'Illegal' drugs sale case: Enforcement Directorate raids de-addiction centres in Punjab, Maharashtra
Actors, anchors, TV hosts among 29 booked by ED for promoting illegal betting apps
'The federal probe agency's investigation stems from various FIRs filed by Punjab Police against a doctor named Amit Bansal, a pharmaceutical company, a drugs inspector and some others. Amit Bansal runs 22 drugs de-addiction centres across Punjab,' the sources said.
'The raids are being conducted in Chandigarh, Ludhiana and Barnala in Punjab and in Mumbai, Maharashtra, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA),' they said.
ED searches multiple locations in Delhi over cyber fraud case involving Chinese national
Sources said private de-addiction centres like the ones run by Bansal have been entrusted by the Punjab government to provide BNX (Buprenorphine/Naloxone) medicine to patients, enrolled in their facilities, so that they can be weaned away from narcotics.
It was found that these medicines meant for rehabilitation of drug addicts were being taken in "excess" quantity for a "new kind of drug abuse", they said. The sources claimed Bansal, through his de-addiction centres, "misused" the facilities and was involved in "illegal" sale of such drugs.
Seat blocking scam: ED raids three engineering colleges in Bengaluru, seizes ₹1.37 crore in cash
A drugs inspector named Rupinder Kaur is being searched as the official allegedly assisted Bansal in forwarding incorrect inspection report related to pilferage of medicine from his hospitals, the sources said.
A phrama company named Rusan Phrama Limited, manufacturer of BNX, was also covered during the action, they said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
ED opposes M3M director's plea to quash graft FIR: ‘Don't need sanction to prosecute private person'
The Enforcement Directorate Tuesday opposed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court a plea moved by M3M Director Roop Bansal seeking to quash a corruption case registered against him for allegedly conspiring to bribe a trial court judge. In the case, Bansal is booked under Sections 7, 8, 11 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) along with Section 120-B of the IPC. Bansal's lawyers contended that the proceedings were invalid due to the absence of sanction required under Section 17A of the PCA to prosecute the judge allegedly linked to the bribery. The counsel argued that a person could not be prosecuted solely under Section 120-B for criminal conspiracy unless tried alongside the public servant accused, and that without sanction against the judge, the entire case stood vitiated. Countering this, senior panel counsel Zoheb Hossain, appearing with Lokesh Narang for the ED, contended that the plea of want of sanction was not available to Bansal as he was a private individual, not a public servant. The ED further submitted that even if proceedings against a public servant were barred for lack of sanction, it would not automatically nullify the prosecution of private individuals accused of aiding, abetting, or conspiring to commit offences under the PCA or under Section 120-B of the IPC. After Chief Justice Sheel Nagu had recused from hearing the matter as he had dealt with it on administrative side, Bansal's plea was listed before Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing virtually for the petitioner, sought an adjournment due to network issues. Considering the request, the bench adjourned the matter to July 30 for final arguments. The corruption FIR quashing plea in Roop Bansal vs State of Haryana has seen unusual twists and turns. It was first listed before Justice Anoop Chitkara in October 2023. After change in roster, the matter was listed before Justice NS Shekhawat who recused from hearing the case in January this year. The matter was then listed before Justice Kaul, before whom it was dismissed as withdrawn. It then went to Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu, who heard the matter and reserved for judgment on May 2, with pronouncement due on May 12, when the Chief Justice, citing 'the interest of the institution' and the need to 'preserve and protect the reputation and dignity' of Justice Sindhu, reassigned it to himself on May 10. This case was assigned to Justice Kaul after Chief Justice Nagu recused himself from hearing it on July 3, citing the need to uphold the principle that justice must not only be done but 'should also appear to have been done.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
ICICI-Videocon loan probe: PMLA appellate body upholds ED's property seizure in case against Chanda Kochhar
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act has allowed the seizure of properties in a case involving former ICICI Bank chief executive Chanda Kochhar , her husband Deepak Kochhar and Videocon Group promoter Venugopal Dhoot , overturning a ruling of the Adjudicating Authority to release its order on an appeal filed by the Enforcement Directorate that had attached the properties, the tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority "ignored crucial evidence" and based its ruling on "irrelevant considerations", particularly on the role of Deepak Kochhar in managing NuPower Renewables (NRPL) and a Rs 64 crore loan that the company received from Videocon-linked to the investigating agencies - ED and the CBI - this ₹ 64 crore was a quid pro quid for helping the Videocon Group get a loan from ICICI Bank where Deepak Kochhar's wife was a top executive. The Kochhars and Dhoot have denied the tribunal said the Adjudicating Authority placed undue emphasis on the shareholding structure of NRPL while overlooking material facts, including the control exercised by Deepak Kochhar as its managing director. On paper, the transfer of funds to NRPL may have been shown as from one Videocon Group company to another, "but if the veil is lifted, the affairs were under control of Deepak Kochhar", the tribunal said in its order pronounced tribunal ruled that the property transactions, including the transfer of a flat at CCI Chambers in South Mumbai were "nothing but proceeds of crime ". It noted that the flat purchased by a Videocon-linked entity for ₹3.25 crore was transferred to a family trust associated with Deepak Kochhar for just ₹11 rejected the defence's claim that the sanctioning of the loan to the Videocon Group was a collective decision at ICICI Bank, saying that Chanda Kochhar's active role, lack of disclosure and urgency in approving the loan raised serious concerns. It said as per rules, Chanda Kochhar should not have attended the meeting of a committee that cleared the loan, but she not only participated but also sanctioned the loan under the urgent category."This is taken to be nothing but commission of crime which includes even the offence under Section 420 IPC (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property)," the order upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision declining to confirm the attachment of ₹ 10.5 lakh seized during a raid on a Kochhar-linked company but confirmed the provisional attachment of all other that it did not find any illegality in the attachment, the tribunal said it "rather find perverse finding in the hands of the Adjudicating Authority on all the issues relevant to the case".
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Bihar EOU arrests a man in connection with ₹101 crore embezzlement
Bihar Economic Offences Unit (EOU) on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) arrested Mohammed Syed Shahnawaz Wazi a resident of Patna under Khajekalan police station in connection with embezzlement of ₹101.67 crore. EOU Additional Director General (ADG) Nayyar Hasnain Khan told The Hindu that Mr. Wazi was working as assistant branch manager and branch manager in Awami Cooperative Bank, Pirbahore from the year 1998 to the year 2013. He added that by criminal conspiracy in connivance with other employees of bank, officials and employees of Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India, agents and brokers of LIC, by preparing fake LIC policies and opening fake loan accounts, a total of ₹18.17 crores of deposit amount / public money was embezzled by fraud and forgery. In this regard, Pirbahore (Patna) Police Station Case No. 229/21 was registered, which was investigated by the EOU in the year 2024. According to EOU, Wazi, as Branch Manager, Vaishali Sahakari Vikas Cooperative Bank, Hajipur from the year 2014 to 2023, by hatching a criminal conspiracy in connivance with other employees by preparing fake LIC policies and documents of Bear House / Cold Storage, embezzled ₹83.50 crore by fraud and forgery of public money. Hajipur City Police Station had lodged three cases against him which were being investigated by the EOU. 'In the four cases, about ₹101 crore rupees deposited by common citizens in the banks were embezzled on a large scale. Mr. Wazi is the main accused in this. Earlier also a criminal case related to embezzlement was found registered against in the year 2013,' Mr. Khan said. According to EOU, Mr. Wazi was absconding in these cases for the last 4 years and Enforcement Case Information Reports (ECIR) under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) has also been registered in this case by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Mr. Khan also informed that on the basis of evidence found in the primary interrogation of Wazi, two of his associates have been arrested by the special team of EOU. They have been identified as Shaukat Ali and Rajnikant alias Gopal Prasad, both are residents of Patna. 'In the course of the investigation so far, it has come to light that apart from the main accused of this case, employees and other agents of Awami Cooperative Bank, Pirbahore, Vaishali Cooperative Bank, Cooperative Bank Hajipur, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Patna office and many brokers are also involved in this criminal conspiracy, against whom further action is being taken,' Mr. Khan said.
