Steve Reed is leading a campaign of disinformation on Scottish water
Our water is cheaper – we pay much less for our water than people in England and Wales. And our water is cleaner – 87% is judged to be either 'high' or 'good' quality by our environmental regulator, Sepa.
READ MORE: Broadcast watchdog called in over Labour's 'misleading' Scottish water claim
Any profit that Scottish Water makes off our bills is invested in making improvements to its infrastructure – rather than lining the pockets of shareholders.
The benefits of Scotland's approach were outlined this week in the Independent Water Commission's recent report into the water industry in England and Wales. It gave special mention to the way we manage our water sector – specifically highlighting the way the Scottish Government works as good practice.
The report also draws attention to our long-term vision, the ongoing flexibility in our investment programme, our approach to sharing costs across generations and our ethical-based regulation model – which ensures we deliver the best outcomes possible for the public.
But you wouldn't have heard of this if you listened to the UK Environment Secretary Steve Reed talking about it.
Instead, he has taken to the airwaves with a campaign of disinformation about Scotland, designed to undermine the idea of public ownership of water.
You might expect this from a Tory politician, but the last time I checked, this UK Government was meant to be a Labour government.
Mr Reed's repeated assertion that pollution in Scotland's rivers is worse than England is simply wrong. The independent report commissioned by his own department clearly shows that is not the case, noting that 66% of Scotland's water bodies are of good ecological status as compared with 16.1% in England.
Even allowing for differences in the timeframe for those figures, it is clear that Scotland has far higher water quality.
Much of the improvement is due to significant investment in the water industry and efforts made by Sepa to address pollution from other sources
In fact, we take the issue of pollution so seriously that we have already committed up to £500 million to further improve water quality, specifically to increase monitoring of the highest priority waters and tackle debris and spills.
While companies in Labour-run England aren't delivering for anybody except shareholders, Scottish Water has been labelled the UK's top-performing water company and as the most trusted utility in the UK according to the Customer Service Institute.
READ MORE: SNP minister calls on UK counterpart to retract 'misleading' Scottish water comments
There is much we have to be proud of when it comes to our water. There is also a lot that others can learn from the Scottish Government's approach to managing the sector.
However, we are not complacent.
Like the rest of the UK, Scotland shares pressures relating to ageing assets and climate change and we will need to do more and more to manage this.
But if we're going to make progress and deliver the best outcome for households and businesses, that has to start with an understanding of the facts.
So we'll leave Labour to explain to people in England and Wales why they can't have what people have in SNP-run Scotland – and we'll get on with ensuring that our natural resources truly benefit the people of Scotland.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
ICE is recruiting agents with ads, incentives. Sheriffs aren't happy.
"America needs you," reads one of the ICE recruiting ads, featuring a finger-pointing Uncle Sam, evoking WWI recruiting posters. "America has been invaded by criminals and predators. We need YOU to get them out." The federal spending plan funds the hiring of 10,000 new ICE agents, making ICE the single-largest law enforcement agency in the country, larger than the FBI, DEA, ATF and other agencies combined. For comparison, the FBI only has about 13,700 special agents, according to the Department of Justice. Even before the new hires take their posts, the dramatic expansion of public ICE operations has upset communities from coast to coast, and raised questions about the tactics agents have used as they've chased suspects across Home Depot parking lots, farm fields and into medical buildings. The aggressive recruitment efforts have also angered local sheriffs worried that deputies in already understaffed offices will be lured away by the big bonuses and higher pay. "It is tone deaf and reflects a total lack of judgment and character on their part," Jonathan Thompson, the executive director and CEO of the National Sheriff's Association, said of a recruiting offer emailed to local deputies nationwide. "This is either galactically stupid or purposefully malicious. You're just robbing Peter to pay Paul. And in this case, you're robbing the poorest of Peter to pay the richest of Paul." Massive media blitz, incentives and job offers Bolstered by new staffing, federal officials have promised to further flood Democrat-run cities with deportation officers in response to a lack of cooperation in executing Trump's get-tough approach that has targeted undocumented immigrations with or without criminal records. The Department of Homeland Security has already begun hiring for the new jobs. Federal officials are planning a massive social media blitz to reach recruits, potentially advertising on YouTube and SnapChat, but also on connected TVs via Hulu and Amazon Prime. In addition to the signing bonuses, ICE is offering up to $60,000 in student loan forgiveness, although applicants don't need to have college degrees to be considered for some of the jobs. ICE officials on July 31 announced they've made 1,000 job offers since Trump signed the funding law. Among those receiving job offers are retired ICE agents who quit during the Biden administration, said acting ICE Director Todd M. Lyons in a statement. "They couldn't do the jobs they signed up to do," Lyons said. "Now, people are lining up to work with us because they know our officers and agents are allowed to enforce immigration law fairly and across the board, and that's a cause people really believe in." Applicants 'should expect a certain level of risk' White House officials say there's been an 830% increase in assaults against agents through July 14th, compared with the same period last year, and the recruiting materials say applicants "should expect a certain level of risk," but that they will be trained to take "every precaution" in remaining safe. How quickly ICE can bring aboard the new employees remains uncertain. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has long struggled to hire Border Patrol agents, who typically take more than 300 days to bring aboard, according to a 2024 GAO study. Joe Gamaldi, the national vice president of the Fraternal Order of Police union, said he suspects ICE will face the same recruiting challenges as local departments. He said years of demonizing law enforcement by some politicians, activists and media has created a "toxic cocktail" that will make hiring challenging. "Truth be told, all police agencies are competing for a small pool of people who are still willing to serve and literally die for their communities," he said. "Bonuses and better pay will help, but ultimately police officers, and those interested in police work, want to serve for an agency and communities that appreciate them and don't treat them like scum." Local sheriffs furious about ICE recruitment efforts The aggressive hiring efforts have frustrated local law enforcement leaders who worry their officers will flock to better-paying federal jobs. Without telling local sheriffs in advance, ICE officials directly emailed recruitment offers to hundreds of deputies across the country. Thompson, of the National Sheriff's Association, said sheriffs feel betrayed by the move. Thompson said sheriffs agreed to send deputies to special immigration enforcement training designed for local police, only to then have ICE try to simply poach them away. "It's become a wildfire of discontent, and not how partners treat partners," he said. "This is an embarrassment to this president, and it's sad." Thompson said some sheriff's offices currently have vacancies of 40% and predicted the ICE hiring spree could further winnow the ranks of local law enforcement. Other policing experts have raised concerns about the risks of hiring so quickly. National-security expert and commentator Garrett Graf, who investigated Border Patrol hiring surges after 9/11, said in a Substack post that ICE risks a surge of applications from Americans "specifically attracted by the rough-em-up, masked secret police tactics, no-holds-barred lawlessness that ICE has pursued since January." Graff added: "If you're excited to dress up like you're taking Fallujah for a raid of hard-working roofers in the Home Depot parking lot, working for ICE or CBP shouldn't be for you."
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Reeves couldn't be more proud of crippling the economy
Rachel Reeves strode onto the stage at the Edinburgh festival in a black jumpsuit and an orange scarf. Iain Dale, in a dark maroon jacket, kicked with a dare. 'Try, if you can, not to use the phrase '13 wasted Tory years' or '22 billion pound black hole.'' 'What else am I going to talk about?' said Reeves. She's a much warmer and funnier soul than her TV image suggests. Dale asked about the awkward moment when she wept during PMQs in June. 'I was having a bit of a day, a difficult day at work,' she said vaguely. 'There was stuff going on. But it's different for me. The cameras are on me. But most people have days at work when they cry.' Dale asked if her troubles had been exacerbated by the Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, who mentioned in the chamber that she 'was looking miserable.' 'Well, it was a fact, wasn't it,' said Reeves. So why not just skip PMQs? asked Dale. 'I thought I was OK,' she said. 'Obviously, I wasn't. But I thought I was.' Dale asked about her childhood and her early involvement in politics. Her parents were primary school teachers who voted Labour but weren't party members. Aged 17, appalled by the ruinous state of her school, she decided to join the Bromley Labour party. 'The playground was freezing in winter and the library had been converted into a classroom. There just weren't enough textbooks to go round.' She was inspired by Blair's slogan, 'education, education, education' and she campaigned in the 1997 election alongside her younger sister, Ellie, now an MP and chair of the Labour party. At university, she was known as a political wonk and her friends bought her a framed portrait of Gordon Brown for her 19th birthday. The chancellorship, she said, was always in her sights. 'The office has existed for 800 years and it's about time we had a female chancellor. But it shouldn't have taken 800 years.' After Labour's victory last July, she invited Brown to the Treasury which he hadn't visited since 2007. She asked him how old he was when he became chancellor. He told her he couldn't remember. 'I'm only 46,' she said. This jogged his memory. 'Well, I was 45.' Dale asked if Brown likes to call her and offer political advice. 'He doesn't phone,' she said. 'He sends me emails with quite a lot of capital letters.' And does he point out her mistakes? 'No. But he does have a lot of ideas,' she said diplomatically. Brown isn't the only former chancellor who wants access to his successor. She's on friendly terms with Rishi Sunak's chancellor, Jeremy Hunt. 'Jeremy's been in Number 11 a couple of times, had a cup of tea with me, and given good advice.' Dale asked if she expected to meet Donald Trump on his forthcoming state visit and she didn't seem to care either way. 'I suppose so,' she said, airily. 'I met Macron a few weeks ago.' Did she have a message for Trump? She ducked the question and praised her own government. 'We've got our trade deal with the US. One of the best trade deals in the world. At the G7, all the finance ministers want to find out how we got our trade deal.' Dale invited her to say a word in favour of Brexit which enabled the UK to dodge the tariffs levied by America on the EU. She refused to do so. Instead she talked about the levels of global investment arriving in Britain. She mentioned a figure of '£125 billion' but much of this involves carbon capture and renewables produced by GB Energy. The funds are being underwritten by state subsidies. 'We're investing public money to leverage in that private money,' she said. In other words, foreign investors are being bribed to set up shop in the UK. But she likes anything that involves net zero. She regards the Labour party as the saviour of this self-harming energy policy. 'The Tories legislated for [net zero] but are rowing back on it. And Reform are coming out with all sorts of conspiracy theories.' Asked if she regretted any part of her 2024 budget, she gave herself a glowing review. She even praised the wildly unpopular National Insurance rise because it allowed her to sink an extra £25 billion in the NHS. The UK economy is in great shape, she seems to believe. And she twice quoted this odd-looking statistic. 'In the first quarter of this year, the UK had the fastest growing economy in the G7.' Dale asked about Your Party (or 'Jezbollah' as he called it) created by Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Sultana. Reeves laid the blame on Corbyn's hunger for power despite failing to become prime minister in 2017 and 2019. 'He gave us Labour's worst result since 1935. He's been rejected twice. But he's got a big ego.' Reeves is surprisingly cool about introducing new wealth taxes. She said the government already takes a big chunk with inheritance tax and capital gains tax. 'I'm not keen to do what Switzerland does with a wealth tax. And we may lose money.' But her abiding instinct is to expand the state and to pay for it by increasing taxes. A hard-left questioner from the floor asked her to 'stop scoring own goals' and tax people more. 'But we have increased taxes,' she cried in outrage. 'Last year's was the biggest tax-raising budget ever.' That's how she thinks. She's crippling the economy and she couldn't be more proud.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Recognising Palestinian state would destabilise international law, Starmer told
Sir Keir Starmer has been warned that recognising a Palestinian state would 'destabilise' the international legal order. Malcolm Shaw KC, a leading lawyer, said that the recognition plan 'would create a troublesome precedent and could well challenge and ultimately destabilise an international system founded upon a common understanding of what it is to be a state'. The fresh legal opinion, seen by The Telegraph, was circulated to the Prime Minister, Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, and dozens of influential Labour MPs. It was commissioned by Lord Mendelsohn, the Labour peer, in response to Sir Keir's decision to recognise a State of Palestine in September unless Israel meets certain conditions. The warning comes after Hamas made it clear it will not disarm unless an independent Palestinian state is established. The militant group took the step of issuing a statement 'in response to media reports quoting US envoy Steve Witkoff, claiming [Hamas] has shown willingness to disarm'. It said: 'We reaffirm that resistance and its arms are a legitimate national and legal right as long as the occupation continues. 'This right is recognised by international laws and norms, and it cannot be relinquished except through the full restoration of our national rights - first and foremost, the establishment of an independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.' Hamas added that Mr Witkoff's trip on Friday to a Gaza aid distribution site was 'designed to mislead public opinion, polish the image of the occupation, and provide it with political cover for its starvation campaign and continued systematic killing of defenceless children and civilians in the Gaza Strip'. Mr Shaw's legal opinion says the Prime Minister's plan to recognise the state of Palestine is 'premature and may have unintended consequences' and that it 'confuses and distorts' any attempt at a peaceful two-state solution. 'A prize for precipitating war' He describes Sir Keir's decision to make statehood dependent on the behaviour of Israel, a 'third country', as 'remarkable'. 'This is exceptional and, frankly, not in keeping with the tenor of the relevant international principles,' he wrote. 'Recognition at the current time will be seen as a prize for precipitating the war on Oct 7 2023 with its attendant rapes and massacres.' Mr Shaw also argues that the Palestinian territories 'do not currently satisfy' the criteria for a state. Some 40 peers warned this week that recognising Palestine in the process set out by the Prime Minister would be illegal. They included Lord Pannick KC and Lady Deech, both respected lawyers and patrons of UK Lawyers for Israel, an association of British lawyers who are supportive of Israel. Lord Hermer is understood to have disagreed with their arguments and dismissed their claim. But Mr Shaw's opinion could pile further pressure on the Government to reconsider its legal position with regards to recognition. He further argues that since both Israel and the Palestinian territories are still bound by the Oslo Accords, the agreement that remains the legal framework that governs the relationship between Israel and the Palestinians, proper recognition at this time is not possible. Mr Shaw, who is the author of a standard legal textbook on international law, is currently representing Israel in its International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against South Africa, which argued that Israeli forces had committed genocidal acts in Gaza. While Sir Keir has always agreed to the principle of recognising a Palestinian state at some point, he was reluctant to do so until his surprise announcement this week. The Prime Minister appears to have been influenced by a number of factors, including the worsening starvation crisis in Gaza, pressure from international allies such as Emmanuel Macron, and increasingly vocal calls for immediate recognition from his own MPs. The setting up of a rival Left-wing political party under Jeremy Corbyn which calls for an independent Palestinian state may have also put pressure on Sir Keir to act. On Saturday, protesters from the activist group Youth Demand blocked roads in the Holland Park and King's Cross areas of London as they called for an immediate British trade embargo on Israel. On Thursday, Labour MPs supportive of Israel reportedly clashed with Jonathan Powell, Sir Keir's national security adviser, in a meeting about the recognition announcement.
