Mt Pleasant residents 'devastated' at theft of $95k bronze bird sculpture
Photo:
Supplied
The theft of a $95,000 bronze sculpture by Llew Summers from a Christchurch community centre has devastated locals who fear the prized artwork will be sold for scrap metal.
Mt Pleasant community members raised their own funds to buy the 2.2 metre-long and 2.2 tonne sculpture named Flight, depicting a large bird, in honour of the late artist who lived in the seaside suburb.
Sculpted in 2018, the artwork was installed on a plinth outside the centre in 2023 at a cost of around $125,000.
On Friday morning the plinth sat empty, surrounded by tyre marks coming from the road and community centre car park.
Mt Pleasant Community Centre president Derek McCullough said he first became aware the sculpture was gone after someone noticed it was missing on their way to work.
He said the sculpture was inspired by the nearby estuary and the last big bronze work Summers made.
"Llew was a local resident who lived here most of his life and had his funeral here, which was an amazing event.
'So it was a tribute to him and on that basis, the locals got together to raise money to buy it," he said.
"[Flight] was just a lovely piece that reminded us of his presence around here, and also that we live on the side of an estuary with 30,000 more birds beside the big one he made.
"We are just devastated that someone decided to steal it."
Mt Pleasant Community Centre president Derek McCullough standing next to the empty plinth where the stolen sculpture once sat.
Photo:
RNZ / Joe Shaw
McCullough said he had not been able to establish when or how the sculpture had been stolen because there was no security camera footage.
He hoped a member of the public saw the thieves but was not optimistic the sculpture would be found.
"Because of its size and weight, it would have taken quite an exercise to get it. With thousands of cars passing a day, we're hoping one of them might have seen something happening," he said.
McCullough said someone likely stole the sculpture because of the scrap value of bronze.
"I've contacted the Association of Metal Recyclers and put in a report, hopefully that might stop that particular avenue.
"Otherwise, who knows? Maybe it's an unscrupulous art collector who decided they'd like it in their backyard or that they could sell it to someone just as unscrupulous," he said.
Police confirmed they received a report on Friday about the stolen sculpture but they were yet to identify any offenders.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
22 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Northland man charged with injuring police dog, drug-related offences
File image. Photo: RNZ / Richard Tindiller A Northland man has appeared in court charged with injuring a police dog and a raft of drug-related offences. Marshall James Dennis Joyce was arrested after a traffic stop in Whangārei early on Sunday morning escalated into what police described as a violent assault. The 47-year-old Ruakākā man was charged with assaulting police, injuring a police dog, possession for supply of methamphetamine and cannabis, possession of cocaine and LSD, and unlawful possession of ammunition. He was remanded in custody after Monday's appearance in the Whangārei District Court. He is due back for a list hearing by audio-visual link on 13 August. Police said the dog suffered an eye injury and underwent urgent veterinary treatment. Its current condition is not known. Earlier, Northland's top cop, Superintendent Matt Srhoj, said a police dog handler stopped a car on Kahiwi Street, in the suburb of Raumanga, just before 4.30am on 20 July. The dog handler spotted drug paraphernalia inside the car but the driver became aggressive before a search could be carried out. Srhoj said extra officers were sent to the scene as his aggression escalated, with pepper spray, a taser and the police dog all deployed. As well as methamphetamine, LSD tabs, cannabis and cocaine, police seized more than $5000 in cash. Srhoj said it was fortunate the police officer was not seriously injured, but the dog suffered a scratch to one eye and required urgent treatment. The 47-year-old man sustained minor injuries and was taken to Whangārei Hospital. Srhoj praised the officers who rushed to the scene to support their colleague. "We have no tolerance for unprovoked violence, especially directed to our staff who are just doing their jobs," he said.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Body found off walkway near Auckland's Southern Motorway
A police cordon is set up in a walkway near SH1 at Highbrook. Photo: RNZ / Bella Craig A man's body has been found off a walkway which runs alongside Auckland's Southern Motorway. Police were alerted at around 11.30am and while carrying out initial investigations at the scene they located a suspicious item near the man's body. The object was first thought to be an improvised explosive device (IED). "The area was immediately cordoned off, including the closure of SH1 between Princes Street and Highbrook Drive," a spokesperson said. The Police Specialist Search Group and the NZDF EOD Team were sent to the area. After a thorough search two objects were found, both of which were safely removed from the scene. "Initial enquiries indicate that these items are not IEDs, and further specialist enquiries will need to be carried out into these two objects." The motorway has since reopened. The spokesperson said police would provide further details in due course. St John were at the scene with two rapid response vehicles in a standby capacity. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mama Hooch rapist brothers Danny and Roberto Jaz challenge their convictions and sentences
Danny (left) and Roberto Jaz were convicted in 2023 of drugging and violating more than 20 women. Photo: NZ Herald / George Heard Two Christchurch brothers who used their family's bar and restaurant to drug and rape young women are challenging their convictions and sentences Danny and Roberto Jaz were convicted in 2023 of drugging and violating more than 20 women at the bar Mama Hooch and neighbouring restaurant Venuti between 2015 and 2018. A High Court appeal was heard by Justice Cameron Mander at Christchurch on Monday, but reporting of the matter was suppressed until 4pm on Tuesday as well as the reasons for that suppression. Roberto Jaz was jailed for 17 years, and his older brother Danny was jailed for 16-and-a-half years in August 2023 by Judge Paul Mabey, who described their attacks as predatory and heartless. The pair accumulated almost 70 convictions between them for sexual violation, drink spiking, stupefying and making an intimate visual recording. Judge Mabey imposed non-parole periods of half their sentences. A month later the brothers lodged appeals against their convictions and sentences . RNZ is now able to report on that High Court hearing. Jaz brothers' lawyers Ron Mansfield KC (left) and James Carruthers. Photo: Stuff/Chris Skelton Lawyer for the Jaz brothers Ron Mansfield KC told the court his clients did not get a fair hearing in the District Court and there was a significant miscarriage of justice. "There is a significant and concerning danger and, in my submission, an obvious one in putting apparent efficiency of process over and above the interests of justice and standard principles of natural justice in any case, let alone one as serious as this one. That is what the appellants submit that this judge has done," he said. The trial was complex and involved a substantial number of charges and complainants alleging very serious offending, Mansfield said. "In effect, the judge simplistically ran roughshod over the defence cases in relation to each grouping of charges. Beyond that he failed to consider all relevant evidence relating to identified charges resulting independently in miscarriages of justice in relation to those specific charges." Lawyer for the Crown Charlotte Brook said there was a wealth of evidence against the Jaz brothers and disputed Mansfield's claims of complexity or a miscarriage of justice. "They had access to drugs, their positions at the bar meant they had access to the drinks being served, they were well known for handing out free drinks at the bar, which a number of witnesses said sometimes tasted awful and they didn't want to drink them. There was the internal propensity evidence - the sheer number of victims who the Crown alleged to have been stupefied suggests that the appellants had a propensity to do so," she said. There was also the evidence of the brothers' own statements to each other in their group chats and to others, where they talked openly about administering drugs to people, Brook said. "Their description of their preferred drug as 'bitter water' is consistent with the evidence of witnesses who said that sometimes they'd be given a free drink and it would taste so horrible, so bitter that they didn't want to drink it," she said. Lawyers for the Crown Andrew McRae (left) and Charlotte Brook. Photo: Stuff/Chris Skelton Mansfield argued the judge oversimplified points and failed to consider others, an example being the evidence complainants gave alleging they were drugged. "There was a lot more to this case than the judge considered applicable when he came to looking at the issues, such as whether the complainants were stupefied, or somehow rendered, so they that could not consent to some sexual assault," he said. Many of the complainants acknowledged they had consumed substantial quantities of alcohol either prior to going to the premises or while at the premises, and in some cases had used controlled drugs too, Mansfield said. "When the witnesses said in the lower court that 'look I've been drunk before' or 'I've used drugs before and this wasn't like any of those occasions' the judge would simply say and he said it a number of times: 'the answer is the evidence'. What he didn't do was really query that response in light of the alcohol and or controlled drugs that they'd actually consumed against their age, weight and relative inexperience with consumption of both at that particular time, let alone the realities of both alcohol and drug consumption," he said. Brook disputed Mansfield's characterisation the trial was complex or there was a miscarriage of justice. "Of course it was serious, of course it was long, but the Crown says that doesn't necessarily mean it was complex. None of the charges were genuinely novel or complex in and of themselves... most charges were able to be dealt with quite briefly only a couple of paragraphs," she said. Mansfield said the trial judge also erred in not allowing closing arguments, rendering the trial unfair. "In my submission really it was the opportunity that all parties required in the District Court, that's the prosecution and defence, to a greater extent the defence... the only opportunity to present the defendants' case in relation to each grouping of charges was by way of the closing addresses," he said. Justice Mander reserved his decision. Jaz brothers' lawyer Ron Mansfield KC. Photo: Stuff/Chris McKeen Police began investigating the Jaz brothers in July 2018 after two women reported being drugged and sexually assaulted at the venues. At a judge-alone trial in 2023, the men were convicted of 69 charges relating to 23 victims, mostly women aged 18 to 24. The sentences brought an end to five years of complex and detailed investigation work and a drawn-out prosecution process. Survivors told the brothers during sentencing that their crimes had left them feeling damaged, fearful and forever changed . Lead investigator Detective Inspector Scott Anderson praised the victims for coming forward and seeing the protracted process through. "Their journey through the process has not been easy, however, because of their courage they have made our community a safer place," he said. Anderson said the men had preyed on their victims in a disturbing way. "One of their sole purposes was actually using the bar for their own gratification and servicing what they thought was quite all right for them, which it obviously wasn't," he said. "It just goes to show how premeditated they were in targeting vulnerable people, in particular young girls, to do what they wanted with." The Jaz brothers' father Michael Jaz owned both Mama Hooch and Venuti. Both venues have since closed and the company Jaz Holdings Limited was put into liquidation in August 2023 .