It's last orders for the onboard bar. Flying is no fun any more
This long-conditioned ritual at 37,000ft skidded to a halt this month. Virgin Atlantic — our 'fun' airline to the more sensible British Airways — said it would axe its beloved bars by 2028; the space will instead be used for more premium seating called 'retreat suites'. It also said it would introduce free Starlink wi-fi across its fleet by the end of 2027.
Blame sober Gen Z obsessed with wellness, blame squeezed airline margins, blame our hyperconnected world. I'm dismayed — and thirsty.
I have fond, and squiffy, memories of in-flight bars. One of the most ridiculous flights I've been on was — no surprise — a Virgin service to New York for 2019's World Pride, staffed entirely by LGBT crew. The DJ Jodie Harsh took over the bar on the Airbus A330 and we passengers, giddy on gin miniatures and mini pretzels, jumped around to Spice Up Your Life somewhere over Newfoundland. It's hard to imagine that kind of stunt today.
Other times it's more prosaic. These extra social spaces — installed on all Virgin aircraft at great expense — are an escape valve from your seat, particularly if you're flying long haul. That there are gin and tonics and delicious little bags of crisps and sweets on tap is neither here nor there. 'We have loved the bar, but we have a new vision for social spaces: the retreat suites, the private space built for sharing and socialising,' Virgin Atlantic said. Meh.
Onboard bars still do exist, but increasingly limply. The Gulfies, including Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad, all offer social spaces only on their monstrous Airbus A380s, but on the few times I've sneaked in they have been pin-drop quiet. When I flew on the weird Global Airlines inaugural flight in May — the founder's aim being to take the airline back to the golden age of flying — I spent a lot of it propping up the SkyPub on the upper deck of the A380. Qantas's A350 aircraft, which it uses for ultra-long-haul flights from London to Australia, instead have a 'wellbeing zone' for stretching and hydrating … and not the fun kind.
The advent of free onboard wi-fi is a further dent to the in-flight experience, forcing us to stay connected to the ground. Lots of airlines, like British Airways, offer free wi-fi to their premium passengers and members of their loyalty schemes. Others, like JetBlue and Air New Zealand, offer it to everyone, regardless of cabin. Other carriers are trialling streaming entertainment straight to your phone — which I guess is fine and perfectly logical. But, but, but. I spend my life looking at my phone — is it too much to ask to stare at a slightly bigger screen to watch some mindless guff for a few hours? The sky is the last sanctuary we have.
Rhys Jones, aviation editor of the frequent-flyer website Head for Points, agrees that 'it's a shame to see the bar go'. He adds: 'It was part of what set Virgin Atlantic apart. Without it, Virgin will lose a little bit of its sparkle. That said, I understand why it has made this decision: attitudes have changed and competition has become cut-throat. Increasingly we are seeing airlines maximise every square foot of space on board planes and, unfortunately, the bar just simply didn't pay its way.'
I think I speak for a lot of frequent flyers when I say: one for the road?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
I fear a state monopoly of the rail timetable, fares and capacity
'N o room, No room,' said Network Rail, which owns and manages railway infrastructure. And the regulator, the Office of Rail and Road, agreed. In its decision of July 3, the office rejected three companies' applications, made in 2024, for track access contracts for the west coast main line — the railway that has its London terminus at Euston. Virgin wanted to operate three new services including Euston to Birmingham; First Group applied to operate new services from Euston to Rochdale; and Wrexham, Shropshire & Midlands Railway Company applied to operate new services to Wrexham. Their problem was that in May 2020 — four years before they made their applications — Network Rail had made a formal declaration that part of the route, from London to Leighton Buzzard, counted as 'congested infrastructure'. They made applications that seemed doomed to fail, unless the rail regulator intervened. • Great Bolshevik Railways going the wrong way The regulator concluded that this part of the line was 'currently unable to accommodate any of the proposed applications'. That verdict depended heavily on the value the regulator placed on Network Rail having some spare capacity available for existing and planned services. Also, critically, it depended on the existing timetable and service specifications for the incumbent operators, and for the HS2 line north of Birmingham. Will the 'existing timetable and service specifications' be maintained by Great British Railways, the planned state-owned railway company? If not, will the private or 'open-access operators' like Virgin be able to use the spare capacity ? If the answer to both questions is no, the future for passengers is bleak. Subject to there being any appeal, the regulator's decision has brought to the fore first, to my mind, a predictable clash between an independent regulator and a government hostile to any engagement by the private sector in its state-owned and controlled railway, and secondly a complete absence of any sense of direction or commitment on the part of the government as to the future of the timetable and service specifications. • Virgin Trains' attempt to get back on to the railways blocked The regulator's decision also showed how its so-called 'not primarily abstractive', or NPA, test would work, even though its decision was not based on it. This test is used to help the regulator to balance its statutory duties, in particular those to promote competition for the benefit of users and to have regard to the funds available to the secretary of state. Of five applications it looked at, four would have passed the test. However, the government argued that only one of the five would have passed the test. Moreover, the regulator's decision refers to Department for Transport submissions made to it in June this year in which the government 'stressed the need for ORR to take steps to fully understand and consider the cumulative scale and impact of abstraction when it assesses open-access applications'. My concern is that a state monopoly in control of the timetable, fares and capacity, and intolerant of any risk that competition may erode that monopoly through the provision of better services, is a bleak future for us all. John Swift KC was Rail Regulator, 1993-1998
BBC News
9 hours ago
- BBC News
Wizz Air flight to Luton diverted after 'technical issue'
A UK-bound passenger flight had to be diverted after developing a "technical issue", an airline has Air said a flight from Poland bound for Luton Airport was "safely diverted" to Amsterdam on Sunday flight left Poland at 11:35 BST and the airline added that it was bringing "the affected passengers to London Luton as soon as possible".In a statement, a spokesperson from Wizz Air said: "We can confirm that flight WUK1KM from Poznan Airport to London Luton Airport was safely diverted to Amsterdam due to a technical issue." They added: "The safety of our passengers and crew is of utmost priority. "We are keeping all affected passengers promptly informed on developments and will be providing WIZZ vouchers to all of them." Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Times
9 hours ago
- Times
It's last orders for the onboard bar. Flying is no fun any more
Flying used to go something like this. Turn up at the airport, perhaps slurp a cheeky beer at Gatwick's Red Lion before you board. Switch your smartphone to flight mode, knowing you have a few hours' reprieve to watch something brain-dead like Mission: Impossible without being pestered. Listen intently for the rattle of the in-flight trolley, which still has the ability to reduce me to a panting Pavlovian dog (just me?). And if I'm flying in premium, a discreet slope off to the onboard bar once the seatbelt sign has been switched off. This long-conditioned ritual at 37,000ft skidded to a halt this month. Virgin Atlantic — our 'fun' airline to the more sensible British Airways — said it would axe its beloved bars by 2028; the space will instead be used for more premium seating called 'retreat suites'. It also said it would introduce free Starlink wi-fi across its fleet by the end of 2027. Blame sober Gen Z obsessed with wellness, blame squeezed airline margins, blame our hyperconnected world. I'm dismayed — and thirsty. I have fond, and squiffy, memories of in-flight bars. One of the most ridiculous flights I've been on was — no surprise — a Virgin service to New York for 2019's World Pride, staffed entirely by LGBT crew. The DJ Jodie Harsh took over the bar on the Airbus A330 and we passengers, giddy on gin miniatures and mini pretzels, jumped around to Spice Up Your Life somewhere over Newfoundland. It's hard to imagine that kind of stunt today. Other times it's more prosaic. These extra social spaces — installed on all Virgin aircraft at great expense — are an escape valve from your seat, particularly if you're flying long haul. That there are gin and tonics and delicious little bags of crisps and sweets on tap is neither here nor there. 'We have loved the bar, but we have a new vision for social spaces: the retreat suites, the private space built for sharing and socialising,' Virgin Atlantic said. Meh. Onboard bars still do exist, but increasingly limply. The Gulfies, including Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad, all offer social spaces only on their monstrous Airbus A380s, but on the few times I've sneaked in they have been pin-drop quiet. When I flew on the weird Global Airlines inaugural flight in May — the founder's aim being to take the airline back to the golden age of flying — I spent a lot of it propping up the SkyPub on the upper deck of the A380. Qantas's A350 aircraft, which it uses for ultra-long-haul flights from London to Australia, instead have a 'wellbeing zone' for stretching and hydrating … and not the fun kind. The advent of free onboard wi-fi is a further dent to the in-flight experience, forcing us to stay connected to the ground. Lots of airlines, like British Airways, offer free wi-fi to their premium passengers and members of their loyalty schemes. Others, like JetBlue and Air New Zealand, offer it to everyone, regardless of cabin. Other carriers are trialling streaming entertainment straight to your phone — which I guess is fine and perfectly logical. But, but, but. I spend my life looking at my phone — is it too much to ask to stare at a slightly bigger screen to watch some mindless guff for a few hours? The sky is the last sanctuary we have. Rhys Jones, aviation editor of the frequent-flyer website Head for Points, agrees that 'it's a shame to see the bar go'. He adds: 'It was part of what set Virgin Atlantic apart. Without it, Virgin will lose a little bit of its sparkle. That said, I understand why it has made this decision: attitudes have changed and competition has become cut-throat. Increasingly we are seeing airlines maximise every square foot of space on board planes and, unfortunately, the bar just simply didn't pay its way.' I think I speak for a lot of frequent flyers when I say: one for the road?
