US cancels next round of talks on easing tensions with Russia, says Moscow
In a statement, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova did not say if Washington had given any reason for the break in the talks, which began after Trump returned to the White House in January.
Russia had described relations as "below zero" under the previous administration of President Joe Biden, which provided advanced US weapons to Ukraine and imposed multiple rounds of sanctions on Moscow over the war.
"As of today, the next meeting within the framework of bilateral consultations on eliminating 'irritants' in order to normalize the activities of diplomatic missions of both countries has been cancelled at the initiative of the American negotiators," Zakharova said.
"We hope that the pause they have taken will not last too long."
Russia had said only last week that the US-Russia talks, which have been proceeding on a separate track from discussions about ending the war in Ukraine, would soon move to Moscow from Istanbul.
However, the Kremlin - while denying that dialogue had stalled - also said last week that there were "a lot of blockages in bilateral relations" and talks on improving them were not expected to yield quick results.
Both sides say there is huge potential for business and investment deals if relations improve. But Trump, despite holding five phone calls with President Vladimir Putin - most recently on Saturday - has voiced frustration about Russia's war actions in Ukraine and the lack of any visible progress towards a peace deal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
40 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
U.S. Supreme Court Is Being Used By Trump To Implement His MAGA Agenda
By T N Ashok WASHINGTON: In a landmark but largely silent move, the U.S. Supreme Court has paved the way for former President Donald Trump to dismantle the Department of Education, terminate thousands of federal employees, and slash funding to states — all without providing a single word of legal justification. Issued as a terse four-sentence, unsigned emergency order, the Court's decision marks a deepening reliance on the so-called 'shadow docket' — a fast-track legal mechanism that allows the Court to make sweeping rulings without full briefing, oral arguments, or detailed opinions. This latest ruling continues a growing trend under Trump's second term, in which the Court has used abbreviated procedures to rubber-stamp controversial executive actions — bypassing normal legal scrutiny and raising concerns about democratic accountability and constitutional balance. The Supreme Court's quiet approval of Trump's efforts to effectively shutter the Education Department is not an isolated case. Over recent months, the Court has: approved the firing of tens of thousands of federal workers; Permitted the discharge of transgender service members; Lifted protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants from conflict zones; allowed the President to fire leaders of independent federal agencies; granted powers traditionally held by Congress to the executive branch. And in most of these cases, the Court offered little or no explanation — just brief procedural rulings with outsized consequences. Georgetown law professor Stephen I. Vladeck, an expert on the Court's emergency procedures and author of The Shadow Docket, noted in his newsletter: 'Monday's ruling is just the latest completely unexplained decision that is going to have massive real-world effects long before the justices ever confront whether what the government is doing is actually lawful.' According to Vladeck, in the past 10 weeks alone, the Court has granted seven major emergency petitions from the Trump administration without any written rationale — a rate that far exceeds any prior administration. The US supreme court' full bench comprises nine judges — six appointed by presidents preceding Trump — three by George W Bush, two by Barack Obama, and one by Joe Biden. Trump himself appointed three judges to the SC in his first term including Chief Justice John Roberts. In sharp contrast to the majority's silence, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a blistering 19-page dissent, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, warning of the erosion of constitutional safeguards. (Soomayor and Elena Kagan were appointed by Barack Obama and Ketanji Brown Jackson by Joe Biden). 'The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve,' Sotomayor wrote. 'Either way, the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is grave.' Her dissent emphasized that decisions of this magnitude deserve public explanation and judicial accountability, especially when they reshape the structure of government. 'By abandoning our duty to explain,' she wrote, 'we are undermining the legitimacy of this institution and the rule of law itself.' The 'shadow docket' — a term coined by law professor William Baude and popularized by critics of the Court — refers to emergency rulings made without full arguments or opinions. While initially used sparingly, the Court's use of it has exploded in recent years. Justice Elena Kagan publicly criticized this trend in 2021, writing: 'The majority's decision is emblematic of too much of this Court's shadow-docket decision making — which every day becomes more unreasoned, inconsistent, and impossible to defend.' One particularly controversial moment came in 2021, when the Court refused to block a Texas abortion law that effectively nullified Roe v. Wade — again without full briefing or explanation. That emergency ruling previewed the Court's eventual nationwide overturning of Roe the following year. Justice Samuel Alito, in a 2021 speech at Notre Dame, defended the emergency docket and dismissed the term 'shadow docket' as a political smear. 'The catchy and sinister term 'shadow docket' has been used to portray the Court as having been captured by a dangerous cabal,' Alito said. 'This portrayal feeds efforts to intimidate the Court and damage it as an independent institution.' Alito likened emergency orders to emergency medicine: 'You can't expect EMTs to act like a full surgical team,' he said. 'The urgency of the moment often demands quick, narrow decisions.' He also pushed back against media criticism: 'Journalists may think we can dash off opinions the way they dash off articles,' Alito said. 'But every word we write has consequences, so we must be deliberate — even in silence.' But many legal scholars argue that deliberate silence can be even more damaging than hasty explanation. Daniel Epps, a law professor at Washington University, put it plainly: 'Unexplained orders expose the Court to suspicion and criticism, especially in a polarized political climate.' While he acknowledged the need for caution in creating precedent, Epps argued that even short explanations would be better than none: 'In May, the Court allowed Trump to fire leaders of independent agencies. That ruling was just two pages — but enough to guide future courts while leaving some flexibility.' In contrast, rulings with zero reasoning, he said, create confusion in lower courts and fuel public distrust. A June ruling allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third-party countries without a hearing — but did not clarify who the order applied to. This led to a new emergency application for clarification days later. Only then did the Court issue a more detailed follow-up, permitting the deportation of men held at a U.S. base in Djibouti to South Sudan. 'This back-and-forth could have been avoided with a single explanatory sentence,' said Professor Vladeck. America has turned into a land legal chaos and continuing confusion. (IPA Service)
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Who is in the running to succeed Jerome Powell as Fed chair?
Replacing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is not a question of if, but when. Speculation over who could succeed Mr Powell ramped up this week following reports that President Donald Trump was considering firing the Fed chair – an unprecedented action. Mr Powell's term expires in May 2026. Mr Trump said it was unlikely he will try to fire Mr Powell and will instead wait out the remainder of his term. The US President has thus far not attempted to oust Mr Powell, but the race to replace him has already begun. He has considered naming Mr Powell's successor by September or even sooner, the Wall Street Journal reported last month. Such an extended period could lead to confusion in the markets should a 'shadow Fed chair' emerge ahead of the end of Mr Powell's term. But Mr Trump has become increasingly irate with Mr Powell for not cutting interest rates. Mr Trump has made clear that anyone who wants the job in Foggy Bottom must support low interest rates. Here is a look at the reported candidates to replace Mr Powell: Kevin Hassett National Economic Council Kevin Hassett is one of Mr Trump's longest-serving economic aides. Mr Hassett held two roles during Mr Trump's first term including as chair of the Council of Economic Advisors. He was also the economic architect of the Abraham Accords. Before rejoining the White House this year, Mr Hassett was the global director of research for Affinity Partners, a private equity firm led by Jared Kushner, Mr Trump's son-in-law. He was previously director of economic policy studies at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute. Mr Hassett also served as economic adviser to John McCain, George Bush and Mitt Romney during their presidential campaigns. Kevin Warsh Former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh served as former Fed chair Ben Bernanke's liaison between Washington and Wall Street during the global financial crisis. Mr Warsh has become increasingly critical about the Powell Fed within the last year, accusing the current board of 'mission creep' earlier in May. Speaking to CNBC on Thursday, the former Fed governor criticised the central bank for worrying that Mr Trump's tariffs policies could lead to an inflation resurgence. 'If they were a very credible central bank, they could say, 'We're looking past this one-off change in prices,' and so their hesitancy to cut rates, I think, is actually quite a mark against them,' he said. Mr Warsh was considered a hawkish official to fight against inflation during his tenure at the Fed from 2006 to 2011, but he has shifted his position this year which has put him in line with Mr Trump's desire install a dove to lead the Fed. Scott Bessent Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is leading the search committee, is also a reported contender. Mr Bessent has been at the centre of tariff negotiations with major trading partners including China. But Mr Trump could want Mr Bessent to remain at the Treasury Department. 'Because I like the job he's doing,' Mr Trump said on Tuesday. Christopher Waller Christopher Waller, who currently serves on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, is considered to be a dark horse candidate to ascend to chair. Mr Waller is notably one of two recent Fed officials to have argued for a rate cut at the Fed's recent meeting – outliers from other voting members. He has also said that he expects Mr Trump's tariffs to lead to a one-time effect on inflation rather than being a more persistent increase in prices. Mr Waller, a Trump appointee, joined the Fed in 2020. His tenure as Fed governor runs through January 2030.
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US officials do not want to sell advanced AI chips to company run by UAE spy chief: Report
The UAE's bid to buy hundreds of thousands of advanced AI chips from Nvidia is being held up by US officials concerned that China could gain access to advanced American technology, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday. US officials are weighing whether or not to sell chips directly to a company owned by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the UAE's powerful national security advisor. Tech CEOs, diplomats, security officials and investors have all been waiting for clarity on whether the US would begin exporting Nvidia AI chips to the UAE as part of a much-hyped deal that President Donald Trump announced during a visit to the Gulf in May. Bloomberg reported earlier this month that neither Saudi Arabia nor the UAE have been approved to receive the chips by the Commerce Department. On Thursday, the WSJ reported that plans to export chips to the UAE have been delayed, as the US weighs new terms for a deal. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The original agreement envisioned the UAE purchasing up to 500,000 of Nvidia's most advanced AI chips annually, starting in 2025. Of that amount, 400,000 would go to US firms working on data centres and AI projects inside the oil-rich Gulf state. But a big slice - 100,000 chips - is supposed to go directly to G-42, the state-owned AI firm run by Sheikh Tahnoon, who is also the UAE's AI czar. Tahnoon, who sports aviator sunglasses because of an eye condition, manages the UAE's most ambitious tech investments and has personally overseen outreach to the US. His lobbying has been framed as a bet by the wealthy Gulf state on American technological prowess over China. He visited US President Donald Trump at the White House in March to lay the groundwork for the deals announced in May. White House AI czar David Sacks, who spearheaded the deal, is seen as an advocate for pushing the sales through. How BlackRock and an Italian shipping dynasty are upending Middle East's port business Read More » Supporters believe that if the US doesn't relax its restrictions, it could lose a valuable market in the Gulf to China. Huawei has approached both Saudi Arabia and the UAE to purchase AI chips, albeit not its most advanced ones, Bloomberg reported. But US suspicion over the UAE's commitment to safeguarding American technology hung over Trump's visit. Trump stopped in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE in May. His trip to the UAE was the shortest and did not include a dinner like in Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Middle East Eye revealed at the time that Trump's National Security Council pushed to downplay his stop in the UAE, in part due to frustration over the Emiratis' perceived economic and military ties to China, one source briefed by the NSC told MEE. Trump has since fired many of those NSC officials. Some US defence and intelligence officials were concerned that in his rush for deals, Trump overlooked concerns about how to secure the technology behind American weapons systems and AI from China. The WSJ has reported that US officials want to cut off direct access to chips for G42. The Commerce Department doesn't plan to approve any chips going to the Emirati state-owned group, the WSJ reported. Trump would have the final say on exports. Just this week, he lifted his ban on Nvidia selling H20 artificial intelligence chips in China after meeting Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. The decision lifted Nvidia's share price. The UAE is interested in H100 chips, the most advanced AI chips produced by Nvidia. A single chip costs an estimated $25,000. Clinching the sale of 500,000 to the UAE would be a boon to Nvidia. The sheer number of chips underscores the Gulf region's unrivalled buying power. The UAE's ambassador to the US, Yousef al-Otaiba, and Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the CEO and managing director of Mubadala, the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, attended an energy and tech conference with senior US officials in Pittsburgh this week.
