logo
Federal judge dismisses legal challenges to Woodfibre LNG's ‘floatel'

Federal judge dismisses legal challenges to Woodfibre LNG's ‘floatel'

OTTAWA – Canada's Federal Court has rejected legal challenges disputing the approval of a so-called 'floatel' used to house workers near Squamish, B.C., as they build a liquefied natural gas facility at an abandoned pulp mill.
The court ruled on two judicial review applications challenging the decision by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada to approve the use of a repurposed cruise ship to house workers for the Woodfibre LNG project.
The group Citizens for My Sea to Sky, which opposes the project, challenged the decision, saying it was unfair not to hold further public consultations after Woodfibre abandoned its original plan to ferry-in workers from Squamish and Vancouver.
The second review focused on claims of a 'heightened risk' of gender-based violence faced by women in nearby communities due to an influx of 'a largely male construction workforce' needed for the project.
The court ruling says B.C.'s Environmental Assessment Office imposed conditions to prevent gender-based violence, including forbidding workers from entering Squamish for non-work purposes, and the judge found no evidence those measures were 'insufficient.'
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
The ruling says the federal agency acted reasonably and fairly when it found the floatel's use 'would not result in increased impacts on the environment.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 23, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court approves class-action lawsuit against Canada Post alleging illegal 'drip pricing' on shipping
Court approves class-action lawsuit against Canada Post alleging illegal 'drip pricing' on shipping

Vancouver Sun

time10-07-2025

  • Vancouver Sun

Court approves class-action lawsuit against Canada Post alleging illegal 'drip pricing' on shipping

A B.C. small business owner's complaint that Canada Post uses illegal 'drip pricing' in online shipping services has been certified by the Federal Court as a class-action lawsuit. The lawsuit seeks compensation from the troubled national postal service for adding a mandatory 'fuel surcharge' late in the purchase process, after showing shipping rates. If successful, customers who used Canada Post's online shipping tools in the last few years could be eligible for reimbursement. Marci Deane filed a civil lawsuit in Federal Court last year alleging that three of Canada Post's online shipping services failed to disclose the full price of shipping by adding a required additional charge for fuel after advertising a purchase price, in violation of the Competition Act. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. She accused the Crown corporation of using banned 'drip pricing' and 'double ticketing' in its sales. The additional charge to the price is significant. The cost of the fuel surcharge is calculated as a percentage of the price of the shipping job — from a high of 26 per cent to a low of 13.75 per cent in April 2024, depending on service type and destination. Canada Post adjusts it weekly based on the price of fuel Canada Post denies using 'drip pricing' or 'double ticketing.' The Crown corporation opposed the certification of Deane's lawsuit as a class action. Making it a class-action case means that if the lawsuit is successful, any damages assessed by a judge can apply to a wide group of people who suffered similar losses, rather than just Deane. In court, Canada Post argued all pricing information is disclosed on a single webpage, during a single stage of the purchasing process. The company said customers are unable to complete their purchase without agreeing to the fuel surcharge, so they can change their mind before paying if they objected. They also argued that when opening an account to use its services, customers agree to terms that would allow fuel surcharges. Deane complained of three of Canada Post's online shipping services, called Snap Ship, Ship Online, and Shipping Manager. They allow online users to create, pay, and print shipping labels to send parcels. Deane, as a small business owner, has been using Canada Post services and programs for businesses for more than 15 years, court heard. While deciding whether Deane's lawsuit should be a class-action suit, Justice Jocelyne Gagné was shown screen shots and videos of the Canada Post online purchase process and parsed the experience. Deane showed the Snap Ship service in action. The video showed that after logging into her account and entering shipping information and destination, Canada Post displays four shipping options with prices, from regular parcel shipping to priority shipping. None of the quoted prices include a fuel surcharge. Canada Post said that the onscreen box Deane showed was only part of a single, longer page of four successive stages where surcharges are shown in a separate summary box. The judge found neither of their descriptions to be adequately accurate, noting that each successive box must be closed for the next to open and by the time the destination information is entered in a box, triggering a fuel surcharge being listed in the summary box, that summary is no longer visible onscreen. A user must scroll up to see it. When the last box is filled out and closed, the page still doesn't return to the summary page, the judge noted. That stationary summary box was a change to the site made in July 2023, court heard. Before that, the summary box was dynamic, meaning it moved along with the cascading order process and was always visible. The mechanics of the three online shipping tools are basically the same, but some have additional business options. Ship Online is a service anyone can use to create paid shipping labels. Snap Ship is designed for small businesses doing regular low-volume shipping. Shipping Manager is designed for large volume commercial clients. The Competition Act bans several sales tricks that are considered false or misleading representations in transactions. 'Drip pricing' is when a price is presented that is never attainable because obligatory charges are automatically added later in the purchase process (unless the fee is government mandated, such as a sales tax). 'Double ticketing' is when a product costs more than the lowest of two or more advertised prices, such as the same items having different price tags offered for sale at the same time. For a claim to be certified as a class action, a court must rule that there is a reasonable cause of action, meaning a sound legal basis for complaining, and there must also be an identifiable group of people suffering the same alleged loss, among other considerations. The damages claimed by Deane is the cost of the fuel surcharge in all transactions in the time frame, plus the cost of investigating and launching her lawsuit. If Deane is successful, Canada Post could be forced to reimburse the fuel surcharges. Certifying a suit as a class action does not assess the merits of it, only that it can appropriately move forward as a court action. The parties and the judge looked carefully through previous class action competition-related complaints: one against Airbnb over service fees, one against Cineplex over buying online movie tickets, and the third against internet phone service provider Ooma. Gagné, the judge, questioned how the same shipping transaction could be guilty of both drip pricing and double ticketing. 'One cannot say that Canada Post is, on one hand, adding price elements as the sale process unfolds, and, on the other hand, charging the higher of two or more prices clearly expressed,' Gagné wrote in her ruling, published Thursday. Gagné rejected Deane's claim against Canada Post of double ticketing but accepted her claim over drip pricing could proceed as a class action. She defined the eligible class of claimants as Canadian residents charged fuel surcharges through Canada Post's online shipping tools Snap Ship, Ship Online, and Shipping Manager after June 23, 2022. The judge said who was a member of the group and how large it might be should be sorted out at trial. Receipts from customers show a fuel surcharge and Canada Post has online records of some users, she said. • Email: ahumphreys@ | X: AD_Humphreys Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here .

Canadian natural gas prices could climb 60% this year as LNG exports ramp up, Deloitte predicts
Canadian natural gas prices could climb 60% this year as LNG exports ramp up, Deloitte predicts

Vancouver Sun

time08-07-2025

  • Vancouver Sun

Canadian natural gas prices could climb 60% this year as LNG exports ramp up, Deloitte predicts

Canadian natural gas prices are poised to jump nearly 60 per cent this year — marking the end of years-long discounts — as a new export terminal begins shipping to global markets, a new forecast from Deloitte Canada predicts. A tanker carrying the first load of liquefied natural gas from LNG Canada Development Inc.'s terminal set sail last week from the northern coast of British Columbia, giving Canadian producers access to global markets. Two more projects — Cedar LNG and Woodfibre LNG — will add even more shipping capacity by 2028. Stay on top of the latest real estate news and home design trends. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Westcoast Homes will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The report from Deloitte Canada says the LNG projects will not only create more demand for natural gas companies — they will also likely lead to much higher prices. That's because producers are not drilling fast enough. At the current pace of drilling and investment, the report says it could take four to seven years for Canadian producers to meet demand from LNG export projects already underway. It means natural gas prices in Alberta are likely to stay elevated for the next several years. According to Deloitte, the Alberta benchmark price, known as AECO, is expected to hit an average of $2.20 per million BTUs in the second half of the year, up by close to 62 per cent over 2024 levels. The report expects another big jump next year, with average prices rising to $3.50 per million BTUs. 'The commissioning of the long-awaited LNG Canada export facility has sparked optimism that the era of extremely low Canadian gas prices compared to Henry Hub, may finally end,' the report said, referring to a U.S. benchmark price. Canadian natural gas often trades at a sharp discount to U.S. fuels, given that the Canadian product must travel long distances to reach American markets. Access to LNG shipping terminals should narrow the discount. But the good times may not last. 'If similar levels of activity and associated production are maintained over the next five years, all added demand from LNG exports would be met and it could be argued prices could return to current levels,' the report said. In oil markets, Deloitte expects North American prices will improve in the final half of the year, averaging US$72 per barrel, before slipping to just over US$67 next year. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies — a group known as OPEC+ — have recently reversed a decision to cut production, adding 411,000 barrels to global supplies in each of May, June and July. Eight members of the alliance said over the weekend they expect to add another 548,000 barrels in August, a stunning increase as they seek to capture an even greater share of the market.

Competition Bureau advances probe into Amazon in Canada
Competition Bureau advances probe into Amazon in Canada

CTV News

time08-07-2025

  • CTV News

Competition Bureau advances probe into Amazon in Canada

The Competition Bureau has obtained a court order that advances its investigation into Amazon in Canada, it said in a statement on Tuesday, 'to determine if the company is engaging in conduct that may be an abuse of dominance under the Competition Act.' The Federal Court order requires Amazon to 'produce records and information relevant to the investigation.' 'There is no conclusion of wrongdoing at this time,' the statement reads. This is a breaking news story. More details to come.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store