Before Martyrs' Day, Mirwaiz's blistering attack over ‘house arrest' — ‘fearing mention of martyrs in my sermon'
The chief cleric of Jammu and Kashmir said he was confined to his house in a post on X. July 13 is marked as Martyrs' Day as a homage to the 22 Kashmiris who fell to the bullets of the Dogra army while protesting the rule of Maharaja Hari Singh in 1931.
'Disallowed to go to Jama Masjid today, put under house arrest, fearing the mention of the martyrs of 13th July 1931 in my Friday sermon,' the post said.
Highlighting the sacrifice of the martyrs and 'all the martyrs since,' Mirwaiz said that it is 'etched in the collective memory of Kashmir and cannot not be undone by restrictions and bans'.
'No living nation can forget the supreme sacrifice of life of its martyrs against tyranny and injustice,' he said, appealing authorities to life restrictions to allow the public to peacefully pay homage and expressing a desire to the martyrs' graveyard in downtown Srinagar
'Inshallah if allowed as per our tradition, we will visit the martyrs' graveyard on July 13th after Zuhr prayers and pay homage to the revered martyrs,' he said.
Earlier this week, both National Conference and Peoples Democratic Party expressed their resolve to visit the Mazar-e-Shuhada on July 13 with the former writing to the Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar for permission to visit the mazar.
Formerly a public holiday in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, it was scrapped by the Lieutenant Governor-led administration after the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019.
Entry to the mazar-e-shuhada (martyr's graveyard) has also been restricted on previous occasions. Last year, leaders such as Mufti and Peoples Conference chairman Sajad Lone were restricted to their residences on July 13.
After the Omar Abdullah government took over the reins of government in October last year, the issue of restoring the July 13 holiday was also debated in the J&K Assembly. This year, July 13 falls on Sunday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Can't open floodgates': SC junks plea for delimitation in AP, Telangana
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking a fresh delimitation exercise in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, ruling that there exists a constitutional bar against taking up such a demand before the first census conducted after 2026, while also cautioning that entertaining such public interest petitions could 'open the floodgates' for similar pleas from other states. Supreme Court of India. (PTI) A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh delivered the judgment, firmly rejecting allegations of discrimination vis-à-vis the separate delimitation conducted for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, which was reconstituted in 2019 following the abrogation of Article 370. 'On a plain and harmonious reading... Section 26 of the AP Reorganisation Act (on increase in assembly seats) is subject to Article 170 of the Constitution,' said Justice Surya Kant while reading the operative portion of the verdict. 'We have held that this (granting the plea) will open floodgates for all states to approach seeking parity. We hold that the constitutional mandate under Article 170(3) serves as a bar. Demand for the delimitation is contrary to the same and thus fails,' he added. Article 170(3), inserted by the 84th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2001, freezes the allocation of seats in state assemblies until data from the census conducted after 2026 is available. Dismissing the writ petition filed under Article 32, the court held that the exclusion of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana from the 2020 delimitation notification issued for Jammu & Kashmir was not arbitrary or violative of Article 14. It clarified that delimitation provisions applicable to J&K, a Union Territory, were distinct from those governing states under Chapter III of Part VI of the Constitution, dealing with the structure, composition, functioning, and powers of state legislatures. 'J&K having been reconstituted is not governed by Chapter III of Part VI of the Constitution,' Justice Kant observed. He further noted that while 'legitimate expectation' is a well-settled principle of law, it 'does not lead to any legal right' and cannot override the express provisions of the Constitution. 'The expectation under the AP Reorganisation Act cannot be seen in isolation, as it is subject to Article 170,' he said. The writ petition, filed by K Purushottam Reddy in 2022, had sought directions to the Union of India to initiate the process of increasing the number of assembly seats in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana under Section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014. The petitioner argued that since the government had carried out a similar exercise in Jammu and Kashmir, post its reorganisation into a Union Territory, the exclusion of AP and Telangana amounted to 'unreasonable classification' and was therefore unconstitutional. It was contended that delimiting constituencies exclusively for J&K, while declining to operationalise Section 26 for AP and Telangana, violated the equality clause under Article 14 of the Constitution. However, the Supreme Court dismissed this argument, holding that the two exercises were constitutionally distinct and based on separate legal frameworks. It underscored that while Section 26 of the AP Reorganisation Act contemplated an increase in the number of assembly seats in both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, Article 170(3) of the Constitution clearly bars any delimitation exercise until after the first census post-2026. 'Thus, any expectation for an earlier delimitation, even if indicated in the Reorganisation Act, cannot override the Constitution itself,' the court held. The bench justified the separate delimitation in Jammu and Kashmir on the ground that it had undergone a fundamental constitutional reorganisation in 2019. Following the abrogation of Article 370, the former state was restructured into a Union Territory under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which empowered the Centre to initiate a fresh delimitation exercise through a Delimitation Commission. The petition before the court had attempted to argue that the same yardstick should apply to AP and Telangana. However, the bench held that Union territories are not subject to Article 170, which deals with the composition of state legislative assemblies. Therefore, the delimitation exercise in J&K could not be compared with that in states. This line of reasoning was consistent with the Supreme Court's February 2023 judgment, which upheld the validity of the delimitation exercise in Jammu and Kashmir, rejecting the challenge filed by two residents of Srinagar. In that verdict, a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and AS Oka dismissed the plea questioning the legal basis of setting up the Delimitation Commission for J&K and increasing its assembly seats from 83 to 90. The court had made it clear that the Delimitation Act, 2002, and the 2019 Reorganisation Act provided sufficient legal grounds for the commission's formation, and the Election Commission's role did not preclude the constitution of a separate delimitation body for the UT. The final delimitation order for J&K was notified in May 2022. It increased the number of assembly seats from 83 to 90, allocating 43 seats to Jammu and 47 to Kashmir. This marked a shift in the region's political balance, with Jammu's share rising to 47.8%, up from 44.6%, and Kashmir's falling to 52.2%, down from 55.4%. The exercise was carried out based on the 2011 Census, and despite opposition from regional parties, the Centre maintained that delimitation was a necessary step before holding fresh elections. The Union government had also argued in court that the Delimitation Commission's orders, once published in the Gazette, are final and not open to judicial review.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
‘Filthy water, not allowed to meet children': Imran Khan under ‘harshest prison term in Pakistan's history'
In a message from the jail, former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan has said that he is undergoing the 'harshest prison term' in the country's history and the water that he gets for ablution is filthy and unfit for human use. read more A supporter of jailed former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan holds his poster during a gathering by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party to observe Martyrs' Day to honour those who allegedly died during last month's protest, in Peshawar on December 15, 2024. (Photo: Abdul Majeed/AFP) Pakistan's incarcerated former prime minister Imran Khan on Thursday said he is undergoing the 'harshest prison term' in the country's history. Khan, 72, has been lodged at the Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi since August 2023 in multiple cases. 'I am enduring the harshest prison term in the country's history solely for the supremacy of the Constitution and in service of my nation,' he was quoted as saying in a post uploaded on his verified X handle. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The level of oppression and authoritarianism is such that even the water I have for ablution is filthy and contaminated with dirt, unfit for any human being,' Khan alleged. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder alleged the books sent to him by his family have been withheld for months and access to television and newspapers has also been suspended. 'I have spent countless hours re-reading the same old books, but now even those are no longer available,' he said. Khan asserted that no political leader in Pakistan's history has faced the kind of treatment he is currently experiencing. He contrasted this with former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, who, despite being involved in several corruption cases, 'was granted every possible comfort' during his imprisonment. Khan emphasised that his wife, Bushra Bibi, who is 'innocent' and not involved in politics, is being subjected to 'inhumane conditions' in prison. The 72-year-old cricketer-turned-politician further alleged that all his basic human rights have been violated. Even the minimum facilities accorded to ordinary prisoners under the law and the jail manual are denied to him. 'Despite repeated requests, I have not been allowed to speak to my children. Political meetings have also been restricted; I am only permitted to meet certain 'choice individuals', while all other interactions are barred,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khan appealed to his party members to set aside all internal differences and focus solely on the movement planned for August 5. The PTI is all set to launch the 'Free Imran Khan Movement' from August 5 across the country. Khan's sons –Suleman and Kasim — are currently in the US, meeting with the Trump administration and Congressmen as part of efforts to release Khan who has been in jail for the last two years in multiple cases. 'I am waging a battle against a 78-year-old system, and my greatest success is that despite unprecedented oppression, the public stands firmly with me,' Khan said. He said on February 8, 2024, the people expressed their trust in PTI by voting for it even in the absence of an electoral symbol. 'After such a clear mandate, it is the moral and political responsibility of every party member to become the voice of the people. It will be nothing short of disgraceful and condemnable if PTI leaders waste time on internal conflicts at this critical juncture. Anyone found engaging in factionalism within the party will be expelled,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khan said the Shehbaz Sharif-led government has crippled the judiciary and 'the way biased judges are now delivering blatantly unjust verdicts' is visible to the entire nation. 'We must launch a robust campaign to liberate the judiciary, for no nation can survive, let alone progress, without judicial independence,' he said. (This is an agency copy. Except for the headline, the copy has not been edited by Firstpost staff.)
Time of India
16 hours ago
- Time of India
With 30-sec speech, Derek starts TMC's Parl ‘Bhasha Andolan'
Kolkata: All Trinamool MPs will speak in Bengali in Parliament's monsoon session, party sources have confirmed. With a 30-second speech in Bengali, TMC 's leader in Rajya Sabha Derek O'Brien started the trend on Thursday, wishing five retiring RS members well. One of the retiring MPs — MDMK's Vaiko — referred to his long association with CM Mamata Banerjee in Parliament and also broached "linguistic terrorism". At the party's Martyrs' Day rally on Monday, TMC national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee announced that the party would take 'Bhasha Andolan' to Parliament. However, with LS adjourned since that day, no TMC LS member had an opportunity to speak. While RS was adjourned too, a special session was held from 12pm to 1.30pm for outgoing MPs. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata TMC on Thursday also hit out at BJP-led Centre over the absence of Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore's statue at the Jallianwala Bagh memorial. TMC MP Ritabrata Banerjee sought answers from the ministry of culture . Banerjee said: "When the Jallianwala Bagh massacre happened in 1919, Tagore was one of the first to condemn it by renouncing the knighthood conferred upon him by the British. There is a letter he wrote slamming this barbarism and explaining why he was renouncing the title... by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo it is taught in schools and universities. Tagore gave us the National Anthem in Bengali. In 1925, The Guardian — then the Manchester Guardian — referred to Tagore as a 'passionate political activist'. " He added: "Given the way Tagore condemned and criticised the British... his statue and letter should be displayed at the Jallianwala Bagh memorial." The MP also informed TOI that giving in to a long-standing demand by TMC lawmakers, Parliament canteen had replaced Basa with Bhetki in its fish items.
