Hundreds of Missourians continue to languish in jail waiting for mental health services
There are 430 Missourians across the state in jails waiting to be moved to state psychiatric hospitals, up from around 300 at this time last year.
The average time those people wait in jail before receiving treatment has held steady at 14 months, according to Missouri Department of Mental Health data.
Those individuals were arrested, found incompetent to stand trial and ordered into mental health treatment designed to allow them to have their day in court — a process called competency restoration that generally includes therapy and medication. Those being held in jail are sometimes incarcerated for longer than they would be if they'd received the maximum sentence for the crime they were charged with.
Testifying before the Missouri House Health and Mental Health Committee earlier this week, Valerie Huhn, the state mental health agency's director, called the issue the 'most critical' of the department's various waitlists for services.
'I just wanted to make everybody aware of some of the risks that we know we're taking on because we can't get these individuals from jail into our state operated hospitals,' Huhn said. 'Obviously their illness is worse, and as their treatment is delayed, that makes it harder for us to turn them around.'
The state also faces potential lawsuits, Huhn said.
'We also know that there are federal lawsuits in five states for inappropriate detention and imprisonments, and there are federal lawsuits in 10 states for violation of due process,' she said. 'So there are a lot of risks for us not being able to address the needs of these populations.'
State Rep. Kent Haden, a Republican from Mexico, said county jails are ill-equipped to hold individuals awaiting psychiatric treatment for so long.
'My sheriff continually tells me, 'I am not prepared to handle mental health issues in my jail.' And he had a suicide,' Haden said. 'He said: 'We were not prepared to handle this situation.''
The waitlist peaked in February and March, when the average stood at 440 people per month, and has since declined to 430 as of May 1.
Huhn attributed the slight decline to the launch, over the last few months, of a handful of pilot programs that were signed into law two years ago. These jail-based competency restoration programs are designed to bring treatment to jails, rather than require individuals be transferred to psychiatric facilities.
'That program was slower starting than we wanted to see, but it is now open,' Huhn said.
It has a capacity of 40 people, she said, and currently is serving 19.
Those programs are in the Jackson, Clay and St. Louis County jails, Deb Walker, the spokeswoman for the department, told The Independent.
In 2023, the state legislature approved $300 million to build a psychiatric hospital in Kansas City, which will add 150 beds. That is estimated to open in 2029, Huhn said, which is 'not soon enough' to ameliorate the issue.
The legislature that year also worked to increase outpatient competency restoration, which has been slow to get off the ground, to treat those who can be safely released in their communities. Huhn said the agency is working to bolster that, including with money in the budget for community behavioral health liaisons to work between the agency and court. Outpatient treatment efforts will be targeted for those charged with low-level offenses, meaning misdemeanor charges and parole violations.
More Missourians are in the pipeline who will need competency restoration.
There are 80 people awaiting court orders and 230 more in open pretrial evaluations, of which the department estimates around half will be found incompetent.
The waitlist is a result of limited bed capacity, workforce, and a lack of community placements, Huhn told lawmakers, as well as a surge in the number of court-ordered competency evaluations. There has been a 48% increase in the last five years in those evaluations.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
GOP tax-spending bill sets path for direct primary care boost
Providers of "direct primary care" who charge patients a monthly fee for unlimited visits and workups are poised to become big winners from the new Republican tax-and-spending law. Why it matters: The law for the first time allows patients to tap their health savings accounts for the concierge-like primary care arrangements, and lets employers extend both benefits, in the belief they're more efficient than the traditional fee-for-service system. The change aligns with a Project 2025 goal to promote more personalized and flexible direct primary care, and a GOP penchant for expanding the use of high-deductible health plans and their tax-advantaged savings accounts. The legislation"takes an impediment out of the way" for employers who want to improve their employees' primary care, said Jim Winkler, chief strategy officer for the Business Group on Health. "It certainly is helpful at a time when employers are very interested in that space." Driving the news: Starting next year, people who have a high-deductible plan and direct primary care membership through their workplace can contribute to an HSA. The ability to invest pre-tax dollars and spend them later on eligible health care expenses can lessen the burden of a large insurance deductible. About 21% of U.S. workers with employer-sponsored health insurance were enrolled in HSA-eligible high-deductible plans in 2024, according to KFF. Until now, the tax code disqualified people who use concierge care from contributing to an HSA. Employers are among those who advocated for the change, which had some bipartisan support, Winkler said. The bill also makes direct primary care membership fees an allowable HSA expense for people who don't get a subscription through their employer. The change opens the direct primary care market to more employers, said Rebecca Springer, director of market development at health care investment bank Bailey and Co. The share of employers offering direct primary care subscriptions grew a staggering 800% between 2017 and 2022, according to a report from direct care software platform Hint Health. Still, a relatively small number of employers offer direct primary care benefits. "It's certainly a tailwind for direct primary care," she added. Yes, but: There are still underlying challenges, tempering expectations of a big boost for the sector, she noted. Direct primary care is still a relatively small segment of health care, and it can be difficult to scale. It's also not very integrated with the broader health system. "What makes a direct primary care model really good for a patient is that they get to spend more time with the physician," Winkler said. Doctors also like the smaller patient loads. "Finding more primary care physicians — and we have a scarcity of that in our country — will be a challenge as this model grows," he said. "It's true of any version of advanced primary care that's rooted in how that physician spend more time with the patient." What we're watching: Whether more physicians start or join concierge care practices going forward. Many have been interested but hesitant to make the leap because until now, there hasn't been a clear financial incentive to help patients afford the services, which can cost up to $150 per month — on top of insurance premiums and specialist copays — for an individual under the new law, said Shawn Martin, CEO of the American Academy of Family Physicians. "Now that that exists, I think you'll see a lot more interest in the model," he said. AAFP's 2024 survey of doctors providing direct primary care found that 94% were satisfied with their overall practice, compared with 57% of doctors not practicing direct primary care.
New York Post
13 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC risks a $7.2 billion loss — if it ignores Trump's sensible homeless orders
New Yorkers are fed up with having to climb over drug-addled zombies and avoid mentally deranged vagrants on the streets and in the subways. But the city's far-left politicians insist the homeless should be catered to on their own terms: We must care for them wherever they choose to sleep and even give them clean needles to support their addictions — the public's fears and disgust be damned. Last week President Donald Trump took the people's side. Advertisement His new executive order aims to pull federal funding from the 'failed programs' that facilitate the use of illegal drugs and permit the mentally ill to roam the streets and subways. 'The overwhelming majority' of the homeless, Trump stated, 'are addicted to drugs or have mental health disorders or both. We want to take care of them. But they have to be off our streets.' Advertisement Trump wants civility. The president can't force New York to follow his order, but his funding threat sets up a clash with city and state officials. In 2024, federal cash — $7.2 billion in all, according to NYU's Furman Center — accounted for most of the money spent by the city's two housing agencies, and a significant share of the Department of Homeless Services' budget. Under Trump's edict, federal funds will go only to housing programs that require addicts and the mentally ill to receive treatment — and can't be used to facilitate drug use. Advertisement He's boldly declaring that law-abiding people deserve safe neighborhoods and transit. Trump is discarding orthodoxies that the homelessness industrial complex and its political allies have insisted on for decades. Like 'housing first' — the ubiquitous blue-state policy that offers the homeless permanent housing without making them enroll in addiction or mental-health treatment. Advertisement Billions have been spent on 'housing first,' and yet the number of homeless people is higher than ever. And like 'harm reduction,' another orthodoxy — providing clean needles, and even supervised injection sites, to make drug addiction slightly less deadly. Gotham was the first city to open drug-use centers where addicts can shoot up under the supervision of medical personnel, who intervene in case of an overdose. The perfect addition to any neighborhood. Voters need to weigh in, making it clear they want a livable city, not sidewalks strewn with syringes and subway stations swarming with the mentally ill. Start with the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, and the stark electoral choice between Republican Maud Maron and incumbent Democrat Alvin Bragg. On a recent July day, Bragg could be seen painting watercolors in Washington Square Park, totally content with the reality his policies have allowed: The park has become a dangerous drug den, with addicts shooting up just a few feet away from his easel while social workers passed out free syringes for 'harm reduction.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Maron, Bragg's November challenger, calls out harm reduction for what it is —'Orwellian doublespeak.' Advertisement 'It is harm amplification,' she told me, 'trapping addicts in their addiction and ruining public spaces for everyone else.' Even before Trump's new executive order, Mayor Eric Adams had indicated his support for involuntarily hospitalizing violently mentally ill vagrants. But in the upcoming mayoral election, leading challenger Zohran Mamdani is clearly on the side of the vagrants, not the public. Advertisement He insists the city should provide 'outreach' and services to the unhoused wherever they choose to flop, including in the subways. Mamdani wants to turn empty retail stores in subway stations into drop-in hubs for vagrants, a reckless proposal. Creating magnets that draw more homeless people into the subways would be a gut punch for New Yorkers who must ride the rails to get to work or school. Mamdani has been pushing this proposal throughout his three terms in the state Assembly — elected each time with no Republican opponent in the general election to question him. Advertisement One-party rule greased the skids for Mamdani to rise to the mayoral race. Adams succeeded in getting Gov. Kathy Hochul to include in this year's state budget a change in the state's involuntary commitment law, expanding it to apply to those incapable of meeting their own basic needs, not just those who are deemed dangerous. That's a step in the right direction — but Mamdani would take the city backward, ceding the streets to the crazies. The American Civil Liberties Union bashed Trump's proposal to hospitalize the severely mentally ill, saying it 'displays remarkable disdain' for 'vulnerable people.' The National Alliance to End Homelessness condemned it as 'undignified.' Advertisement But having to hug the subway wall for fear of getting pushed onto the tracks by a crazy person is undignified, too. Compassion for the homeless must be balanced with the safety and orderliness the rest of us deserve. Bragg and Mamdani overlook that imperative. Voters be warned. Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and co-founder of the Committee to Save Our City.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Quest, Labcorp downplay ‘Big Beautiful Bill' impact
This story was originally published on MedTech Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily MedTech Dive newsletter. Historic Medicaid cuts in Republicans' 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' signed into law earlier this month, are unlikely to have a negative impact on laboratory testing volumes in the near term, executives at Labcorp and Quest Diagnostics reassured investors on earnings calls last week. Labcorp CEO Adam Schechter, answering an analyst's question on potential fallout from the legislation, described the impact as manageable. While lab testing is an essential tool used in almost every healthcare decision, it accounts for a 'very small fraction' of U.S. healthcare spending, the CEO said. The new tax and domestic policy law overhauls Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act to align with Republican priorities, including funding cuts, Medicaid work requirements and stricter eligibility verification for the safety net insurance program and the healthcare exchange. The legislation decreases federal healthcare spending by $1.1 trillion over the next decade and is expected to cause 10 million Americans to lose health insurance. Schechter said he doesn't foresee an impact on Medicaid until 2028, 'and the key is going to be, do people find insurance through other ways, through states or spouses that might have insurance?' If a large group of people become uninsured, Schechter said he would be concerned, but he doesn't expect that to happen. 'I don't think it's very likely in the United States that you'll have a very big group of people automatically become uninsured in a specific period of time,' he said. On the healthcare exchange, the expiration of tax credits could have a negative impact for Labcorp of as high as 30 basis points, Schechter said. The legislation will be harder on Labcorp's hospital customers, he said, which could accelerate deals for outreach businesses and running hospital laboratories. Quest Diagnostics CEO Jim Davis said the cuts to Medicaid would have no impact next year and 'very little' impact in 2027 because states will have time to react to the changes. In addition, no more than 4% to 5% of Quest's revenue comes from the healthcare exchange. CFO Sam Samad said the company expects an impact of about 30 basis points on Quest's testing volumes in 2026 if exchange subsidies are not renewed at the end of this year. Davis said people who buy their insurance on the exchange may be able to pay higher premiums to keep their coverage or could switch to their employers' health insurance. Both Quest and Labcorp raised their revenue forecasts for 2025. William Blair analyst Andrew Brackmann, in a note to clients Friday, said Labcorp investors are likely to remain focused on potential impacts from Washington. However, 'looking to the second half of the year and into 2026, expectations appear appropriately set.' Recommended Reading Labcorp to buy some Community Health assets for $195M Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
