
Would you cheat on your tax? It's a risky move, tax office knows a lot about you
About 60 per cent of taxpayers use an accountant to prepare their tax return while the other 40 per cent lodge their returns via their MyGov account. This links them to the tax office, Medicare and other government services.
The tax office receives about 1000 tip-offs a week from people who know or suspect evasion. Of these, the office deems about 90 per cent warrant further investigation.
What to remember when preparing your tax return
These days, the tax office prefills much of your income information. The ATO will let you know through your MyGov account when your income statements from your employer are 'tax ready'.
But other income including bank interest, dividends and managed investment funds distributions may take longer to appear, so don't rush to complete and lodge your tax return on July 1 if these aren't there. When these items prefill, check them for accuracy and correct any errors.
The tax office does not know about all your income so remember to provide details of other sources including capital gains on investments and income from other jobs for which you have an Australian Business Number.
Some items, such as private health insurance information, are only partially pre-filled so be sure to check that all questions have been answered and all necessary information provided.
To claim a deduction you must have spent the money yourself and were not reimbursed from another source.
The expense must be directly related to earning your income from either employment or services provided, from investments such as shares or a rental property, or from a business you operate.
And you must have a record to prove your expense. This usually needs to be in the form of a receipt or a diary.
If you don't know how to record your deductions, an easy option is to use the tax office myDeductions app. You can scan receipts and allocate them to the correct section of your return.
What the tax office will be looking for in 2025
Each year the tax office targets particular areas. For 2025, these are:
Working from home expenses: you can choose between two methods: the fixed rate method or the actual cost method.
The fixed rate method allows you to claim 70 cents for each hour worked from home during the year. You do not need to keep receipts, but you must keep a record of the hours worked at home.
The actual cost method allows you to claim the costs of working from home, but taxpayers must have a dedicated room set aside for the office and remove all private use.
You cannot claim personal items like interest on a home loan or rent expenses unless you are operating a business from home.
Personal items, such as coffee machines, are not claimable even if you use them while working from home. Mobile phone and internet costs are included in the 70 cents per hour fixed rate. The ATO will be looking for taxpayers who claim these twice – for example, on their return and from their employer.
The 70 cents per hour rate does not include depreciation of work-related technology and office furniture, cleaning of the home office and repairs to these items. So these amounts can be claimed separately.
Motor vehicle expenses: there are also two methods to work out this claim. The log book method requires you to have kept a record for 12 weeks. You then need to work out the percentage you used your car for work or business which is applied to your expenses.
The cents per kilometre method allows you to claim 88 cents for each kilometre up to 5,000 km of work or business travel. No receipts need to be kept for this method, but you must be able to justify the total kilometres that you have claimed.
If you use the cents per kilometre method, do not double dip by claiming additional motor vehicle expenses.
Rental properties: make sure the expenses you claim do not include your personal costs. For example, the interest expenses must only be for the rental property and not interest from your personal home.
Also, if you own 50 per cent of the rental you can only claim 50 per cent of the expenses, even if your taxable income is higher than the other owner. If you have a holiday home you can only claim expenses for when that home was rented out, not the whole year.
Cryptocurrency: many taxpayers are buying and selling cryptocurrency. These transactions need to be reported in your tax return when they are sold as a capital gain or capital loss.
Other forms of income: if you earn money through the sharing or gig economies, you must include all income from these activities in your return. If you sell goods online, the tax office may consider it to be a business, and it will expect the income to be declared.
Don't be tempted to cheat
The ATO already knows a lot about your tax situation, which makes it harder than ever to cheat.
The tax office uses data matching to check information you include in your return against data provided by other parties including share registries and your health insurer. It also gathers information from the internet.
If the data doesn't match your return, or your claim is considered excessive, the ATO may contact you. You may be asked to explain why and, if your explanation is unsatisfactory, you might be audited.
Penalties of 25 per cent to 75 per cent of the tax owed may apply for falsely claiming deductions. The more dishonest the claim, the higher the penalty).
The link between what you claim and what you earn has to be real. So do not claim the cost of your Armani suit as a work uniform or your pet as a mascot for your business. Even the cost of a massage chair to relieve work stress cannot be claimed.
Dubious claims received by the tax office in recent years are many and varied. They have included Lego, school uniforms and sporting equipment purchased for kids, USD 9000 worth of wine bought by a wine expert while on a European holiday, for personal consumption, and a claim using receipts lodged by a doctor for an overseas conference he didn't attend.
What if I make a mistake or the ATO finds an error?
If you make a mistake in your tax return, you can always amend it via MyTax.
The tax office will not fine you unless you did not take reasonable care, but you will have to pay back the shortfall in tax.
The due date to lodge your own return is October 31. If you are having trouble meeting this date, contact the tax office and ask for an extension. (The Conversation) PY PY
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
How Immigrants Will Help Fund Trump's Tax Cuts
WASHINGTON—To help cover the cost of their marquee tax-and-spending package , Republicans have turned to a community President Trump has often targeted: immigrants. The package, which is heading to Trump's desk, includes new fees on immigrants navigating the legal process, and cutting legal immigrants out of certain federal safety-net programs. The Wall Street Journal estimates that immigrants—including those who are in the U.S. legally—will be paying in some way for at least $64 billion of the package through 2034. That helps fund new tax cuts and Trump's mass-deportation pledge. Here are five ways the bill focuses on immigrants for savings: Narrowing the child tax credit The bill will make U.S. citizen children whose parents are without legal status ineligible for the child tax credit, an annual break for families to help defray the cost of raising children. Republicans argue that the exclusion is necessary to ensure government money doesn't land in the hands of immigrants in the country illegally—even if their children were born in the U.S. The change is estimated to make 2.6 million children ineligible for the $2,200 annual credit. A new remittance tax For the first time, Congress is putting a tax on remittances, the payments immigrants send to family or friends in their home countries. Those payments will be taxed at 1%—down from as high as 5% in an earlier version of the bill—and the new tax is estimated to generate more than $9 billion. (The tax applies to remittance transfers in which the sender uses cash, a money order, a cashier's check or any 'similar physical instrument.') The effect of the tax isn't fully known. It could cause immigrants to use other, possibly illicit methods to transfer their money to avoid the new levy. It could also have a meaningful impact on the gross domestic products of several Central American nations such as Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, where remittances make up a significant portion of those countries' annual income. Cuts to the social-safety net Republicans are making several classes of legal immigrants, including refugees and immigrants who won their asylum cases, ineligible for programs including Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps. Those savings tally more than $60 billion, and make up a significant chunk of the party's cuts to those groups. Federal agents in the hallway of an immigration court in New York City last month. Refugees—immigrants whom the U.S. government has decided to resettle from abroad—have typically been eligible for safety-net programs because lawmakers understood they likely would be resettling in the U.S. with little to no money. Visa holders, along with a host of other immigrants, will now be prohibited from buying insurance through the Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare. (Young immigrants under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, will no longer be eligible for subsidies through the ACA.) New visa, asylum fees Under the bill, the U.S. for the first time will charge immigrants $100 to apply for asylum, making the U.S. one of the few countries to affix a price tag to asking for humanitarian protection. Asylum seekers will also be required to pay $100 for each year they wait in an asylum backlog, as well as $550 each year to renew a work permit. (Currently, asylum seekers pay a lower fee for a two-year work permit or longer.) In addition, should asylum seekers want to appeal a denial, it will cost them $900 to have an appeals body review their claims—an increase from an existing $110 fee. Separately, anyone issued a temporary visa, such as a tourist, student or work visa, will be required to pay a new $250 'visa integrity fee' in addition to existing fees for respective visa categories. Many of these fees are written as minimums, meaning Trump or any future administration could jack them up even higher. Fees related to asylum seekers are expected to pull in at least $1.2 billion over the next 10 years. Fees intended to penalize illegal immigration It is already considered a federal misdemeanor to cross the border into the U.S. illegally, but the bill will also now require immigrants caught to pay a $5,000, nonwaivable fee—money many immigrants likely won't have. It also creates a $5,000 fee for those ordered deported at court hearings they don't attend, who are later arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The fees are intended to give the government new ways to bring criminal charges against immigrants, if they fail to pay these mandatory fees. Those two fees are expected to generate $146 million through roughly the next decade. Methodology The Wall Street Journal identified sections of the tax-and-spending measure—called the 'one big, beautiful bill'—that was passed by the Senate on Tuesday. (The House passed the measure Thursday, and the president was expected to sign it into law Friday.) The Journal added up five- and 10-year estimates from those provisions two ways: first, how much the government would save by making cuts to social programs; and second, by how much the government would rake in from new fees. The numbers came from Congressional Budget Office estimates and the Joint Committee on Taxation. In most cases, the Journal examined savings in direct spending for benefit cuts and revenue figures from newly imposed fees. The Journal didn't include fees that already exist but are being increased. Write to Michelle Hackman at and Jack Gillum at


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
No tax on tips or overtime? This could be the game-changer your paycheck needs
No tax on tips and overtime: How Trump's new tax law could change your paycheck in 2025- In a major shift that could impact millions of working Americans, President Donald Trump's new tax bill has officially cleared Congress. Passed by Republicans on Thursday, the bill eliminates federal income tax on tips and overtime pay, fulfilling a major campaign promise Trump made in 2024. The law is set to take effect in 2025 and will run through 2028, providing tax relief for service workers and hourly employees who earn extra by working longer hours. The bill will be signed into law by President Trump on July 4, a symbolic date highlighting what the White House calls 'a tax independence day' for working-class Americans. But while some workers could see more take-home pay, others — especially those in lower-income brackets — may not see much benefit at all. How does the 'no tax on tips' rule work? Under current IRS rules, workers must report all tips over $20 per month to their employers, and those amounts are taxed just like regular wages. But Trump's new tax law changes that. Starting in 2025, employees can deduct up to $25,000 in tip income from their federal income taxes. This means workers won't owe federal income tax on that portion of their tips — although they will still have to pay payroll taxes like Social Security and Medicare. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like (46만원 지원할인) 모발이식 500모 49.5만원 지원할인 모발이식 더 알아보기 Undo The deduction applies even if you take the standard deduction — so you don't need to itemize. That's a big win for many service industry workers. However, there's an income limit: Live Events For individual filers, the deduction begins to phase out if their modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds $150,000. For married couples filing jointly, the phase-out begins at $300,000. For every $1,000 over the limit, the deduction drops by $100. According to Mark Luscombe, principal analyst at Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting, 'An estimated 4 million workers receive tip income — they could be directly impacted by this.' Also Read: Big changes ahead! How Trump's Big Beautiful Bill could impact your Income Tax and wallet What is the new tax break for overtime workers? The law also eliminates federal income tax on overtime pay, up to specific limits: $25,000 for married couples filing jointly $12,500 for single filers and others As with tips, the deduction phases out at $150,000 for individuals and $300,000 for couples. That means if you earn overtime in 2025–2028, you'll still see the usual tax withheld in your paycheck — but when you file your taxes, you can deduct the income and get that tax money refunded. Even if you don't itemize deductions, you still qualify. The White House estimates that the average worker receiving overtime will save between $1,400 and $1,750 per year. Who actually benefits the most from Trump's tax cut? While the headlines sound great, not everyone will feel the impact. A Tax Policy Center study shows that: Households earning $33,000 or less won't benefit much — many already owe little to no federal income tax. 40% of households that report tip income won't get any tax benefit. But 60% of households with reported tip income will benefit, saving an average of $1,800 per year. Among those earning under $33,000, only 1.4% will benefit, with an average annual tax savings of just $450. So, while the law targets working-class Americans, the biggest gains will likely go to middle-income households — not the lowest earners. Will small businesses and contractors also benefit? Yes, but only under certain conditions. Some independent contractors and small business owners may qualify for the deductions, but they must meet strict criteria. To claim the deduction, business income must exceed deductions, losses, and costs, including the cost of goods sold. The IRS is expected to issue more guidance soon. This is intended to prevent businesses from restructuring purely to exploit the tax break. However, as Luscombe points out, 'Some businesses may shift toward relying more on tip income and overtime pay to take advantage of these deductions.' What's the impact on the federal budget and job market? While many workers may see higher take-home pay, the government will collect less revenue. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation: The tip income deduction will reduce federal revenue by $40 billion between 2025 and 2034. The overtime pay deduction is expected to cost $124 billion through 2028. Some policy experts, including the Tax Foundation, warn the law could distort the labor market. By making overtime more financially appealing, some workers might prefer hourly jobs with overtime potential over salaried positions that don't pay extra for long hours. There's also concern about whether these benefits truly reach the people who need them most. Will this tax break really help working Americans? President Trump's tax law delivers a bold promise: let workers keep more of their hard-earned money. For many in the hospitality, food service, and retail industries, this could mean hundreds or even thousands of dollars in tax savings each year. But the benefit is not universal. Lower-income workers — the ones most likely to earn tips — may see little change. And the overall impact on the federal deficit and labor market remains a question. As this new law rolls out in 2025, it's crucial for workers to understand how to report income correctly, track their earnings, and take advantage of the new deductions when tax season comes around. FAQs: Q1: What is Trump's new tax law on tips? Trump's tax law removes federal income tax on up to $25,000 in tip income starting in 2025. Q2: Who qualifies for the no tax on overtime pay under Trump's new law? Workers earning overtime can deduct up to $25,000 in income, with limits based on total earnings.


Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
First Guardian Master Fund collapses, over 6000 Australians face superannuation loss
Thousands of Australians at risk as superannuation fund collapses Over 6,000 Australian investors may lose access to their retirement savings following the collapse of the First Guardian Master Fund . The fund, which received $590 million in superannuation investments, is now under investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ( ASIC ) for potential misuse of investor funds and undisclosed conflicts of interest. The First Guardian Master Fund was registered in August, 2019 as a managed investment scheme. Falcon Capital Limited, based in Melbourne, was responsible for managing the fund. In May 2024, Falcon Capital suspended applications and withdrawals, preventing most investors from accessing their superannuation or transferring funds to a new superannuation provider. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo Also read: The $100-a-week super habit that could save Aussie business owners from a $500,000 retirement shock Financial advisers directed superannuation transfers into risky scheme Many investors were guided by financial advisers to transfer their superannuation from established funds such as ANZ into First Guardian via retail choice super funds. Forklift driver Juan Carlos Sanchez reported being promised up to $1 million in retirement savings by telemarketers working for financial advisory firm Venture Egg . 'They were talking numbers of – 'we'll have you $800,000 in your super by the time you retire; a million dollars', really crazy things like that,' Mr. Sanchez told the ABC. Live Events Mr. Sanchez received an email in May, 2024 from the AusPrac fund confirming that withdrawals had been frozen. 'When I got that email, my stomach dropped, it's just been wiped out by this collapse,' he said. 'I just had this sick feeling.' ASIC alleges investor funds were not reinvested for growth but redirected into a cash hub controlled by First Guardian directors. Mr. Sanchez and thousands of other investors are now unable to access their superannuation balances. Also read: Superannuation changes explained: Why 80,000 retired and super-rich Aussies will pay more tax ASIC investigates fund misuse and offshore transfers ASIC alleges Falcon Capital director David Anderson funneled millions from First Guardian investors into his own business interests, including failed property developments and craft breweries. He was also reportedly a shareholder in ventures involving celebrity chef Scott Pickett. 'First Guardian has invested in entities which Mr. Anderson had an association with or financial interest in and Falcon appears to have failed to recognise and manage consequent conflicts of interest,' ASIC stated. In April, 2024, the Federal Court appointed FTI Consulting as Falcon Capital's liquidators following an ASIC application. Anderson's assets were frozen, and his passport seized. Along with Falcon director Simon Selimaj, Anderson is barred from leaving Australia until February, 2026. Public court documents allege Anderson transferred $274 million to offshore companies tied to him after receiving notice of the investigation. ASIC also identified $5.6 million deposited into Anderson's personal ANZ account without clear justification. Among these transactions was a $16,000 mortgage payment on Anderson's multimillion-dollar home. In its filings, ASIC claimed Falcon continued to reinvest limited funds into illiquid assets, despite previously indicating that it would prioritize investor redemptions once receivables were recovered. In a best-case scenario, regulators estimate $81 million remains unaccounted for. Also read: Trillions wiped from the economy and Americans' pensions as stock markets tank following Donald Trump's ta Financial adviser and marketing payments under regulator scrutiny ASIC is also investigating Melbourne-based financial adviser Ferras Merhi, head of Venture Egg Financial Services . Merhi is connected to 2,440 clients who collectively invested $179 million into the First Guardian Master Fund. The Federal Court has issued interim orders freezing select assets belonging to Merhi. Court documents allege Merhi received over $19 million in payments from First Guardian for marketing services while directing clients into the same fund. ASIC further alleges that $23 million in fund assets were disbursed for marketing purposes, contradicting representations made to investors. 'Everyone is running for the hills trying to cover their backsides. It's absolutely shameful,' said investor Greg McElherron. 'If you're going to be not only encouraged but mandated to put money into your super, it should be protected.' Investors used reputable super platforms before collapse Investors accessed the First Guardian Master Fund through well-known superannuation platforms, including Diversa, Netwealth, and Equity Trustees. They were advised to roll their superannuation balances into retail super funds or self-managed superannuation funds before transferring into First Guardian. David Anderson's attorney, Dan Mackay, stated, 'There have been no findings of fact or law by any court or tribunal, nor by ASIC. Mr. Anderson will fully exercise his rights in response to allegations which may be made against him at the appropriate time in the appropriate forum.' Also read: How will Trump tariffs affect retirement and 401Ks? ASIC's investigation into First Guardian Master Fund, Falcon Capital, and associated individuals remains ongoing. FAQs about the First Guardian Master Fund collapse 1. What is the First Guardian Master Fund and why did it collapse? The First Guardian Master Fund was a managed investment scheme that received $590 million from over 6,000 Australians through superannuation transfers. It collapsed in early 2024 following ASIC's investigation into alleged misuse of investor funds, conflicts of interest, and failure to manage investments appropriately. 2. Can superannuation investors recover their money from the First Guardian collapse? Recovery of superannuation funds from the First Guardian Master Fund remains uncertain. ASIC's best-case scenario analysis found $81 million unaccounted for. With much of the money allegedly moved offshore or invested in illiquid assets, full recovery appears unlikely for many investors. 3. Who is being investigated in connection with the First Guardian collapse? ASIC is investigating Falcon Capital directors David Anderson and Simon Selimaj, as well as financial adviser Ferras Merhi of Venture Egg Financial Services. Allegations include diversion of superannuation funds, offshore transfers, personal benefit payments, and undisclosed marketing commissions. 4. How were investors directed to invest in the First Guardian Master Fund? Investors accessed the First Guardian Master Fund via trusted super platforms like Diversa, Netwealth, and Equity Trustees. Financial advisers, including those from Venture Egg, encouraged clients to roll their superannuation into retail or self-managed super funds before investing in the scheme.