Palestinians storm aid centres, ignoring checks
By late afternoon on Tuesday, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said it had distributed about 8000 food boxes, equivalent to about 462,000 meals, after an almost three-month-old Israeli blockade of the war-devastated enclave.
In the southern city of Rafah, which is under full Israeli army control, thousands of people including women and children, some on foot or in donkey carts, flocked towards one of the distribution sites to receive food packages.
Videos, some of which Reuters could not immediately verify, showed lines of people walking through a wired-off corridor and into a large open field where aid was stacked. Later, images shared on social media showed large parts of the fence torn down as people jostled their way onto the site.
Israel and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said, without providing evidence, that Hamas, Gaza's dominant militant group, had tried to block civilians from reaching the aid distribution centre.
Hamas denied the accusation.
"The real cause of the delay and collapse in the aid distribution process is the tragic chaos caused by the mismanagement of the same company operating under the Israeli occupation's administration in those buffer zones," Ismail Al-Thawabta, director of the Hamas-run Gaza government media office, told Reuters.
"This has led to thousands of starving people, under the pressure of siege and hunger, storming distribution centres and seizing food, during which Israeli forces opened fire," he added.
The Israel military said its troops fired warning shots in the area outside the compound and that control was reestablished.
A UN spokesperson called images of the incident "heartbreaking."
Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein wrote on X that 8000 "food packages" were delivered to Palestinians on Tuesday, the first day of what he described as an American initiative.
Some of the recipients showed the content of the packages, which included some rice, flour, canned beans, pasta, olive oil, biscuits and sugar.
Although the aid was available on Monday, Palestinians appeared to have heeded warnings, including from Hamas, about biometric screening procedures employed at the foundation's aid distribution sites.
Israel says the Switzerland-based GHF is a US-backed initiative and that its forces will not be involved in the distribution points where food will be handed out.
But its endorsement of the plan and its closeness with the US has led many to question the neutrality of the foundation, including its own former chief, who resigned unexpectedly on Sunday.
The Israeli military said four aid sites have been established in recent weeks across the enclave, and that two of them in the Rafah area began operations on Tuesday and "are distributing food packages to thousands of families in the Gaza Strip."
The GHF said the number of people seeking aid at one distribution site was so great at one point on Tuesday that its team had to pull back to allow people to "take aid safely and dissipate" and to avoid casualties. It said normal operations later resumed.
Israeli officials said one of the advantages of the new aid system is the opportunity to screen recipients to exclude anyone found to be connected with Hamas. Israel, at war with Hamas since October 2023, accuses Hamas of stealing supplies and using them to entrench its position. Hamas denies the accusations.
The Israeli military said in a statement that 400 humanitarian aid trucks were waiting in Gaza for distribution but that the UN was still refusing to "do its job."
Last week Israel eased its blockade, allowing a trickle of aid trucks from international agencies into Gaza - just a fraction of the 500-600 trucks that the UN estimates are needed every day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Kanye West has Australian visa revoked after Heil Hitler song release
Kanye West's Australian visa has been cancelled by the federal government because the American rapper was promoting Nazism through the release of a song called Heil Hitler, Immigration Minister Tony Burke says. Speaking on ABC's Afternoon Briefing this week, Burke said that the rapper who now goes by the name of Ye 'no longer has a valid visa' because 'he's made a lot of offensive comments', specifically referencing a recent release titled Heil Hitler. Burke said West has been travelling to Australia 'for a long time', and that following his 2022 marriage to Australian designer Bianca Censori, he now has family in the country. 'It wasn't a visa even for the purpose of the concerts; it was a lower level. And the officials still looked at the law and said, 'if you're going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism, we don't need that in Australia,'' Burke said. 'I think that what's not sustainable is to import hatred. Like, you know, some people say, 'Oh, don't you believe in freedom of speech?' And for Australian citizens, yeah, you've got full freedom of speech. But we have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry.' What power does the government have to cancel visas? The Minister for Immigration has various powers to refuse or cancel the visa of any visitor to Australia, and their family, including if the person fails a 'character test' and the refusal is deemed in the national interest. The test states that if the minister believes an individual is at risk of vilifying or inciting discord among a segment of the community they may cancel or refuse a visa. Having a criminal record, association with criminal groups, suspicions of human trafficking and crimes against humanity are also considered in the character test. Who else has had their visa cancelled?
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Kanye West has Australian visa revoked after Heil Hitler song release
Kanye West's Australian visa has been cancelled by the federal government because the American rapper was promoting Nazism through the release of a song called Heil Hitler, Immigration Minister Tony Burke says. Speaking on ABC's Afternoon Briefing this week, Burke said that the rapper who now goes by Ye 'no longer has a valid visa' because 'he's made a lot of offensive comments', specifically referencing a recent release titled Heil Hitler. Burke said West has been travelling to Australia 'for a long time', and that following his 2022 marriage to Australian designer Bianca Censori, he now has family in the country. 'It wasn't a visa even for the purpose of the concerts; it was a lower level. And the officials still looked at the law and said, 'if you're going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism, we don't need that in Australia,'' Burke said. 'I think that what's not sustainable is to import hatred. Like, you know, some people say, 'Oh, don't you believe in freedom of speech?' And for Australian citizens, yeah, you've got full freedom of speech. But we have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry.' What power does the government have to cancel visas? The Minister for Immigration has various powers to refuse or cancel the visa of any visitor to Australia, and their family, including if the person fails a 'character test' and the refusal is deemed in the national interest. The test states that if the minister believes an individual is at risk of vilifying or inciting discord among a segment of the community they may cancel or refuse a visa. Having a criminal record, association with criminal groups, suspicions of human trafficking and crimes against humanity are also considered in the character test. Who else has had their visa cancelled?
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Trump's foolish war on the world is a mess
Further complicating matters is that the administration has imposed the 10 per cent baseline tariff rate, foreshadowed the so-called reciprocal tariffs (there's nothing reciprocal about them) and has already imposed additional sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminium, products derived from those metals, autos and auto parts and foreshadowed more of those targeted tariffs. That makes the negotiations multidimensional and the overall outcome, once there is one, very messy. Each of America's major trading partners will have unique deals – a mix of an overall rate plus the sectoral tariffs – whether negotiated or imposed. The agreement with Vietnam, and what's known about discussions with other major trading partners, provide some insights into what the US is trying to achieve, although details are sketchy – Trump announced the deal with Vietnam on his Truth Social platform. 'Vietnam will pay the United States a 20 per cent tariff on any and all goods sent into our Territory, and a 40 per cent Tariff on any Transhipping. In return, Vietnam will do something they have never done before, give the United States of America TOTAL ACCESS to their Markets for Trade,' Trump wrote (in his usual unique style). 'In other words, they will 'OPEN THE MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that, we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff,' he wrote. Trump thinks Vietnam, with per capita incomes of about $US4500, would be a good market for American SUVs, whose prices range from $US30,000 to about $US80,000! Loading Leaving aside the reality that it won't be the Vietnamese paying the import duties but the US importers, the rate on Vietnam's export to the US has just doubled. During Trump's trade war with China in his first term, a lot of companies that had used China as their manufacturing base shifted their factories to Vietnam. Others set up entities that finished semi-manufactured products from China to qualify as Vietnamese sourced products and there were those who simply re-labelled Chinese products as made in Vietnam. Since then, exports from Vietnam to the US have soared. Last year, for instance they jumped 33 per cent. Vietnam exported $US136.6 billion ($A207.5 billion) of goods to the US in 2024 but imported only $US13 billion. The 40 per cent rate for 'transhipping' is squarely aimed at China, which is acutely aware that in most of the negotiations the US is trying to restrict efforts by Chinese companies to circumvent the 55 per cent tariff the US has imposed on its exports to the US and reduce its trade with third countries and access to global supply chains. Trump's 'liberation' of America will come at a heavy cost. The deal with Vietnam will, if it can be policed (a major 'if' for all these trade deals), hit China's exports of components and the rebadging of Chinese goods as 'Made in Vietnam.' Similar demands are being made of the EU and other Asian and Latin American economies, some of which (including Germany) have significantly greater trade relationships with China than they do with the US. China has already warned that it won't accept US attempts to throttle its exports, with the Ministry of Commerce saying last weekend that 'of this happened, China will never accept it and will resolutely counter it to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' China, of course, has a more powerful trade weapon than Trump's tariffs that it can deploy. It demonstrated in the trade confrontation with the US earlier this year, when there was an exchange of absurdly high tariffs that ended in an uneasy truce, that its dominance of rare earths can be weaponised. There's not much advanced manufacturing that can occur without access to rare earths and rare earth magnets – China could shut down the US auto industry almost overnight by cutting off supply and do substantial damage to America's defence capabilities. It could also use that leverage against countries co-operating with the US to shrink its exports. Trump's attempt to dictate lop-sided terms of trade with America's trade partners hasn't been as straightforward as he anticipated because they impinge on other countries sovereignty and are complicated by their domestic politics. Negotiations with Japan have stalled because the US has imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Japan's auto exports and Trump has demanded Japan open its heavily protected market to American rice. Japan's auto industry generated about 10 per cent of its GDP and employs about 8 per cent of its workforce. While it exports about 1.4 million cars a year to the US, it makes a lot more – about 3.3 million a year – within the US. Japan's trade negotiators have made it clear that, while they are happy to commit to buying a lot more LNG and military equipment from US, the tariff on its auto exports is a dealbreaker. Rice is another non-negotiable, even though Japan is experiencing a shortage of the staple. The agricultural lobby within Japan is powerful and its support critical to the ruling Liberal Democrat Party, which faces an election later this month. That suggests its tariff will be set at 24 per cent – the rate announced on April 2 – although Trump has said that, if there is no deal, it could be 35 per cent 'or whatever the number is.' Trump's 10 per cent baseline, sectoral and China tariffs have already raised the effective tariff rate on imports to the US from around 2.5 per cent into the mid-teens. Loading Drawing a line from the deal with Vietnam and the likely outcome of the talks with Japan, it is conceivable that that rate could double again once the reciprocal tariffs are unveiled. Trump's tariffs will raise a lot of revenue, but contrary to what he says and appears to believe, it will be from US companies and consumers, will drive up consumer prices and inflation and/or drive down US profit margins and economic activity and damage relations with America's trading partners, including its closest allies. Trump's 'liberation' of America will come at a heavy cost.
