
The Tragic Case Of Rodney Hinton Jr. And The Trauma Of Black Grief In America
When you're Black in America, justice is rarely served—it's endured. It is a word we're taught to believe in but often experience as a double entendre: a promise for others, a punishment for us. The heartbreaking and complex case of Rodney Hinton Jr. reminds us just how devastatingly true that can be.
Rodney Hinton is not a monster. He's a father. A man. A human being who, on May 1, watched the bodycam footage of Cincinnati police officers killing his 18-year-old son, Ryan Hinton. Less than 24 hours later, Hinton was accused of using his vehicle to kill Deputy Larry Henderson in what prosecutors are calling a 'targeted attack.' But to simply label this as a calculated act of violence is to ignore the gaping emotional wound behind it—and the systemic rot that helped inflict it.
Let's be clear: the killing of anyone, especially in a moment that endangers others, is not to be celebrated. But we cannot ignore the context in which this tragedy unfolded, because context is everything. The criminal legal system would have us compartmentalize grief, especially Black grief, into something manageable, something acceptable. But what does acceptable look like when you've just watched your baby be executed on tape?
Rodney Hinton snapped, and while that may not be a legal justification, it is a human explanation.
The Trauma of Losing a Child to Police Violence Source: Angelo Merendino / Getty
The loss of a child is often described as the most excruciating pain a person can endure. According to research from the American Psychological Association, parents who lose children, particularly to violent, traumatic causes, face higher rates of PTSD, depression, substance abuse, and even suicidal ideation. For Black parents, that trauma is compounded by centuries of systemic racism, policing that disproportionately targets their children, and a justice system that rarely holds officers accountable.
Watching the footage of Ryan Hinton being shot by police — after he allegedly ran from a stolen car while armed — was undoubtedly a triggering event. Hinton's attorney confirmed he has a history of mental illness and experienced a psychiatric episode after seeing the footage. That's not an excuse; it's a reality.
And while many are quick to dismiss 'mental illness' in Black defendants, it's important to remember that trauma, especially racial trauma, is cumulative. It builds, silently, beneath the surface until it explodes. Whether or not Hinton was in full control of his faculties will be determined in court, but mental health experts already know this kind of psychological break isn't rare—it's tragically predictable.
The Weaponization of Grief
GoFundMe, the platform many turn to for support in crisis, swiftly removed all campaigns created to support Hinton after demands from the Ohio Fraternal Order of Police. They apologized for the 'misuse' of the platform. And yet, platforms like GiveSendGo have hosted campaigns for individuals caught on camera spewing racial slurs at children and even accused murderers. Why the double standard?
Because in this country, Black rage—especially when it follows Black death—is not allowed. We are expected to mourn silently, to protest peacefully, to bury our children with poise and dignity. Anything more, and the full weight of the system comes crashing down. Hinton's grief wasn't quiet. It wasn't palatable. It was real. And now, the state is seeking to kill him for it.
A System Stacked Against Us
The facts speak for themselves. According to Mapping Police Violence, Black people are nearly three times more likely to be killed by police than white people, and more likely to be unarmed at the time of their death. In 2023 alone, police in the U.S. killed over 1,200 people, and Black individuals made up a disproportionate percentage of those deaths.
Since the Trump administration, the risks have only grown. Under Trump, federal oversight of local police departments was effectively neutered. Consent decrees—agreements between the DOJ and police departments to address misconduct—were rolled back or ignored. Trump's Justice Department ended investigations into departments with a history of racial abuse, sending a clear message: police would not be held accountable on his watch.
In 2017, Trump even told a room full of officers not to be 'too nice' when handling suspects, indirectly encouraging aggressive and often violent behavior. And when the federal government refuses to check police power, we get the kind of horror that Rodney Hinton had to watch: his child, gunned down by the people sworn to serve and protect.
A Legal System Built on Punishment, Not Compassion
Now, Rodney Hinton faces the possibility of the death penalty—the only charge in Ohio that allows for it. And while prosecutors paint this as a premeditated, cold-blooded killing, his defense insists that Hinton was experiencing a psychiatric episode and could not fully comprehend the consequences of his actions. As his attorney rightly pointed out, 'an indictment is not indicative of guilt.'
In fact, death penalty cases in Ohio rarely end in execution. The last time someone was executed in the state was in 2018. There are 113 people currently sitting on death row, and many have been there for decades. Why? Because Ohio, like many states, is facing increasing moral, legal, and logistical challenges in carrying out executions. Pharmaceutical companies no longer want their drugs used for lethal injections, and public sentiment continues to shift away from capital punishment.
Yet, here we are again—using the threat of state-sanctioned death against a Black man whose real crime, some would argue, was loving his son too much to let his murder go unanswered.
Justice for Whom? Source: WISH-TV / WISH-TV
Rodney Hinton's case will make headlines, stir debates, and likely polarize communities. But it should also make us ask hard questions: What does justice look like in a system that produces this kind of pain? What resources exist for families who suffer violent losses at the hands of police, and why are we more comfortable condemning the broken response of a grieving father than we are in confronting the broken system that put him there?
There are no winners in this story. Deputy Henderson should still be alive. Ryan Hinton should still be alive. Rodney Hinton should not be sitting in a jail cell, staring down the possibility of death. But this is what happens when we refuse to address the root causes—when we let racism, unchecked policing, and disregard for mental health run our justice system.
The truth is, justice in America was never built to protect Black people. It was built to police us, punish us, and parade us as warnings. And until we confront that reality, until we stop expecting grieving parents to act like saints while burying their babies, there will be more Rodney Hintons.
And more broken hearts that no courtroom can heal.
SEE ALSO:
Sean Combs' Legal Team Claims 'Mutual Abuse' In Relationship With Cassie Ventura
Trump Administration's Push To Suspend Habeas Corpus Is Fascist
SEE ALSO
The Tragic Case Of Rodney Hinton Jr. And The Trauma Of Black Grief In America was originally published on newsone.com
Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

28 minutes ago
4th man accused in fatal dogpile outside Milwaukee hotel pleads guilty
MADISON, Wis. -- The last of four Milwaukee hotel workers accused of killing a man by pinning him to the ground has pleaded guilty to being a party to felony murder. Former Hyatt Hotel security guard Todd Erickson entered the plea in connection with D'Vontaye Mitchell's death in Milwaukee County Circuit Court on Thursday morning, online court records indicate. Erickson was set to go on trial on Aug. 11. He faces up to 15 years in prison when he's sentenced Sept. 3. His attorney, Kerri Cleghorn, didn't immediately return a voicemail left at her office. Erickson's plea moves a massive criminal case reminiscent of George Floyd's death a step closer to resolution. According to investigators, Mitchell ran into the Hyatt's lobby in June 2024 and went into the women's bathroom. Two women later told detectives that Mitchell tried to lock them in the bathroom. Security guard Brandon Turner pulled Mitchell out of the bathroom and together with a guest dragged him out of the lobby onto a hotel driveway. Turner, Erickson, bellhop Herbert Williamson and front desk worker Devin Johnson-Carson continued to struggle with Mitchell before taking him to the ground and piling on top of him, according to a criminal complaint. Hotel surveillance video shows Johnson-Carson holding Mitchell's legs while Erickson, Turner and Williamson held down his upper body. They kept him pinned for eight to nine minutes. By the time emergency responders arrived, Mitchell had stopped breathing. A medical examiner later determined that Mitchell was morbidly obese, suffered from heart disease, and had cocaine and methamphetamine in his system. The medical examiner concluded that he had suffocated and ruled his death a homicide. Attorneys for Mitchell's family have likened his death to the murder of Floyd, a Black man who died in 2020 after a white Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for about nine minutes. Floyd's death sparked a national reckoning on racial relations. Mitchell was Black. Court records identify Erickson as white and Turner, Williamson and Johnson-Carson as Black. The four workers told investigators that Mitchell was strong and tried to bite Erickson, but they didn't mean to hurt him. Ambridge Hospitality, the company that manages the Hyatt, fired all four of them in July 2024. Turner, Williamson and Johnson-Carson were all charged with being a party to felony murder along with Erickson. Turner pleaded guilty to that count this past March. Williamson and Johnson-Carson both pleaded guilty to a reduced count of misdemeanor battery that same month. All three are set to be sentenced Sept. 3, the same day as Erickson.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
A 4th man accused in a fatal dogpile outside a Milwaukee hotel pleads guilty to felony murder
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The last of four Milwaukee hotel workers accused of killing a man by pinning him to the ground has pleaded guilty to being a party to felony murder. Former Hyatt Hotel security guard Todd Erickson entered the plea in connection with D'Vontaye Mitchell's death in Milwaukee County Circuit Court on Thursday morning, online court records indicate. Erickson was set to go on trial on Aug. 11. He faces up to 15 years in prison when he's sentenced Sept. 3. His attorney, Kerri Cleghorn, didn't immediately return a voicemail left at her office. Erickson's plea moves a massive criminal case reminiscent of George Floyd's death a step closer to resolution. According to investigators, Mitchell ran into the Hyatt's lobby in June 2024 and went into the women's bathroom. Two women later told detectives that Mitchell tried to lock them in the bathroom. Security guard Brandon Turner pulled Mitchell out of the bathroom and together with a guest dragged him out of the lobby onto a hotel driveway. Turner, Erickson, bellhop Herbert Williamson and front desk worker Devin Johnson-Carson continued to struggle with Mitchell before taking him to the ground and piling on top of him, according to a criminal complaint. Hotel surveillance video shows Johnson-Carson holding Mitchell's legs while Erickson, Turner and Williamson held down his upper body. They kept him pinned for eight to nine minutes. By the time emergency responders arrived, Mitchell had stopped breathing. A medical examiner later determined that Mitchell was morbidly obese, suffered from heart disease, and had cocaine and methamphetamine in his system. The medical examiner concluded that he had suffocated and ruled his death a homicide. Attorneys for Mitchell's family have likened his death to the murder of Floyd, a Black man who died in 2020 after a white Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for about nine minutes. Floyd's death sparked a national reckoning on racial relations. Mitchell was Black. Court records identify Erickson as white and Turner, Williamson and Johnson-Carson as Black. The four workers told investigators that Mitchell was strong and tried to bite Erickson, but they didn't mean to hurt him. Ambridge Hospitality, the company that manages the Hyatt, fired all four of them in July 2024. Turner, Williamson and Johnson-Carson were all charged with being a party to felony murder along with Erickson. Turner pleaded guilty to that count this past March. Williamson and Johnson-Carson both pleaded guilty to a reduced count of misdemeanor battery that same month. All three are set to be sentenced Sept. 3, the same day as Erickson. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Police and Courts Are Turning to AI. Is the System Ready for It?
Can AI be used to make the criminal justice system more fair and efficient, or will it only reinforce harmful biases? Experts say that it has so far been deployed in worrying ways—but that there is potential for positive impact. Today, AI tech has reached nearly every aspect of the criminal justice system. It is being used in facial recognition systems to identify suspects; in 'predictive policing' strategies to formulate patrol routes; in courtrooms to assist with case management; and by public defenders to cull through evidence. But while advocates point to an increase in efficiency and fairness, critics raise serious questions around privacy and accountability. Last month, the Council on Criminal Justice launched a nonpartisan task force on AI, to study how AI could be used in the criminal justice system safely and ethically. The group's work will be supported by researchers at RAND, and they will eventually take their findings and make recommendations to policymakers and law enforcement. 'There's no question that AI can yield unjust results,' says Nathan Hecht, the task force's chair and a former Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice. 'This task force wants to bring together tech people, criminal justice people, community people, experts in various different areas, and really sit down to see how we can use it to make the system better and not cause the harm that it's capable of.' Risks of AI in law enforcement Many courts and police departments are already using AI, Hecht says. 'It's very piecemeal: Curious people going, 'Oh, wow, there's this AI out here, we could use it over in the criminal court.' But because there are few standards for how to deploy AI, civil rights watchdogs have grown concerned that law enforcement agencies are using it in dangerous ways. Thousands of agencies have come to rely upon facial recognition technology sold by companies like Clearview, which hosts a database of billions of images scraped off the internet. In many databases, Black people are overrepresented, in part because they live in communities that are overpoliced. AI technology is also worse at discerning differences in Black people's faces, which can lead to higher misidentification rates. Last year, the Innocence Project, a legal nonprofit, found that there have been at least seven wrongful arrests from facial recognition technology, six of which involved wrongfully accused Black people. Walter Katz, the organization's director of policy, says that police sometimes make arrests solely based on AI's facial recognition findings as opposed to having the AI serve as a starting point for a larger investigation. 'There's an over-reliance on AI outputs,' he says. Katz says that when he went to a policing conference last fall, 'it was AI everywhere.' Vendors were aggressively hawking technology tools that claimed to solve real problems in police departments. 'But in making that pitch, there was little attention to any tradeoffs or risks,' he says. For instance, critics worry that many of these AI tools will increase surveillance of public spaces, including the monitoring of peaceful protesters—or that so-called 'predictive policing' will intensify law enforcement's crackdowns on over-policed areas. Where AI could help However, Katz concedes that AI does have a place in the criminal justice system. 'It'll be very hard to wish AI away—and there are places where AI can be helpful,' he says. For that reason, he joined the Council on Criminal Justice's AI task force. 'First and foremost is getting our arms wrapped around how fast the adoption is. And if everyone comes from the understanding that having no policy whatsoever is probably the wrong place to be, then we build from there.' Hecht, the task force's chair, sees several areas where AI could be helpful in the courtroom, for example, including improving the intake process for arrested people, or helping identify who qualifies for diversion programs, which allow offenders to avoid convictions. He also hopes the task force will provide recommendations on what types of AI usage explicitly should not be approved in criminal justice, and steps to preserve the public's privacy. 'We want to try to gather the expertise necessary to reassure the users of the product and the public that this is going to make your experience with the criminal justice system better—and after that, it's going to leave you alone,' he says. Meanwhile, plenty of other independent efforts are trying to use AI to improve the justice processes. One startup, JusticeText, hopes to use AI to narrow the gap between resources of prosecutors and public defenders, the latter of whom are typically severely understaffed and underresourced. JusticeText built a tool for public defenders that sorts through hours of 911 calls, police body camera footage, and recorded interrogations, in order to analyze it and determine if, for example, police have made inconsistent statements or asked leading questions. 'We really wanted to see what it looks like to be a public defender-first, and try to level that playing field that technology has in many ways exacerbated in past years,' says founder and CEO Devshi Mehrotra. JusticeText is working with around 75 public defender agencies around the country. Recidiviz, a criminal justice reform nonprofit, has also been testing several ways of integrating AI into their workflows, including giving parole officers AI-generated summaries of clients. 'You might have 80 pages of case notes going back seven years on this person that you're not going to read if you have a caseload of 150 people, and you have to see each one of them every month,' says Andrew Warren, Recidiviz's co-founder. 'AI could give very succinct highlights of what this person has already achieved and what they could use support on.' The challenge for policymakers and the Council on Criminal Justice's task force, then, is to determine how to develop standards and oversight mechanisms so that the good from AI's efficiency gains outweigh its ability to amplify existing biases. Hecht, at the task force, also hopes to protect from a future in which a black box AI makes life-changing decisions on its own. 'Should we ensure our traditional ideas of human justice are protected? Of course. Should we make sure that able judges and handlers of the criminal justice system are totally in control? Of course,' he says. 'But saying we're going to keep AI out of the justice system is hopeless. Law firms are using it. The civil justice system is using it. It's here to stay.'