Israel says it killed Iranian commander who helped fund, arm Hamas
Saeed Izadi, commander of the Palestine Corps in the Quds Force, was killed early Saturday during an Israeli strike in the city of Qom.
Izadi was also "one of the orchestrators" of the Oct. 7, 2023, unprovoked Hamas attack on Israel, according to BBC News.
"The blood of thousands of Israelis is on his hands," IDF chief Eyal Zamir said in a statement, calling it a "tremendous intelligence and operational achievement."
Following the killing of Mohammed Sinwar, the head of Hamas' armed wing, at a hospital in Gaza in May, a joint operation between the IDF and the Israel Security Agency (ISA) discovered an underground command center underneath the hospital.
Israeli troops found documents in the command center revealing that Hamas' military wing had maintained contact with Izadi in recent months, including Sinwar.
Correspondence between Sinwar and Izadi planning an operation in which Izadi would arm Hamas with $21 million in weapons followed by an additional $25 million in weapons was found in the command center, the IDF said.
"Due to the intensive efforts of the Southern Command, the Intelligence Directorate and the ISA, these two projects to arm Hamas's military wing in the Gaza Strip with advanced weapons worth tens of millions of dollars did not come to fruition," the IDF said.
Izadi had been sanctioned by the U.S. and U.K. over his ties to the Palestinian militant faction Islamic Jihad, which also helped plan the Oct. 7 terror attacks.
The IDF said later Saturday that it also had killed a second Iranian commander, Benham Shariyari, during a strike on his vehicle in Tehran.
Shariyari had been "responsible for all weapons transfers from the Iranian regime to its proxies across the Middle East," including missiles and rockets launched by Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis at Israel, the IDF said.
"Since the outbreak of the war, the IDF has been working to dismantle the military capabilities of the Hamas terrorist organization. The IDF will continue to act against any attempt by the Iranian regime to arm and fund the terrorist organizations that threaten the State of Israel and its civilians," the IDF said. "The elimination of Izadi constitutes a significant blow to the Iranian regime's weapons supply and terror financing network."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump showed moral clarity on Iran. He should do the same for Ukraine.
On June 19, facing pressure to join in Israel's bombing campaign against Iran, President Donald Trump announced, 'I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' Cynics assumed this was yet another example of the president putting off a difficult decision indefinitely. 'TACO,' some said, employing a popular acronym for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' The doubters were wrong. Two days later, U.S. bombs and missiles hit three Iranian nuclear sites. Though there has been much debate over just how much damage the Iranian nuclear program suffered, at least one thing now seems clear: Trump meant it went he said that Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism that has vowed 'death to Israel,' would not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. If only the president had the same moral clarity about stopping the barbaric war being waged in Ukraine by Iran's despotic ally, Russia. When it comes to that conflict, however, Trump appears to be engaged in exactly the kind of irresolute policy that many (wrongly) suspected he was pursuing with Iran. On May 28, Trump was asked by a reporter whether Russian dictator Vladimir Putin wants to end the war. He replied: 'I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks. … We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not, and if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently.' More than a month later, Trump isn't doing anything differently even as Russia shows no sign of ending its aggression. Every week seems to bring fresh reports of Russian airstrikes on Ukrainian cities that are described as the largest since the war began. Over the weekend, Russia fired 537 aerial weapons, including 60 missiles, at Ukraine, primarily at civilian targets. Some Ukrainians are now going to sleep with whistles around their necks to make it easier to find them if they are buried under rubble by a Russian attack. Trump has repeatedly insisted that, if he had been president in 2022, Putin would never have invaded Ukraine. But since Trump returned to office this year, Putin's attacks have surged — and Trump hasn't done anything about it. Russia's summer offensive appears stalled, despite the country's large numerical advantage in troops, but Ukrainian cities are suffering more damage from Russian drone and missile strikes amid fears that Ukrainian air defenses are being depleted. In April, Trump beseeched Putin: 'Vladimir, STOP!' Vladimir hasn't stopped, yet Trump does not appear to be applying pressure to back up his words. Instead, at the Group of Seven summit in Canada recently, Trump complained about Russia's expulsion from the group. He apparently continues to speak regularly and cordially with Putin, who has been indicted as a war criminal by the International Criminal Court and is a pariah throughout the West. And the Trump administration continues to block legislation, with more than 80 sponsors, that would impose tariffs of 500 percent on any nations that buy Russia's energy products. Admittedly, there is a case to be made, as Post columnist Jim Geraghty recently noted, that this well-intentioned bill is impractical: Are we really willing to cut off all U.S. trade (which is what a 500 percent tariff would mean) with important international partners, including India, Turkey, Brazil, the European Union and South Korea, if they don't stop buying Russian energy? But it isn't as if Trump is doing anything else to turn up the heat on the Kremlin; since returning to office, he has not imposed any additional sanctions on Russia, thereby allowing existing sanctions to become less effective. Two other possible courses of action would be more effective and produce less collateral damage: providing Ukraine with badly needed air defense ammunition and other munitions while pressuring European countries to release to Ukraine the $300 billion in frozen Russian assets. Ukraine already produces about 40 percent of the weapons it uses on the front lines. With that influx of Russian funds, Ukraine could dramatically expand defense production and become more self-sufficient with weapons. That would send a strong signal to Putin that he might as well make a deal, because he is never going to achieve his objective of turning Ukraine into a Kremlin satrapy. Of even greater immediate impact would be additional deliveries of Patriot air defense interceptors. The Patriot is the most advanced air defense system in Ukraine and the Ukrainians' only effective means of shooting down ballistic missiles, but, more than a year after the last U.S. aid package was approved, Ukrainian stockpiles are dwindling. Last week, Trump said, 'We're going to see if we can make some available,' but there is no indication that his administration is doing so. Instead, the Pentagon this week halted further military aid, supposedly because U.S. stockpiles were running low. President Volodymyr Zelensky in recent months has done everything Trump wanted, from supporting an immediate ceasefire to signing a minerals deal with Washington. Putin would not even agree to a temporary ceasefire. And yet Trump is essentially punishing Ukraine and rewarding Russia. Having failed to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours — as he repeatedly promised on the campaign trail — Trump now seems ready to wash his hands of the conflict. He has hinted that he might step back from the frustrating peace talks, which would mean allowing Putin to wage war without repercussions. Trump has even compared the two sides to 'two young children fighting like crazy': 'Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' Such comments suggest Trump is guilty of moral myopia about the war in Ukraine — quite a contrast to the moral clarity he displayed about the Iranian nuclear program. Ukraine and Russia are not toddlers squabbling on the playground over inconsequential stakes. Ukraine is a pro-Western democracy that is the victim of an unprovoked war of aggression launched by an anti-American dictator. There is no moral equivalence between the sides; the war is as pure an example of good vs. evil as the modern world has seen. If Russia wins, all of Europe will be endangered, and other aggressors such as China will be emboldened. That makes aid to Ukraine — leading to a peace settlement that safeguards its sovereignty — a moral and strategic imperative for the United States. Trump just doesn't get it, and Ukraine could wind up paying a heavy price for his shortsightedness.
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 25, 2025
The rundown: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said his country will not abandon its nuclear program and that it must now rethink how to protect its facilities after strikes by Israel and the U.S. Here's what else he said. Why it matters: Araghchi told Al-Araby Al-Jadeed the nuclear program was transparent and under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and that Iran had shown its commitment to the Non-Proliferation Treaty—but that still was not enough to protect it. Read more in-depth coverage: IDF Shares Iran Nuclear Assessment as Trump Doubles Down on 'Obliteration' TL/DR: Trump said Iran will never rebuild its nuclear facilities and that his country's strikes alongside Israel's had caused them "monumental damage". What happens now? The top Iranian diplomat said the attacks will have "serious and profound effects on the course of the nuclear program," adding: "We need to rethink how we protect our nuclear facilities." Deeper reading Iran Defies Trump on Nuclear Program
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Amnesty accuses Israel and aid system of using starvation to commit Gaza genocide
CAIRO (AP) — Amnesty International accused a controversial Israeli- and U.S.-backed system to distribute aid in Gaza of using starvation tactics against Palestinians to continue to commit genocide in the Gaza Strip during Israel's war with Hamas. The U.K.-based human rights group released a report Thursday condemning Israel and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which the U.S. and Israel have backed to take over aid distribution in Gaza from a network led by the United Nations. Gaza's Health Ministry says more than 500 Palestinians have been killed at or near GHF distribution centers over the past month. The centers are guarded by private security contractors and located near Israeli military positions. Palestinian officials and witnesses have accused Israeli forces of opening fire at crowds of people moving near the sites. The Amnesty report said Israel has 'turned aid-seeking into a booby trap for desperate starved Palestinians' through GHF's militarized hubs. The conditions have created 'a deadly mix of hunger and disease pushing the population past breaking point.' 'This devastating daily loss of life as desperate Palestinians try to collect aid is the consequence of their deliberate targeting by Israeli forces and the foreseeable consequence of irresponsible and lethal methods of distribution,' said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty's secretary general. Israel's foreign minister denounced the Amnesty report, saying the organization has 'joined forces with Hamas and fully adopted all of its propaganda lies.' The Israeli army says it has fired warning shots to control crowds and only fires at people it says are acting suspiciously. The Foreign Ministry and COGAT, the Israeli defense body in charge of coordinating aid to Gaza, said Israel has facilitated the entry of over 3,000 aid trucks into the Gaza Strip since May 19 and GHF has delivered boxes of food with the equivalent of 56 million meals. Humanitarian organizations say that amount is not nearly enough to meet overwhelming need in Gaza. GHF did not immediately return requests for comment. The World Food Programme says despite the new Israel-backed initiative, food consumption reached a critical low last month, with food diversity reaching its worst level since the conflict began. 'The continued closure of crossings, intensified violence since March, soaring food prices, and extremely limited humanitarian and commercial supplies have severely restricted access to even basic food items,' the WFP said in a June report. Amnesty's report follows a statement earlier this week from more than 165 major international charities and non-governmental organizations calling for an immediate end to the foundation. They say the new mechanism allows Israel to use food as a weapon, violates humanitarian principles and is ineffective. It's the latest sign of trouble for the GHF, a secretive initiative headed by an evangelical leader who is a close ally of President Donald Trump. Last month, the U.S. government pledged $30 million for the group to continue operation, the first known U.S. donation to the group, whose other funding sources remain opaque. GHF started distributing aid May 26 following a nearly three-month Israeli blockade that pushed Gaza's population of more than 2 million to the brink of famine. Palestinian witnesses have describe scenes of chaos around the distribution sites, and two contractors in the operation have told The Associated Press that colleagues fired live ammunition and stun grenades toward crowds of people. Palestinians often must travel long distances to reach the sites. In a statement Tuesday, GHF rejected criticism of its operations and claimed it has delivered more than 52 million meals to hungry Palestinians. 'Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza,' GHF said. GHF has called for Israel's military to investigate the allegations from Gaza's Health Ministry, but last month the organization said there has been no violence in or around its centers and its personnel have not opened fire. Israel demanded the alternative plan because it accuses Hamas of siphoning off aid. The U.N. and aid groups deny there is significant diversion. Amnesty accused Israel last year of committing genocide in the Gaza Strip during its war with Hamas, saying it has sought to deliberately destroy Palestinians by mounting deadly attacks, demolishing vital infrastructure, and preventing the delivery of food, medicine and other aid. Israel, which was founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust, has adamantly rejected genocide allegations against it as an antisemitic 'blood libel.' It is challenging such allegations filed by South Africa at the International Court of Justice and has rejected the International Criminal Court's accusations that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister committed war crimes in Gaza. ___ Dazio reported from Berlin. ___ Follow AP's war coverage at
