Pistevo Decision's Ganbayar Gansukh Captures First Place in AWS Summit Washington, DC 2025 'LLM League' Challenge
Victory highlights Pistevo Decision's growing influence in responsible generative-AI solutions for the public sector
'Ganba's win underscores the ethos of every 'Pistevor'—pairing rigorous engineering with a mission to 'democratize wisdom' for governments, nonprofits, and citizens alike.'— Cupid Chan
HERNDON, VA, UNITED STATES, June 30, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- Pistevo Decision today announced that team member and AI engineer Ganbayar ( Ganba ) Gansukh earned first-place honors in the 'LLM League' competition at the AWS Summit Washington, DC, held June 10–11 at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center. The head-to-head challenge asked participants to fine-tune large language models (LLMs) against real-world, domain-specific problems, demonstrating the tangible impact that carefully scoped generative-AI solutions can deliver, even on smaller, compute-efficient models.
'Attending AWS Summit Washington, DC 2025 and achieving victory in the LLM League was an exhilarating experience, and a heartfelt thank you to Amazon Web Services (AWS) for organizing such a thrilling event,' said Ganbayar Gansukh. 'The LLM League provided a chance to dive deep into the cutting-edge world of cloud and AI, highlighting the power of accessible AI and proving that impactful results can be achieved even with smaller models. Coming out on top further validated the potential of generative AI and my own growing expertise in this field.'
'Ganba's win underscores the ethos of every 'Pistevor'—pairing rigorous engineering with a mission to 'democratize wisdom' for governments, nonprofits, and citizens alike,' added Cupid Chan, CEO of Pistevo Decision. 'By excelling in a public-sector-focused AI arena, our team reaffirmed that responsible, domain-specific AI can be both practical and powerful.'
The AWS Summit Washington, DC brings together technologists who serve federal, state, local, and educational agencies to explore how cloud and AI can accelerate mission outcomes. Gansukh's achievement signals Pistevo Decision's readiness to help agencies adopt trustworthy LLM workloads—leveraging guard-rail architectures, policy alignment, and outcome-driven metrics—to turn raw data into timely, actionable insight.
About Pistevo Decision
Pistevo Decision is a technology company dedicated to 'Democratizing Wisdom.' The company delivers modular, standards-based data and AI platforms—most notably its Carealth solution for healthcare—that empower organizations to transform siloed information into proactive, human-centered decisions. Pistevo Decision is headquartered in Herndon, VA, with team members supporting public-sector and commercial clients.
Media Contact
Communications Manager, Pistevo Decision
[email protected]
https://pistevodecision.com
https://www.linkedin.com/company/pistevo-decision
Cupid Chan
Pistevo Decision
email us here
Visit us on social media:
LinkedIn
Facebook
X
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor 1
16 minutes ago
- Motor 1
We Tested Apple CarPlay Ultra. It's Great—But There's a Catch
"Does it have CarPlay?" It's one of the first questions anyone—driver, passenger, or buyer—asks about a new car. The frustrating menus, clunky user interfaces, and overall poor experience surrounding modern car infotainment systems have driven the majority of people to Apple CarPlay (or Android Auto, Google's native equivalent), which effectively mirrors your phone on the infotainment display. Since CarPlay's introduction in 2014, it's been almost exclusively for the center display. Now, though, with the arrival of CarPlay Ultra, the entire gauge cluster and dashboard turn into an Apple-mimicking iPhone projection. But of course, it's not without a bit of controversy. Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1 Fourteen automakers originally signed on for CarPlay Ultra when Apple announced it back in 2022. But some, like Audi, Ford, and Mercedes-Benz, have since backed away from the deal , while General Motors continues its assault on CarPlay entirely. Genesis, Hyundai, Kia, Porsche, and Aston Martin, though, still welcome the new technology. On the surface, it's a debate between the popularity of CarPlay and the automaker's ability to tightly control its user experience. Beneath the many consumer layers, automakers are worried about handing over user data to Apple—data that the automakers find extremely valuable. If they aren't selling your data to insurance companies, they're selling it to advertisers or aggregators looking for valuable details on consumer habits. Cluing Apple into that data isn't something automakers will do readily. In the case of Aston Martin, it recognized the popularity of CarPlay and made the decision "for [its] customers." As a small-volume luxury carmaker, Aston stands to lose if it doesn't get with the times. For much larger brands, this isn't as much of an issue. Nonetheless, I got to sample and stress-test CarPlay Ultra for a few hours in a 2025 DBX and lightly grill Aston about how Ultra integrates into existing systems. First and most importantly, CarPlay Ultra only works with an iPhone 12 or newer running iOS 18.5. Upon first connection, the phone uploads 50 MB of data to the car, basically a folder full of graphical assets specific to each vehicle. Ultra runs alongside the automaker's infotainment system as a sort of plug-in program, interfacing with the onboard systems for advanced driver assistance, air conditioning, radio, and drive modes so that most functions can be controlled through CarPlay. CarPlay Ultra does not deeply interface with the vehicle network. Instead, the onboard systems offer the relevant information to CarPlay and nothing more, at least according to Aston Martin. In nerd speak, CarPlay doesn't even communicate on the controller area network bus (CAN bus) of the DBX. Effectively, it's Apple graphics and UI over Aston's systems. It does run as a small operating system within the DBX, but it's not an entirely new infotainment system, and it still operates as a phone projection. Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1 Effectively, it's Apple graphics and UI over Aston's systems. Curiously, Aston did not have to pay a licensing fee either. All the automaker had to do was foot the development costs on integration, and Apple simply provided support. As Aston tells it, integration was relatively painless, with Apple listening to feedback from Aston and vice versa. But customers beware: As the old saying goes, 'If the product is free, you are the product.' Still, the user interface is classic Apple: Easy and intuitive. All major functions were easy to find under the new "Vehicle" menu, with specific push notifications while using physical controls. For example, clicking the ADAS off button on the center console prompted a CarPlay notification confirming the system's deactivation. Even drive mode selections were displayed when switching from Sport to Sport+, and specific drive mode settings were available deeper within CarPlay, allowing adjustments to things like the dampers, steering, and engine tuning, among others. The controversial piece, the gauge cluster, was also a highlight. It ran faster and looked slicker than Aston's native stuff, though that's more of an Aston issue than a CarPlay improvement. Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1 Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1 The ability to customize colors and backgrounds on a variety of layouts was lovely, and Aston's collaborative gauge cluster was crisp, with the Apple-specific stuff existing between the speedometer and tachometer. A full-screen Apple Maps projection also exists in the gauge cluster with turn-by-turn navigation. It's all undeniably Apple, but extremely nice to look at and use. There were a few caveats, though. Ultra is wireless only, which is difficult enough for standard CarPlay at times. Using Aston's provided iPhone 15, it ran smoothly for the two hours I tested it. Yet, using it with my personal iPhone 13 Pro Max running iOS 18.5 was excruciatingly laggy and slow. I attempted to use it for 15 minutes, but it never smoothed out, so I reverted back to the iPhone 15. That said, it's still in the early stages, so there are probably some bugs that need ironing out, and there's a new switching menu to smoothly choose between paired phones. At any rate, CarPlay Ultra is here—and it's very good. While the DBX does lose a little bit of Aston Martin charm, it still has a reasonable amount of brand identity beneath the Apple onslaught. But even Aston's new infotainment system, for as good as it is, benefits from legibility improvements and additional ease of use. That makes CarPlay Ultra an easy win. But what happens once Ultra goes up against Hyundai and Porsche's excellent systems? With automakers dropping out of Ultra and dragging their feet on integration, we will have to wait and see. More On Apple CarPlay Chevy's Infotainment System Is Excellent—Especially With CarPlay: Review GM Swears Ditching Apple CarPlay Was Still the Right Move Stop Trying to Reinvent the Infotainment System Apple CarPlay iOS 18: All the Updates You Should Care About Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
NATO Launches Global Arms Race As Defense Spending Set To Explode
Unidentified NATO soldiers Readers of a certain age will recall President Ronald Reagan launching one of the most ambitious military buildups in American history. In a bid to overwhelm the Soviet Union, Reagan doubled the U.S. military's budget from under $150 billion in 1980 to over $300 billion by 1985. The government invested heavily in B-1 bombers, MX missiles and an expanded Navy fleet. The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), dubbed 'Star Wars' by critics, aimed to create a space-based missile defense system. The 40th president believed that peace could only be achieved through strength, and history proved him right. The Americans outspent and out-innovated the Soviets… and ultimately outlasted them. NATO Agrees to Increase Defense Spending Today, we're seeing Regan's strategy play out on the international stage. At the NATO summit in The Hague last week, the 32-member alliance agreed to boost defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, with a floor of 3.5% earmarked for 'core military needs.' That's more than double the previous 2% target set back in 2014. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte credited President Donald Trump with pushing allies to commit to a higher spending level. 'This would not have happened' without Trump, Rutte said. Trump echoed Reagan's 'peace through strength' energy in his own remarks: 'It's vital that this additional money be spent on very serious military hardware... and hopefully that hardware is going to be made in America because we have the best hardware in the world.' Growing Number of Conflicts Across the Globe It's not difficult to see why this spending spree is happening now. The world is getting more dangerous. According to the 2025 Global Peace Index, there are 59 active state-based conflicts globally, the highest number since World War II. Number of state-based conflicts is now higher than at any point since WWII Ranked as this year's least peaceful country, Russia remains an active military threat, with its war in Ukraine extending into a third year and showing few signs of resolution. China is executing a 'massive' military expansion, according to NATO, including advanced missile systems and naval expansion in the South China Sea. And as you know, Iran recently retaliated against U.S. airstrikes with missile attacks on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, raising tensions in the Middle East. NATO Allies Moving Fast Some NATO countries aren't waiting until 2035 to act. Poland is already spending over 4% of its GDP on defense, the highest rate among all other and bottom five military spenders in NATO Germany has pledged to reach 3.5% by 2029, even changing its constitutional debt rules to make it possible. The UK just ordered a dozen nuclear-capable F-35A fighter jets, marking its biggest nuclear deterrent upgrade since the Cold War. Here in the U.S., President Trump has proposed an $893 billion defense budget for 2026 that favors drones and smart missiles, while reducing some legacy investments such as warships and fighter jets. He appears to be focused on high-tech, cost-effective equipment, modeled in part after Ukraine's recent successes with drones on the battlefield. Defense a 'Dynamic Growth Industry'? Defense has long been considered a 'value sector'—slow and steady, backed by government contracts. That narrative could be changing. According to analysts at Stifel, we're entering a new cycle where defense is a 'dynamic growth industry.' We're now in an arms race driven not just by tanks and jets, but also AI, cyber, space and next-gen missiles. Consider that U.S. defense budgets remain near record highs. Defense spending in Europe rose 17% year-over-year to $693 billion in 2024, before the new 5% NATO target became a reality. Despite this, Europe is still overly reliant on American hardware and production capacity, according to findings by the Kiel Institute. That, too, could spell opportunity. American defense companies—especially those focused on drones, missile systems, cybersecurity and space-based tech—stand to benefit the most from this multi-decade rearmament cycle. For investors, I believe this marks the beginning of a long-term secular shift.
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Your Boss Will Soon Grade You On AI Usage - Here's Why
Here's a number that should terrify every CEO: Daily AI usage has doubled in the past 12 months - from 4% to 8% of employees. Yes, you read that correctly. After billions in investment and endless hype, 92% of employees still don't use AI daily. At first glance, this seems to capture the spectacular failure of corporate AI adoption. Yet, this belies a fundamental truth that Microsoft' CEO Satya Nadella recently admitted: "The hardest part of AI isn't the tech - it's getting people to change how they work." "The hardest part of AI isn't the tech - it's getting people to change how they work." - Microsoft ... More CEO Satya Nadella And yes, companies need to push to change how they work in the AI era. According to the PwC 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer, the report finds that since GenAI's proliferation in 2022, globally, productivity growth has nearly quadrupled in industries most exposed to AI (e.g. financial services, software publishing), rising from 7% from 2018-2022 to 27% from 2018-2024. In contrast, the rate of productivity growth in industries least exposed to AI (e.g. mining, hospitality) declined from 10% to 9% over the same period. It's not a question of 'if', but 'how' to drive AI adoption. The Adoption Mirage The headlines scream success. 78 percent of respondents say their organizations use AI in at least one business function, according to McKinsey's latest State of AI report. Companies are patting themselves on the back for "digital transformation." However, the success or failure of technology has always been at the mercy of adoption by people. This is a fundamental principle in business transformation that consulting firms have studied for decades and have created countless presentations and papers to help enterprises with organizational change. If we dig deeper into the data, a different story emerges. Despite two years of AI hype, only 8% of U.S. employees use AI daily - up from a tiny 4% just 12 months ago. Even 'frequent' usage (a few times a week) sits at just 19%. The vast majority (60%) still don't use AI regularly at all, according to Gallup's latest comprehensive workplace study. Think about that - we're celebrating going from terrible to slightly less terrible. Regular AI Use Growing Rapidly Among U.S. Workers How often do you use artificial intelligence in ... More your role — daily, a few times a week, a few times a month, a few times a year, once a year, less than once per year, or never? The Real Numbers Nobody Wants to Share In another recent study, KPMG surveyed 48,340 people across 47 countries to understand attitudes toward AI and its usage in the workplace. But wait, it gets worse. Despite the 58% usage rate, only 47% of the surveyed employees reported any form of training or education in AI. Translation: We're asking employees to adopt technology they don't understand, for purposes that aren't clear, with no training or support. The Mandate Approach: Use It or Lose (Your Good Review) According to Business Insider, Microsoft is making AI usage mandatory for performance evaluations. Julia Liuson, president of the Microsoft division responsible for developer tools such as AI coding service GitHub Copilot, recently sent managers stating "AI is now a fundamental part of how we work. Just like collaboration, data-driven thinking, and effective communication, using AI is no longer optional - it's core to every role and every level." To drive AI use across the company, managers must now evaluate employees based on their internal AI tool adoption. Microsoft is even considering formal AI usage metrics for future performance reviews. The Evangelist Approach: Train the Trainers While most companies struggle with single-digit daily usage, Moderna achieved near-100% voluntary AI adoption within six months of deploying OpenAI's ChatGPT Enterprise. The difference? They didn't mandate - they taught. Moderna set their objective high - achieve 100% adoption and proficiency of generative AI by all its people with access to digital solutions in the six months period. Brad Miller, Moderna's Chief Information Officer, was pragmatic about the task at hand. '90% of companies want to do GenAI, but only 10% of them are successful, and the reason they fail is because they haven't built the mechanisms of actually transforming the workforce to adopt new technology and new capabilities.' For this, Moderna assigned a team of dedicated experts to drive a bespoke transformation program. Their approach combined individual, collective and structural change management initiatives. 'We believe in collective intelligence when it comes to paradigm changes,' said Miller, 'it's everyone together, everyone with a voice and nobody left behind.' The pharmaceutical giant's results speak for themselves: Moderna has successfully driven AI adoption across the company in six months. The Wall Street Journal reports that Moderna went so far as to merge its technology and HR departments, creating 3,000 GPTs while restructuring roles with regulatory oversight. How did they do all of this? By solving real problems. Clinical teams built "Dose ID GPT" for trial analysis. Legal departments created contract review assistants. HR streamlined onboarding. Most importantly, Moderna didn't force adoption through performance reviews. They created tools so useful that employees couldn't imagine working without them. That's the difference between compliance and transformation. The Path Forward: What Actually Works Amid this push for AI adoption, some patterns of success emerge from the Gallup data: Clear Strategy Matters: When employees strongly agree that their leadership has communicated a clear plan for integrating AI, they are three times as likely to feel very prepared to work with AI and 2.6 times as likely to feel comfortable using AI in their role. Experience Changes Everything: Sixty-eight percent of employees who had firsthand experience using AI to interact with customers said it had a positive effect on customer interactions; only 13% of employees who had not used AI with customers believed it would have a positive effect. Leaders Use It More: Frequent AI use is also more common among leaders (defined as managers of managers), at 33%. They are twice as likely as individual contributors (16%) to say they use AI a few times a week or more. Based on successful implementations at Moderna and others, here's what measurably works: The Uncomfortable Truth After analyzing data from thousands of employees across multiple studies, the conclusion is inescapable: The AI revolution is failing because companies are missing the most crucial steps: leadership from the top and training for everyone. They're buying tools instead of building capabilities. They're mandating usage instead of demonstrating value. They're measuring adoption instead of impact. Most importantly, they're treating AI like software when it's actually a fundamental shift in how work gets done. In five years, asking if someone uses AI will be like asking if they use email. The companies that win won't be those with the strictest mandates. They'll be the ones where that 8% of daily users becomes 80% - not because they have to, but because they can't imagine working without it. The question isn't whether your employees will use AI. It's whether you'll lead that transition thoughtfully or force it desperately. The race is on. Where does your company stand?
