India lose 0-2 to Thailand in football friendly before AFC Asian Cup qualifier
India have also beaten Thailand 1-0 in the Kings Cup in 2019. Thailand were technically bettered equipped and more clinical while India were left ruing missed opportunities and costly defensive lapses. The Indian midfield also lacked creativity.This was the Indian team's second defeat in seven matches under head coach Manolo Marquez, the last one being 0-3 loss to Syria in the Intercontinental Cup last year in Hyderabad.advertisementOut of the five remaining matches under his charge, four were drawn games while the lone win came against Maldives (3-0) in March in an international friendly.Thailand made their early dominance count. Phitiwat Sookjitthammakul found Korawich Tasa near the edge of the Indian box in the eighth minute. Tasa smartly laid it off for Ben Davis, who took a deft first touch to steady himself before unleashing a thunderous right-footed shot past Indian goalkeeper Vishal Kaith.It was Davis' fourth goal in seven appearances for Thailand, and the Indian backline was left exposed, reacting too late to close him down.India gradually grew into the game, using the width of the pitch to stretch the Thailand defence. Liston Colaco, operating fluently between midfield and the left flank, was a standout performer, linking up well with Sunil Chhetri and forward Ashique Kuruniyan.India's first opportunity to level the score in the first half came in the 24th minute. Colaco delivered a teasing free-kick from the left which Chhetri met with a clever header, timing his run perfectly to get ahead of his marker. However, Thailand goalkeeper Saranon Anuin dived to his left to pull off a sharp save.Thailand continued to pose threat on the Indian citadel, with long-range efforts from Korawich Tasa and Arjvilai narrowly missing the target.advertisementThe momentum began to shift slightly in India's favour as the half wore on. Abhishek came close with a driven shot from distance that missed the horizontal by inches in the 40th minute.But the golden opportunity arrived in first-half stoppage time. Chhetri played a sublime through ball from midfield to find Colaco's run, splitting the Thai defence. Colaco brought the ball under control but couldn't finish the one-on-one chance as Anuin narrowed the angle to eventually thwart the danger with a timely save.In the 59th minute, a miss pass in the midfield gifted Thailand ball possession. The ball was quickly fed to Arjvilai on the left flank. Spotting Vishal Kaith slightly off his line after sidestepping Ashish Rai, Arjvilai curled a magnificent effort into the top-right corner to double Thailand's lead and deflate Indian hopes.Substitute Lallianzuala Chhangte got a fine chance in the 80th minute but his left footer went just wide of the upright.The Changsuek, meanwhile, looked to exploit the spaces India left behind and could have added a third if not for a crucial intervention by Anwar Ali, who threw himself in front of a goal-bound shot in the dying moments.advertisementThe match was part of preparation for India's crucial AFC Asian Cup qualifying round match against Hong Kong on June 10 in Kowloon.The same was also the case for Thailand as they face Turkmenistan in their AFC Asian Cup final round qualifier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Microsoft restores services, Delhi HC closes Nayara Energy's plea
Nayara Energy informed the Delhi High Court on Wednesday (July 30, 2025) that Microsoft has restored cloud services to its cloud-based services, following which the court allowed the company to withdraw its petition. Nayara Energy — an Indo-Russian oil refining and marketing company — had approached the court after being suddenly locked out of its Microsoft account, disrupting critical business operations. Also Read | CEO of Russia-backed Indian refiner Nayara Energy resigns after E.U. sanctions, sources say The company contended that Microsoft's unilateral action was based solely on its interpretation of recent European Union (EU) sanctions against Russia, despite Nayara being an Indian entity. At the outset of the hearing, counsel for Nayara Energy told the court that 'the matter is resolved because they (Microsoft) have restored all services.' The court then allowed Nayara to withdraw the petition, granting liberty to approach the court again should Microsoft take similar action in the future. Senior advocates Rajiv Nayyar and Dayan Krishnan, appearing for Nayara, argued that Microsoft had acted without notice and urged the court to record that any future termination of services should not be abrupt. 'At least they should give 3–4 days' notice before terminating. There can't be an abrupt shutting,' the lawyers said. Narrating the background, Mr. Krishnan said, 'Originally, there were servers. Then the Ukraine war started. They (Microsoft) came to us to move to cloud servers. We were apprehensive. They assured us: 'Don't worry, the Indian entity will not be affected by any of these (sanctions).' After that, this has happened.' Microsoft's counsel said the service has been restored but further clarified that no assurances could be given for the future. 'They (Nayara) are a sanctioned entity by the EU. We have restored today, but I can't make these statements for the future,' Microsoft's counsel submitted. Taking note of the developments, the court observed, 'Earlier, without notice, they had shut their services. You came to court. Now they have restored it. The grievance stands mitigated. In the future, we believe they would not do the same exercise, and as and when they intend to, they will perhaps give you notice. If they don't, you can come back to court.' In a recent press statement Nayara had said, 'While the sanctions originate exclusively from the EU, Microsoft—a U.S.-headquartered corporation—has chosen to withdraw services from Nayara Energy without any legal requirement to do so under U.S. or Indian law'. According to a Microsoft spokesperson, 'Microsoft is committed to supporting all its customers in India and worldwide, and has restored services for Nayara Energy. We are engaged in ongoing discussions with the European Union towards service continuity for the organization.' Nayara Energy said it is a vital contributor to India's energy security, accounting for approximately 8% of the country's total refining capacity, approx 7% of its retail petrol pump network.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
6 minutes ago
- First Post
'India-US ties go beyond trade deal or ceasefire claims': Govt sources on why India didn't call Trump 'a liar'
Regarding Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's call for Prime Minister Narendra Modi to declare US President Donald Trump a 'liar', sources in the government have said that the India-US relationship goes beyond the disagreement over the ceasefire and trade talks and should not be compromised on these issues. read more Sources in the Union government have stressed that the India-US relationship goes beyond the disagreement over the ceasefire in the India-Pakistan conflict earlier this year and cannot be compromised over the issue. Since May when India and Pakistan clashed for four days before reaching a ceasefire on May 10, US President Donald Trump has claimed that he brokered the ceasefire between the two countries. India, on the other hand, has maintained that Pakistan made a request after four days of battering that India granted. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi of the Congress party said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should publicly declare Trump a 'liar' over his false claims. Notably, while the government has not used the word 'liar', it has repeated multiple times that the ceasefire was a result of India accepting Pakistan's request and no third-party intervention was at play there. 'If Narendra Modi has even 50 per cent of the courage of Indira Gandhi, he should declare in the House that Trump is lying about the ceasefire,' said Rahul. On the intervening night of May 6-7, India launched Operation Sindoor and struck terrorist sites in Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK). It was launched in response to the attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam in which terrorists killed 26 people on April 22. After Pakistan responded to Indian strikes with attacks on Indian civilian and military sites, India struck Pakistani military sites, including airbases and air defence units and, after four days of battering, Pakistan reached out to India with a request for a ceasefire on May 10. India granted Pakistan the request. India-US ties go beyond disagreements, say sources Sources in the Union government have said that the India-US relationship goes beyond ongoing differences, such as differences over the ceasefire in the India-Pakistan conflict and ongoing trade talks. Even as the August 1 deadline for a trade deal is just around the corner, India and the United States have not been able to reach any deal. It is believed that the Trump administration's refusal to respect Indian red lines about sensitive sectors of dairy and agriculture and genetically modified (GM) crops is the main barrier in the two sides reaching a deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump on Tuesday said that India will likely face 20-25 per cent tariff starting August 1, which will be much higher than the 15 per cent tariff that he has imposed on the European Union (EU) and Japan that he has struck deals with. Sources said that the United States has so far stood with India in disputes with China, such as during the Doklam standoff of 2017, and such an important relationship cannot be compromised on one or two differences. Moreover, sources stressed that the prime minister has publicly declared that no leader asked India to stop the war. Similarly, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has said that Modi and Trump never had the discussion about stopping the war. Sources further said that the Congress party has been in power before and it should know how governments function, suggesting that the party should realise the kind of words that the government would use to assert disagreement with the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Feels like we're still in 1947 era': Irfan Pathan stands by Gautam Gambhir, slams Oval pitch curator
Irfan Pathan has slammed England pitch curator Lee Fortis over his heated exchange with Team India Head Coach Gautam Gambhir at The Oval. According to him, Fortis has a history of being rude to overseas teams. 'The curator at The Oval has a bit of a history of being rude. This isn't the first time something like this has happened with overseas team captains and coaches,' Irfan Pathan said. Irfan Pathan explained the difference between bowling and fielding spikes. Bowling spikes have steel nails while fielding ones do not. Spikes can collect dirt and grass, especially on wet grounds, and sometimes damage the pitch or grass. Then, he spoke about Gautam Gambhir being accused of wearing spikes during the pitch inspection. Irfan said Gambhir had followed the rules by wearing rubber spikes. 'The way the media is trying to paint Gautam Gambhir as the villain is a part of an ongoing trend. It's been happening for quite some time now, and people are noticing it,' Pathan said. Pathan referred to a photo on Twitter (now X), uploaded by Sarang Bhalerao. It was originally shared by cricket analyst Adam Collins on July 25, 2023. The photo, taken two days before Ashes 2023, shows England Head Coach Brendon McCullum having a light-hearted chat with Fortis. Both of them were standing in the middle of the pitch. 'So, an English coach can go there, but an Indian coach cannot. It feels like we're still in the 1947 era. (I am) Absolutely not going to accept it. Fans can decide whether they will accept this or not. But, I will not,' Pathan said on his YouTube channel. 'How can you inspect the pitch from 2.5 metres away? You have to touch and check it. This is an unnecessary controversy,' he added. Irfan praises the Indian cricket team's fight and spirit in the ongoing Test series against England. Despite injuries and challenges, Team India won a Test, drew another and competed fiercely overall. 'Even though India are trailing 2-1 before the final match, they've played really good cricket. It's been 20 days of solid cricket,' Pathan said.
