the voices and aspirations of the communities it is meant to serve and affirms the principle of self-determination.
Suhakam adds that although the government accepted 17 of its 18 recommendations from the national inquiry, progress has been slow.
'Suhakam, therefore, calls for the immediate revival of the Special Cabinet Committee on Indigenous Rights, with specific timelines for implementation, progress monitoring, and periodic public reporting,' the rights body states.
Simultaneously, Suhakam reiterates the urgent need for a comprehensive and independent review of the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 and the Orang Asli Development Department (Jakoa), as outlined in recommendation 14 of the national inquiry, transforming Jakoa into a rights-based institution that can provide effective support and protection for the Orang Asli.
'Jakoa as the main federal agency overseeing Orang Asli affairs must evolve into a rights-based institution capable of protecting indigenous rights, not just delivering welfare,' it states.
As part of the broader constitutional reform agenda, Suhakam has called for Article 153 of the Federal Constitution to be amended to explicitly recognise the Orang Asli as entitled to the same constitutional safeguards and affirmative action measures as other indigenous groups such as the Malays as well as the Orang Asal of Sabah and Sarawak.
'This recognition is vital in ensuring that the rights, identity, and entitlements of the Orang Asli are no longer subject to administrative ambiguity or exclusion,' the rights body stresses.
Article 153 of the Federal Constitution gives the Malays and natives of East Malaysia special rights and privileges in education, public service and business, among others, as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may deem reasonable.
Another critical issue Suhakam has highlighted is the lack of alignment between federal and state policies, particularly in the recognition and protection of ancestral and customary land.
Policy gaps have left indigenous communities vulnerable to land disputes, displacement, and the loss of livelihoods, it points out.
'There is a critical need to harmonise Federal and State policies, especially regarding the gazettement and legal protection of ancestral and customary lands. The lack of harmonisation of policies has placed indigenous communities in precarious conditions, with frequent reports of displacements, loss of livelihoods, and prolonged disputes.'
Both federal and state governments must uphold their responsibilities as custodians of indigenous land and resources, including enforcing land rights through clear, consistent policies aligned with international standards such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Inter-national Labour Organisation Convention 169, Suhakam says.
'The government of Malaysia must act as the guardian of indigenous peoples by aligning national laws with international human rights instruments, which affirm indigenous peoples' rights to free, prior, and informed consent, and to preserve their culture, lands, and institutions.'
Article 8(2) of the UN Decla-ration, for one, calls on states to prevent and provide redress for actions aimed at dispossessing indigenous peoples of their lands, territories, or resources.
Ultimately, says Suhakam, no meaningful reform can happen without the active involvement of indigenous communities and civil society, stressing the necessity of their participation to ensure that any changes are effective and accepted by those directly affected.
'Any legislation, policy or programme undertaken must include the direct and meaningful participation of indigenous communities and civil society actors. Without their input, any reforms initiated risk being ineffective or rejected by the very communities they are intended to serve,' Suhakam notes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Close Federal Ties Prove GPS Is A Respected Political Force
Close Federal Ties Prove GPS Is A Respected Political Force

Barnama

time6 hours ago

  • Barnama

Close Federal Ties Prove GPS Is A Respected Political Force

GENERAL MIRI, July 22 (Bernama) -- The close cooperation between Sarawak and the Federal Government under the leadership of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim proves that Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) is a respected and formidable political force. Sarawak Premier Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Openg said the appointment of Sarawak native Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof as Deputy Prime Minister, along with the presence of several federal ministers from the state, was a significant recognition of Sarawak. 'Never before has a Sarawakian been entrusted with the responsibility of Deputy Prime Minister. This shows that Sarawak under the GPS platform is a respected political power,' he said in his speech at the 62nd Sarawak Day celebration here tonight. As the head of the GPS government, he said the strong collaboration with the Federal Government would continue in the interest of both the nation and Sarawak, adding that the state's pursuit of prosperity would not hinder national development. 'The increase in Sarawak's revenue, including through the state sales tax, will not reduce the federal revenue as the Federal Government has ample room to boost its income without burdening the people,' he said. Abang Johari also rebuked claims by certain quarters that Sarawak was being 'excessive' or greedy in asserting its rights, stressing that the demands were based on the Federal Constitution and the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). He said GPS would continue fighting for Sarawak's rights through negotiations with the Federal Government, guided by the MA63 framework. 'Sarawak has successfully regained nine rights enshrined under MA63, and efforts will continue to reclaim all those that have been eroded,' he said. He also reflected on the key decision made by Sarawak's leaders 62 years ago to join in forming Malaysia for greater security and prosperity.

Balance of trade between nations need to reflect parity and equality
Balance of trade between nations need to reflect parity and equality

Focus Malaysia

time9 hours ago

  • Focus Malaysia

Balance of trade between nations need to reflect parity and equality

ONE of the reasons cited by US President Donald Trump in increasing trade tariffs with Malaysia is that the balance of trade has been in Malaysia's favour for many years, and that the Malaysian government has not seriously addressed the problem. Trump had expressed hopes that higher tariffs could redress the situation and expects Malaysia to purchase a more wider range of American goods and products. Many nations too have lopsided balance of trade with the US and this is one of the reasons for the much-feared Trump's tariffs worldwide which will begin to be implemented from Aug 1. Numerous countries have taken advantage of the large unrestricted open US market to increase exports exponentially but buy back less in imports leading to an unfavourable balance of trade. The US has lost out to many countries in the trade of agricultural and manufactured goods as well as services. This is the reason why the US is now the world's biggest debtor nation. Many American multi-national have also added to the problems by opening new manufacturing centres outside the US to take advantage of lower labour costs and other incentives and exporting their products to the US for higher profits. This has led to the famous 'rust belt', a vast number of US factories that had been shuttered down due to economic changes. This became a major socio-economic issue during the presidential elections. The range of products and services the US depends on worldwide especially from the European Union (EU) and Asean countries has increased manyfold over the last few decade and is straining the US economy with the huge range imports which are not matched with imports by these countries. This has been cited as one of the reasons for the much talked about decline of the US as a superpower. Trump is imposing punitive tariffs on nation he feels are restricting US imports through restrictions, regulations and import substitution. The entry of China as a big time trading nation has upset the balance of trade internationally. China's economy of scale has led to cheaper and competitive prices and many nations have lost their erstwhile monopoly. Previously, Malaysia trade with the US was more balanced as Malaysia used to buy a large range of manufactured products and other goods and services from the US. However, the situation has drastically changed when China began flooding its products in Malaysia. This led to Malaysia buying less from not only the US but also the EU, among others. Malaysia often lauds its favourable trade balance as an economic achievement and advantage but does not take into account the disadvantage it causes to others. For a healthy trading relationship there should not be a very wide gulf or deficit between trading partners. Another country with a perennially lopsided balance of trade with Malaysia is India. India has had an unfavourable balance of trade with Malaysia for decades. India is Malaysia's largest importer of palm oil and is one of the main countries Malaysia considers to sell off any glut arising in palm oil. This enables palm oil prices to be kept high and well above production costs. The palm oil sector has been one of the most profitable and Malaysia reaps billions of ringgit due to high prices fuelled by large scale imports by India. In fact whenever palm oil exporters get wind of prospective large scale purchase of palm oil from India due to domestic vegetable oil shortage or demand for festivals many of these exporters and speculators jack up the prices. The situation became so exploitative more than a decade ago when India decided to have a more stable palm oil pricing with a government to government arrangement with Indonesia. Needless to say Malaysia-India trade ties need to become more balanced and fair to both sides. Malaysia needs to import more from India considering the presently wide range of manufactured as well as tradition products from India. Indian investors and businesses need to reciprocate by increasing their economic activities in Malaysia and their involvement in the IT and related sectors is one way to improve the balance of trade. The Malaysian Indian community should look into good investment opportunities in Tamil Nadu as the government is providing various incentives for export-related manufacturing for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and larger firms. Alternatively, joint ventures between India and Malaysia need to be increased .This will also help redress the gap between imports and exports. Governments worldwide need to ensure that the balance of trade is fair and amicable for both sides and ensure that exploitative restrictions, over-regulation and domestic discrimination as well as unfair practices do not lead to countries reacting with higher tariffs and taxes. Trump's tariffs show how the US now unilaterally reacts to stop the disadvantages to the US economy. He has shown the way as to how to redress unfavourable trade balances with tariffs and other restrictions to save a country's economy. Tariffs will be a feature of the future with more nations feeling they are being exploited through unfair and discriminatory trade practices. Suffice to say, the days of unrestricted open markets are officially over. ‒ July 22, 2025 V. Thomas is a Focus Malaysia viewer. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: AFP/Andrew Hanik

AGC's decision not to prosecute Zamri Vinoth, Firdaus Wong is 'selective enforcement', says MIC president
AGC's decision not to prosecute Zamri Vinoth, Firdaus Wong is 'selective enforcement', says MIC president

The Star

time9 hours ago

  • The Star

AGC's decision not to prosecute Zamri Vinoth, Firdaus Wong is 'selective enforcement', says MIC president

PETALING JAYA: The Attorney General's Chambers is practising 'selective enforcement' of the law in its decision not to prosecute Zamri Vinoth and Firdaus Wong for alleged seditious and defamatory remarks, says Tan Sri SA Vigneswaran. The MIC president stated that the non-prosecution of both individuals has sparked public concern, following Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said confirmed that authorities found 'insufficient evidence'. He stated that this was despite nearly 900 police reports being lodged against Zamri over a Facebook post concerning the relocation of the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple in March 2025. Vigneswaran stressed that the 3R principle – pertaining to race, religion and royalty – 'is not a legal tool to defend the sanctity of only one religion,' but a doctrine designed to maintain religious harmony and public order in a pluralistic nation. 'To enforce the 3R doctrine only when a particular race or religion is affected, while failing to act decisively when other races or faiths are insulted, reflects a dangerous and unacceptable double standard,' he said in a statement on Tuesday (July 22). He added that such practices undermine the Federal Constitution's Article 8 on equality before the law. He questioned the AGC's conclusion, noting that Zamri's Facebook post had 'led to mass outrage,' and was 'publicly made, widely circulated, and interpreted as seditious, defamatory and inciting.' 'It is inconceivable that such conduct does not meet the legal threshold for criminal charges under the Penal Code or the Sedition Act 1948,' he said. Vigneswaran argued that prosecutions in such cases are not merely punitive, but serve as deterrence and a reaffirmation that 'no one is above the law' and that 'freedom of religion includes protection from religious defamation.' He called on the AGC to clarify its rationale, warning that public silence and inaction risk being perceived as bias and could inflame divisions in Malaysia's multiracial society. 'Selective silence is not neutrality. It is complicity. 'If the 3R doctrine is to have any meaning in today's Malaysia, it must be applied across all faiths - with fairness, firmness and integrity,' Vigneswaran added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store