
Groups present 117-policy roadmap ahead of state elections
Representatives from SABAR presenting a copy of the 'Sabahans' Aspirations and Demands' to representatives from STAR Sabah, SAPP, PBS, Parti Impian Sabah, Warisan, PGRS, LDP and Parti Kerjasama Anak Negeri.
KOTA KINABALU (June 23): In a powerful display of civic engagement and participatory policymaking, more than 300 stakeholders gathered at Wisma Wanita for the final town hall of the 'Sabah Voices to Action – Shaping Sabah's Future Together' initiative.
The event marked the official launch of the 'Sabahans' Aspirations and Demands' report — an unprecedented 60 plus pages of policy document outlining 117 actionable recommendations across 21 key areas in Education, Healthcare, Public Infrastructure and Good Governance.
Compiled through a three-month consultative process involving diverse communities across the state, the report is now publicly accessible in Bahasa Malaysia, English and Chinese at https://www.sabar.org.my/action/#reports.
Launched in January and formally executed between March and June 2025, this non-partisan, citizen-driven movement — spearheaded by the Sabah Action Body Advocating Rights (SABAR) in collaboration with civil society partners — was designed to empower ordinary Sabahans to voice their priorities and shape meaningful policy reforms in the lead-up to the 2025 Sabah State Election.
The initiative employed a multi-platform strategy to reach a broad spectrum of Sabahans through eight widely streamed podcast episodes, more than 30 published articles in a local daily, and 12 regional town halls in districts such as Kota Marudu, Keningau, Tawau, Sandakan and Kota Kinabalu.
Over 500 individuals — including professionals, educators, healthcare workers, youth, and civil society leaders — participated in the formulation of the report.
In his opening remarks, Datuk Zainie Abdul Aucasa, chairman of the Board of SABAR, emphasized that the document reflects the aspirations and concerns of everyday Sabahans, gathered through a genuine grassroots engagement process. While acknowledging that it may not represent every voice, he asserted that it serves as a powerful foundation for further inquiry, dialogue and collaborative action.
'This is not a final blueprint,' he said, 'but a compelling starting point.'
He extended a sincere appeal to political leaders across the spectrum: 'Please listen with open hearts. The voices you hear today are not partisan — they represent the shared hopes of a people who deeply love this state and want to see it flourish. This is an opportunity to demonstrate real commitment to participatory governance and people-centred leadership. I urge you to reflect these priorities meaningfully in your election manifestos.'
He continued by acknowledging the roots of Sabah's challenges, stating, 'We must understand that the problems we face today did not arise overnight. They are the result of decades of accumulated neglect, flawed policies and missed opportunities. Now is not the time for finger-pointing. It is time to set politics aside and embrace shared responsibility. We are not here to complain; we are here to build and be part of the solution.'
Zainie concluded with a call for courage and collective action, reminding the audience that what matters most is a willingness to act — decisively and responsibly — for the future of Sabah's next generation.
Among the report's major recommendations is the call to establish a Sabah Ministry of Education with autonomy over procurement of infrastructure and educational resources, teacher recruitment and training, curriculum development and assessment. It advocates for universal access to quality preschool education, targeted support for rural and undocumented students, strategic actions on STEM and TVET, and greater bilingual proficiency through the Dual Language Programme.
The document stresses the importance of including Sabah-centric content in the national curriculum and ensuring that teachers are locally recruited, equipped with innovative teaching methods and digital tools, and protected from excessive administrative workloads.
In the area of healthcare, the report proposes the establishment of a Sabah Ministry of Health to design and implement state-specific programs, complementing federal initiatives. It calls for improved welfare, incentives and clear career progression for healthcare workers, expanded health services to rural and underserved communities, introduction of technology such as telehealth, and travel assistance for patients needing treatment outside their districts.
The report also recommends increased training opportunities for post-basic, allied health sciences and specialist development to address Sabah's unique healthcare challenges more effectively.
On public infrastructure, the report introduces a six-stage development cycle encompassing inclusive needs assessment, integrated planning, transparent procurement, sufficient and timely disbursement of funds, accompanied by efficient implementation, regular maintenance and proactive rehabilitation. It calls for a Sabah Integrated Infrastructure Master Plan, centralized project management, digital procurement platforms and independent oversight mechanisms.
To ensure sustainability and relevance, it emphasizes the importance of involving local contractors and communities in both planning and implementation. Emergency preparedness, climate resilience and long-term planning are also identified as critical components of effective infrastructure development.
In the area of good governance, the report recommends wide-ranging structural reforms. These include the enactment of Political Financing and Procurement Acts, mandatory open tenders with real-time public tracking, and the establishment of independent procurement and audit commissions. It urges the depoliticization of appointments in government-linked companies (GLCs) and public service, standardization of asset declarations and key performance indicators, and decentralization of fiscal and development planning powers under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
A macro-level governance framework is proposed to restore public trust and improve accountability in the management of GLCs and public resources.
Lim Hock Song, organising chairperson of the initiative, reiterated the non-partisan nature of the movement.
'This is about people. It's about the wellbeing of Sabahans and the future we want to build together,' he declared. He emphasized that the report, once released, would take on a life of its own — as the collective intellectual property of the people of Sabah and an open-source resource for all.
'It is not a final blueprint, but a living document. We hope Sabahans will embrace it as a shared starting point, from which we can build together toward a brighter future for every community across our state.'
Delivering a stirring closing remark, SABAR trustee Datuk Ujang Sulani placed the initiative within Sabah's long journey toward self-determination.
'Sabah has always been rich — not only in resources, but in spirit. But prosperity remains elusive. We must go beyond dialogue. This is no longer about being heard. It is time for us to be heeded,' he declared.
Referring to the unfulfilled promises of the Malaysia Agreement 1963, he added, 'That agreement must translate into true freedom — not only from colonialism, but from dependency, bureaucracy and neglect.'
Ujang concluded by urging all present to treat this final town hall not as an ending, but as a beginning.
SABAR urges all political parties and candidates contesting the 2025 Sabah State Election to give thoughtful consideration to these aspirations and demands, and to reflect them clearly and meaningfully in their upcoming election manifestos.
The full 'Sabahans' Aspirations and Demands' report is now available at https://www.sabar.org.my/action/#reports
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Borneo Post
10 hours ago
- Borneo Post
PBS hits back at Bung: 'We stated a principle, not a plea'
Christopher KOTA KINABALU (June 28): Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) Youth chief Datuk Dr Christoper Mandut has hit back at Sabah Umno chief Datuk Seri Bung Moktar Radin's statement, calling it 'defensive, bitter and riddled with contradictions.' Christopher said PBS never claimed to have received an official offer from Barisan Nasional (BN), but simply made clear its position that the party will not cooperate with BN in the upcoming 17th Sabah State Election. 'Whether or not an invitation was extended is beside the point. We are stating our stand, which is our democratic right – not imagining things. It is called principle,' he said in a statement on Saturday. His comments came in response to Bung's remark that PBS was rejecting 'something that was never offered,' while accusing the party of political irrelevance and historical betrayal. Christoper questioned the logic of such attacks, saying that if PBS was truly insignificant, there would be no reason for Sabah Umno to dedicate an entire press release to the party. 'The contradiction speaks for itself,' he said, adding that the hostility from Bung appeared to reflect a sense of insecurity rather than genuine political confidence. He emphasised that PBS, as one of Sabah's oldest and most established political parties, remained focused on its core struggle – upholding Sabah's rights and the Malaysia Agreement 1963. 'We have a clear political track record and continue to resonate with generations of Sabahans. Unlike some, we don't need to tear others down to stay relevant,' he added. Responding to accusations that PBS had 'jumped coalitions' and 'betrayed allies, Christoper turned the spotlight on Umno's own political realignments over the years, urging Bung to reflect on his own party's history. 'Politics is not static. Parties realign based on the needs of the people they represent. What matters is whether those choices are made in the interest of the rakyat – not out of personal ambition,' he stressed. He also rejected Bung's remarks that PBS was merely 'clinging to the coattails of others,' saying that the party remained a proactive and constructive partner in the Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) government. Christopher called for maturity and respect in political discourse ahead of the coming election, warning that Sabahans were watching and deserved better than 'petty personal attacks and theatrics.' 'Let's rise above insults and name-calling. The people are intelligent and they know who is working sincerely for them, and who is only making noise in the media,' he said.


Borneo Post
10 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Sabahans must hold own key, says SAPP
Richard (front row, third from left), Chong (fourth from left) and Aloysius (second from left) with SAPP members at the annual general meeting. KOTA KINABALU (June 28): The people of Sabah must defend their sovereignty and make sure the key to their future stays in their own hands in the coming state election, said Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) deputy president cum secretary-general Datuk Richard Yong We Kong. 'Sarawak has stood firm in defending its rights. Its state government recorded RM14.1 billion in revenue for 2024, which is more than twice the revenue of Sabah. 'Sarawak has already set up its own sovereign wealth fund and is introducing free education. This shows a high level of financial independence. In comparison, Sabah's revenue during the same period is only RM6.4 billion. Our financial structure still relies heavily on federal allocations.' Richard, who also serves as Deputy Speaker of the Sabah State Legislative Assembly, made these remarks on Friday evening while officiating the annual general meeting of SAPP Kepayan and Moyog Constituency Liaison Committees, held jointly in Penampang. He pointed out that Sabah has yet to fully implement the 40 percent net revenue return promised under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). 'This continues to prevent us from having genuine financial control.' He added that even after five prime ministers, MA63 has made little real progress and Sabah continues to be sidelined. Richard urged everyone in Sabah to pay close attention to the court case brought by the Sabah Law Society, which will be heard on July 7. 'This case is seeking to legally enforce our 40 percent revenue entitlement, which allows, just from inland revenue alone, Sabah to gain at least RM2 billion more. 'What matters most is that Sabah's future must be decided by Sabahans who are truly committed to defending our rights. We cannot hand the key to outsiders,' he added. SAPP Kepayan CLC chairman Datuk Chong Pit Fah said the annual general meeting is especially important as the state election draws near. 'This is a moment for us to seriously reflect on the future of Sabah,' he said. He emphasised that Sarawak has been consistent in standing its ground on issues such as oil royalties, federal allocations and control over its own media narrative. The federal government does not dare to cross Sarawak's lines. Everything Sarawak has asked for has been fulfilled, step by step. 'Today, Sarawak is financially richer than the federal government. If we in Sabah want the same, there is only one way forward. We must vote for local parties.' Chong said that SAPP, since leaving Barisan Nasional in 2008, was the first party to openly champion the cause of Sabah autonomy, and had never shied away from speaking out. 'Parties from Peninsular Malaysia, however, now claim that they also support autonomy. But such talk is only meant to confuse the public and blur the facts. 'True autonomy means we no longer have to fly across the South China Sea to ask for what is rightfully ours,' he added. Chong called on Sabah voters to stop being deceived that this is impossible. Sarawak is already a living example of what can be done. 'Blindly following others will only cause us to lose our direction. In the end, all we will get is tax, tax and more tax.' SAPP Moyog CLC chairman Aloysius Danim Siap said that the party has always taken a practical and down-to-earth approach, and engaged the grassroots directly and does not rely on empty slogans. 'Our leaders are consistent in both word and action. We never back down when it comes to defending Sabah's sovereignty. Real progress must be concrete and deliverable,' he said.


Borneo Post
11 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Pandikar's brinkmanship jolted him to higher profile
Pandikar Amin By first sulking and going on the offensive for having been sidelined in the favour and election seats shares in GRS, Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Hj Mulia unexpectedly gained a stronger foothold in Sabah politics! Speaking last April, he made a threat that Usno 'may be forced to contest solo in the upcoming state election if it continues to be belittled and sidelined' in the GRS coalition. He pointed to the 'dismissive attitude' by some leaders within GRS, who questioned Usno's right to demand seats despite the party's efforts to build grassroots support. Within three days, on May 1, Gagasan Rakyat Bingkor Deputy Division Chief Rafie Robert and Kiulu Deputy Chief, Datuk George Teo, told Usno that it was free to leave the GRS if it feels the ruling coalition cannot meet its demands or felt it has been belittled. With disregard for any decorum, Rafie said bluntly, 'If you are dissatisfied … don't force yourself to stay … just leave.' But the Chief Minister, Datuk Seri Panglima Hajiji Hj Noor, stepped in to cool things down by declaring, after a three-hour meeting of GRS leaders on May 7, that 'All is well in GRS.' The congenial smiles of the four leaders, Hajiji, Pandikar, Datuk Yong Teck Lee and Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan on the front page headline of a local paper was hilarious knowing the strained backdrop of the news story. In dealing with the constrains to manoeuvre in the local political arena, Pandikar hasn't accepted any disadvantage he may have, but has leveraged on his strength of personality, as one who has gone through years in the political combat zones. Putting forth a self-assured front, he spoke his mind against some of whom he describes as 'greenhorns' – all in the bravado well-horned since his days in Bersih, AKAR and in the hot chair of Parliament. His latest no-nonsense pro-Sabah speech in Kunak, in which he raised Sabahans' grievances under the federal policies, has now gone viral and defined his and Usno's political stance. His strategy of advocating strongly for Sabah's greater autonomy within the GRS coalition has indeed enhanced his political influence. This 'brinkmanship' – pushing the boundaries of expected relationship norm in GRS – to the point of threatening to go it alone in the forthcoming PRN17, has likely boosted his clout within the coalition and among Sabahans for several reasons: 1. He appeals to the Sabah Sentiment: The desire for greater autonomy and a fairer share of resources is deeply felt among many Sabahans. By publicly and aggressively championing these causes, Pandikar positions himself as a strong advocate for Sabah's interests, resonating with voters who feel marginalized or ignored by the federal government. This strengthens his base of support. 2. Internal Coalition Dynamics: His outspokenness creates pressure within the GRS coalition. While potentially disruptive, it forces other coalition partners to acknowledge and address Sabah's concerns, giving USNO a more prominent role in discussions and decision-making processes. His willingness to push boundaries gains him attention and influence. 3. Media Attention and Public Perception: Pandikar's assertive tactics generate considerable media attention, increasing his visibility and shaping public perception. This increases his profile and strengthens his influence beyond the immediate political arena. 4. Negotiating Power: By demonstrating a willingness to push the boundaries of the coalition, Pandikar strengthens his negotiating position. He can leverage his vocal support for Sabah's autonomy to secure concessions and influence policy decisions within GRS. 5. Mobilization of Support: This assertive stance can mobilize support not only within USNO but also amongst other groups and parties sympathetic to Sabah's cause. This expands his political base and increases his bargaining power. However, it is crucial to note that this brinkmanship may carry some risks. Although his assertiveness had pushed GRS for a reconciliation, any excess may alienate coalition partners and damage his relationships within GRS. But as one who has known him since our days in AKAR, I see no possibility of him compromising on his stance where Sabah rights are concerned. It's a u-turn from his previous stance when he was Parliament chairman, but this new direction boosts Usno's influence as it resonates with the now popular 'Sabah for Sabahans' slogan. What he has achieved with his typical virulent rhetoric are leadership gems which has raised him further up in the Sabah political current, ultimately to herald the recognition that Pandikar Amin Hj Mulia is still a force to be reckoned with! It could also be perceived negatively by some voters who prefer a more conciliatory approach. The effectiveness of his strategy will depend on careful calculation and a deep understanding of Sabah's political landscape. The long-term consequences remain to be seen. Pandikar's shift from a previously pro-federal stance to a strong advocate for Sabah's greater autonomy represents a significant change in his political trajectory. This U-turn can be analyzed from several perspectives: • Political Pragmatism: Pandikar's change might be driven by political pragmatism. He may have recognized that advocating for Sabah's autonomy resonates far more strongly with the Sabah electorate than a pro-federal stance. By aligning himself with the popular sentiment of greater self-determination, he enhances his political viability and appeal within Sabah. • Evolving Political Landscape: The political landscape in Sabah has shifted significantly. The increased focus on the implementation of MA63 and the growing demand for greater autonomy have created a more receptive environment for pro-autonomy voices. Pandikar's shift might reflect an adaptation to this evolving political reality. • Internal Party Dynamics: His change could be influenced by internal dynamics within USNO and his desire to strengthen the party's position within Sabah's political arena. Embracing the autonomy agenda allows him to consolidate his position as a key leader within the party. • Strategic Calculation: Pandikar's U-turn could be a strategic calculation aimed at enhancing his negotiating power. By adopting a more assertive stance, he can exert greater influence within the GRS coalition and secure concessions from the federal government. • Response to Public Pressure: It's possible the shift is a response to mounting public pressure from Sabahans demanding greater autonomy and a more assertive representation of their interests at the federal level. Pandikar may have sensed this public sentiment and changed his political position to better reflect the views of his electorate. • Shifting Priorities: His priorities might have changed over time, leading to a reevaluation of his political stance. He may have come to view greater autonomy as essential for Sabah's long-term prosperity and well-being. However, it's important to acknowledge that Pandikar's change could also be perceived as opportunistic. The timing of his shift raises questions about his sincerity and motivations. His previous pro-federal stance could be used to criticize his current advocacy for greater autonomy, potentially undermining his credibility among some segments of the population. The long-term implications of this change will likely depend on the consistency and effectiveness of his approach. How has Pandikar's U-turn affected his relationship with other GRS leaders? What are the key issues Pandikar advocates for Sabah? What are the main reasons for the U-turn?