
Civil servants rack up £75,000 in expenses giving away Chagos Islands
Foreign Office diplomats landed taxpayers with the large bill for travel to and from Mauritius, covering business class flights, hotel stays and taxis.
It comes on top of the estimated £9-£18 billion price that Britain will pay when handing over the strategically important Indian Ocean archipelago.
Critics said that Rachel Reeves's new Office for Value for Money (OVM) should investigate the spending, revealed by The Telegraph under freedom of information laws.
Figures released by the Foreign Office show that a team of just eight negotiators racked up the £75,000 bill.
The bulk of the spending was on 19 flights for officials on British Airways and Air Mauritius, of which 17 were business class.
The team clocked up £68,452 in air fares, with the most expensive being a return flight with BA in December which cost £6,338.
A further £3,458 was spent on hotel stays by the negotiators, at resorts in Mauritius where rooms cost up to £230 per night.
The remainder included £237 on meals, £104 for taxis and rail fares, and £1,444 worth of fees for flight changes and bookings.
The negotiations took place the end of August and in mid-December, when temperatures in the Indian Ocean islands average 27C.
At the same time Britain was battered by seasonal storms while the South of England endured its wettest Autumn in a century, according to the Met Office.
James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said: 'Taxpayers will be horrified to hear that Labour are wasting so much money in order to negotiate wasting a whole lot more.
' Rachel Reeves's brand new OVM isn't looking at Chagos because, according to the Treasury, treaties are 'outside their remit'.
'That needs to change – wasting tens of thousands of pounds gadding about to waste billions of pounds renting islands we already own is far from value for money.'
The Foreign Office said that all the flights were in line with its 'strict rules' that business class can only be used for journeys longer than 10 hours.
It added that negotiators had only booked hotel rooms when there was not enough space to accommodate them at the High Commissioner's residence.
'In-person negotiations are essential to delivering such a complex agreement that is in the UK's national interests. In order to minimise cost, the negotiating rounds were split between the UK and Mauritius,' the department said in a statement.
The revelation comes after it emerged that Mauritius is demanding even more money from British taxpayers under the deal to hand over Chagos.
Under the controversial agreement thrashed out by Labour, the UK would already pay an estimated £9 billion to £18 billion.
No 10 would relinquish control to Mauritius, which is 1,500 miles from the archipelago and has never previously governed it.
Britain would then take out a 99-year lease on the biggest island, Diego Garcia, which is a key military base used by the US air force.
The deal has proved highly controversial in the UK and US but unexpectedly received the approval of Donald Trump at the start of this month.
Following the US president's sign off, Mauritian negotiators tabled demands for even larger lease payments and a new pot of development funding.
A Foreign Office spokesman said the negotiations in person 'were vital to delivering an agreement that secures the full operation of the base on Diego Garcia', adding: 'The UK Government has robust rules in place to ensure any expenditure is carefully checked and provides value-for-money for the taxpayer...
'As much as possible, the negotiators stayed at the High Commissioner's residence while in Mauritius for the negotiations.
'The agreement is rooted in a rational and hard-headed determination to protect UK security. Once signed it will protect the base on Diego Garcia and cement UK and US presence in the Indo-Pacific for generations to come.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
12 minutes ago
- Metro
RB Leipzig set new lower asking price for Chelsea and Arsenal target Xavi Simons
Arsenal and Chelsea will be able to sign Xavi Simons for a discounted price if they formalise their interest in the wantaway RB Leipzig star. The Netherlands international has made clear his desire to leave the Bundesliga club this summer. RB's position has been rendered weak following their failure to qualify for European football next season. Simons has just two years left on his contract and with no prospect of a contract extension in the offing, Simons' departure is looking increasingly certain. London rivals Arsenal and Chelsea are carefully monitoring Simons' situation while Bayern Munich are also understood to be in the mix. Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link we'll send you so we can get football news tailored to you. The German champions were stunned after missing out on Florian Wirtz who sealed a British record move to Liverpool having opted to leave Bayer Leverkusen earlier this summer. RB Leipzig were hoping to make a sizable profit on the €50m (£41.8m) they spent to sign the player earlier this year but, according to Fabrizio Romano, the creative midfielder will now be available for under €70m. Whether that will be a valuation that would tempt Barcelona back into the mix remains to be seen. On Thursday, Barcelona's sporting director, Deco, met with Simons' brother Faustino and the midfielder's advisor, Ali Barat, at a hotel in the city. Barca are unlikely to be able to finance a deal if they were required to compete with the Bundesliga giants and have already seen a move for Nico Williams fall through earlier in the window. In any case, Simons is, according to Bild, minded to join an English side to continue his development having endured something of a nomadic career to this point. The 22-year-old already has the names of Paris Saint-Germain, where he had two different spells, PSV and Leipzig on his CV. More Trending Arsenal have made just one attacking signing so far this summer with Noni Madueke having completed his move from Chelsea last week. A move for Viktor Gyokeres is still hanging in the balance while little progress has been made on a reported move for Eberechi Eze. Real Madrid's Rodrygo is said to remain on Arsenal's radar but his wage demands are likely to prove prohibitive. Chelsea, for their part, have signed two strikers already in Joao Pedro and Liam Delap but are seeking further reinforcements. MORE: Club expect to receive official Man Utd transfer bid for goalkeeper 'soon' MORE: Mikel Arteta speaks out on Arsenal's handling of Thomas Partey exit following rape charges MORE: 'That's crazy' – Paul Pogba questions Man Utd decision to let go of 'great player'

Leader Live
12 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Ukraine's allies stand at ‘moment of maximum opportunity'
The Defence Secretary said the UK and other allies must use Donald Trump's 50-day ultimatum to Vladimir Putin to start a '50-day drive' to arm Ukraine ahead of any talks, with the aim of strengthening its hand against Russia. The US president has threatened to impose 'very severe' tariffs on Russia if it does not agree a ceasefire by September 2, 50 days on from his announcement that he would sell 'top-of-the-line' weapons to Nato that could then be given to Ukraine. Speaking at the 29th meeting of the Ukraine Defence Contact Group (UDCG), Mr Healey told allies gathered from 52 nations: 'This is a moment of maximum opportunity. 'Last week, President Trump announced a new plan for large scale Nato weapons transfers, and committed to getting these, he said, quickly distributed to the battlefield. 'The UK backs this policy. We will play our full part in its success.' Mr Healey added: 'Alongside this new agreement to ensure that Ukraine has what it needs to defend itself, President Trump also started the clock on a 50-day deadline for Putin to agree to peace or to face crippling economic sanctions. 'And as members of this UDCG, we need to step up, in turn, a 50-day drive to arm Ukraine on the battlefield and to help push Putin to the negotiating table.' The UK Defence Secretary chaired the meeting for the fourth time, also his third time co-chairing with German defence minister Boris Pistorius. The group, which brings together defence ministers and officials from Ukraine's allies, was chaired by the US until Mr Trump came to power and began rowing back on American support for Kyiv and European security. As the UK and Germany led calls for European allies to step up their support for Kyiv, Mr Healey said the two countries have 'agreed to partner in providing critical air defence missiles to Ukraine'. His German counterpart Mr Pistorius, meanwhile, said the pair were involved in an initiative to replenish ammunition for anti-aircraft guns. 'We will, together with our British friends, provide 220,000 rounds of 35 millimetre ammunition for the Gepard anti-aircraft gun system at short notice, financed by Germany,' the German defence minister said. The drive to step up support for Ukraine comes after the UK revealed it has spent some £150 million on air defence and artillery for the war-torn nation over the past two months. At least £700 million will be spent on similar support over the course of the year, according to the Ministry of Defence.


Powys County Times
12 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
‘Never again': Regulatory reform pledged to prevent repeat of water bill hikes
The Environment Secretary has said households will 'never again' face major water bill hikes as he announced an overhaul of regulation of the troubled sector. Steve Reed announced in a speech alongside the River Thames that regulator Ofwat would be scrapped, as part of measures to pull overlapping water regulation by four different bodies into one 'single powerful' regulator responsible for the whole sector. He made the announcement in response to an independent review by Sir Jon Cunliffe which called for the move, as one of 88 measures to tackle problems in the water sector. The review was commissioned by the Government to answer public fury over pollution in rivers, lakes and seas, soaring bills, shareholder payouts and bosses' bonuses. Mr Reed pledged the new regulator would 'stand firmly on the side of customers, investors and the environment', as he said the Government would cut sewage pollution by half by 2030 – based on a new, higher baseline of pollution in 2024 compared with previous targets relating to 2021. And it would oversee maintenance and investment in water infrastructure so that 'hard-working British families are never again hit by the shocking bill hikes we saw last year'. Questioned by journalists after the speech about future bill hikes, Mr Reed insisted it was 'absolutely the intention' that the reforms would ensure there was adequate investment in the long term to prevent the kind of 30% increase seen in customer water bills last year at the next price review in five years. He also accused the Tories of failing to ensure sufficient investment in crumbling pipes and infrastructure that would have prevented the recent hikes. But in a separate speech, review author Sir Jon warned that costs and bills are likely to continue to rise, as he recommended the Government introduce a national social tariff to help households struggling to pay. 'The cost of producing water and wastewater services is likely to increase over the medium and longer term as the industry has to replace ageing assets, respond to higher environmental and public health standards and continue to adapt to the challenges of population growth and climate change,' he said. 'And against that likely background of rising costs and rising bills, there is a need for a stronger safety net for the most vulnerable when exposed to water poverty.' Asked if investor returns will need to rise to attract the capital needed and contribute to bill hikes, Sir Jon said: 'All the investors I talked to said we are happy to accept a lower return … if you can give us lower risk on the downside. 'Bills will have to reflect what investors need, the equity they need. 'That is part of the cost of building the infrastructure that we need but at the same time, a regulator needs to continue to maintain pressure and efficiency.' Sir Jon's review did not explore renationalising water companies; ministers have refused to entertain the possibility despite demands from campaigners to return them to public ownership. Mr Reed warned nationalisation would cost £100 billion and slow down efforts to cut pollution. He said it was not the answer, adding: 'The problems are to do with governance and regulation, and we are fixing those problems so we can fix the problem of sewage pollution and unacceptable bill hikes in the fastest time possible.' The reforms would see a single regulator replace Ofwat and take in functions related to the water sector from the Environment Agency, which currently investigates pollution incidents and licenses water abstraction from the environment, as well as the Drinking Water Inspectorate and Natural England. Sir Jon suggested a new water regulator would take two years to set up after looking at the time frame for setting up Ofcom, the communications regulator, in the early 2000s. The process could involve bringing the different organisations together as one before integrating the staff and working out where there may be duplication or gaps. Sir Jon also said the Government will have to tackle the issue of securing a 'very high level of leadership', adding that the current system does not have the skills and expertise that will be needed in the new set-up. Asked if ministers need to carry forward all of his 88 recommendations to ensure a full reset of the sector, he said: 'I don't think you're going to solve the fundamental problem unless you tackle all of those issues. 'I think you can get improvement on all those dimensions, but I do think you need to address it all in order to move us to a different place.'