
How a camel herder from Qatar who can't speak a word of English ended up living in London's smartest street - then tried to rape a woman in a private heart clinic where HE was being treated
Standing in the dock at Southwark Crown Court this week was Nasser Al-Gherainiq who was convicted of two counts of attempted rape which left his victim 'frozen with fear'. Her words.
The appearance of this foreign national in court – a scene replicated up and down the country – has become frighteningly common, with foreign offenders now representing nearly one in eight (12 per cent) prisoners in our overcrowded jails.
But surely few have a story quite like 27-year-old Al-Gherainiq who was, until his arrest at least, a camel herder from a conservative Bedouin tribe in the deserts of Qatar.
According to his barrister, he had little contact with the outside world or any experience of modern or urban life before his arrival in the UK to receive treatment for a rare heart condition at a private health unit linked to the renowned Royal Brompton Hospital in south-west London.
Al-Gherainiq, dressed in standard prison 'greys' (grey sweatshirt, grey trousers), was effectively from a different age, in other words.
It was the reason why, when asked how he was going to plead, Al-Gherainiq, who spoke no English, answered in Arabic and an interpreter next to him then replied: 'Not guilty.'
Profound cultural differences, the defence argued, meant he did not know how to interact with women. He was 'equivalent to an immature and inexperienced adolescent' who 'completely failed to understand' his victim's 'true feelings'.
Put bluntly, they argued that he did not know the woman had not consented to sex when he pulled her into a toilet cubicle at the medical centre and assaulted her.
The jury flatly rejected that version of events. He might have come from a remote corner of the earth, but the judge told Al-Gherainiq: 'You knew perfectly well what you were doing,' before jailing him for seven years.
The case left a number of puzzling and troubling questions. How did he get here? Who paid for his treatment and the trip? Where did he stay when he came to London?
The last of these is perhaps the key to unlocking this quite extraordinary saga.
Al-Gherainiq, who spent more than a year on remand before going on trial, came to the country sometime in 2023, the first time he had ever left Qatar.
He appeared before Westminster Magistrates' Court in August of that year following his arrest. His address was given as 79 Mount Street.
Mount Street, currently perhaps the most glamorous address in London, is in the heart of Mayfair. It's home to Scott's restaurant as well as George, an ultra-exclusive private members' club, and Toteme, the chic Swedish fashion brand which has also opened a signature store there.
It is also an area which is sometimes known as 'Little Doha' or 'Qataropolis' because of the number of multi-million-pound Qatari-owned properties in the highly exclusive enclave.
Number 79 is a six-storey Victorian townhouse that was once the London residence of homeware tycoon David Meller, a former vice chairman of Watford Football Club. When he sold the mansion for more than £40million in 2015, it was among the most expensive domestic property deals in the capital at the time. The stamp duty payment alone was in excess of £4.7million.
Hard to imagine then what connection an apparently lowly camel herder – and now convicted sex attacker – had with such a place.
The connection, however, is revealed at the Land Registry where the current owners who purchased the property from the Mellers (for precisely £44.25million) are listed as the 'State of Qatar', effectively the Thani dynasty, the ruling family of the oil and gas rich Gulf state.
Qatar is one of the few countries in the world that offers near free universal healthcare to all its citizens which includes sending them overseas if certain specialised services are unavailable at home.
Among the foreign cities where Qatar has medical offices is London which is linked to the Hamad Medical Corporation back in the Middle East, Qatar's main not-for-profit health care provider.
In 2023, 53,000 Qataris applied to receive treatment abroad. Al-Gherainiq was one of them. After a series of medical checks in his homeland, he was flown to London, a Qatari official with knowledge of the case revealed, and was initially given a daily allowance to cover his accommodation costs.
His private housing arrangements fell through at the last minute, though, and the Qatari Embassy stepped in to help him.
No 79 Mount Street, once a family home with a swimming pool in the basement, and now split up into separate rooms and apartments, is managed by the embassy and used for functions and events.
On rare occasions, as in this instance, ordinary Qatari citizens can temporarily be given a room as 'emergency accommodation'.
This is how a camel herder from the desert came to be living on Millionaire's Row.
'The Embassy of the State of Qatar in London is aware of a criminal case involving one of its citizens and his subsequent conviction,' the official said.
'The Embassy has had no contact with the individual since the time of his arrest and has not provided legal representation or support beyond standard consular assistance, in accordance with international consular norms.'
Al-Gherainiq was evicted from Mount Street after the police contacted the embassy following his arrest.
Locals say residents at the palatial property which occupies 10,000 square feet and is close to the private health unit in Wimpole Street where Al-Gherainiq was a patient, are not long-term, staying a maximum of a few months before moving on.
They are often picked up by luxury cars such as Ferraris, Aston Martins and Lamborghinis.
A team of security guards monitor comings and goings from the property next door, which the Qataris also own.
Relations between the Qatari contingent and neighbours are often strained.
'They think they own the street,' said a builder carrying out work at a house on the opposite side of the road.
They probably do, given that even a few years ago, a quarter of Mayfair's 279 acres and more than 4,300 residential properties, were reportedly owned by Qatari investors.
The contrast between this world and the world Nasser Al-Gherainiq inhabited couldn't be more stark.
He belonged to the Al Murrah tribe – the 'People of the Camel' – the largest and most powerful in Qatar, which has strong relations, including marital ties, with the ruling House of Thani.
Qatar might combine Arab culture with Western luxuries epitomised by the bling, glamour and gleaming skyscrapers of the capital Doha, but it remains a deeply patriarchal society.
Polygamy is legal, meaning a Muslim man is allowed up to four wives at once provided he treats them equally.
Opaque male guardianship rules leave women without basic freedoms, such as travelling on their own with women needing permission to travel abroad from the male head of the household, according to Human Rights Watch (HRW).
And only 45 minutes from Doha and its surrounding suburbs is the desert.
Many of the Al Murrah tribe, which is made up of various clans, have joined government sponsored resettlement programmes in urban areas.
But a hardcore, like Al-Gherainiq, remain in the wilderness, claiming, among other things, historic nomadic rights.
Many elders here still expect women to organise their lives around domestic chores, such as weaving, shearing sheep and crafting goat-hair tents and carpets for which they have become famous.
Al-Gherainiq himself, the court heard, had almost no contact with women outside his family and his only really 'meaningful contact' with a female in the family was with his mother.
'Limited visits to Doha and a preference for a desert environment curtailed his exposure to urban and modern societal norms,' said Jane Bickerstaff, KC, defending.
It might explain his unhealthy attitude to women but how could it possibly justify dragging a woman into a toilet cubicle and attempting to rape her twice?
'I was so scared,' his victim said in a statement read to the court. 'I felt frozen with fear. I couldn't go anywhere. Although the incident lasted a few minutes it felt like ages to me... my life has never been the same... I am not the outgoing woman I used to be. I am withdrawn and highly anxious and overly cautious, especially when I'm on my own in an unfamiliar environment.'
The fact this incident happened in a top medical centre is particularly chilling.
The woman, who is receiving therapy, still has difficulty sleeping and has nightmares and flashbacks. She has withdrawn from work and church, 'two things she loved', Judge Adam Hiddleston said.
'Clearly what you did has had a devastating effect on her,' he told Al-Gherainiq. 'There is evidence of severe psychological harm.' He added: 'I appreciate the cultural differences between the world in which you grew up and in the United Kingdom.'
But he rejected any suggestion that his sentence should therefore be reduced.
The judge made a recommendation that he should be deported to Qatar 'as soon as possible' once he has served his sentence.
In fact, he wants to go back, his barrister said, because 'there is no reason for him to apply to remain here'.
While it's not known if Al-Gherainiq got his heart treatment, this statement suggests it is not an outstanding issue.
The Qatari Embassy, which housed Al-Gherainiq after he first arrived in London, has been at the centre of controversy itself in the past and has a history of claiming diplomatic immunity when staff bring legal actions.
One sexual harassment case made headlines in 2019.
Mother-of-two Deanne Kingson, 58, a personal assistant, recalled how she was pestered for sex, pressed to host orgies for diplomats and go on holiday to Cuba with one of them.
She told the tribunal the then deputy ambassador Fahed Al-Mushairi repeatedly tried to sleep with her and then turned his attention to her 19-year-old daughter when she refused, even offering to marry her.
The case was not contested by the Qatari Embassy.
A panel of tribunal judges concluded that Ms Kingson – sacked after rejecting such advances and awarded £388,920 for unfair dismissal – was seen by diplomats as being 'liable to be willing to engage in sexual conduct with male employees' because she was not Muslim.
Might this then have also been the reason why camel herder Nasser Al-Gherainiq tried to rape a woman at a private clinic before sexually assaulting her on his first trip outside Qatar?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Driver released after two pedestrians die in Caversham crash
A driver who was arrested after the death of two pedestrians in a crash has been released while police continue their pedestrians, two women aged 68 and 72, were hit by a blue Volkswagen Tiguan on Peppard Road in Caversham, Reading, shortly before 08:00 BST on died at the scene, near Cedarwood Crescent, Thames Valley Police said.A 47-year-old woman from Reading, arrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving, has been released under investigation, the force added. Anyone who may have witnessed the event is urged to contact the force. You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

The National
25 minutes ago
- The National
Palestine Action documentary brought forward due to ban
The online release of To Kill a War Machine was brought forward to this week after it emerged that the Home Office is going to proscribe Palestine Action after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and spray-painted two military planes red. Days after the incident, the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, said the 'disgraceful attack' was 'the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. A draft of a proscription order against Palestine Action will be presented to parliament on Monday. READ MORE: Met police drops second terror charge against Kneecap The ban under terror laws would make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group and would be punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The film's directors have been scrambling to take legal advice and fear they will end up being in breach of counter-terror laws if they continue distributing their documentary, according to the Guardian. Showings of the film have been lined up across Britain in the coming days and weeks but plans to ban the group have cast doubt over whether the screenings can go ahead. To Kill a War Machine was made available to watch online on Tuesday and has been downloaded by people from all over the world. However, its London-based directors, Hannan Majid and Richard York, are concerned that Britain could end up being the only place in the world where people would not be able to see the film. 'We've operated around the world and have a lot of experience of regimes telling us what we can and can't do,' Majid told the Guardian. 'We've had authorities in Bangladesh telling us we shouldn't even be editing footage of garment workers and activists advocating for their rights, and we've been followed by the police in Cambodia, but we have never encountered anything like this in Britain.' Majid has been working with York since 2006 through their production company, Rainbow Collective, which focuses on documentaries about human rights issues and have collaborated with organisations including Amnesty International. To Kill a War Machine took six months of work and was made independently by the filmmakers from Palestine Action. The documentary uses real-time bodycam and phone footage that the group had put into the public domain. In the film, activists are seen smashing and occupying weapons factories across the UK while explaining their motivation for their actions, which they view as legitimate in the face of alleged war crimes in Gaza. (Image: @IMDmilo) There are also interviews with two activists from Palestine Action, Sohail Sultan and Joe Irving, both of whom were acquitted of charges of causing criminal damage. However, the move by the UK Government to proscribe Palestine Action means there are now questions looming over whether the documentary and events, including a London premiere on July 18, can be continued after the group is banned. 'We set out to make this film in a completely legitimate and legal manner, as we have done with other films. It's been certified by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) and it is good to go but now we are being advised that the curtailing of Palestine Action could have a major knock-on effect for us as it could become not only illegal for others to voice support for them but also for us, as film-makers, to distribute this film,' said York. Majid added: 'People are still excited and there has been a tremendous outpouring of support on social media. 'Hopefully we can still go ahead with much of our plans, but we have had to rush things forward and do the digital release this week rather than waiting for September and try to build on the awards we have already picked up. 'That all changed on Monday night and there has been a spike as soon as we put it online.' The filmmakers are having discussions with distributors in the UK and the US about the potential risks of showing the film. 'On the basis of some of our legal advice, we may not even be able to distribute it in other countries and territories if the film is seen as being somehow in support of a group which is proscribed. We are still hoping to be able to show it in cinemas within the law,' said York. They are also considering whether they will have to withdraw submissions for a range of international film festivals.


The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Wimbledon: the tennis commands attention, but so should the abuse of players
With temperatures forecast to be as high as 34C, spectators as well as players must arrive at the All England Lawn Tennis Club on Monday prepared to deal with conditions more familiar at grand slams in Australia and the US. But as Wimbledon opens its doors, three weeks after a French Open men's singles final that some regard as the best tennis match ever (Carlos Alcaraz beat Jannik Sinner over five and a half hours), other warnings besides heat are known to be troubling some of the players. Emma Raducanu has said she feels 'comfortable' and 'safe', thanks to tighter security arrangements introduced after an unnamed man, who previously signed an agreement to stay away from her, was blocked from buying tickets. Earlier this year she became visibly distressed by his presence at a match in Dubai, after he approached her in person. But while this particular situation appears to have been dealt with, the wider picture regarding female players' experiences remains troubling – as does the wider problem of online abuse in sports, including that aimed at referees. Earlier this month the British No 2, Katie Boulter, gave an interview highlighting the toll this behaviour takes. Other players have also described the impact of stalkers and fixated male fans. Three years ago, a different man from the one in Dubai was sentenced to 200 hours community service after repeatedly turning up at Raducanu's house. Stalkers are not a new problem for celebrities, including sportspeople. In 1993, Monica Seles was stabbed in Hamburg by a man obsessed with her rival, Steffi Graf. But the darker side of fame has been magnified by digital media – which has changed the rules of social engagement for athletes as well as everyone else. Since sport, for most people, is an enjoyable leisure activity, its stars are widely regarded as lucky, talented people – not obvious objects of concern. But the disproportionate harassment of female players should bother spectators and society at large, as well as those with a professional interest in their wellbeing. To some degree such attacks are in line with women's negative experiences in other areas of public life, including politics, and part of a wider problem of escalating, technologically enabled sexism. But the role of online gambling in fomenting aggression is an element specific to sports that is rightly attracting attention. A newly released report from the Women's Tennis Association and International Tennis Federation found that 77% of abuse directed at players' personal accounts came from 'frustrated gamblers', with a handful of top female players facing a disproportionate share of hostility. Unsurprisingly, given their well documented opposition to stronger regulation in general, gambling companies have been slow to act. But players and those tasked with safeguarding them are pushing back. The two-times Wimbledon finalist Ons Jabeur – who plays her first-round match on Monday – is among those who have called for betting companies to ban abusers from their platforms for life. She deserves praise for speaking out. Sir Andy Murray, and others who have voiced concern, recognise that regulating online speech is complex. That does not mean that the status quo is acceptable. Fatalistic attitudes to the growing problem of sexualised online abuse are part of the problem that policymakers need to grip.