
Better Dividend Stock: Whirlpool vs. UPS
Whirlpool stock analysis (9.1% dividend yield)
Both Whirlpool's and UPS' shares are down heavily this year, as they've both suffered a deterioration in their trading conditions.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
WHR data by YCharts.
For Whirlpool, it comes down to a combination of stubbornly high interest rates and competitor behavior in light of President Donald Trump's reelection. Relatively high interest rates curtail the housing market and, in turn, discretionary demand (which tends to be higher-margin than replacement demand) for housing appliances. Consequently, Whirlpool's first-quarter organic sales rose just 2.2% year over year, with organic sales flat in its key major domestic appliance North America business.
Whirlpool's sales were also highly likely affected by competitor behavior in the fourth quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2025. CEO Marc Bitzer said on the recent earnings call: "Asian appliance producers significantly increased imports into the U.S. ahead of the tariffs in the first quarter and fourth quarter, essentially loading the U.S. industry. This market disruption will likely continue into Q2 as competitors attempt to sell through their inventory."
With the first and second quarters negatively affected by such actions, 30-year mortgage rates still above 6.5%, and general uncertainty in the economy concerning tariffs, this casts some doubt on management's decision to maintain its full-year guidance.
Whirlpool's full-year guidance implies that its dividend is sustainable. For example, the guidance calls for sales of $15.8 billion with an ongoing earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) margin of 6.8%, implying an ongoing EBIT of $1.07 billion, dropping down to $500 million to $600 million in free cash flow (FCF). That's more than enough to cover the the $384 million in dividends that Whirlpool paid last year.
That said, there's a significant risk to the dividend if Whirlpool falters this year. The company has $4.8 billion in long-term debt and $1.85 billion in debt maturing this year, of which it plans to pay down $700 million and refinance $1.1 billion to $1.2 billion. Any significant deterioration in the FCF outlook may cause management to cut the dividend to shore up its balance sheet, not least in paying down debt.
UPS stock analysis (6.8% dividend yield)
Continuing the theme of looking at dividend sustainability, UPS management is clear on three things regarding the matter:
Its longstanding aim is to pay out 50% of its earnings in dividends, and it's committed to sustaining and growing the dividend
The current dividend of $6.56 per share is barely covered by the Wall Street analyst consensus for UPS earnings in 2025 of $7.11, implying a payout ratio of 92%
Management expects $5.7 billion in FCF in 2025, barely covering the $5.5 billion cash dividend
Whether you look at the payout ratio in terms of earnings (as management does) or FCF, UPS' ability to pay its dividend is beginning to look stretched. At the same time, UPS management is trying to finesse a 50% reduction in Amazon.com delivery volume by the second half of 2026, while dealing with a deteriorating demand environment. This could cloud UPS' ability to generate earnings and cash flow over the near term.
In its key U.S. domestic market, the decline in its average daily volume (ADV) in February and March was "higher than we expected," according to CEO Carol Tome on the earnings call. Moreover, UPS guidance for the second quarter calls for a U.S. domestic year-over-year ADV decline of 9%. Management declined to update its full-year guidance.
UPS or Whirlpool?
On balance, UPS' dividend looks more sustainable than Whirlpool's, so it wins the contest. UPS has $19.5 billion in long-term debt, which looks manageable compared to guidance for $5.7 billion in FCF in 2025. Whirlpool's $4.8 billion in long-term debt is far higher than its estimated FCF of $500 million to $600 million in 2025.
However, there's a good chance both could cut their dividends by the end of the year. That doesn't mean they are unattractive stocks; it just means anyone buying in for the dividend alone needs to prepare for potential disappointment.
Should you invest $1,000 in United Parcel Service right now?
Before you buy stock in United Parcel Service, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and United Parcel Service wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $623,685!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $701,781!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is906% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to164%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 28, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon. The Motley Fool recommends United Parcel Service and Whirlpool. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
23 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
OPINION: Taxes remain largest single expense for Canadian families
Canada Revenue Agency income tax forms and statements. Getty Images While policymakers in Canada face many issues, including U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war, few issues are more important to Canadians than the rising cost of living. And while inflation and housing costs are important, there's another even larger expense that makes it harder for families to make ends meet: Taxes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account As the saying goes, the two certainties in life are death and taxes. But, while we all know we must pay taxes, it's more difficult to know just how much in total we actually pay. Canadians pay many different taxes to local, provincial and federal governments — income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes and payroll taxes, to name a few. And while some of these are quite visible (you can see how much personal income tax is taken off your paycheque), others are more hidden. According to a new study published by the Fraser Institute, in 2024, the average Canadian family (including single people) paid $48,306 in total taxes. Given the average family's total cash income was $114,289 in 2024, this means families paid 42.3% of their incomes in taxes levied by all levels of government. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. This is much more than what families used to pay, even after adjusting for inflation. In fact, the average Canadian family paid just $17,166 in total taxes in 1961 (adjusted for inflation), which represented 33.5% of its total income that year. In other words, from 1961 to 2024, the inflation-adjusted tax bill of the average Canadian family increased by more than 180%. How does the average family's total tax bill compare with how much it spends on the basic necessities of food, shelter and clothing? In 2024, the average Canadian family spent $12,925 on food, $25,199 on shelter and $2,435 on clothing. Which means the average family spent a larger share of its income on taxes (42.3%) than on basic necessities (35.5%). This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Simply put, taxes are the largest single expense for Canadian families. Of course, Canadians receive some value from their tax dollars in the form of government services, so the total tax bill is the price Canadians pay for government services. Therefore, it's ultimately up to individuals and families to decide whether or not they get their money's worth from government. But clearly, some Canadians do not feel like they're getting good bang for their buck. For instance, according to a 2023 poll , nearly half (44%) of Canadians felt they received 'poor' or 'very poor' value from the services they receive from all levels of government. A 2025 poll found similar results — more Canadians feel they receive 'bad' value rather than 'good' value for money from all levels of government. Canadian families pay more in taxes than they spend on food, shelter and clothing combined, yet many feel they do not receive good value for their money. If policymakers want to help families make ends meet, they should lower the tax burden. Jake Fuss and Grady Munro are economists at the Fraser Institute Columnists Toronto & GTA Hockey Sports Toronto Blue Jays


Globe and Mail
23 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why QuantumScape Stock Is Sinking Today
Key Points QuantumScape is sinking after Goldman Sachs published bearish coverage on the stock. Goldman raised its one-year price target on QuantumScape from $2 per share to $3 per share, but it maintained a sell rating on the stock. QuantumScape's solid-state batteries could be revolutionary, but the stock is a high-risk play. 10 stocks we like better than QuantumScape › QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) stock is being hit with big sell-offs Friday in response to bearish analyst coverage. The company's share price was down 6.3% as of 3 p.m. ET. despite the S&P 500 being up 0.4% and the Nasdaq Composite being up 0.3% at the same point in the day. The stock had been down as much as 11.9% earlier in trading. Shortly before the market closed yesterday, Goldman Sachs published new coverage on QuantumScape and reiterated a sell rating on the stock. Despite some recent pullbacks, the company's share price is still up 127% this year. QuantumScape stock sinks following bearish coverage With its coverage yesterday, Goldman Sachs raised its one-year price target on QuantumScape from $2 per share to $3 per share but kept a sell rating on the stock. Mark Delaney, the firm's lead analyst on the solid-state battery specialist, said he saw some encouraging signs with QuantumScape's new Cobra manufacturing process and the expansion of its deal with Volkswagen 's PowerCo subsidiary, but he remained heavily bearish on the stock due to a belief that big risk factors facing the business aren't reflected in its current valuation. As of this writing, the investment firm's price target implies potential downside of roughly 74.5% for the stock. What's next for QuantumScape? QuantumScape's solid-state battery technologies have the potential to make big waves in the electric vehicle (EV) industry by offering superior charge capacity, faster charging, and safety improvements. On the other hand, it still remains to be seen whether they will actually wind up being brought to market and used by Volkswagen's PowerCo and other potential customers. With its recent quarterly report, the company announced that it had secured a new deal with PowerCo worth $131 million and that it now had enough cash to fund its operations through 2029. QuantumScape stock could deliver huge returns if its solid-state batteries see market adoption, but the stock is a speculative play and could see big sell-offs if the company hits roadblocks on the path to commercialization. Should you invest $1,000 in QuantumScape right now? Before you buy stock in QuantumScape, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and QuantumScape wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,040% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
LILLEY: As Trump lashes out, sources say Canadian side playing games
Mark Carney won the election by promising he was best positioned to deal with Donald Trump, but so far he hasn't delivered Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox US President Donald Trump speaks as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (R) looks on, as they meet during the Group of Seven (G7) Summit at the Pomeroy Kananaskis Mountain Lodge in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada on June 16, 2025. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images) Donald Trump says he's having no luck with Canada on a new trade deal. That won't be a shock to anyone familiar with how talks between Washington and Ottawa have been going. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account On Friday though, Trump let loose on Canada and a whole pile of other topics while speaking with reporters. 'We don't have a deal with Canada,' Trump said. 'August 1 is going to come, and we will have most of our deals finished, if not all. We haven't really had a lot of luck with Canada. I think Canada could be one where they'll just pay tariffs. It's not really a negotiation.' That last part, that it's not really a negotiation, is something I heard Thursday from the Canadian side – before Trump ever spoke. 'We haven't put anything on the table,' said one source well-briefed on the talks. Read More Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Americans want a deal with us, they've said so repeatedly, and time and again, both Canadian and American sources have said it is Canada's negotiating team getting in the way. 'It should take half a day to get a deal done, we negotiated a deal with China in a weekend,' an American diplomat quipped in May. Back then, a deal seemed possible. In fact, at the beginning of June, government sources were saying that a deal was imminent. Both sides wanted to sign a deal before the G7 meetings in Kananaskis. Somehow, it all fell apart. There is plenty of blame to go around, and Trump will shoulder a great deal of that blame. He's erratic, he's unpredictable, his negotiating style is to create havoc to throw his negotiation partner off balance. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. All of that is true though for every other country in the world and those other countries are getting deals. Canada is not only not getting a deal, but our negotiating style is also irritating Trump to the point that he lashes out. Some Canadians will take joy in irritating Trump, but I'm looking at the rising unemployment, especially in communities like Windsor that rely on the auto sector. Job one for the Carney government should be to protect the jobs of Canadians, not to leave them dangling as our negotiators play games. A month ago, Prime Minister Mark Carney appointed Ambassador Kristen Hillman as Canada's chief negotiator. It's time to pull her – she's not getting the job done. 'She's a wonk,' said one experienced government hand. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'She's good at advising and putting issues into perspective. She's not a negotiator,' said someone with experience working alongside Hillman on this file. RECOMMENDED VIDEO The Americans are looking to secure a deal with us and instead of sending in a salesperson, a closer, we're sending in the accounting team. It won't work. We aren't even trying to secure the same kind of deal. The Americans are looking for a deal in principle, a high-level deal in broad strokes, we are pushing for something more comprehensive than the Americans are interested in. And at the same time as we say we want to negotiate a more comprehensive deal, we put nothing forward – everything is about waiting for them to move. The Americans, you may have noticed, are busy with other countries who want to negotiate. They don't have time for teams playing games. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. One source said that Hillman is playing a similar strategy to what the Canadian delegation used in renegotiating NAFTA in 2017. The problem with that is those tactics irritated the Americans so much that they froze us out, signed a deal with Mexico and we had to play catch up. Mark Carney won the election by promising the public he was best positioned to deal with Donald Trump. So far, he hasn't delivered – and that is hurting Canadian jobs and Canadian companies. Enough of the games, it's time for Carney to replace Hillman and send in someone who can and is willing to negotiate a deal. blilley@ Hockey Sports Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Columnists