&w=3840&q=100)
US crackdown on birth tourism: Will pregnant, young women face visa heat?
Over the past few weeks, US embassies have started warning foreign nationals that their visas could be cancelled if officials believe the trip is primarily for giving birth in the country.
'Using your visa to travel for the primary purpose of giving birth in the United States so that your child will have US citizenship is not permitted,' said the US Mission to Nigeria in a post on social media. 'Consular officers will deny your visa application if they have reason to believe this is your intent.'
The decision is entirely up to the consular officer assessing the visa interview. And that's where things become uncertain.
According to Adesh Nandal, advocate at Jotwani Associates, this guidance increases the risk of visa denials for pregnant women—even if their stated reason for travel is valid.
'The US Department of State has long applied a discretionary standard under Section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which requires nonimmigrant visa applicants to overcome a presumption of immigrant intent,' Nandal told Business Standard.
He added, 'Now, officers are being told to watch for signs that the applicant's real reason is to give birth in the US so the child can get citizenship. Pregnancy may not just be seen as a medical condition anymore—it could be viewed as a red flag for so-called birth tourism, especially if there's no strong evidence of another reason to visit.'
Tougher scrutiny for pregnant travellers
Ketan Mukhija, senior partner at Burgeon Law, said visibly pregnant women now face extra hurdles.
'Consular officers may deny B-1/B-2 visas if they determine that the applicant's primary intent is to give birth in the US to secure citizenship for the child. This places an elevated burden on pregnant applicants to show a clear, legitimate reason for travel,' Mukhija said.
But the policy doesn't just affect pregnant women.
Even women who are not visibly pregnant could face trouble, according to immigration lawyers.
'Visa adjudication is inherently subjective and often conducted in a matter of minutes,' Mukhija said.
Nandal added, 'Legitimate travellers—such as women attending conferences, family gatherings, or simply on holiday—may be denied visas if their pregnancy draws suspicion and they cannot quickly rebut that presumption with strong proof. Even with solid documentation, pregnant applicants face a higher risk of refusal.'
This has wider implications for young female applicants.
'The warning introduces the risk of profiling based on gender, age, and reproductive capacity. Even though the advisory specifically mentions those intending to give birth in the US, it may lead officers—consciously or unconsciously—to apply more intense scrutiny to young women of childbearing age,' said Nandal.
He said this creates 'an implicit bias' in the visa decision process.
'A young woman travelling alone, recently married, or with limited travel history may be seen as a potential birth tourist based solely on demographic assumptions,' Nandal explained. 'Such profiling, though legally questionable from an equal protection standpoint, is hard to challenge because of the doctrine of consular nonreviewability.'
He added that applicants are not entitled to know the exact reason for their refusal, as Section 214(b) denials often come with a generic explanation.
What is birth tourism?
Birth tourism refers to the practice of travelling to the US to give birth so that the baby automatically receives American citizenship. Under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, anyone born on American soil is a US citizen, regardless of the immigration status of their parents.
Former President Donald Trump criticised the practice during his first term. In January 2020, the White House released a statement saying, 'The administration is taking action to end 'birth tourism' – a practice in which aliens travel to the United States with the purpose of giving birth to gain citizenship for their children.'
The statement claimed that organised groups were helping women exploit a 'loophole' to get US passports for their babies.
On January 20, 2025, shortly after returning to office, Trump signed an executive order to end birthright citizenship. But that order has faced legal pushback.
Federal judges in several states have blocked the move, including US District Judge Leo Sorokin in Massachusetts.
'American-born babies are American, just as they have been at every other time in our Nation's history,' said New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin, who was part of the legal challenge. 'The President cannot change that legal rule with the stroke of a pen.'
The White House has not yet appealed the latest rulings. The matter may end up in the US Supreme Court.
What pregnant women and others can do to protect their application
Applicants can take proactive steps to protect their visa application by clearly documenting their travel plans and nonimmigrant intent.
'For women who are pregnant but do not plan to give birth in the US, transparency is key,' Nandal said.
'For example, a doctor's note confirming the due date and that travel is safe—along with proof of plans to return home before the delivery—can directly address an officer's concerns.'
Even for those who are not pregnant, it's important to present clear supporting documents, such as:
• A full travel itinerary with dates, destinations, and hotel bookings
• Letters from employers or universities showing ongoing obligations
• Evidence of family or community ties, such as children or dependents remaining at home
• Financial records showing the ability to pay for the trip
• Return flight bookings
During the visa interview, applicants should be able to explain their travel plans clearly and confidently. Avoiding vague answers and anticipating potential concerns can make a difference.
'If a consular officer begins asking about pregnancy or future plans to give birth, it's best to stay calm and provide simple, factual responses. There's no need to volunteer personal medical details unless directly asked, but one should be ready to dispel any incorrect assumptions,' Nandal said.
What red flags do visa officers look for?
Consular officers are trained to spot patterns or inconsistencies that suggest the applicant might not be honest about their travel purpose.
'When it comes to suspected birth tourism, common red flags include the following,' said Nandal:
• Visible pregnancy with no documentation or medical explanation
• Lack of insurance or a financial plan for maternity care
• Vague or inconsistent travel details
• Travel dates close to the due date without strong justification
• Discrepancies between the visa form and interview answers
• Prior visits to the US during pregnancy or before childbirth
'These signals may not prove anything on their own,' he said, 'but taken together, they can lead an officer to reject the application.'
No appeal for these denials
Nonimmigrant visa denials under Section 214(b) cannot be appealed or challenged in court.
'Red flags like vague travel plans, late-pregnancy travel, or weak home country ties can result in rejection,' Mukhija said. 'There is no appeal process. The only option is to reapply with new, stronger evidence of a valid reason to travel.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
US Fed judge blocks Trump's plan to end protection from deportation of over 60,000 citizens of Nepal and other nations
San Francisco-based US District Judge Trina Thompson agreed the plaintiffs had shown there was sufficient racial animus behind the decision and that the Trump administration had failed to undertake an "objective review of the country conditions" before ending protections. A migrant is detained by federal immigration officers at U.S. immigration court in Manhattan, New York City, U.S. (File Photo) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A federal judge ruled against US President Donald Trump 's administration plans to end protections from deportation for citizens of Nepal Nicaragua and Honduras , barring their removal while the case continues, The Hill Francisco-based US District Judge Trina Thompson agreed the plaintiffs had shown there was sufficient racial animus behind the decision and that the Trump administration had failed to undertake an "objective review of the country conditions" before ending protections."The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood," Thompson wrote. "The Court disagrees."The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Nepal in June and for Nicaragua and Honduras in July. Each country was initially designated after natural disasters, but the protections can also be offered to people unable to be deported to their home country due to civil moves would require 51,000 Hondurans and nearly 3,000 Nicaraguans who have been in the country for roughly 25 years to leave the county by September. Some 7,000 Nepalese citizens were also set to lose protections in just days, as per The reviewed a number of prior comments from Trump as well as Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, including comments from the secretary referring to migrants as criminals and gang members, and the president stating that migrants were "poisoning the blood of our country.""Indeed, code words may demonstrate discriminatory intent," she wrote, The Hill quoted. "Color is neither a poison nor a crime."Thompson said the DHS failed to do the fulsome review required to end TPS, determining the Trump administration did not consider conditions beyond recovery from the hurricanes that rocked the Central American countries and the earthquake that sparked the designation for Nepal, as per The Hill.


Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘We love the city but feel alone': American family adjusting to life in Ahmedabad seeks tips from locals
A heartfelt Reddit post by an American man living in Ahmedabad has gone viral online, drawing warm responses from locals. The post was shared in the r/AskAhmedabad subreddit with the caption, 'Foreigner Living in Ahmedabad'. An American man shared his Ahmedabad experience online, sparking warm responses from Reddit users.(Pexels/Representational Image) The Redditor, who works in the software industry, explains that he recently relocated to Shela (city in Gujarat) with his family for a year-long work assignment. Though he's visited Ahmedabad many times before, this is their first time living here as a family. They've been in the city for about a month and are gradually getting settled in. Adjusting to life in Ahmedabad: In his post, he mentions enjoying the city's food, especially paan, and praises the kindness of local people. While he has coworkers to connect with, he shared that his family is beginning to feel bored and a bit isolated. 'We would like to get engaged a bit more with the community. I would like to know if we can get a private teacher or tutor to help with Gujarati,' he further mentions. He also mentioned that Westerners seem quite rare in his area, which makes locals hesitant to approach them. However, he described these interactions as 'charming' and said they're simply looking for a few connections and friends to help make their stay smoother. Take a look at the post here: Screengrab of the Reddit post.(@slayer3600/Reddit) Reddit users react: Reddit users responded with warmth and enthusiasm, offering practical tips, local resources, and even personal invites. The post quickly became popular for its honest tone and curiosity. One of the users, @Lopsided-Slice-1077, commented, 'Navratri is coming up, maybe learn garba and you will have a good chance of making a lot of friends in Navratri.' A second user commented, 'Learn Hindi/Gujarati. And join a garba dance class, it's fun.' Another user commented, 'Hope the city is treating you good. You can follow some Instagram pages like 'Plan Kya hai Ahmedabad' that keep you posted on events or meetups around the city.' A few users even offered to meet the family in person to help them settle in.


Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Even before Trump's ‘penalty' threat, Indian refiners began cutting down on Russian oil imports
Amid increasing pressure on India from the US and other Western powers over the past couple of months, Indian refiners — led by public sector players — began cutting down on Russian oil imports, much before US President Donald Trump's announcement earlier this week of an unspecified tariff 'penalty' on New Delhi for its defence and energy imports from Moscow. Latest vessel tracking data shows that July deliveries of Russian crude — which would have been contracted May or early June — to Indian refiners fell significantly. Industry and trade sources also indicated that Indian public sector refiners have, for the time being, halted future contracting of Russian oil, the mainstay of India's oil imports for the better part of the past three years. Trump has now said that he 'heard' that India will no longer be buying oil from Russia, calling it a 'good step', but also added that he is not sure if the information is 'right or not'. 'Well, I understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step. We'll see what happens,' Trump told reporters in the US on Friday. Meanwhile, India — the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil with an import dependency level of over 85 per cent — continues to maintain that its oil purchases are commercial decisions. 'We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time,' Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said Friday in response to a question on whether Indian refiners have stopped buying Russian oil over the past few days. Industry insiders, experts, and trade sources indicate that renewed pressure and threats from the US and Europe over the past few weeks have cast a shadow on India's Russian oil imports, and could mark the beginning of Indian refiners pivoting away from Moscow's oil. So far, India had successfully managed to walk 'the fine line between energy security and geopolitical pressure', but its options now appeared limited, one expert said, adding that Indian refiners 'must now plan not just for commercial shifts, but for systemic geopolitical realignment'. Deliberations are on between the government and other stakeholders — primarily refiners — on managing the situation and assessing the choices on the table for India, sources said. With a pre-emptive reduction in Russian oil imports, some bit of signaling has already taken place. The next steps would most likely be decided on how the India-US dynamic evolves, and more importantly, whether or not Trump decides to further harden the American stance and rhetoric against Russia. Any breakthrough between the White House and Kremlin over the Russia-Ukraine war would most likely ease the pressure on buyers of Russian crude. This renewed pressure from the West — forcing Russia's top trade partners to cut down on imports from the country — are aimed at forcing the Kremlin's hand into ending the war in Ukraine. For Trump, who wants the three-year-old Russia-Ukraine war to end within days, this is an opportune time to pressurise countries like India and China over their Russian imports, given the sensitive trade negotiations that these countries are holding with the US. India's Russian oil imports in July were at 1.6 million barrels per day (bpd), down 24 per cent from June levels, and 23.5 per cent from volumes delivered in July of last year, according to latest tanker data from global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler. The share of Russian crude in India's oil import basket in July contracted notably to around 33.8 per cent from July's 44.5 per cent. While the drop in oil imports from Russia is evidently more pronounced among Indian state-owned refiners, likely reflecting heightened compliance sensitivity amid mounting risks, private sector refiners—who account for over half of Russian crude imports, have also reduced exposure to Moscow's oil. The reduction in import volumes from Russia in July was offset by higher crude deliveries from other suppliers — mainly Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, the US, Nigeria, and Kuwait — all of which expanded their share in India's oil imports vis-à-vis June levels. With much of the West shunning Russian crude following the country's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia began offering discounts on its oil to willing buyers. Indian refiners were quick to avail the opportunity, leading to Russia — earlier a peripheral supplier of oil to India — emerging as India's biggest source of crude, displacing the traditional West Asian suppliers. While the discounts have varied over time, Russian oil flows to India largely remained robust despite Western pressure and limited sanctions on Russia's oil trading ecosystem. But the appears to be changing now, and fast. 'On one side, the EU's (European Union's) sanctions — effective from January 2026 — ban imports of refined products derived from Russian-origin crude, forcing Indian refiners to segment crude intake and product flows. On the other hand, the US tariff threat raises the possibility of secondary sanctions that would directly hit the shipping, insurance, and financing lifelines underpinning India's Russian oil trade. Together, these measures sharply curtail India's crude procurement flexibility, raise compliance risk, and introduce significant cost uncertainty…(it) represents a double whammy for Indian refiners,' said Sumit Ritloia, Lead Research Analyst, Refining & Modeling at Kpler. Before this week's tariff announcement by Trump mentioning a 'penalty' on India, India's significant Russian oil imports were being subjected to a more aggressive stance by Western powers for a few weeks. Trump himself had had threatened 'biting' secondary tariffs of 100 per cent on buyers of Russian exports, and the European Union last month announced a sanctions package, widely seen as the most comprehensive effort yet by the EU to restrict Russia's revenue stream, placing a ban on import of fuels into Europe if made from Russian oil in third countries like India, and also sanctioning Indian refiner Nayara Energy, in which Russian oil giant Rosneft holds 49.13 per cent stake. According to Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri, the massive market share of Russian crude in India's oil imports doesn't mean that India is dependent on Russia for oil, and other suppliers can quickly come in to replace Russian volumes if there is any major disruption. 'I don't feel any pressure in my mind. India has diversified the sources of supply… I'm not worried at all. If something happens, we'll deal with it…there is sufficient supply available,' Puri had said at an event earlier in July. He added that India in recent years has expanded its crude sourcing slate from 27 countries to around 40 countries, and enough oil was available globally for India to buy and ensure energy security. If India indeed decides to shift away from Russian crude, industry insiders and experts expect New Delhi to negotiate a potential wind-down period for reducing supplies, as replacing the massive volumes of Russian oil supply overnight is impossible, according to industry insiders. It would take at least three-four months to substantially cut down on imports and shift to other suppliers — mainly in West Asia, but also in Africa, and even the US and Latin America. Loss of discounted Russian barrels would certainly push up the relative cost of imports by a few dollars a barrel, which in turn would inflate India's oil import bill by billions of dollars on an annualised basis. Additionally, if global oil prices rise in the eventuality of most of Russian oil going off the market, the hit for India would be amplified further. 'Replacing Russian crude isn't plug-and-play…it is no easy feat—logistically daunting, economically painful, and geopolitically fraught. Supply substitution may be feasible on paper, but it remains fraught in practice. Gulf barrels come with pricing rigidity, African grades add freight volatility, and Latin American flows face availability constraints,' said Ritolia. India's traditional crude suppliers in West Asia — chiefly Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE — would be the logical fall-back, but Indian refiners will have to grapple with significant constraints as they reduce Russian oil imports. A lot of the crude from West Asia comes through term contracts, unlike spot purchases of Russian crude, which may force Indian refiners to commit to higher annual offtake of West Asian oil, which is more rigidly priced compared to discounted Russian crude. Also, a number of Indian refineries that had gotten attuned to processing Russian crude in large volumes may see an impact on their product yield and refinery configurations due to crude quality mismatch. India is also expected to sustain its ongoing efforts to diversify its sources of crude oil. Geopolitical shifts, freight economics, and refinery economics are expected to continue shaping India's crude sourcing decisions and diversification strategy. Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More