logo
She was expelled from the United States, but still thought America would help. She was wrong

She was expelled from the United States, but still thought America would help. She was wrong

Yahoo30-03-2025
She asked to be identified only as 'Ambo,' out of fear of being recognized back in her home country.
'Life is very difficult for me,' she told CNN from a school-turned-shelter on a humidly hot day in Panama City, Panama.
Over the ambient noise of blade fans attempting to cool the large room, she explained she left her native country of Cameroon due to 'political issues,' fearing that she would either be 'sentenced dead' or spend the rest of her life in prison if she stayed.
She remembers arriving at the US-Mexico border on January 23 – three days after US President Trump's inauguration – after trekking through Central America and the dangerous Darién jungle.
She turned herself in to United States Customs and Border Protection in hopes of making her case for asylum. By her count she spent 19 days in US custody, then finally got that chance – or so she thought.
Just after midnight on February 13, by her recollection, she and other migrants were loaded onto a bus where they drove for hours.
'We were so happy thinking that they were going to transfer us to a camp where we are going to meet an immigration officer,' she recalled.
She still thought that when she was loaded onto a plane, believing they were headed to another facility in the United States. But when they landed, they were in Panama.
'We're asking them why are they bringing us to Panama? 'Why are we in Panama?'' she said, 'People started crying.'
Even still, she was optimistic.
'We're like thinking maybe the camp in the US is full. That is why they are bringing us here. When it will be our turn, they will come and take us to give us a listening ear,' she said.
But the Panamanian government took them to a hotel in Panama City, guarded tightly by security, no phones, and limited access to the outside world, according to multiple migrants CNN spoke to. Panama's Security Minister Frank Ábrego previously told a local radio program the deportees were held at the hotel, in part, because officials needed to 'effectively verify who these people are who are arriving in our country.'
Even in a new country, under a new government authority, she held out hope someone from the United States government would step in and fix the situation.
'We were somehow happy that maybe the immigration from the US would come to Panama to listen to our stories,' she told CNN, now fighting back tears.
'It wasn't the case.' Her voice cracked, recalling the moment her optimism shattered.
This is the downstream reality of an increased immigration crackdown in the United States, which the Trump administration has pressured Latin American countries like Panama, Costa Rica, and El Salvador to help with.
Just days before she arrived at the border, Trump had signed an executive order effectively shutting down the US-Mexico border to migrants seeking asylum in the United States. Weeks later, the Panamanian government agreed to receive some of those migrants, at least temporarily, and took in nearly 300.
Many are asylum-seekers from places like Iran, Afghanistan, Russia, China, Sri Lanka. They are now are caught in limbo – expelled from the United States, but unable to go back to their home countries out of fear of being persecuted or killed.
'They shouldn't just like abandon us like that without telling us what we have done wrong. It become very, very difficult and confusing to us. I've left my children back home,' Ambo said through tears.
Another woman from Ethiopia, was on a similar flight. She too requested not to use her name for fear of retaliation in her home country.
'I am so shocked. I'm saying this is Texas or Panama?' she recalled.
She told CNN she too had trekked through Central America, injuring her leg in the Darién jungle, to reach the US-Mexico border. She said she too had left Ethiopia due to political issues and feared returning.
'I don't have family. They died already,' she told CNN.
And a fellow asylum-seeker migrant Afghanistan, who did not want to share his identity, told CNN en Español's Elizabeth Gonzalez that if he were to return to Afghanistan, he would be killed by the Taliban.
They all now live in a humble shelter, one of multiple places in Panama where these migrants are trying to navigate life, in a country where they don't speak the language.
'Almost all of us are from different countries, but here we are like family, you know?' said the woman from Ethiopia.
As she sat with CNN, mattresses on the floor lining the edges of the room, she said, 'We are together. Everyone is in distress. Everyone is in a bad situation.'
Days after they were initially brought to a Panamanian hotel, the migrants were loaded onto buses again. They expected to be moved to another hotel, Ambo says.
But the drive stretched on for hours, until they arrived at a facility over a hundred miles outside of Panama City on the outskirts of the Darién jungle near the border with Colombia.
'Are you going to kill us? Why are you bringing us here?' she recalled asking in fear, 'Bringing us in this place, a forest. What is going to happen to us?'
Artemis Ghasemzadeh, an English teacher from Iran, remembers crying after being expelled from the United States on her February birthday.
'I changed my religion in Iran and the punishment of that is may be a long prison or at the end is death,' she told CNN. 'They took two of my friends from the underground church, so I understand it's time to go. The next is me,' she added.
In February she was seen in a window of the migrant hotel with the words 'Help Us' written across the window.
Days later she was at this Panamanian jungle camp, known as the San Vicente shelter, with over 100 other migrants who were in the same situation as hers.
'The food was really disgusting,' said Ghasemzadeh. 'The bathroom was really dirty, no privacy, no door,' she added.
Salam said the water for bathing was not clean, causing hives to break out on her skin. She pulled up a pant leg to show the marks on her skin. 'All my body is like this,' she said.
Panama's President José Raúl Mulino has repeatedly denied that authorities have violated the deportees' rights. Reached for comment about conditions at the camp, a spokesperson from the Panamanian Security Minister's office deferred to the International Office for Migration (IOM), which assists migrants.
A spokesperson at IOM stressed, however, that handling the deportees is a 'government-led operation,' telling CNN 'we did not have direct involvement in the detention or restriction of movement of individuals.'
Through every step of the way, attorneys for these migrants argue their rights were violated.
'Our claim is that America violated the right to seek asylum and by extension, by receiving them, the Panamanian government did the same thing,' said Silvia Serna Román, regional litigator for Mexico and Central America for the Global Strategic Litigation Council. 'Even though they all claim to be to be asylum seekers, they have never had their right to be heard,' she added.
Serna Román is part of a group of international lawyers that filed a lawsuit against Panama on these alleged violations in the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Ian Kysel, who is also part of that group, has previously said they are exploring a range of further legal actions, including against US-specific entities and other countries that might be taking in deported or expelled US migrants.
Panama has denied any wrongdoing in this saga.
In early March, the Panamanian government released the over 100 migrants from the remote jungle camp, but gave them 30-day 'humanitarian' permits, extendable up to 90 days, to find another place to go or risk deportation from Panama.
'We're also trying to navigate the terms of those permits,' Serna Román explained. 'If they're only given 90 days and the 90 days come up then they might be forcibly removed and they might be like involuntarily be taken back to their countries and that's our concern,' she added.
All the migrants CNN and CNN en Español spoke to said going back to their countries simply was not an option.
'Asylum means I'm not safe in my country, I need help. Just that. I'm not criminal. I'm educated person and just need help,' Ghasemzadeh explained.
'If I come back to my country, my government will kill me, so in Panama they are free to kill me,' she added.
Aurelio Martinez, a spokesperson in Panama's security ministry, told CNN that after the 90-day period it would be studied whether to grant another extension or if their status would become illegal.
When CNN pressed on whether that could trigger forcible repatriation, Martinez simply said they will review each case individually, that Panama always supports migrants and human rights, and that they intend to maintain that support and commitment.
Ambo, her life now in a demoralizing standstill, still dreams about the United States, even though she has no idea when this nightmare will end.
'America has always been a country that received people from all over the whole world. I believe that is why many people are going towards the USA for to seek for asylum,' she said.
'They should listen to us and see if they can permit us to stay or not because when you don't listen to somebody, it means that human rights does not exist again in America.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hunter Biden Trashes Democrats He Saw as Betraying His Father
Hunter Biden Trashes Democrats He Saw as Betraying His Father

New York Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Times

Hunter Biden Trashes Democrats He Saw as Betraying His Father

In a pair of podcast appearances over the past several days, Hunter Biden, the son of former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., appears to be trying to settle scores with Democrats he sees as having contributed to his father's political undoing. Mr. Biden delivered a broad critique of the party last week on the debut episode of a podcast hosted by Jaime Harrison, the former Democratic National Committee chairman, arguing that Democrats lost the 2024 election because they did not remain loyal to his father. In a separate, three-hour-plus podcast released on Monday, the younger Mr. Biden named names, unleashing a profane tirade against a host of perceived enemies, including the senior Biden aide Anita Dunn; the Democratic éminences grises David Axelrod and James Carville; the Obama administration alumni who built Crooked Media, a booming liberal podcast network; the CNN host Jake Tapper; and the actor George Clooney. In a single minute-long clip, he used a version of the same expletive 13 times. His interviewer this time was Andrew Callaghan, a YouTuber previously known for crisscrossing America in an R.V. In the videotaped conversation, Mr. Biden dismissed Mr. Clooney as 'a brand' and Mr. Carville as someone who 'hasn't run a race in 40 years.' Mr. Axelrod, he said, 'had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama, and that was because of Barack Obama.' The former Obama aides behind Crooked Media and its 'Pod Save America' flagship, he said, were 'four white millionaires that are dining out on their association with Barack Obama from 16 years ago.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

FEMA search and rescue chief resigns after frustration with Texas flood response
FEMA search and rescue chief resigns after frustration with Texas flood response

CNN

timea few seconds ago

  • CNN

FEMA search and rescue chief resigns after frustration with Texas flood response

The head of FEMA's Urban Search and Rescue branch, which runs a network of teams stationed across the country that can swiftly respond to natural disasters, resigned on Monday. Ken Pagurek's departure comes less than three weeks after a delayed FEMA response to catastrophic flooding in central Texas caused by bureaucratic hurdles put in place by the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the disaster response agency. Pagurek told colleagues at FEMA that the delay was the tipping point that led to his voluntary departure after months of frustration with the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle the agency, according to two sources familiar with his thinking. It took more than 72 hours after the flooding for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to authorize the deployment of FEMA's search and rescue network. After spending more than a decade with FEMA's urban search and rescue system, including about a year as its chief, Pagurek said in his resignation letter, obtained by CNN, that he was returning to the Philadelphia Fire Department and did not mention the Texas flooding. 'This decision was not made lightly, and after much reflection and prayer, it is the right path for me at this time,' Pagurek wrote. 'I have been continually inspired by the unwavering dedication, unmatched courage, and deep-seated commitment we share for saving lives and bringing hope in the face of devastation.' The Department of Homeland Security has defended its response to the Texas floods. A department spokesperson stressed that Noem initially tapped into other DHS assets, including rescue teams from the US Coast Guard and Border Patrol, and over time, as a need for FEMA resources arose, those requests received the secretary's approval. Some FEMA officials have balked at sweeping changes to FEMA under the Trump administration, more than a dozen agency officials have told CNN, which they believe have stripped the agency of its autonomy and undermined its ability to respond to disasters quickly and efficiently. Pagurek joins dozens of high-ranking officials to leave FEMA since Trump took office, as the agency undergoes a major overhaul and faces plummeting morale and a brain drain from the departure of longtime leaders. Established by Congress in the early 1990s, FEMA's urban search and rescue system, or US&R, includes a network of 28 highly trained state-managed teams stationed across the country, ready to rapidly deploy to a wide range of disasters – from collapsed buildings to catastrophic storms. Annual congressional funding ensures these task forces are equipped for the nation's worst emergencies and paid when FEMA deploys them – though local fire departments and emergency management offices house and staff the crews and maintain their readiness.

Presidential Pettiness
Presidential Pettiness

Atlantic

timea few seconds ago

  • Atlantic

Presidential Pettiness

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Presidents are, like the rest of us, flawed human beings. Many of them had volcanic tempers: Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and Joe Biden, among others, reportedly could sling Anglo-Saxonisms with gusto. In public, most of them managed to convey an image of geniality. (Nixon might be the exception there, but he embraced being an uptight square and his admirers found it endearing.) But all of them, regardless of their personality, had at least some notion about government, some sense of what they wanted to accomplish in the most powerful office in the world. Donald Trump exhibits no such guiding belief. From his first day as a candidate, Trump has appeared animated by anger, fear, and, most of all, pettiness, a small-minded vengefulness that takes the place of actual policy making. It taints the air in the executive branch like a forgotten bag of trash in a warm house on a summer day—even when you can't see it, you know it's there. Trump's first run for office was itself a kind of petty tantrum. Trump had always wanted to run for president, a wish he expressed as far back as the 1980s. But Trump's journey from pro-abortion-rights New York oligarch to anti-abortion Republican populist picked up speed after President Barack Obama humiliated him at the 2011 White House Correspondents' Association dinner. Trump denies that Obama's jibes moved him to run, but he jumped into the open GOP field once Obama's two terms were coming to an end, and to this day, he remains obsessed with the first and only Black president—to the point that he misspoke on at least one occasion and said that he defeated Obama, not Hillary Clinton, to win his first term. Trump's second term has been a cavalcade of pettiness; his lieutenants have internalized the president's culture of purges, retribution, and loyalty checks. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's insistence, for example, on renaming U.S. military bases after Confederate leaders has led to clumsy explanations about how the bases are now named for men who had names that are exactly like the 19th-century traitors'. This kind of explanation is the sort of thing that high-school teachers get from teenage smart alecks who think they're being clever in class. My colleague Shane Harris recently reported an appalling story about how former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper sponsored a rescue dog to become a working animal at the CIA. He named the dog Susan, after his late wife, an animal lover who volunteered at a local shelter. Clapper was looking forward to attending Susan's graduation ceremony at a CIA facility—but the agency, taking what it believed to be Trump's lead, barred him from even setting foot on CIA property. (Trump despises Clapper, and blames him for what Trump calls 'the Russia hoax,' among other slights against the president.) As Shane wrote: 'The upshot is that an octogenarian Air Force retiree who spent half a century in his nation's service was not allowed to attend a party for a dog he essentially donated to the government and named after his dead wife.' Meanwhile, those still in government are being harassed and driven out of public service because of who they know—or even what they might be thinking. Over at the FBI, as I wrote earlier this month, Director Kash Patel is reportedly strapping people to polygraph machines to find out whether anyone is saying bad things about him. Michael Feinberg, a senior FBI counterintelligence agent, was told that he could accept a demotion or resign because of his friendship with Peter Strzok, an agent fired years ago who has long been an object of Trump's wrath. Now Trump wants to fire Fed Chairman Jerome Powell because Powell refuses to lower interest rates and make Trump's economy look better than it is. (Inflation and joblessness are both rising.) Trump can't summarily fire Powell, but the president is taking the Fed chair's opposition so personally that he is already ginning up a baseless accusation that Powell is somehow guilty of malfeasance on a building project, on the theory that it might be the kind of misconduct that would allow Trump to remove him. Even on matters of grave international importance, Trump governs by emotion rather than any coherent sense of policy. A few weeks ago, the president seemed to change course on the war in Ukraine. He said he would allow arms shipments to continue, and promised last week to have advanced systems such as Patriot missile batteries sent to Ukraine. Trump's own Defense Department was caught flat-footed after repeatedly putting a stop to those shipments. (After all, Trump and Vice President J. D. Vance seemed to be on Vladimir Putin's side after they engaged in an unseemly—and yes, petty— ambush of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House this past winter.) But Putin had finally done something worse than murdering thousands of Ukrainian civilians and kidnapping Ukrainian children: He had made Donald Trump look like a chump. Putin refused to help Trump fulfill an unwise campaign promise by acceding to a cease-fire. Instead, the Russian president has unleashed some of the most violent attacks of the war, a raised middle finger to the White House and its chief occupant. You can do a lot of bad things around Trump. You can ignore court orders. You can deport people without due process. You can let Ukrainian rivers fill with the blood of innocent people. But when you make Trump look weak or stupid, you've gone too far. Trump's promises on Ukraine might amount to very little. Emotional reactions pass quickly, and Trump's attention span is measured in milliseconds; he flip-flops on everything from trade to friendships. So far, some shipments to Ukraine have resumed, but Trump has also offered Putin a respite of 50 days to come to the table—which would be just about the number of days left of good weather for military operations. ('Fifty days' could also be just another version of the way Trump uses 'two weeks' to punt issues that he doesn't want to deal with further downstream.) Now Trump's attention seems to be on strong-arming the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians football and baseball teams into reclaiming their old names, the Redskins and the Indians. It's possible that Trump is responding to some hidden groundswell of nostalgia. He's also not the first president to get fired up about Washington's home team: Obama was clearly interested in getting rid of the Redskins name, and undoing anything Obama did is something of a Trumpian rule. More likely, however, Trump is focusing on this small issue in the hopes of picking a racist scab that will occupy the attention of his base—because much of that base right now is deeply angry about a supposed cover-up relating to Trump's former friend and the convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. Yet again, when trying to throw red meat to the faithful, Trump picked something small and silly. Trump rules by appeals to grievances—rather than focusing on substantive national problems—because at least some of the MAGA movement revels in that kind of cruelty. This culture-warring behavior helped get him elected, and Trump's voters have been willing to join him on these capricious roller-coaster rides for the first six months of his second term. But roller coasters don't have actual destinations, and sooner or later, even the most dedicated riders will want to get off. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News The Pentagon is starting to pull out 700 Marines who were sent to Los Angeles last month, as President Donald Trump's military deployment to the city winds down. A federal judge appeared to be leaning in favor of Harvard University during today's hearing over Harvard's lawsuit claiming that the Trump administration moved to cut its federal research funding to the university for political reasons. The Justice Department confirmed to Fox News that it has received a criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who alleges that Obama administration officials 'manufactured and politicized intelligence' about Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Dispatches Evening Read Should You Sunscreen Your Cat? By Katherine J. Wu For all of the eons that animal life has existed on Earth, the sun has been there too. And for all of those eons, animal life has had only one solution for intense exposure to the sun: evolution. Some creatures have thick, dark skin that's resistant to UV harm; others sprout fur, scales, or feathers that block the sun's rays. Many fish, reptiles, amphibians, and birds may produce a compound that protects their cells against the sun's damaging effects. Hippos, weirdly, ooze a reddish, mucus-y liquid from their pores that absorbs light before it can destroy their skin. And plenty of creatures have evolved behaviors that take advantage of their environment—rolling around in dirt or mud, simply retreating into the shade. But certain modern animals have sun problems that natural selection can't easily solve. More From The Atlantic Read. Tyler Austin Harper recommends eight books that break down what's really going on with America's universities. Watch. In 2020, David Sims shared 25 feel-good movies perfect for rewatching—whether you need a laugh, a dose of nostalgia, or just an escape from everyday stress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store