logo
NY Times reporter filed HR complaint because editor threatened to ‘kill' him over story length

NY Times reporter filed HR complaint because editor threatened to ‘kill' him over story length

Business Mayor08-05-2025
The latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US
A New York Times reporter got into an 'epic blow-up' with his editor over a recent story about Harvard that resulted in the reporter filing a human resources complaint because he felt the editor threatened to 'kill' him if his initial draft was too long.
Before the Times published a triple-bylined report last month about some of Harvard's most prominent donors wanting to 'strike a deal' rather than fight the Trump administration, the high-stakes nature of the story resulted in tensions that boiled over as the deadline approached.
The incident was first reported by the Breaker newsletter. The Independent , meanwhile, was able to corroborate Breaker's report with three additional sources.
'According to two people familiar with the matter, [reporter Rob] Copeland and the New York Times business editor Ellen Pollock had an epic blow-up before the Harvard story ran,' Breaker noted. 'It resulted in a HR complaint about a 'death threat' and…Copeland taking time out from the paper.'
Copeland, the author of a bestselling book on famed Wall Street hedge-fund manager Ray Dalio, had drawn the ire of Pollock over delays in the story, prompting her to call him and his editor, Michael Corkery, into her office to hash it out. The story was seen as especially sensitive within the Times as many of the paper's reporters and alumni attended the prestigious Ivy League school. New York Times reporter Rob Copeland went to HR after editor Ellen Pollock said she'd 'kill' him if his draft on a high-stakes Harvard story was over 2000 words. (Getty Images)
According to sources familiar with the situation, Pollock yelled at Copeland for not staying on task and following her directions, eventually resulting in her telling the reporter that she would 'kill' him, Corkery, and herself if his draft came in over 2,000 words. Read More M&S marks 20 years of Gastropub range with Tom Kerridge ad
The tense argument and aftermath soon became the talk of the Grey Lady's newsroom, with one version spreading throughout the halls that threats of shooting were made during the heated dispute, though our sources note that this was not accurate.
For the most part, Times sources that spoke to The Independent indicated that Pollock was almost certainly joking when she issued her supposed 'death threat' to Copeland, something that isn't out of character for the highly respected journalist. At the same time, many reporters at the paper were 'baffled' that Copeland escalated the matter to HR.
'Ellen is a great journalist with a very direct approach, and most people who work for her understand that it's in the service of getting the best story,' one staffer said.
'Yes, obviously there was no way that Ellen was going to pull off a murder-suicide at The Times without clearing it with the masthead first,' the same staffer snarked when asked about the nature of Pollock's 'threat' to Copeland.
In the end, it was apparent that Copeland didn't see the humor in Pollock's and told her that she had committed an 'HR violation' and promptly filed a complaint. In the end, the veteran editor apologized.
' The Times is committed to fostering a productive and supportive workplace, and takes seriously all matters related to how our staff works together,' a New York Times spokesperson said in a statement.
As for the final product, the story – which Copeland co-wrote with Maureen Farrell and Michael Schmidt – came in at 2,282 words. 'Copeland, Corkery and Pollock remained alive at the time of our publication,' Breaker cheekily noted in their report. Read More Craft Media appoints Media Week Podcast host head of planning
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mike Khouw on a hedging strategy with the market at record highs and some threats emerging
Mike Khouw on a hedging strategy with the market at record highs and some threats emerging

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Mike Khouw on a hedging strategy with the market at record highs and some threats emerging

Slightly over a year ago, CNN hosted a debate between then-President Joe Biden and Former (and current) President Donald Trump. President Biden's approval rating heading into the debate was already low. The Pew Research Center's survey in April of 2024 showed that the number of U.S. adults who disapproved of his performance as President vastly outnumbered those who approved. Times/Siena polls suggested Trump led Biden by about 3% among likely voters ahead of the debate, and that lead widened to 6% after Biden's poor peformance and ultimately, he bowed to pressure from his own party to withdraw from the race. It was at this point, when the prospect of Trump returning to the White House went from possibility to probability, that economists and investors really began to weigh in on the implications of "Trumponomics" 2.0. Much of what was published at the time expressed significant concerns about some of his proposals, so much so that on July 11th, 2024, the Economist published an opinion piece entitled, "Trumponomics would not be as bad as most expect." The authors taking a fairly balanced view said, "Mr. Trump and his advisers have many rotten ideas. They also have some decent ones." This week marked two milestones. It has been six months since Mr. Trump was once again sworn in as president of the United States, and the S & P 500 just hit another all-time high. We are also kicking off the first earnings season, where publicly traded companies will report a full quarter's worth of operating results under the new administration. .SPX 1Y mountain S & P 500 , 1 year During this period, the markets experienced historic volatility induced by policy proposals. However, did the chaos we observed in stock prices reflect chaos in corporate operating results? Early indications from both economic data and the ~10% of the Russell 3000 that have reported so far since July 1st are actually pretty good. A higher percentage of companies that have reported since July 1st of this year gave a positive revenue surprise, a smaller percentage reported a negative earnings surprise, the percentage above consensus for both revenues and earnings is higher this year, and earnings have averaged 10.9% growth YoY, well above long-term growth rates. So was The Economist right? Here are some points to consider. While tariff threats have been substantial, we still don't know where exactly that will land. The government has benefited from additional tariff revenue, and some price increases are being seen. One potential reason revenues and earnings could rise is that businesses are pricing products in anticipation of tariffs, but due to delays, the impact has not yet been fully felt. Economists warned of another inflationary impact. Cracking down on illegal immigration would increase labor costs. So far, this too does not appear to be creating huge disruptions, but while border crossings have slowed to a trickle, deportations, while causing a bit of a political firestorm in some cities, have a real impact that is muted because, by its own reckoning, the White House claims 100,000 deportations since January 20th. At that pace, the administration won't be able to deport even 10% of those who entered the country illegally under Biden, and because they are (supposedly) focusing on criminals, those deportations are not likely to impact wages paid at legitimate industries (yet). While the White House has been highly critical of Fed rate policy generally and Chairman Jerome Powell specifically, and the next appointee is likely to be more aligned with Trump's rate wishes, FOMC rate policy is still by committee. History has not been kind to political interference in central banking activities, and it's likely that even if the new chairman adopts a more dovish stance, the FOMC will remember the mistakes the Fed made during the Arthur Burns era. If they do vote to cut rates, I believe it will be based on inflation and employment data, not White House rhetoric. Deficits remain a complete disaster. Where in the past the predominant parties would at least pay lip service by either demanding higher taxes or lower spending, that appears to be out the window in DC these days. Valuations in several sectors are well above long-term averages relative to the market and to their own sector history. The most notable exception is healthcare. Time to hedge? Any or all of these factors could reemerge as a threat to equities, and while there are still several weeks until Labor Day, it's worth remembering that September and October are months that have seen significant volatility in past years. With the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) just over 15 as I write this, below the 10-year average of 18.6 and in the 39th percentile, now might be a good time to consider adding some hedges, either to high-flying constituents of one's portfolio via put spreads or, more generally, by purchasing some relatively low cost put spreads on an equity market proxy, such as SPDR S & P 500 ETF Trust (SPY). For example, the Sep 30th, month-ending 630/600 put spread, which expires in 67 days costs less than 1% of the underlying. DISCLOSURES: (None) All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer.

Democratic Party's autopsy report of 2024 election will avoid asking if Harris should have run
Democratic Party's autopsy report of 2024 election will avoid asking if Harris should have run

Fox News

time3 hours ago

  • Fox News

Democratic Party's autopsy report of 2024 election will avoid asking if Harris should have run

A Democratic National Committee "autopsy" of the 2024 election will reportedly ignore reviews of the presidential campaigns, according to a recent report on Saturday. New York Times journalists Reid J. Epstein and Shane Goldmacher reported what is being described by party officials as an "after-action review" of what went wrong in the election. However, the review is expected to focus more on outside groups and super PACs and how they spent money on advertising and other voter turnout efforts. Top Democrats informed Epstein and Goldmacher that the report was not expected to look at any strategic decisions made by the campaign, such as whether then-President Joe Biden should have stayed in the race or dropped out sooner, and if then-Vice President Kamala Harris was the best person to run in his place. The "autopsy" is also expected to avoid any campaign decisions by the Harris team, such as repeatedly referring to her opponent, President Donald Trump, as a fascist. "Party officials described the draft document as focusing on the 2024 election as a whole, but not on the presidential campaign — which is something like eating at a steakhouse and then reviewing the salad," they wrote. The report, which was first launched in March, is still under review by Democratic operative Paul Rivera. Rivera has so far conducted more than 200 interviews with officials from all 50 states. Despite avoiding key questions about the campaign, DNC officials were optimistic about the report's upcoming results. "The D.N.C.'s post-election review is not a finger-pointing exercise; it's about bringing together Democrats across the ecosystem to adopt an actionable playbook to win, not just for 2026 and 2028, but to dominate for cycles to come," DNC spokesperson Rosemary Boeglin told the New York Times. "Democrats are cleareyed about the challenges facing the party — many of which are rooted well before the 2024 cycle — and it requires all of us to make structural changes in how we run campaigns." Fox News Digital reached out to the DNC for comment. The Democratic National Committee has been under controversy recently with multiple resignations and party infighting. Last month, American Federation of Teachers (AFT) chief Randi Weingarten and Lee Saunders, President of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, resigned from their positions, citing a problem with party leadership.

‘We're able to explore more behaviors a lot more quickly': How one local robotics company uses AI
‘We're able to explore more behaviors a lot more quickly': How one local robotics company uses AI

Boston Globe

time5 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

‘We're able to explore more behaviors a lot more quickly': How one local robotics company uses AI

Harvard for investigating its 'continued eligibility' for a program that gives visas to international students and faculty. Columbia to restore its federal funding after the administration accused it of allowing antisemitism. President Trump's name appears in documents related to Jeffrey Epstein that his administration is refusing to release, . Separately, a House committee voted to subpoena and files from the administration, while a judge rejected an administration request to unseal other documents in the case. Two fired Market Basket executives accused the grocery chain's board of dismissing them Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT In conversations about artificial intelligence, the future tense tends to get a workout. Will AI lead to mass layoffs? Which AI company will end up on top? Will the US's new AI strategy, which the White House Yet for many Americans, AI is already a daily reality. AI-powered chatbots provide customer service, That's also true for local businesses. Earlier this year, the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce was looking for ways to help firms navigate AI adoption. 'People seem to be hungry for, 'Well, how are other people using it?'' said Jim Rooney, who leads the Boston Chamber. Advertisement Rooney's solution was a survey. The anonymized results, I wanted to better understand what local businesses' use of AI looks like in practice. Today's newsletter is the first in a two-part series about what I found. Advertisement Better, faster, smarter When I visited Piaggio Fast Forward on a recent Friday, the Charlestown-based robotics company's brick-walled offices were largely devoid of people. But they were populated by something else: a fleet of squat, rotund machines. This was the gita (pronounced like a Bostonian saying Derek Jeter's surname), which Piaggio unveiled in 2019. Essentially a backpack on wheels, the gita mini and gita plus — and stores groceries, gear, or other cargo beneath a central hatch. The robot's camera and sensors detect color and depth, which, with the push of a button and a warbly chime, lets it 'pair' with a specific person and automatically trundle along behind them during errands. The experience feels like having R2-D2 at your heels. (The resemblance is no longer implicit; Piaggio recently reached a licensing agreement with Lucasfilm and Disney to sell $2,875 gita mini s that So where does AI come in? When Tyson Phillips first joined Piaggio to lead its research and development team, the technology wasn't on the menu. But about two and a half years ago, he came to see it as a necessity. Phillips's engineers built their own AI models to help train the company's robots to interact with people and the environment. 'It's actually very difficult to program a robot to do something,' Phillips said. 'AI is shortening that process a lot.' To train the machines, Phillips invites paid human guinea pigs into a high-ceilinged space in Piaggio's offices. Its floor features lines of colorful tape, mannequins, and other obstacles that simulate what a robot might encounter in the outside world, like doors, walls, and people. Using motion capture cameras, Phillips records the volunteers navigating those obstacles, then distills the data into algorithms to program the robots. Advertisement A Piaggio Fast Forward employee presses a button to "pair" with one of the robotics company's gitamini robots. David L. Ryan/Globe Staff Part of AI's advantage is that it isn't human. Where a flesh-and-blood observer might write off a volunteer's subtle turn or weight shift while opening a door as intuitive, AI can recognize such moves as potentially valuable datapoints. 'With AI tools, we are hoping to identify those much smaller, more nuanced behaviors,' Phillips said. And for a relatively small company like Piaggio, the added analytical firepower helps. 'We're able to explore more behaviors a lot more quickly.' That has come in handy to train Piaggio's other robot, kilo, which looks a bit like if Apple designed a flatbed cart. Built for warehouses and factory floors, kilo 'I think we'll use it to allow us to explore situations that we would've been previously uncomfortable in,' he said. Evolutionary vs. revolutionary Piaggio isn't alone. 'Every robotics company's using AI in some way,' Phillips told me. Yet some prognosticators worry that widespread adoption will cause layoffs, particularly among coders. So far, Piaggio says, AI hasn't replaced anyone on Phillips's team, which includes people with backgrounds in AI as well as in biomechanics and neuroscience. In the Boston Chamber's survey, just 7 percent of companies reported job reductions because of AI. Advertisement Instead, just as Piaggio's robots are designed to work alongside people, Phillips hopes that AI will supplement rather than supplant. His engineers still develop algorithms by hand, using AI to check their work. 'We have an idea, we test it, we check it with AI, we tweak the original idea, we tweak the AI, and it bounces back and forth,' he said. Still, that collaborative spirit helps explain why Piaggio's use of AI is mostly evolutionary, facilitating its business without radically reshaping it. But there are companies in Greater Boston trying to use the technology in more revolutionary ways. Next week, in part two of this series, I'll explore that. Related: As Massachusetts lawmakers try to lure AI data centers, environmental advocates from elsewhere warn that the centers 🧩 9 Across: 90° POINTS OF INTEREST UNITE HERE Local 26 represents Fenway Park concession workers who are threatening to strike. Cassandra Klos/Bloomberg Receipts: Massachusetts lawmakers say court-appointed lawyers should've asked the Legislature for raises sooner, rather than launching a work stoppage that has paralyzed state courts. Emails show the attorneys have been asking Labor dispute: Fenway Park concession workers Piling up: Boston 'Pawtriots': The Patriots' first day of training camp saw the team practicing without pads — Advertisement Feeling better: Eight members of a Parisian youth choir are OK Dwight Evans: The former Red Sox right fielder has another shot at making the Hall of Fame this year. Grant Watch: How a researcher from Medfield created the go-to database Changing the subject: Trump and Tulsi Gabbard, his national intelligence director, baselessly claim that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and other Democrats plotted a 'coup' against Trump years ago and that they could face criminal charges. ( Wares the beef: Beef prices are climbing across the country as drought Sentenced: A judge gave Bryan Kohberger life in prison without the possibility of parole for killing four University of Idaho students in 2022. The victims' family members excoriated Kohberger. ( BESIDE THE POINT 🌽 Cultivating community: An 18th-century farm is flourishing 🎙️ Big deal: 'The Big Dig,' GBH and PRX's nine-episode series about the infamous Boston megaproject, made Time magazine's list of the 100 best podcasts of all time. ( 🤦🏻‍♀️ A Miss Conduct classic: Their neighbors' floodlights shine directly into their bedroom. The neighbors 🐻 'Da Pope': A Chicago family on vacation gave Pope Leo XIV a T-shirt inspired by the nickname for the city's NFL team. ( Advertisement 📺 Don't be a Debbie Downer: 'SNL' alumna Rachel Dratch discusses 💃 A step ahead: A Boston soul line dancing group is 🎶 Don't worry: Does live music at Logan baggage claim actually reduce travel stress? Thanks for reading Starting Point. This newsletter was edited by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store