Make-or-break vote on Trump tax bill imminent
Trump is seeking a green light in the House of Representatives for his Senate-passed 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — but faces opposition on all sides of his fractious party over provisions set to balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net.
Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson spent much of Wednesday struggling to corral his rank-and-file members as the package scraped through a series of 'test' votes that laid bare deep divisions in the party.
It was set for a final vote to advance it from Congress to Trump's desk around 8.30am (7.30pm Thailand time) after passing its last procedural hurdle in the early hours.
'We feel very good about where we are and we're moving forward,' an upbeat Johnson told reporters at the Capitol.
'So we're going to deliver the Big, Beautiful Bill — the president's 'America First' agenda — and we're going to do right by the American people.'
Originally approved by the House in May, Trump's sprawling legislation squeezed through the Senate on Tuesday by a solitary vote but had to return to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp of the senators' revisions.
The package honours many of Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing $4.5 trillion to extend his first-term tax relief.
But it is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while shrinking the federal food stamps programme and forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch.
While moderates in the House are anxious that the cuts will damage their prospects of reelection, fiscal hawks are chafing over savings that they say fall far short of what was promised.
Johnson has to negotiate incredibly tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers in the final vote, among more than two dozen who have declared themselves open to rejecting Trump's bill.
'Abomination'
Republican leaders had been hoping to spend just a few hours on Wednesday afternoon approving the package, although they had some breathing room ahead of Trump's self-imposed Independence Day deadline on Friday.
The 887-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed version further to the right.
Republicans lost one conservative who was angry about adding to the country's $37 trillion debt burden and two moderates worried about plans for around $1 trillion in health care cuts.
Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance under the bill at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close.
Legislation in the House has to go through multiple preliminary votes before it can come up for final approval, and a majority of lawmakers must wave it through at each of these stages.
But there were warning signs early on as the package stumbled at one of its first procedural steps, with a vote that ought to have been straightforward remaining open for seven hours and 31 minutes — making it the longest in House history.
Johnson had been clear that he was banking on Trump leaning on waverers, as the president has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure.
The Republican leader has spent weeks hitting the phones and hosting White House meetings to cajole lawmakers torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath.
'FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!' Trump thundered in one of multiple posts to his Truth Social platform that sounded increasingly frustrated as Wednesday's marathon voting session spilled into Thursday.
The minority House Democrats have signaled that they plan to campaign on the bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to analyses showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
an hour ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump says tariff letters to 12 countries going out Monday
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump said he had signed letters to 12 countries outlining the various tariff levels they would face on goods they export to the United States, with the "take it or leave it" offers to be sent out on Monday. Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he travelled to New Jersey, declined to name the countries involved, saying that would be made public on Monday. Trump had earlier on Thursday told reporters that he expected a first batch of letters to go out on Friday, a national holiday in the United States, though the date has now shifted. In a global trade war that has upended financial markets and set off a scramble among policymakers to guard their economies, Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some ranging as high as 50%. However, all but the 10% base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That period ends on July 9, although Trump early on Friday said the tariffs could be even higher — ranging up to 70% — with most set to go into effect on Aug 1. "I signed some letters, and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump said, when asked about his plans on the tariff front. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." It is not known whether Thailand, which faces a 36% tariff, is among the countries targeted. The Thai delegation headed by Deputy Prime Minister Pichai Chunhavajira flew home from Washington on Friday without reaching an agreement. Mr Pichai said the talks had gone well and Thailand gained 'valuable insights' that will guide the development of a revised proposal. However it is not known when or if talks will resume, or whether Thailand will be granted an extension. Trump and his top aides initially said they would launch negotiations with scores of countries on tariff rates, but the US president has soured on that process after repeated setbacks with major trading partners, including Japan and the European Union (EU). He touched on that briefly late on Friday, telling reporters: "The letters are better ... much easier to send a letter." He did not address his prediction that some broader trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline. The shift in the White House's strategy reflects the challenges of completing trade agreements on everything from tariffs to non-tariff barriers such as bans on agricultural imports, and especially on an accelerated timeline. Most past trade agreements have taken years of negotiations to complete. The only trade agreements reached to date are with Britain, which reached a deal in May to keep a 10% rate and won preferential treatment for some sectors including autos and aircraft engines, and with Vietnam, cutting tariffs on many Vietnamese goods to 20% from his previously threatened 46%. Many US products would be allowed to enter Vietnam duty free. A deal expected with India has failed to materialise, and EU diplomats on Friday said they have failed to achieve a breakthrough in trade negotiations with the Trump administration, and may now seek to extend the status quo to avoid tariff hikes.
Bangkok Post
3 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump says tariff letters to 12 countries signed, going out Monday
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump said he had signed letters to 12 countries outlining the various tariff levels they would face on goods they export to the United States, with the "take it or leave it" offers to be sent out on Monday. Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he travelled to New Jersey, declined to name the countries involved, saying that would be made public on Monday. Trump had earlier on Thursday told reporters that he expected a first batch of letters to go out on Friday, a national holiday in the United States, though the date has now shifted. In a global trade war that has upended financial markets and set off a scramble among policymakers to guard their economies, Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some ranging as high as 50%. However, all but the 10% base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That period ends on July 9, although Trump early on Friday said the tariffs could be even higher - ranging up to 70% - with most set to go into effect Aug 1. "I signed some letters, and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump said, when asked about his plans on the tariff front. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." Trump and his top aides initially said they would launch negotiations with scores of countries on tariff rates, but the US president has soured on that process after repeated setbacks with major trading partners, including Japan and the European Union (EU). He touched on that briefly late on Friday, telling reporters: "The letters are better ... much easier to send a letter." He did not address his prediction that some broader trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline. The shift in the White House's strategy reflects the challenges of completing trade agreements on everything from tariffs to non-tariff barriers such as bans on agricultural imports, and especially on an accelerated timeline. Most past trade agreements have taken years of negotiations to complete. The only trade agreements reached to date are with Britain, which reached a deal in May to keep a 10% rate and won preferential treatment for some sectors including autos and aircraft engines, and with Vietnam, cutting tariffs on many Vietnamese goods to 20% from his previously threatened 46%. Many US products would be allowed to enter Vietnam duty free. A deal expected with India has failed to materialise, and EU diplomats on Friday said they have failed to achieve a breakthrough in trade negotiations with the Trump administration, and may now seek to extend the status quo to avoid tariff hikes.
Bangkok Post
5 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Casino bill delay likely for review by new cabinet
The controversial entertainment complex bill needs to be reviewed by the newly formed cabinet before proceeding with it further, Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat said. Speaking at a forum hosted by the Press Council of Thailand to mark its 28th anniversary on Friday, Mr Julapun said government whips and cabinet representatives have discussed the possibility of delaying the bill for a thorough review by the new ministers. He dismissed speculation that the bill's fate was tied to the recent withdrawal of the Bhumjaithai Party (BJT) from the coalition, saying the coalition still commands a majority that is enough to secure its passage. However, Mr Julapun noted that due to the major cabinet reshuffle, fresh input from the new ministers on the highly contentious issue is welcome. There are also calls for the government to first address ongoing Thai-Cambodian border tensions, he added. According to the minister, the formal withdrawal of the bill typically requires a resolution by the cabinet, and the bill could be withdrawn immediately if the House raises no objections. Mr Julapun admitted that the opposition might push for deliberation and vote the bill down. "But the government is confident it has sufficient support to either delay deliberation or withdraw the bill for review," he said. The bill, which seeks to establish integrated entertainment complexes that include casinos, was originally scheduled to be the first item on the House agenda on July 9. It was to be followed by four other bills related to social harmony and political amnesty. Mr Julapun also dismissed any connection between the government's casino policy and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen's recent criticism of Thailand, saying the decision to delay it is primarily to allow for further review and ease political tensions. Visuth Chainaroon, the chief government whip, yesterday echoed the need for its withdrawal, citing the coalition's slim majority and an unfavourable political climate. He said he discussed the matter with Prime Minister's Office Minister Chusak Sirinil, and both agreed that a postponement could still intensify public pressure, making a full withdrawal the better course of action. "If the new cabinet is ready, it can resubmit the bill. But it must engage with the public first, as this bill has wide-ranging repercussions," he said.
