AI translation service launched for fiction writers and publishers prompts dismay among translators
'There will always be a place for expert human translation, especially for highly literary or complex texts,' said the founders Fred Freeman and Betsy Reavley, who previously founded Bloodhound Books, which specialises in crime and thrillers. 'But GlobeScribe.ai opens the door to new opportunities, making translation a viable option for a much broader range of fiction.'
GlobeScribe conducted 'extensive blind testing' of its tool. Native speakers reviewed GlobeScribe translations alongside human-translated versions of texts without being told which method had been used. 'The feedback consistently showed that readers could not reliably distinguish between them,' according to a company statement. 'In some cases, reviewers even felt the AI-assisted versions were closer in tone and fidelity to the original English manuscript.'
However, prominent translators along with a translators' organisation have expressed concern over the initiative.
GlobeScribe 'may claim to unlock global access for fiction, but their approach sidelines the very people who make literature resonate across cultures,' said Ian Giles, chair of the Society of Authors' Translators Association. 'Suggesting that AI can match, or even surpass, the nuanced work of human translators on behalf of authors is flat-out wrong.'
'The best literary translations offer more than simple accuracy, more than literal fidelity to the words making up the sentences,' said Polly Barton, writer and translator of works including the bestselling Butter by Asako Yuzuki from Japanese to English. 'They are engaging with the context from which the book has come, and reproducing the pacing, atmosphere, emotional timbre, rhythm, and all the other, less superficially obvious factors that ultimately determine how fulfilling and rich the reading experience is.'
Deepa Bhasthi, whose translation of Banu Mushtaq's Heart Lamp from Kannada into English won this year's International Booker prize, said that 'there are many words in Kannada that contain whole cultural worlds in them, where there is as much hidden or implied within a cultural context as is conveyed in literal meaning. And that needs a human being, with an understanding of these visible and invisible worlds, to translate such words'.
Asked about GlobeScribe's testing method, Barton said that being a native speaker of a language 'doesn't necessarily equip one to judge all translations from that language with total authority'. Bhasthi added that 'we are not told what kind of texts they were given, what kind of readers the test subjects were'.
GlobeScribe's founders said that while they 'recognise that parts of the industry are understandably cautious about what AI might mean for the arts', they 'believe these tools are here to stay and that they should be embraced thoughtfully and responsibly'. They added that AI could enhance creativity and help professional translators 'increase their productivity and output'. The founders 'are clear that this is not about replacing human translators'.
Julia Sanches – the translator of works including Boulder by Eva Baltasar from Catalan into English – said: 'Even though I don't think Globescribe can translate the kinds of literary texts I translate, I am gloomy about the emergence of all these new AI 'translation' services. They give the appearance that translation is instant, which devalues my labour, and also that it is mediocre, which could make 'good enough' the new standard for the literary arts. And that's a disservice to both authors and readers.'
'This doesn't just end with translation,' said Barton. 'Maybe translators are at the frontline of people being put out of work by AI technologies, but soon there will be more and more jobs threatened to be wiped out in this way. It lies in our hands to decide whether or not we want this to happen.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Authority: Essays on Being Right by Andrea Long Chu review
Andrea Long Chu stands accused of not playing by the rules, of appraising works of fiction as if they were essays or confessions rather than aesthetic objects. 'It is true that I tend to treat a novel like an argument', she writes in the introduction to Authority, a collection of essays and reviews published between 2018 and 2023 in outlets such as N+1, Bookforum and New York Magazine. Long Chu – who won a Pulitzer prize for criticism in 2023 – believes 'all novels refract the veiled subjectivity of their authors', and to pretend otherwise is to indulge a 'pernicious form of commodity fetishism'. In her reviews, books betray their authors, invariably revealing some kernel of inadequacy – be it immaturity, myopia or just terminal dullness. This approach borders on the psychoanalytical, and makes for fun reading. Long Chu diagnoses a case of 'Munchausen by proxy' in Hanya Yanagihara, whose bestselling novels A Little Life (2015) and To Paradise (2022) are powered by 'the misery principle': 'horrible things happen to people for no reason', and the author is 'a sinister kind of caretaker, poisoning her characters in order to nurse them lovingly back to health'. She notes a troubling tendency towards 'infantile' idealisation of mothers and girlfriends in Tao Lin's autofiction, and finds 'something deeply juvenile' about the scatological motifs in Ottessa Moshfegh's novels. Moshfegh's medieval gore-fest Lapovona (2022), fails to shock, because 'You cannot épater le bourgeois without an actual bourgeoisie'; 'the leading coprophile of American letters' is trying too hard to convince us she's not a prude. Reviewing Bret Easton Ellis's 'deeply needless' 2019 essay collection, White ('less a series of glorified, padded-out blog posts than a series of regular, normal-size blog posts'), Long Chu bemoans his descent into fogeyish paranoia, and suggests the author of American Psycho is starting to resemble his most famous creation. 'At some point,' she quips, 'one must ask if a man who sees Nineteen Eighty-Four all around him is really just stuck in the 80s.' A takedown of Curtis Sittenfeld's 2020 novel, Rodham, which imagines an alternative universe where Hillary Clinton never married Bill, is a withering indictment of hollow girl-boss feminism: this is 'an unpolitical book by an unpolitical author about … an unpolitical person'; Sittenfeld's complacency mirrors that of her protagonist, a woman whose 'true talent lies in persuading college-educated people that her ambition, and by extension theirs, is a genuine expression of competence'. A recurring figure in these essays is the successful author with a gripe about oversensitive lefty youngsters and social media mobs. These include Ellis, Moshfegh, Maggie Nelson – whose complaints about art-world censoriousness in On Freedom are dismissed with a huffily italicised 'boring' – and Zadie Smith, whose 'habit of sympathizing with the least sympathetic party in any given situation frequently drives her to the political center'. Long Chu provocatively suggests this tendency is a bit of an act, compensating for Smith's failure to produce a touchstone work of social realism: since Smith has 'never actually excelled at constructing the kind of sympathetic, all-too-human characters she advocates for', she makes up for it with a lofty bothsidesism she thinks becoming of a serious, above-the-fray liberal humanist. Long Chu is similarly unsparing in her critique of the publishing industry's patronising and counterproductive tendency to over-hype minority voices in order to atone for past wrongs. ('This is to respond to pigeonholing by overstating the value of being a pigeon.') In a refreshingly clear-sighted essay on Asian American fiction, she questions whether the experiences depicted in a glut of diaspora novels have anything significant in common beyond their 'diffident, aimless, frustrated' protagonists and a vague melancholy; the much-laboured theme of identity manifests as little more than 'a sensation, a mild, chronic homesickness', and 'the acute experience of racial indeterminacy has diffused into something more banal'. Alongside the literary essays, Authority features dissections of TV shows and video games, and a wryly funny meditation on Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical shortcomings. (His winning strategy as a composer is 'not to persuade but to overwhelm'.) There are also several personal pieces including an essay on vaginoplasty, a fictionalised account of undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (a treatment for depression), and On Liking Women, a widely shared 2018 essay about the author's gender transition that kickstarted her writing career. Here Long Chu draws a connecting line between the gender separatist ideology of 1970s political lesbianism and today's anti-trans activists, whom she accuses of laundering 'garden-variety moral disgust'. In another era, such personal material would have sat uneasily in a volume of criticism, and it says something about our cultural moment that it doesn't seem particularly out of place here. As Long Chu observes in the title essay, the subjectivity of the critic is an increasingly visible presence these days. Tracing the vexed debates around critical authority from the 18th century to the present day, she concludes that the concept has always been 'an incoherent, inconsistent, and altogether empty thing'. The job of today's critic is not so much to impart expertise but to become a storyteller in their own right: 'The critic has become a witness, one whose job is to offer up an event within her own experience in such a way that the reader, if she is so inclined, may experience it too.' This checks out. Though Long Chu's writing style is not as overtly chummy as that of her fellow US critic Lauren Oyler, it has a similarly disarming first-person candour, offsetting stridency with spasms of self-effacing humility, and the sort of tentative qualifications more commonly encountered in spoken discourse than on the printed page. ('Perhaps I am being ungenerous'; 'What I mean is that …'; 'My point is that …'; 'I do not mean …'; 'If it sounds like I'm saying … I suppose I am.') These tics can be a bit cloying, and the occasional adolescent turns of phrase feel jarringly regressive: Long Chu uses 'boring' an awful lot; at one point, she introduces a particularly unimpressive quote with 'The following is an actual sentence.' Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion In a postscript to one of the greener pieces in this volume, Long Chu, who is in her early 30s, winces at the prose style deployed by her younger self – 'that kind of bloggy 'voiceyness' was dated even then'. Her anxiety on this score is symptomatic of a generational dilemma for a cohort of American writers who, having been raised to distrust authority – not just as a concept but perhaps especially as a register – and steeped in the highly self-conscious patter of online communities, must now work out how to be publicly clever in a non-overbearing way. In an anti-intellectual media landscape, one way to make yourself legible is to make yourself small. This is the striking thing about Long Chu's authorial tone: she combines the expert and the naif in a single voice, which chimes with a similar dualism in her reader. These essays are essentially journeys – knotty and meandering, with moments of pithy, clarifying insight. If you can hold someone's interest while figuring things out for yourself in real time on the page, you're doing something right. Perhaps the true source of authority is companionable intelligence, and what we think of as sound judgment is just a function of familiarity – comfort in another person's psychic skin. Authority: Essays on Being Right by Andrea Long Chu is published by Hutchinson Heinemann (£20). To support the Guardian, order your copy at Delivery charges may apply.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Dating apps try something different to keep search for love online
I'm sitting - trying to look composed - in a London bar. Cocktail ordered, there's a rollercoaster knot of anticipation building in my stomach - I'm waiting for a this isn't exactly your typical dating rendezvous - because while my date and I met online, as so many people do nowadays, we matched on an app that doesn't allow users to exchange messages until a few hours before the meetup.I know my date's name and I've seen her photo, but there's been none of the usual small talk messaging - just a few words to confirm I'm looking forward to meeting, and that's it.I first started using dating apps during the Covid lockdowns - Hinge mainly, but I've also tried Tinder and Bumble. They introduced me to a vibrant mix of people - some became short-term flings, others full-blown relationships, and then there were the other indefinable after a mutual new year break-up (with an ex I'd met on Hinge), I returned to the dating app scene as a 30-something tired of the cookie-cutter profiles and weird monoculture. Everyone seems to be looking for someone who "doesn't take themselves too seriously", is itching to make travel and running a personality trait, or is desperate to go hiking. As a wheelchair user, I definitely won't be doing the last two - no matter how much physio I do.I wanted something different. I was after a pasta admirer, like me So, when a friend told me about an app which cuts out pre-date chat and gets straight to the date, I was intrigued. No awkward talking stage, no wondering if you've asked someone out too early - or left it too suggests an overwhelming number of daters have online burnout - so it's no wonder dating apps are trying to reignite the Feeld, an app for the sexually curious; Fourplay, which teams single friends together with other pairs for group dates; and Lex, an LGBTQ+ message board app, while Raya is invite-only for celeb to Ofcom, singletons aged under 25 are dating online more than any other age group – so the big dating apps are also adding functionality to try to keep them June, Tinder introduced its double date feature. Akin to the Fourplay app, it lets users create a joint profile with a friend. Tinder's umbrella company, Match Group, said it needed to keep up with what Gen Z wanted and "build lower-pressure" ways for them to has basically been charging more for a premium match-making service. Hinge X, the most expensive tier, charges £24.99 per week for "enhanced access to your type", the ability to "skip the line" and "like priority". The obvious question, of course, is how that works if multiple users are signed up - they can't all be the apps preach a tailored focus, but together respond to the same underlying sense of dating fatigue I have been feeling too. I'd been sending messages into the ether without any guarantee the algorithm would actually get them to the potential future love of my life - increasingly it felt a waste of as someone who's been on the end of multiple failed talking stages in the past few months - cutting straight to the date felt a novel thing to try. Because, why not? Does online dating work? Once mocked, online dating is now a global love affair worth billions, and love at first swipe has become the generational norm. Almost 10% of Brits told a recent YouGov poll they met their partner on an app too, so that probably tells us studies show cross-gender dissatisfaction, with women overwhelmed by matches, while men generally struggle and are more likely to turn to paid features to boost their chances. Add the normalisation of unhealthy dating behaviours like ghosting - suddenly cutting contact without explanation - and some drained daters are deciding: "it's not me, it's you".Last year, a class action lawsuit accused Match Group, owners of mainstream apps like Tinder and Hinge, of using addictive game-like features to encourage compulsive use. The case has since been sent to arbitration. Match Group rejected the claims calling the lawsuit "ridiculous", reports Reuters news Depth: Why dating apps could be in troubleIs speed dating the answer for Gen Zs looking for love?Tinder's height filter divides datersYet, despite trying to keep us hooked, Ofcom data shows the UK's most popular dating apps saw usage fall by 16% in 2024. Tinder lost 594,000 users, Hinge dropped by 131,000, Bumble by 368,000 and Grindr by 11,000. In June, Bumble laid off 30% of its global Breeze, the new app I was trying, once you match a date is booked at a "partner venue" - this is partly how the app makes its money. Users pay upfront for a drink which acts as a soft deterrent to prevent no-shows – but bail repeatedly and your account will be temporarily my profile, I wrote that I hoped to meet someone self-assured - able to laugh at life and themselves, while also embracing a dance floor with enthusiasm. Bonus points for cat people and pasta-admirers. My date, Rozena (not her real name), had amazing eyes - deep blue, with a purple tinge. She said she was looking for a long-term relationship, listed culture and theatre among her interests, and described the "worst idea she ever had" as the time she tried a particular dance move in heels, and ended up in an felt like exactly the kind of calamity I could get on board with. And that's how I found myself heading to this date.I'd flagged to Breeze that I'm a wheelchair user to make sure the venue was accessible before the booking was confirmed. The app's support team was responsive and the bar certainly seemed fine on paper. But while I could technically get in, all the indoor tables were up a few steps I couldn't navigate, meaning we would have to sit outside. The app later apologised for this and said it would work on how it audits places for accessibility in the future. Less pre-chat made us more present I messaged Rozena through the app - in the short pre-date window that opens just before that first meeting. She was understanding and said she'd brought a raincoat. Luckily, the rain held off. Less fortunately, the table leg made it difficult for me to wheel my chair under it, meaning I had to do a Tom Daley-style swan dive every time I reached for my drink. At least I didn't knock it date was fun - but there was no romantic spark. Rozena admitted her interest in music didn't extend beyond musicals. And while she claimed to be joking, I suspect her disappointment that I wasn't as aligned with her passion for theatre may have been we have discovered there was no chemistry had we met on an app with a pre-date chat function? It's impossible to say. But the limited pre-meet communication window seemed to make us both more engaged when we met in I told Rozena I was thinking of writing an article about the app, she told me she'd been on a few dates through it. One drawback she'd discovered was that her matches weren't always close by – she'd had dates travel from hours away to meet up. Perhaps this is due to a growing user base. After finishing our drinks and saying goodbye, the app's chat window stayed open for a few hours, meaning we could check each other had reached home was an opportunity to exchange numbers via the app if both parties wished to. I received a message saying Rozena had declined, but she left a note saying she had had a lovely time. I am unable to contact her again, but it gave closure. No on this new approach to online dating, I wonder if we are going full circle, pining for the traditional dating culture of the pre-internet age? Sure, it didn't work out this time for me and my date, but it felt much more human, less isn't unique in trying to do something different to help daters find love, but my experience on it made me realise that chatting beforehand can actually really help to build rapport ahead of a date (even if I do sometimes accidentally send essays). Even so, I'll probably continue to use Breeze, as it feels quite low my Hinge dating profile is still running and I'm chatting to four people there - who knows how many might lead to a date? Or perhaps I'll bump into the love of my life the old fashioned way - no phone, no algorithm. Imagine that.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Amazon shoppers love ‘compact and powerful' £160 power bank – now just £13 for Prime members
AMAZON just slashed a lightweight power bank that won't weigh you or your wallet down. The fast-charging tech essential usually retails for £159.99, but right now, Prime members can grab it for just £12.99. Hosgubo Fast-Charging Power Bank, £159.99 £12.99 (Prime member exclusive) BUY FROM AMAZON That brings the Hosgubo Power Bank down by a massive 92%, so it's no surprise it's getting plenty of attention on Amazon right now. You will need to be a Prime member to claim the deal, but with a 30-day free trial available, it's an easy win. Unlike bulkier battery packs, this one is designed with portability front and centre. It weighs just 192g, so it's lighter than most out there and easy to slip into a handbag, backpack, or carry-on. With a 10000mAh capacity, it's got more than enough power to get you through a full day, and then some. And because it's well under the TSA's 27,000mAh limit, you can safely pop it in your hand luggage for a mid-flight top-up. It's not just the size that makes it handy. It supports 3A fast charging, twice as fast as your average power bank, so you won't be stuck waiting forever to recharge. It also has smart safety tech built in to protect your devices from overheating or battery damage, which is always reassuring. There's a USB-C IN & OUT port, a USB-A port, and a built-in USB-C cable, so you can charge three devices at once. Whether it's your phone, wireless earbuds, or even a mate's device, this little power bank can handle it. There's also a clever little design touch: the micro cable doubles as a lanyard, so you can clip it to your bag and keep it handy while you're out and about. There's no guessing games when it comes to battery life, the LED power display shows you exactly how much juice you've got left. With a 4.6-star average and over 500 units sold last month, this compact power bank has impressed Amazon shoppers with its solid design, fast charging, and reliability. "Compact, powerful, and perfect for on-the-go," writes one shopper. "It's honestly become a lifesaver for my on-the-go lifestyle.' "A solid battery pack," says another customer. "The in-built USB-C cable is extremely convenient, snug fitting in my phone and provides a nice, fast charge. " Another buyer writes: "The wireless charging works flawlessly with my phone... The battery level indicator is a nice touch. Amazon's been rolling out a string of similar deals lately, with popular picks like the TRKOY and Matast Magsafe portable chargers flying off the shelves. If you're looking for more top-rated options, check out my tried and tested guide to the best power banks UK buyers love.
