
Russia's RS-28 Sarmat: The Missile That Can Strike Over The Poles, Outrange US And China
As tensions escalate between the United States and Russia, the spotlight is back on one of the deadliest weapons in Russia's nuclear arsenal, the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), dubbed 'Satan 2' by NATO. The missile, a cornerstone of Russian President Vladimir Putin's strategic deterrence doctrine, is designed to outmatch US and Chinese missile systems in both range and payload capacity.
The resurfaced interest follows reports that the US has deployed two nuclear submarines near Russian waters, prompting Moscow to flex its own strategic capabilities. Russian officials have repeatedly touted the Sarmat as a weapon that renders Western defence systems obsolete.
What Makes RS-28 Sarmat So Dangerous?
The Sarmat is a super-heavy, liquid-fueled ICBM developed by Russia's Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau. Intended to replace the Soviet-era R-36M (SS-18 Satan), it took shape as a project in the early 2000s, with its first successful test conducted on April 20, 2022.
One of the most formidable aspects of this missile is its range, estimated at up to 18,000 kms, which allows it to strike virtually any point on Earth, including targets across the North and South Poles. This unique capability has led to concerns in Western military circles about the difficulty of intercepting such a trajectory.
In terms of physical dimensions, the RS-28 weighs 208 tonnes and measures 35 metres in length. But what truly sets it apart is its payload capacity. The missile can carry 10 to 15 nuclear warheads through its Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicle (MIRV) system. Some variants are expected to be equipped with Avangard hypersonic glide vehicles, capable of maneuvering mid-flight to evade missile defence shields.
Its speed is estimated at over Mach 20, placing it well within the hypersonic category, which further complicates detection and interception efforts by traditional radar and satellite-based early warning systems.
Strategic Implications
Russia's deployment of the RS-28 Sarmat is widely interpreted as a direct challenge to US and NATO missile capabilities. It significantly outperforms the American LGM-30G Minuteman III (with a range of around 13,000 km) and China's DF-41 (range: 12,000–15,000 km), particularly in terms of both distance and payload.
The missile is designed with a primary focus on deterrence against the US and NATO, but analysts believe it also represents a threat to countries such as Ukraine, Japan, and Australia, given its role within Russia's broader nuclear doctrine.
Strengths vs Weaknesses
Strengths
Weaknesses
While Russia projects the RS-28 Sarmat as a 'game-changer" in global strategic balance, its deployment also signals a renewed arms race in long-range nuclear missile technology.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
view comments
Location :
Russia
First Published:
August 04, 2025, 13:03 IST
News world Russia's RS-28 Sarmat: The Missile That Can Strike Over The Poles, Outrange US And China
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
2 minutes ago
- India.com
After SC Raps Rahul Gandhi, Congress Attacks Govt, Says ‘Centres DDLJ Policy'; BJP Reacts
Moments after the Supreme Court rebuked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his claim that China had annexed over 2,000 kilometres of Indian territory, party leader Jairam Ramesh took to social media platform X on Monday to launch an attack on the central government over its handling of the border situation with China. Ramesh accused the BJP government of following a "DDLJ" policy - "Deny, Distract, Lie, and Justify." Raising a series of pointed questions, Ramesh said, "ever since 20 brave soldiers were martyred in Galwan on 15 June 2020, every patriotic Indian has sought answers to the following questions. Yet instead of providing answers, the Modi government for the past five years has chosen to obfuscate and hide the truth with its policy of DDLJ - Deny, Distract, Lie, and Justify." The Congress leader posted eight pointed questions to the BJP government, highlighting alleged contradictions between the Prime Minister's 2020 statement denying any intrusion and the later military and diplomatic actions that acknowledged territorial concerns in eastern Ladakh. Ever since 20 brave soldiers were martyred in Galwan on 15 June, 2020, every patriotic Indian has sought answers to the following questions. Yet instead of providing answers, the Modi government for the past five years has chosen to obfuscate and hide the truth with its policy of… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) August 4, 2025 BJP Reaction Reacting to the Supreme Court's statement on Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's remark, BJP National Spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia said, "If the Supreme Court says that a true Indian wouldn't make such a statement, it raises serious questions about Rahul Gandhi's credibility. How mature is he as a leader of the Congress Party?" "The Supreme Court also remarked on how he knew about the area being captured by the Chinese army. Was he there? ... This is not the first time that Rahul Gandhi has shown an anti-India mentality," he further added, ANI reported. Earlier, on Monday the Supreme Court rebuked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over his remark that China had annexed over 2,000 kilometres of Indian territory, stating that a "true Indian" would not make such a remark. The Supreme Court said, 'How do you get to know that 2000 sq km was occupied by China? What is the credible material? If you are a true indian, you would not say this. When there is a conflict across border… can you say all this. Why can't you ask the question in parliament?'


The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘Deny, distract, lie, justify': Congress slams Modi government over 2020 Galwan standoff after Supreme Court raps Rahul Gandhi
The Congress on Monday (August 4, 2025) said every patriotic Indian has sought answers on China since the 2020 Galwan incident but the Modi government has chosen to obfuscate and hide the truth with its policy of "DDLJ — deny, distract, lie, and justify". The opposition party also alleged that the Modi government is responsible for the biggest territorial setback India has faced since 1962, and accused it of pursuing "normalisation" with a hostile China because of its cowardice and misplaced economic priorities. The Congress's attack on the government came on a day the Supreme Court censured Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi over his alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during his Bharat Jodo Yatra. The apex court, however, stayed the proceedings initiated in the matter against Gandhi before a Lucknow court. Also Read | Rahul Gandhi defamation case: Supreme Court stays proceedings; issues notice to State of Uttar Pradesh, complainant The top court told Mr. Gandhi, 'How do you get to know that 2,000 sq km of Indian territory has been occupied by Chinese? Were you there? Do you have any credible material?' Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said ever since 20 brave soldiers were martyred in Galwan on June 15, 2020, every patriotic Indian has sought answers. 'Yet instead of providing answers, the Modi government for the past five years has chosen to obfuscate and hide the truth with its policy of 'DDLJ — deny, distract, lie, and justify',' he said. In a post on X, Mr. Ramesh went on to ask a series of questions. "Why did the Prime Minister give a clean chit to China saying 'Na koi hamari seema mein ghus aaya hai, na hi koi ghusa hua hai' on 19 June 2020, only four days after our soldiers heroically sacrificed their lives for the country in Galwan?" Mr. Ramesh said. "Chief of Army Staff General Upendra Dwivedi has said: 'We want to go back to the status quo of April 2020'. Does the withdrawal agreement of 21 October, 2024, take us back to the status quo?" he said. 15 जून 2020 को गलवान में जब हमारे 20 बहादुर सैनिक शहीद हुए, तभी से हर देशभक्त भारतीय के मन में कुछ जरूरी सवाल उठ रहे हैं। लेकिन बीते पाँच वर्षों में मोदी सरकार ने इन सवालों के जवाब देने के बजाय सच्चाई को छुपाने और भटकाने की नीति अपनाई है- जिसे हम DDLJ कह सकते हैं: Deny (इनकार),… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) August 4, 2025 Are Indian patrols not required to take Chinese concurrence to access their Patrolling Points in Depsang, Demchok and Chumar, whereas earlier they were able to freely exercise India's territorial rights, Mr. Ramesh added. Are Indian patrols not prevented from accessing their Patrolling Points in Galwan, Hot Spring and Pangong Tso by "buffer zones" that lie predominantly within the Indian claim line, he further asked. "Was it not widely reported in 2020 that 1,000 sq km of eastern Ladakh had come under Chinese control, including 900 sq km in Depsang? Did the SP of Leh not submit a paper at the annual Director General of Police Conference in which he stated that India had lost access to 26 out of 65 Patrolling Points in eastern Ladakh?" Mr. Ramesh said. Is it not true that imports from China are booming, especially of electronics, electric batteries, and solar cells, and that important sectors like telecom, pharmaceuticals, and electronics are critically dependent on Chinese imports, he asked. Is not true that the trade deficit with China reached a record $99.2 billion in 2024-25, Mr. Ramesh questioned. "Is it not true that the Modi government is pursuing 'normalisation' with a country that played a crucial role in Pakistan's military operations during Operation Sindoor, supplying weapons systems such as the J-10C fighter and PL-15 air-to-air missile and providing 'live inputs' into Indian military operations as stated on 4 July, 2025; by Deputy Chief of Army Staff Lt General Rahul R Singh?" he said. "The fact of the matter is that the Modi government is responsible for the biggest territorial setback India has faced since 1962, and it is pursuing 'normalisation' with a hostile China because of its cowardice and misplaced economic priorities," Mr. Ramesh said.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Putin is ready to meet Zelenskyy, says Kremlin
Amid pressure from US President Donald Trump to agree to a ceasefire, the Kremlin has said that Vladimir Putin is open to a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. read more In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia's President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces via videoconference at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence outside Moscow on April 26, 2025. AP Photo The Kremlin has said that Russian leader Vladimir Putin is open to a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Putin is ready to meet with Zelensky after preparatory work is done at the expert level, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday, as per Kyiv Post. This is a developing story. It will be updated as details emerge.