More than $1 million spent in Orland Park, Tinley Park mayoral campaigns
Flash forward to this past spring's mayoral election. In the months leading up to the April 1 election, Dodge and his political committees shelled out nearly $190,000, according to state campaign finance reports.
He defeated Keith Pekau, who was seeking a third term and running with his own slate of candidates. Pekau, through two election committees, spent almost twice as much as Dodge, campaign filings for the first quarter show.
And it wasn't just Orland Park with big election outlays.
Tinley Park mayoral candidates Michael Glotz and Michael Maloney, spent more than $700,000 January through March, according to state finance filings.
Voters and elections have gotten more complicated, with candidates competing for the attention of potential supporters through a variety of media and messages, Dodge said.
'You are competing with all the advertisements and messages everybody is exposed to every day,' Dodge said Thursday. 'You are trying to break through with your message.'
That means ads on cable television, data acquisition to find out voter demographics, messages on social media across different platforms and the reliable standards of yard signs and mailers, Dodge said.
'The nature of campaigns nowadays is you are competing with everything, and there is a lot of competition for people's attention,' he said. 'You have to have enough communication to get through all of that.'
It costs money and involves paid workers for things such as photography and media production, a monitored online presence responsive to voter question. Even the old standby mailer has gotten pricier over election cycles, Dodge said.
'Nowadays even an oversize post card costs about 70 cents each to deliver to each home,' including the cost of design and printing, he said. 'If you are sending it out to 10,000 homes you are looking at $70,000.'
During that same first-quarter period, the candidates and their election campaigns in Orland Park took in contributions of more than $400,000, according to state campaign finance filings.
Tinley Park also saw significant amounts of money spent, and earned, in the weeks prior to the election.
Incumbent Mayor Michael Glotz and challenger Michael Maloney took in more than $200,000 during the sprint to Election Day, according to records.
Glotz won a second term, defeating Michael Maloney April 1.
Through his own mayoral election committee and the One Tinley Park committee, which fielded candidates for trustee and clerk, Glotz spent more than a half-million dollars in the January-March quarter, disclosure statements show.
Glotz responded to text messages Wednesday and Thursdays to arrange an interview, but never did commit to a time to respond to questions.
Tinley Together, which Michael Maloney headed as the mayoral challenger to Glotz, took in about $182,000 in the January-March quarter and spent $177,000, according to state filings.
The mayor's Friends of Michael Glotz took in $20,100 in the first quarter, but spent $149,000, with contributions including $72,000 to the One Tinley Park committee.
One Tinley Park fielded Glotz and candidates, and the committee took in more than $190,000 and spent close to $385,000, according to state electoral board filings showing first-quarter income and spending.
Both mayors listed expenses for photography, signs, printing and campaign help.
In Dolton, one-term Mayor Tiffany Henyard received a pittance in contributions during the home stretch of the campaign.
Trustee Jason House easily ousted Henyard, locking up 88% of the vote in the village's Democratic primary. In the April 1 general election, he received more than 95% of the vote over Independent mayoral candidate Casundra Hopson-Jordan.
During the first quarter, House's Friends of Jason House, recorded receipts of a bit more than $31,000 and spent a little more than $45,000, according to state finance reports.
Spending included outlays for consulting, text blasts and mailings.
He headed the Clean House ticket, which also featured candidates for trustee and clerk. State electoral board records did not show any filings for that committee.
Henyard's Friends of Tiffany Henyard showed total receipts of $1,000 and no expenditures during the January-March quarter, according to the report filed by her Friends of Tiffany Henyard committee.
Filings showed the committee ended the election with just under $90,000 on hand, although debts totaled $58,000. All of the debt is comprised of loans Henyard has made to her campaign dating to January 2021, with the most recent loan, for $25,000, coming last November, according to her committee's most recent report.
In Orland Park, Dodge's Dodge for Mayor committee took in $55,200 in the first quarter, and spent more than $34,000 during that period for things such as research and marketing, according to the committee's recent state filing.
He headed the Orland Park for All committee, which recorded first-quarter receipts of $119,000 and expenses over the same period of $138,000.
The money went for things such as advertising on Google, printing, renting office space and mailings, according to the committee's quarterly filing.
Pekau's Keith for Mayor committee recorded first-quarter intake of $46,600, and expenses of $165,500, according to state filings.
The committee transferred $120,000 in February and March to the People Over Politics slate Pekau headed.
People Over Politics saw total receipts in the first quarter of more than $187,000, and that included nearly $150,000 in transfers from Pekau's mayoral committee and money chipped in by candidates on the ticket.
People Over Politics recorded expenses in the first quarter of a bit more than $230,000, with money going to things such as phone polling, printing, consulting, advertising and yard signs, according to its quarterly filing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exelon's Q2 2025 Earnings: What to Expect
Chicago, Illinois-based Exelon Corporation (EXC) is a utility services holding company. Valued at a market cap of $44.1 billion, the company purchases, distributes, and sells electricity and natural gas to residential, commercial, industrial, governmental, and transportation customers. It is expected to announce its fiscal Q2 earnings for 2025 before the market opens on Thursday, Jul. 31. Ahead of this event, analysts expect this utility company to report a profit of $0.43 per share, down 8.5% from $0.47 per share in the year-ago quarter. The company has topped Wall Street's earnings estimates in each of the last four quarters. In Q1, EXC's EPS of $0.92 outpaced the forecasted figure by 8.2%. More News from Barchart Array Technologies (ARRY) Just Flashed a Statistically Significant Reversal Signal for Options Traders Crude Oil Price Fall on Concern About Energy Demand Forecasts for Milder US Weather Weigh on Nat-Gas Prices Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. For fiscal 2025, analysts expect Exelon to report a profit of $2.69 per share, up 7.6% from $2.50 per share in fiscal 2024. Furthermore, its EPS is expected to grow 4.8% year-over-year to $2.82 in fiscal 2026. EXC has soared 22.6% over the past 52 weeks, outperforming both the S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 13.4% gain and the Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLU) 20.3% return over the same time frame. Despite delivering better-than-expected results, EXC's shares closed down marginally on May 1, after its Q1 earnings release. The company posted revenue of $6.7 billion, 4% above the consensus estimates and representing an 11.1% increase from the year-ago quarter. Moreover, its adjusted EPS of $0.92 advanced 35.3% from the same period last year, exceeding Wall Street estimates by 8.2%. Looking ahead, Exelon reaffirmed its fiscal 2025 adjusted EPS guidance, projecting it to range between $2.64 and $2.74, and maintained its operating EPS compounded annual growth target of 5% to 7% through 2028. Wall Street analysts are moderately optimistic about EXC's stock, with an overall "Moderate Buy" rating. Among 18 analysts covering the stock, seven recommend "Strong Buy," nine indicate "Hold," and two suggest "Strong Sell.' The mean price target for EXC is $47.69, indicating a 7.3% premium from the current levels. On the date of publication, Neharika Jain did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Social Security: Young Americans May Lose $110,000 to Keep Program Afloat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Social Security, a foundational program for U.S. retirees and disabled Americans, has come under renewed scrutiny as funding shortfalls loom. A new report by the Cato Institute warned that today's young workers might lose up to $110,000 in lifetime earnings to keep the program afloat. Why It Matters With the Social Security Trust Fund projected to reach insolvency in the next decade, younger workers now face the possibility of significant financial sacrifices to maintain the system for current and future beneficiaries. More than 60 million Americans receive benefits every month. And according to Justice in Aging, Social Security lifts more than 22 million people out of poverty, including over 16 million older adults and almost 1 million children. he Social Security Administration office in Brownsville. he Social Security Administration office in Brownsville. Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis via Getty Images What To Know Social Security faces a potential crisis as its trust fund is predicted to be depleted by the mid-2030s, according to recent projections. The primary driver is an aging population, particularly as Baby Boomers retire and a shrinking base of younger workers are paying into the program. As a result, the Social Security Administration would only be able to pay about 80 percent of scheduled benefits unless funding solutions are enacted. The Cato Institute reported that keeping Social Security solvent in its current form would require today's young workers—those just entering the labor market—to contribute significantly more over the course of their careers. If changes are not made, these workers could see a reduction equivalent to $110,000 of their lifetime earnings due to higher taxes and/or reduced benefits, according to the Cato Institute. That figure is based on the latest report from the Social Security Trustees, which said Congress would need to hike the payroll tax rate immediately and permanently by 3.65 percentage points, from 12.4 to 16.05 percent, to close the program's $25 trillion funding gap and continue to send out scheduled payments. "That means less discretionary income in each paycheck, which could have ripple effects on their day-to-day finances and long-term savings," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9 innings podcast, told Newsweek. "A tax increase would be a hit to growth as less discretionary spending means less in corporate earnings." According to the Cato Institute, this cut would be equivalent to giving up 20 months of pay at the worker's average monthly wage. "There are endless variables affecting Social Security, but in the end, the math does not lie," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "To keep the program going, there will be adjustments in the current payroll taxes, income caps, and full retirement age. We could see a return of the Retirement Earnings Test and may even see means testing for the highest income retirees." This could cause outrage across the general public, which has generally favored targeting higher earners rather than taking away from future retirees' payments. A University of Maryland Program for Public Consultation survey showed that 53 percent of American adults considered it acceptable to reduce Social Security benefits exclusively for the Top 40 percent of income earners. This targeted reduction would address approximately 23 percent of the program's projected funding shortfall. There was also bipartisan support for raising the retirement age, which could close an additional 15 percent of the funding gap. What People Are Saying Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "Younger workers, especially the youngest of the Millennials and all of Gen Z and beyond, should expect Social Security to look different for them than it does now. Adjustments to Social Security are rarely popular, but in the past Congress has been willing to act in the face of dire circumstances, such as in 1983 when the Full Retirement Age was extended." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9 innings podcast, told Newsweek: "While such an increase would extend the solvency of Social Security by about 75 years, it's not a complete solution. The real fix would likely require both raising the payroll tax and removing the income cap. But let's be honest—that kind of proposal is a tough sell politically. Running on a platform to raise taxes rarely gains traction, even when it's tied to securing the future of Social Security." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "There's been an assumption made by Americans for decades now, and that is regardless of warnings and political posturing, Social Security will always be there to provide for retirees. The reality is there's a tremendous shortfall coming in the next decade, and if Congress doesn't act, beneficiaries will see their monthly payments dramatically reduced." What Happens Next With Social Security's financial future uncertain, Congress and the public are set to debate possible reforms, including benefit reductions for higher earners, payroll tax increases, and changes to the retirement age. The conversation will likely intensify as insolvency draws nearer in the next decade, with any enacted policy changes affecting both current retirees and younger generations entering the workforce. No official policy changes have yet been passed, but the heightened awareness and survey support for targeted reform suggest continued bipartisan attention to the problem in upcoming legislative sessions. "There are obviously different solutions to the shortfall that don't involve raising that percentage, but it does present a grim prediction for the American workforce if Congress doesn't act on a more efficient solution," Beene said.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
AM Best Downgrades Issuer Credit Rating of Tuscarora Wayne Insurance Company and Affiliate; Upgrades Credit Ratings of Lebanon Valley Insurance Company; Revises Outlooks to Positive of Illinois Casualty Company; Withdraws ICR of ICC Holdings, Inc.
OLDWICK, N.J., July 24, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AM Best has downgraded the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating (Long-Term ICR) to "a" (Excellent) from "a+" (Excellent) and affirmed the Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of A (Excellent) of Tuscarora Wayne Insurance Company and its affiliate, Keystone National Insurance Company. The outlook of the Long-Term ICR has been revised to stable from negative while the FSR is stable. Both companies are collectedly referred to as Tuscarora Wayne Companies and are domiciled in Wyalusing, PA. Concurrently, AM Best has upgraded the FSR to A- (Excellent) from B++ (Good) and the Long-Term ICR to "a-" (Excellent) from "bbb+" (Good) of Lebanon Valley Insurance Company (Lebanon Valley) (Wyalusing, PA). The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings) is positive. In addition, AM Best has revised the outlooks to positive from stable and affirmed the FSR of A- (Excellent) and the Long-Term ICR of "a-" (Excellent) of Illinois Casualty Company (ICC). AM Best also has revised the outlook to positive from stable affirmed the Long-Term ICR of "bbb-" (Good) of its intermediate parent, ICC Holdings, Inc. (ICCH). Lastly, AM Best has withdrawn the rating of ICCH as the company requested its withdrawal following ICCH's transition to a privately held entity from a publicly held company. Both companies are domiciled in Rock Island, IL. The ratings of Tuscarora Wayne Companies reflect the group's balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its adequate operating performance, neutral business profile and appropriate ERM. The downgrade of Tuscarora Wayne Companies' Long Term ICRs reflects operating performance metrics that more closely align with adequately assessed companies within the commercial property composite. The group's very strong balance sheet strength assessment continues to be supported by the strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR), solid liquidity and generally consistent and favorable loss reserve development, partially offset by dividends to its parent, which has somewhat constrained surplus growth. The neutral business profile continues to focus on underserved commercial business exposures with moderate geographic diversification. AM Best considers Tuscarora Wayne Companies' ERM program to be appropriate for the group's risk profile and includes prudent reinsurance protection and comprehensive risk management. The ratings of Lebanon Valley reflect its balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as strong, as well as its adequate operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate ERM. The ratings also reflect rating enhancement via the explicit and implicit support provided as an affiliate of Tuscarora Wayne Companies. The upgrade of Lebanon Valley's ratings reflects its consistent surplus growth, with gains in surplus reported in each of the past 10 years, conservative investment portfolio and low underwriting leverage metrics that compare favorably with the composite average. The strong balance sheet strength assessment is underpinned by the strongest levels of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by BCAR. The adequate operating performance reflects the consistent performance of the company with net income in each of the past 10 years, with some modest volatility as reflected in underwriting losses in 2021 and 2023. The limited business profile reflects the company's geographic concentration in Pennsylvania and focus on commercial property business. The company is part of the ERM program employed by Tuscarora Wayne Companies and is considered appropriate for the company's risk profile. The positive outlooks reflect the expected product and geographic diversification the company will achieve via the implementation of a pooling agreement with Tuscarora Wayne Companies and ICC. The agreement is expected to be implemented by Jan. 1, 2026. The ratings of ICC reflect its balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its adequate operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management (ERM). The revised outlooks to positive from stable for ICC also contemplate the expected benefits of the forthcoming pooling agreement with its affiliated insurance companies. The pooling agreement will provide greater product diversification through additional commercial multiperil classes and lines of business, such as homeowners' and farmowners' coverages, while also improving the geographic reach of the company. ICC's very strong balance sheet strength is characterized by the strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by BCAR, underwriting and liquidity ratios that are comparable with the composite averages and generally consistent surplus growth. While loss reserve development has been unfavorable in recent periods, influenced by social and economic inflation, the impact has been effectively absorbed without significant drain on the balance sheet. This is reflected by adequate operating performance, which has yielded positive pre-tax operating and net income in each of the past 5 years, despite loss reserve development. The ERM program is considered appropriate for the company's risk profile. On March 13, 2025, ICCH was acquired by Mutual Capital Group, Inc. (the ultimate parent of Tuscarora Wayne Companies and Lebanon Valley). ICCH remains a subsidiary under common management with Mutual Capital Group's other subsidiaries. The prospective pooling agreement between the three rating units is expected to enhance the overall business and geographic diversification. This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments. AM Best is a global credit rating agency, news publisher and data analytics provider specializing in the insurance industry. Headquartered in the United States, the company does business in over 100 countries with regional offices in London, Amsterdam, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and Mexico City. For more information, visit Copyright © 2025 by A.M. Best Rating Services, Inc. and/or its affiliates. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. View source version on Contacts Daniel Mangano Senior Financial Analyst +1 908 882 1907 Maurice Thomas Senior Financial Analyst +1 908 882 2392 Christopher Draghi Director +1 908 882 1749 Christopher Sharkey Associate Director, Public Relations +1 908 882 2310 Al Slavin Senior Public Relations Specialist +1 908 882 2318 Sign in to access your portfolio