Environmentalists oppose ‘unlawful' darting of elephant in Wayanad
The CWW ordered the darting to tranquilise a wild elephant in Meppadi following allegations by locals that the elephant trampled an estate worker to death on Thursday night.
The petition, signed under 'For Coexistence Collective, Kerala' and the Ernakulam-based NGO ANEC, was sent to the CWW and other forest department authorities in the state and the Centre. It demanded the withdrawal of the move and the protection of the elephant corridor. As the darting operation amounts to violations of various laws, the petition demanded the assurance of ecological sensitive zone-related incentives to farmers, a ban on sound pollution activities that disturb wildlife at night, and the identification of illegal tourism resorts in the area, among other demands. It warned of legal action against the authorities if they failed to stop these violations and halt the darting operation.
The petition noted that uncontrolled tourism activities fragment the forest and lead to man-animal conflicts. It highlighted that more than 1,000 legal and illegal tourism resorts operate in Vythiri and Meppadi, disturbing the wildlife.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency
Planet Spark
Learn More
Undo
Meanwhile, the environmentalists noted that the department has not even identified the elephant which allegedly killed the estate worker Arumugan. The petition demanded that the elephant be continuously tracked, observed, monitored, and a database created to ensure that it has a tendency to attack humans before darting and capturing. The petition said that the govt is violating the existing provisions of the Indian wildlife and environment laws.
"A Schedule-1 animal can be captured and removed from its ecosystem only if it is an inevitable situation, and a forest official succumbing to the pressures of locals is such a pathetic situation," it read.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Failed foreign policy': Oppostion tears into govt over US tariff
After US President Donald Trump announced 25% tariffs 'plus a penalty' for India on Wednesday, Opposition parties questioned India's 'failed foreign policy' and asked if Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'will now stand up to Trump'. Opposition parties also questioned PM Modi's 'friendship' with the US president, and his 'silence' on Trump's claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Congress MP and general secretary in-charge for organisation K C Venugopal asked if PM Modi 'will now grow a spine and stand up to Trump'. 'By staying silent on Trump's ceasefire statements and his warmth towards Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir, PM Modi made the grave miscalculation of trying to appease Trump in the hope that India will receive a favourable trade deal,' said Venugopal. 'This completely exposes how the Modi government has compromised our national security and sovereignty by linking it to trade… We demand a clear explanation from the PM on how the government plans to navigate this perilous situation they have landed us in,' said the Congress leader. Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate said the tariffs 'will be disastrous for the Indian economy' and is a clear sign of 'how the BJP government and the PM have compromised India's national interests'. 'This comes despite Mr Modi bending backwards to woo Mr Trump… This move will have far reaching consequences on our economy, on our domestic industry, our exports and in turn employment,' said Shrinate. Samajwadi Party MP Rajeev Rai said the imposition of tariffs on India is an example of 'another failure of the Central government's foreign policy'. 'Modiji also gave the slogan of 'Ab ki baar Trump Sarkar'. On what scale has Trump kept India is clear after this announcement,' said Rai. TMC Deputy Leader in Rajya Sabha Sagarika Ghose said: 'The hollowness of the Modi govt 'abki baar Trump sarkar' slogan has been exposed once again. We bow and scrape before the Americans in the hope of getting special treatment and are rebuffed yet again by the Trump administration. Time to stand up to the US and ensure that we put India first and get the best deal possible for India.' CPI's D Raja said that Trump has claimed 'at least 30 times that he 'mediated' a ceasefire between India and Pakistan using trade as leverage'. 'This is a blatant assertion of arm-twisting India's foreign policy, yet the BJP remains silent,' said Raja. CPI-M member of Rajya Sabha John Brittas said that Trump wants India to be a 'slave'. 'It is quite shocking that the US has imposed tariffs and a penalty on India… The most important aspect is that Trump wants India to be a slave. He has questioned the sovereignty of this country. He wants to dictate where we buy oil and weapons. This is an attack on our sovereignty,' Brittas said. Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi asked where 'India's trade minister is' and said: 'Share a few words on the progress in the Trade deal? The US President's post on the tariffs deserves a firm response from none less than the PM of India.' Asad Rehman is with the national bureau of The Indian Express and covers politics and policy focusing on religious minorities in India. A journalist for over eight years, Rehman moved to this role after covering Uttar Pradesh for five years for The Indian Express. During his time in Uttar Pradesh, he covered politics, crime, health, and human rights among other issues. He did extensive ground reports and covered the protests against the new citizenship law during which many were killed in the state. During the Covid pandemic, he did extensive ground reporting on the migration of workers from the metropolitan cities to villages in Uttar Pradesh. He has also covered some landmark litigations, including the Babri Masjid-Ram temple case and the ongoing Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath temple dispute. Prior to that, he worked on The Indian Express national desk for three years where he was a copy editor. Rehman studied at La Martiniere, Lucknow and then went on to do a bachelor's degree in History from Ramjas College, Delhi University. He also has a Masters degree from the AJK Mass Communication Research Centre, Jamia Millia Islamia. ... Read More
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
ln two weeks, a crucial test for India smartphone success story
President Donald Trump's announcement on Wednesday of a 25 per cent tariff rate on India from August 1 has triggered concerns in the government that electronics exports to the United States, particularly the growing smartphone exports — which currently attract no customs duty — could be affected. A senior government official said a review meeting on Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act of 1962 is coming up in two weeks, after which there will be more clarity on whether smartphone exports could be impacted. In 2018, the US had imposed an additional tariff of 25 per cent and 10 per cent on steel and aluminum respectively, globally under the same provision, which had impacted Indian exports. While smartphones are India's top export to the US by value, Trump has threatened a 25 per cent tariff on Indian-made Apple iPhones, which account for the bulk of mobile phone exports to the country. Days after he announced reciprocal tariffs on a number of countries in April, the US administration had exempted phones, computers and other electronic products, even as the threat of a renewed tariff threat on these items looms large. Section 232 of the Act allows the US President to restrict imports that threaten national security. Specifically, the Secretary of Commerce investigates imports and if it's determined that those imports threaten national security, the President can impose tariffs or other restrictions. The term 'national security' is not defined in the statute. At present, smartphone imports into the US from India attract no customs duty, but India levies a 16.5 per cent tariff on such exports from the US. Smartphone makers have urged New Delhi to drop these tariffs, as they are worried it could irk the US administration, which could impose fresh duties on these imports. Sources said that as part of India's ongoing negotiations with the US for a bilateral trade agreement, New Delhi has agreed to reduce this duty to zero. 'There is a review meeting (on Section 232 exemptions) in the next two weeks, and we will have better clarity after that. The Commerce Ministry will negotiate for status quo,' a senior government official said, requesting anonymity. Since Trump has taken office, the US has launched investigations under Section 232 of its Trade Expansion Act of 1962 in sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, to determine whether imports in these industries could have national security implications for Washington. The Indian Express had earlier reported that India's share in US smartphone imports surged to nearly 36 per cent in the first five months of 2025, from about 11 per cent in 2024. China, which continues to dominate the product category, saw its share drop from 82 per cent to 49 per cent over the same period. US smartphone imports from India jumped by over three times year-on-year to 21.3 million units between January and May this year, according to data from the US International Trade Commission (USITC). In value terms (CIF), imports of Indian-made smartphones increased 182 per cent y-o-y to $9.35 billion, already higher than around $7 billion in the whole of 2024. In May, Apple CEO Tim Cook had said the company expects most iPhones sold in the US in the April-June quarter to have India as their country of origin. Roughly 20 per cent of Apple's global iPhone production capacity is now based in India. Meanwhile, China exported 29.4 million smartphones to the US between January and May — a 27 per cent y-o-y drop — valued at around $10 billion. China (49 per cent) and India (36 per cent) were followed by Vietnam with 8.3 million units exported, accounting for a share of 14 per cent. Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Road to October pact gets tougher, shrinks room to drive a better deal
US President Donald Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports along with a penalty for procuring military equipment and energy from Russia comes barely a day before the intended deadline to conclude agreements. It has key consequences. One, it puts India at a disadvantage in comparison to competitors. Two, it put the onus back on the Indian side to fast-track its negotiations for an interim deal with the US. Indications are that the outer limit for a deal, currently pegged at around October from New Delhi's perspective, might need to be brought forward. What complicates the equation for India is that the Chinese are at an advanced stage of negotiations towards a deal which could have a favourable tariff rate and potential waivers on secondary tariffs, which include the tariff on account of Russian oil imports and the proposed 10 per cent BRICS tariff. Though Trump did not specify the rate of penalty for India on account of Russian oil and defence imports, earlier statements made by Trump indicate that it could be to the tune of 100 per cent. This way, India stands to potentially lose the US tariff advantage vis-a-vis China at least till the time a deal is struck, even if Beijing, too, faces the same penalty for importing from Russia. Beijing does stand to have a first-mover advantage as it has already wrapped up its negotiations ahead of India with the US. A final China deal, however, is still elusive. However, some experts said that Trump's charges regarding non-tariff barriers by India are unlikely to stand up to scrutiny as India's tariffs are WTO compliant. Think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said that by refusing to cross its red lines, particularly on agriculture, India has helped avoid 'the trap of a one-sided deal'. 'India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, non-tariff barriers are common globally, and discounted Russian oil has helped India manage inflation during global volatility…India is not alone; over 90 countries face similar US pressure. A deal may still emerge, but only on fair terms. For now, India's principled stand has avoided the trap of a one-sided deal, and that's a success,' GTRI said in a statement. Trump on Monday had cut short a deadline for Moscow to make progress toward a Ukraine war peace deal or see its oil customers slapped with secondary tariffs of 100 per cent in 10-12 days. 'So I think anyone who buys sanctioned Russian oil should be ready for this,' US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had said. Chinese officials had responded saying China was a sovereign nation with energy needs, and oil purchases would be based on the country's internal policies, Bessent said. 'The Chinese take their sovereignty very seriously. We don't want to impede on their sovereignty, so they would like to pay a 100 per cent tariff,' Bessent said. China is the largest buyer of Russian oil, at about 2 million barrels per day, followed by India (just under 2 million a day) and Turkey. China had agreed to cut tariffs on US goods to 10 per cent from 125 per cent in May, while the US had agreed to lower tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent from 145 per cent. The Trump administration had set a deadline of August 1 to wrap up agreements with the US President having threatened tariffs of up to 25 per cent on Indian imports if the elusive bilateral trade agreement between the two countries is not in place by that date. 'They are going to pay 25 per cent,' Trump had said on Tuesday. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had told CNBC on Monday that the trade agreement with India would need more discussion between the two countries. Trump had, in April, set the tariff on Indian goods imported into the US at 26 per cent on April 2, before pausing his so-called 'reciprocal' levies. India Deal Given how talks between Indian and US negotiators have proceeded, an interim deal still seems distant and is unlikely to be clinched before September, with October a possible outer deadline. Indications are a sixth round of talks between the two negotiating teams will take discussions forward in August. For New Delhi, a tariff of 25 per cent is bad news, but something that policy circles seem to have already factored in. This rate essentially means going back to nearly the reciprocal tariff level, which was 26 per cent. However, the penalty implies an additional setback for India. The resolve from the Indian side would be to push the interim deal in the meantime, to ensure that Indian goods manage a discounted headline tariff, as has been wrangled by other countries that have struck a deal over the last couple of weeks. Without the BRICS levy and the penalty, India's 25 per cent compares reasonably well with countries such as Indonesia (19 per cent) and Vietnam (20-40 per cent) that have wrapped up deals, and could have had an advantage over the current levels of tariffs faced by China (30-34 per cent) and Bangladesh (35 per cent). The equation changes when the additional levies are factored in, especially the one triggered by Russian purchase. There is no clarity yet on how that will be applied. Once the interim deal is clinched, if the final US headline tariff on India ends up between 10 per cent and 15 per cent, the tariff points offered to the UK and Japan, respectively, New Delhi would have reasons to be satisfied. The advantage starts to taper off once the tariff goes over 15 per cent and inches up closer to 20 per cent, as was offered to Vietnam. A trans-shipment clause, of the kind slapped on Vietnam which levies an additional 20 per cent tariff, could be a problem for India too, given that a lot of Indian exports have inputs and intermediate goods in sectors such as pharma, engineering goods and electronics coming in from outside, including China. Also, New Delhi will be closely looking for clarity on the final American duty offer on China, given its belief that Trump will maintain a tariff differential. US and Chinese officials wrapped up two days of discussions in Stockholm on Tuesday, with no breakthrough announced. After the talks, China's top trade negotiator Li Chenggang declared that the two sides agreed to push for an extension of a 90-day tariff truce struck in mid-May, without specifying when and for how long this extension kicks in. For Indian negotiators, extra tariffs on steel and aluminium, over and above the baseline, is an added complication, alongside the proposed BRICS tariff. Trump's insistence on zero duty access to the Indian markets, like in its deals with Vietnam and Indonesia, is also a problem for India. New Delhi is, however, willing to offer concessions on high-value purchases that the US is keen to package as part of its tariff-setting exercise, like the way it got the EU and Japan to sign up for a commitment on investments and purchases of American goods. India may be open to purchasing three big-ticket items from the US: defence equipment, natural gas imports and nuclear reactors. On specific sectors such as auto or consumer non-durables, India is likely to follow a quota system that progressively opens up market access over a span of multiple years, like it did in the UK deal signed last week. Once the official level discussions wrap up by mid-August, there is a sense that a final call on the deal could come down to a conversation between the two leaders, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump. This is especially so since it is Trump who is the trade negotiator-in-chief. For India, the best-case scenario would be to get a deal of some sort now, and then build on that in the future negotiations that could run into 2026, experts said. With Trump announcing the tariffs and penalties on India, that phone call could come in earlier. Exporters Struggle Meanwhile, as the uncertainty continues, India's exporters are struggling to navigate the way forward because buyers in the US are not clear as to what the final tariff will be, and are consequently holding back orders. The higher tariffs that the US has imposed on China means a number of Chinese manufacturers are now also rerouting shipments to Europe at throwaway prices, which is impacting India's exports to the EU as well. India, like other countries, had frontloaded shipments ahead of the reciprocal tariff deadline for the ongoing Spring-Summer season, but there is now a question mark over the orders for the Fall-Winter season from October to March. The higher-than-anticipated US tariff rate could also dent India's growth prospects, economists said. 'When the US had initially imposed tariffs, we had lowered our forecast of India's GDP expansion to 6.2% for FY2026, presuming a tepid rise in exports and a delay in private capex. The tariff (and penalty) now proposed by the US is higher than what we had anticipated, and is therefore likely to pose a headwind to India's GDP growth. The extent of the downside will depend on the size of the penalties imposed,' Aditi Nayar, Chief Economist, ICRA said. Aanchal Magazine is Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and reports on the macro economy and fiscal policy, with a special focus on economic science, labour trends, taxation and revenue metrics. With over 13 years of newsroom experience, she has also reported in detail on macroeconomic data such as trends and policy actions related to inflation, GDP growth and fiscal arithmetic. Interested in the history of her homeland, Kashmir, she likes to read about its culture and tradition in her spare time, along with trying to map the journeys of displacement from there. ... Read More Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
