Nat Barr confronts senior Labor politician over PM's pointed jabs at US following multiple meeting failures with Trump
Albanese spoke in Sydney to mark 80 years since Curtin's death, saying he would pursue Australia's national interest, even when they differ from those of the United States.
Curtin was known for his resistance to pressure from the British and Americans, who wanted him to deploy troops to Burma, now Myanmar, after the fall of Singapore in World War II.
The speech was widely reported as a snub to Donald Trump, with whom Albanese has consistently failed to meet following the US president's re-election in November.
Meanwhile Albanese has met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping three times, with another meeting planned during a forthcoming trip to Beijing, which has raised eyebrows among political observers.
Barr spoke with Plibersek and Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce on Monday, questioning the implications behind Albanese's speech.
Barr asked Plibersek: 'Tanya, that was an interesting speech. It did feel like we were heading in another direction. When you have basically a conga line of defence experts lining up saying we need to be spending more on defence in this country.'
Plibersek: '(Prime Minister Anthony Albanese) made the perfectly valid point that Australia, the Labor government, will always put Australian interests first.'
Joyce: 'When they get a meeting with the president!'
Plibersek: 'Why is that remarkable Barnaby?'
Joyce: 'It is remarkable because we have been devoid of a relationship at the highest level.
'The prime minister and the president are not talking to one another in a face-to-face meeting.
'If you're going to put Australia first, you better get our defence relationship up to speed because the number one job is the protection of the Australian people.
'I didn't give that crazy speech that the Prime Minister gave at the John Curtin Institute where he said we might go our own way. With who's army? We are way behind, we have six submarines and at times, none of them work.
'We have frigates we sometimes can't find crews for. We have a defence force that is smaller in comparative power. In comparative terms, we have never been smaller against a major superpower.
'In comparative terms, not total terms.'
Joyce took aim at Albanese saying Australia is moving closer to China, and further from the United States.
'This is very dangerous,' Joyce said.
'You need to understand the United States is the cornerstone of our defence relationship. It is not going well.
'This is the fourth meeting he has had with the leader of China but that is a totalitarian regime.
'Trump has not had a meeting with the prime minister yet. I'm truly concerned about that, especially while adding a review on AUKUS.'
Barr asked: 'Shouldn't we make friends with China?'
Joyce: 'We should but not at the expense of the US. You need to understand that we live in the realm of the western Pacific, if things go pear-shaped, we are in trouble, real trouble.
'If we have a defence policy that doesn't include the United States, we need to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on defence. We are way, way behind where we need to be.'
Barr asked: 'Is the prime pinister looking for a new best friend in China?'
Plibersek: 'Your question started with the assumption that there is a fraying with the United States, and nothing could be further than the truth.
'The prime minister has spoken to the president on the phone, the defence minister met his counterpart recently, the foreign affairs minister has just been in the United States recently.
'Trade ministers ... All sorts of high-level dialogue (is) constantly going on with the United States and that is as it should be.
'The United States is absolutely our foundational defence and security partner.
'The relationship is terrific.
'We also would have a good trading relationship with China, under the previous Morrison government trading relationship had smashed our agricultural sector. We have restored $20 billion of trade with China.
'It is good for our farmers and good for Barnaby and his constituents.
'I would have thought he would be welcoming the restoration of trade with the stabilisation of the relationship.
'The prime minister has constantly said we cooperate with China where we can, we disagree where we must, and that has worked out very well for Australia in recent years.'
Joyce appeared to call for Australia's Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd to go, echoing concerns that Rudd's past derogatory comments about Trump mean he can't effectively manage Australia's relationship with the US.
'(The meeting failures are) not a sign of a good relationship,' Joyce said.
'If we can't extract the meeting between the prime minister and the president of the United States, we are in the background.
'I like Kevin Rudd, he's a nice guy. But he is not the ambassador for the United States.
'He needs to be moved to somewhere like the United Kingdom or France, and we have got to really work on this relationship because it is tenuous and that is dangerous, or (more) dangerous for Australia than it is for the US.'
Barr asked Plibersek if Albanese's relationship with Trump is where the government wanted it to be.
Plibersek replied: 'He's had multiple calls with the president.'
Barr: 'One was a congratulations. I don't know whether that would count.'
Plibersek: 'We were disappointed when the president needed to return quickly to Washington because the Middle East blew up. Anybody would understand the president of the United States would want to be back in Washington.'
Joyce interjected: 'He talked to the prime minister of India, he just didn't talk to us.'
Plibersek and Joyce also sparred over criticism of Australia's military positioning from former Australian army and navy commanders.
'The former chiefs of the army and navy say we are in worse form than we were 20 or 30 years ago. That's who you need to listen to,' Barr said.
Plibersek replied: '(The Coalition) could have started this project a decade ago, under the Coalition government.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
We didn't get that rate relief, but Australia remains the lucky country
The reason the Reserve Bank can be a bit more indulgent on its monetary policy in future is because the inflation monster has largely been tamed, and this has been achieved without any debilitating increase in unemployment. Loading So there is another tick. And while many economies are panicking about the effects of Donald Trump's imposition of tariffs and their rising inflationary impact, evidence suggests that Australia, perversely, will be a net beneficiary of this otherwise debilitating trade policy. Of course, the uncertainty of the ad hoc and rapidly changing and unpredictable imposition of US trade levies brings with it uncertainty for all countries including Australia, and raises the risk of slower global growth. But according to a report this week from the Productivity Commission, its modelling shows that if one excludes the impact of uncertainty, 'the proposed US tariff changes could have a small, positive effect on Australia's economy. The results suggest that cheaper imports from the rest of the world, and an outflow of productive capital from the US and highly 'tariffed' economies, would slightly increase Australian production.' It was only a few months back that headlines screamed of the damage that would be wrought by tariffs on our steel and aluminium. These fears were, of course, overblown given our exports of these products account for less than a combined $1 billion a year. Rather, the Productivity Commission found that US 'Liberation Day' tariffs and tariffs on aluminium, steel and automobiles and parts could lead to an increase in Australian real GDP of 0.37 per cent. It says that the impact of Trump's tariffs would be negative on Australia if our government sought to impose retaliatory tariffs, but there is no suggestion that the Albanese government would do so. Thus, by several measures Australia is sitting in a sweet spot relative to many – if not most – other countries. Loading The largest shadow on the horizon is the potential fall in demand from China for Australian iron ore and the associated decline in its price. This would play poorly for Australia's sovereign balance sheet, putting pressure on the budget deficit. Based on an expected rate cut next month of 25 basis points to 3.6 per cent, a $600,000 mortgage would cost $100 a month less and take to $300 the monthly savings since the Reserve Bank started easing monetary policy in February. And while the US market was rattled and fell by almost 1 per cent on Monday night about the prospects of large tariffs being placed on Japan and South Korea, the extension of a deadline to August 1, 2025, suggests a better trade agreement over the next couple of weeks.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Don't go to university next year. Just don't
This breaks my heart. I spent my entire young parenthood urging my children to study hard and go to university. Silver bullet, I said. It will change your life, your heart and your mind, I said. Hell, I did the same to myself as I ground my way through a PhD. This was the pinnacle. Hard work, surrounded by smart people urging me to push myself. Just two years ago, I was walking through the grounds of a gorgeous sandstone university with my grandchildren. You'll be going here one day, I heard myself say earnestly. (Yep, tiger mothers turn into tiger grandmothers.) Now, as a bunch of 18-year-olds are worrying about what to do with the rest of their lives, I urge them to take a deep breath. And wait. I urge parents to stop pushing. This is beyond the usual advice I give about gap years, which always assist maturity. Do not force the next generation onto a treadmill with no safety barriers, no assurance and no confidence in the future. Do not force them to attend institutions which do not have students' best interest at heart. Going to university in 2026 is a risk no-one should take. Universities are now places of chaotic cost-cutting and cruel managers whose sole interest is the bottom line. Entire disciplines are being cut, staff numbers slashed and there is an even greater than usual reliance on casual staff who are, appropriating Beyonce's poeticism, underpaid and overwhelmed. Loading I spoke to Graeme Turner, seasoned academic, researcher and author of Broken: Universities, Politics and the Public Good, who acknowledges the crisis in which higher education finds itself. Minutes into our conversation, he says: 'If the government wants to have a higher education system, it is going to have to face the fact that it will have to pay for it. It's the same problem they face with aged care and childcare. You can't prioritise essential services and turn them over to a market and assume it's going to work. History shows it doesn't.' History also shows we have a Labor federal minister for education, Jason Clare, who has broken promises, including the promise he would ditch the appalling scheme by which arts students would have to pay 50 grand for a degree. Yep, that one was a Coalition special – Job-ready Graduates, devised to ensure no-one ever did a degree about critical thinking ever again. That fee is still there a full three years after Labor was first elected. I live in hope the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, with Barney Glover, Larissa Behrendt and Mary O'Kane in its interim phase, will seize this moment to provide advice to Clare to stick to his guns. That would be a revelation to all of us. But Andrew Norton, professor of higher education policy at Monash University, now tells me he thinks it can only happen in 2027. The National Tertiary Education Union (I was a member for 15 years) tells me that more than 10,000 academics have been dumped since the end of 2020. That's thousands of people whose careers were destroyed by the commercialisation of higher education. And sure, never mind fancy-pants careers, the quality of the education those people were providing has deteriorated too. How collegiality in these institutions has survived is a bloody miracle.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
We didn't get that rate relief, but Australia remains the lucky country
The reason the Reserve Bank can be a bit more indulgent on its monetary policy in future is because the inflation monster has largely been tamed, and this has been achieved without any debilitating increase in unemployment. Loading So there is another tick. And while many economies are panicking about the effects of Donald Trump's imposition of tariffs and their rising inflationary impact, evidence suggests that Australia, perversely, will be a net beneficiary of this otherwise debilitating trade policy. Of course, the uncertainty of the ad hoc and rapidly changing and unpredictable imposition of US trade levies brings with it uncertainty for all countries including Australia, and raises the risk of slower global growth. But according to a report this week from the Productivity Commission, its modelling shows that if one excludes the impact of uncertainty, 'the proposed US tariff changes could have a small, positive effect on Australia's economy. The results suggest that cheaper imports from the rest of the world, and an outflow of productive capital from the US and highly 'tariffed' economies, would slightly increase Australian production.' It was only a few months back that headlines screamed of the damage that would be wrought by tariffs on our steel and aluminium. These fears were, of course, overblown given our exports of these products account for less than a combined $1 billion a year. Rather, the Productivity Commission found that US 'Liberation Day' tariffs and tariffs on aluminium, steel and automobiles and parts could lead to an increase in Australian real GDP of 0.37 per cent. It says that the impact of Trump's tariffs would be negative on Australia if our government sought to impose retaliatory tariffs, but there is no suggestion that the Albanese government would do so. Thus, by several measures Australia is sitting in a sweet spot relative to many – if not most – other countries. Loading The largest shadow on the horizon is the potential fall in demand from China for Australian iron ore and the associated decline in its price. This would play poorly for Australia's sovereign balance sheet, putting pressure on the budget deficit. Based on an expected rate cut next month of 25 basis points to 3.6 per cent, a $600,000 mortgage would cost $100 a month less and take to $300 the monthly savings since the Reserve Bank started easing monetary policy in February. And while the US market was rattled and fell by almost 1 per cent on Monday night about the prospects of large tariffs being placed on Japan and South Korea, the extension of a deadline to August 1, 2025, suggests a better trade agreement over the next couple of weeks.
