
The troubling decline of the South African sorghum industry
Whenever I post about the challenges in the maize industry on X, I often see responses from people arguing that South Africans should consume more sorghum. They correctly highlight the crop's nutritional value and resilience in challenging climatic conditions.
But despite all these benefits, the sorghum industry has not taken off. The challenge is not that farmers refuse to plant it. This is due to its weak demand—consumers are not buying sorghum products like other staple grains.
The issue of weak demand partly gave farmers hope that using sorghum in biofuels would provide a much-needed market for farmers. But this venture also did not take off. Thus, sorghum production has continued to decline in South Africa.
South African farmers planted 41 150 hectares of sorghum in the 2024-25 production season, down 75% from the area we planted in 1990-91. The production is estimated at 137 970 tonnes in the current 2024-25, down by 54% from 1990-91.
This is a disappointing picture, and with the promise of the biofuel industry remaining unclear, we may continue to see small plantings for some time.
Let me take you back to 2014, an optimistic time for this crop. At the time, sorghum was one of the promising crops in South Africa's agriculture, boosted by the hope of developing the biofuel industry, creating jobs, and creating a new market for farmers, particularly black smallholder farmers.
Mabele Fuels and Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) were the first to embrace this initiative. Mabele Fuels was to build a processing plant in Bothaville, potentially creating roughly 16,700 jobs and a market for farmers in that area. Similarly, the IDC would create jobs and a much-needed market opportunity for smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape.
These plants would utilise roughly 500,000 tons of sorghum a year, triple the volume South Africa produced then. The government was the key player in creating jobs, boosting the economy, creating a market for smallholder farmers, and reviving the South African sorghum industry. Unfortunately, the government incentives fell short, and the process did not materialise.
In fact, by early 2016, it was clear that the biofuel industry was a lost dream, and farmers were opting for other opportunities, such as accessing new export markets. This was a difficult task as South Africa is not an established exporter of sorghum. South Africa's sorghum exports are concentrated in southern Africa, with key markets being Botswana and Swaziland.
Fellow agricultural economist Tinashe Kapuya and I wrote a research piece in early 2015 to identify potential new markets for South Africa's sorghum industry. We found Cameroon, Sudan, and Ethiopia to be the only attractive markets on the continent, with potential for growth and low import tariffs.
Japan and Mexico were globally identified as the large markets, with zero-rated tariffs for South African sorghum exports.
The key question that emerged from our article was whether South Africa would be competitive enough in these markets, in other words, be able to produce the required volumes at lower costs than its competitors. This was left unanswered, and some farmers were still keen to explore these opportunities until the 2015/16 drought disrupted progress.
Given the failure of the biofuel initiative, developing higher-yielding seed varieties and expanding export markets could revive the South African sorghum industry.
Globally, there is a stable demand for sorghum. Still, for South Africa to participate in such an environment, it would need to increase its volumes and be able to sell at competitive prices. This calls for more research and creative ideas to save the sorghum industry in South Africa.
Regarding the domestic demand, I am not as optimistic that consumers will switch to this crop, at least in the near term.
Wandile Sihlobo is the chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Does the 2025 Corn Crop Have a Pollination Problem?
The US ag BRACE Industry has recently been squawking about a pollination problem with the 2025 US corn crop. We can ignore this group for the most part while focusing on what the market has been and continues to tell us about REAL fundamentals. More News from Barchart Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Here we see, for whatever reason, some interest in US supply and demand next spring. Does the 2025 US corn crop have a pollination problem? This seems to be the subject du jour with nearly every ag media outlet devoting as much time and space to the subject as possible. According to most of these media accounts, the US will be lucky to harvest one truckload of corn this fall, leaving the world in a crushing supply deficit while sending the market soaring to $42[i] per bushel[ii]. Now, if you believe all this, I have a mountain-top villa in south-central Kansas to sell you. Why do I seem skeptical? After all, I'm no more an agronomist than I am an economist. But here's the thing, many of the folks who are squawking about how the sky is falling in regard to the US corn crop couldn't tell an ear of corn from a head of milo. Most of them are members in good standing of the BRACE[iii] Industry meaning they turn to whatever direction the USDA office is from them each morning and repeat their official mantra, 'Everything is always bullish'. If it wasn't a pollination problem it would be 'not enough heat units', or 'it's too hot', or 'it's too wet', or 'it's too dry', or my favorite 'the latest trade deals mean China is going to save US agriculture'. Huzzah! Huzzah!! Huzzah!!! As a former long-time member of the ag media circus turned long-term investor, I've learned to ignore nearly all of what the industry has to say. It gives me a HIT[iv] advantage to listen to what the markets are saying rather than the cacophony screeching voices always present in the background. Given all this, what is the corn market telling us in late July? As always, I'll turn to our key reads on real market supply and demand: The National Corn Index[v], national average basis[vi], and futures spreads. The National Corn Index ($CNCI) was calculated near $3.85 last Friday putting it in the lower 20% of its 5-year price distribution range[vii]. Based on the economic law of Supply and Demand, this tells us spot cash supplies are large in relation to immediate demand. National average basis was calculated last Friday at roughly 14.5 cents under September futures and 34.0 cents under December. The previous 10-year average for last week was 14.75 cents under September with the previous 5-year (and 10-year) low weekly close for the first week of September at 30.0 cents under December. Which leaves us with futures spreads. As you know, I use the price relationship between futures contracts to indicate how the commercial side is position based on its long-term fundamental outlook. A quick recap of what we've seen this past year: Dec25 corn spent the 6-month period from the first weekly close last September through the last weekly close this past February buying 2025 planted area away from the Nov25 soybean futures contract. The September corn contract, a hybrid issue[viii], showed its new-crop side during 2025 indicating those increased acres were planted early. The September-December futures spread posted a high daily close of 3.0 cents inverse on February 20, steadily falling to last Friday's close of 19.5 cents carry. Therefore, the market told us there would be more acres and those acres were planted earlier than usual. Since then, we've seen the 2025-2026 futures spreads (Dec25-Mar26 through May26-July26, summarized by the Dec25-Jul26 forward curve) tell us, to quote Paul Harvey, 'the rest of the story'. To get a better understand of what the market is saying, I track the trend[ix] of percent of calculated full commercial carry[x] covered by each spread and the forward curve. Here's what the trends have done from the first weekly close of March through late July: Dec25 (ZCZ25) -Mar26 (ZCH26) futures spread: 37% calculated full commercial carry (cfcc) to 57%. While still a neutral read, the larger percent tells us the commercial side is comfortable with the number of supplies that will be available in relation to demand during harvest. This same week last year the Dec24-Mar25 spread covered 46%. Dec25-Jul26 (ZCN26) forward curve: 30% to 47%. Again, the increase has been consistent. However, here we see a low weekly close (high percent) of 48% the second week of July. Mar26-May26 (ZCK26) and May26-Jul26 futures spreads: Here's where things get interesting as both spreads have stabilized during July. The March-May reflects the reality of bushels being tucked away over the winter, meaning demand is expected to firm against available supplies. Further out, the May-July closed last weekly covering 30% cfcc as compared to its low two weeks prior of 35% and 36% the same week last year. Is the lower percent due to tighter supplies tied to pollination? Is it due to increased demand from ethanol, feed, and exports? All are possible. The reality is we don't know. What we do know is the commercial side is keeping a close eye on longer-term supply AND demand. This past week I had the privilege of participating in Barchart's Grain Merchandising & Technology meetings in Ames, Iowa and Manhattan. At the Ames meeting, the other guest grains analyst Thomas Call, Senior Consultant of Commodity Risk at Mid-Co Commodities talked about how the corn market didn't seem to have much downside risk at current[xi] levels and seasonal tendencies. I agree, based on my price distribution study and seasonal studies for December corn futures. At last Friday's close, Dec25 was in the lower 23% of its 5-year range. At the Manhattan meeting Guy Allen, Senior Economist at Kansas State University discussed how corn could soon start to rally. As I've talked about over the past year, from an investment point of view, the Dec corn only continuous monthly chart showed a buy signal at the close of August 2024 with another possible at the end of this month, if Dec25 finishes above its June settlement of $4.2550. So, does the 2025 US corn crop have a pollination problem? Maybe. Or maybe not. I'll counter the braying BRACE Industry with this question: Does it matter? Recall Market Rule #5: It's the what, not the why. The 'what' in late July is commercial interests have been providing longer-term support. We'll see what happens over the coming months. [i] According to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, '42' is the answer to everything. A tip of the hat to Scott K., one of my former editors back in the newsroom. [ii] No, the US could never figure out the metric system the rest of the world uses. [iii] BRACE = Brokers/Reporters/Analysts/Commentators/Economists who as a group have never met a USDA statistic they won't quote or a make-believe story they won't pass along. [iv] Hedging-Investing-Trading [v] National average cash price, intrinsic value of the market [vi] National Corn Index minus futures [vii] Based on weekly closes only. This shows us how often a market or contract posts a weekly close above or below certain price levels over a set period of time. It's based on the idea there was value in knowing the upper and lower 33%. What I find more important is what it says about a market when we apply the economic Law of Supply and Demand. [viii] Part old-crop, part new-crop [ix] Simply price direction over time. No extravagant technical analysis necessary. [x] The total cost, storage and interest, to hold supplies in commercial storage. The storage rate is set by the CME with interest the sum of the 90-day SOFR rate + 2.2125 percent. [xi] Sorry Tony D. On the date of publication, Darin Newsom did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
US and EU agree trade deal - with bloc facing 15% tariffs on goods into America
The United States and European Union have reached an agreement on a trade deal, says Donald Trump. The announcement was made as the US president met European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen at one of his golf resorts in Scotland. Speaking after talks in Turnberry, Mr Trump said it was the "biggest deal ever made" and will be "great for cars" as well as having a "big impact" on agriculture. The US will impose 15% tariffs on EU goods entering America, after Mr Trump had threatened a 30% levy. He said there will be $600bn of EU investment in the US, the bloc will buy $750bn in US energy and will also purchase US military equipment. Ms von der Leyen said it was a "good deal" which will bring stability. She said the agreement would include 15% tariffs across the board, and it would help rebalance trade between the two large trading partners. Mr Trump had earlier said the main sticking point was "fairness", citing barriers to US exports of cars and agriculture. He went into the talks demanding fairer trade with the 27-member EU and threatening steep tariffs to achieve that, while insisting the US will not go below 15% import taxes. For months, Mr Trump has threatened most of the world with large tariffs in the hope of shrinking major US trade deficits with many key trading partners, including the EU. In case there was no deal and the US had imposed 30% tariffs from 1 August, the EU has prepared counter-tariffs on €93bn (£81bn) of US goods. Ahead of their meeting on Sunday, Ms von der Leyen described Mr Trump as a "tough negotiator and dealmaker". This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.


Bloomberg
12 hours ago
- Bloomberg
South Africa Approves $5.3 Billion Guarantees for Transnet Debt
South Africa's government approved 94.8 billion rand ($5.3 billion) in guarantees to further support state-owned rail and port operator Transnet SOC Ltd. The allocation includes 48.6 billion rand to ensure all of the company's debt redemptions will be covered over the next five years, the Department of Transport said in a statement on Sunday. The other 46.2 billion rand is to mitigate the risks of credit-ratings downgrades on Transnet's debt.