
401(k) panic in America: Investors flee to safety amid tariff chaos — biggest shift in 5 years
40 out of 61 trading days in Q2 saw net movement out of equities into fixed income.
Roughly 42% of inflows went directly into bond funds.
Stable value funds alone absorbed a massive 40% of March's total trading inflows, driven by their principal protection features.
Why did 401(k) investors move away from stocks in Q2?
Live Events
What made Q2 trading activity the highest in 5 years?
'These moves towards fixed income investments reflect a desire among investors to reduce volatility in their retirement accounts. While some reacted to market swings, others took a more measured approach, rebalancing their portfolios to meet target allocations, especially since equities outperformed fixed income in the second quarter.'
When did investor behavior start to shift again?
Is this panic, or a smart tactical shift?
'These moves toward fixed income reflect a desire to reduce volatility,' said Rob Austin, head of thought leadership at Alight. 'Some investors reacted emotionally to the swings, but others took a calculated approach to rebalance after equities outperformed earlier in the year.'
How do Alight's findings compare to Fidelity's 401(k) data?
'It was really encouraging to see that despite a lot of things going on, and economic ups and downs, people continued to save and didn't pull back, or make a lot of changes to their asset allocation.'
What retirement savers should take away from this shift
Staying the course still works
Advisors continue to recommend long-term investing. The majority of gains often come after big drops — and trying to time the market can be more damaging than riding it out.
Tactical shifts are okay — if you're close to retirement
If you're nearing retirement, shifting some assets to stable value or cash-like investments can help protect against locking in losses.
Opportunistic buying isn't reckless
While some ran for safety, others saw the pullback as a chance to buy quality tech and growth stocks at a discount.
Why it's the biggest shift in five years
What does this mean for long-term retirement planning?
Should 401(k) investors worry about short-term volatility?
FAQs:
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
401(k) investors saw no reason to sit still during the market swings in the second quarter. According to Alight Solutions' 401(k) Index, retirement account trading spiked to its highest level in five years as investors actively moved their money away from stocks and into safer options like bonds. Out of 61 trading days in the quarter, investors shifted money out of equities on 40 days, showing a strong desire for stability amid tariff worries and market volatility.In March 2025, trading in 401(k) plans spiked to levels not seen since the COVID crash in October 2020. The movement was stark: investors pulled significant funds from equities — especially target-date funds, large-cap U.S. stock funds, and mid-cap equities — and poured them into conservative options like bonds, money market funds, and stable value funds.The second quarter of 2025 brought choppy markets, largely driven by uncertainty around tariffs and broader economic signals. Many 401(k) investors didn't feel comfortable riding the wave. Instead, they chose to protect their retirement savings by reallocating funds.According to Alight Solutions, a striking 42% of inflows went into fixed income funds. A large chunk of these movements came out of target-date funds, which are typically designed to adjust risk over time and meant to be left untouched. Yet, even these were heavily traded — a sign that investors were feeling nervous.Retirement savers also moved funds out of company stock and mid-sized U.S. equity funds, diverting those dollars into bond funds, stable value funds, and to a lesser extent, money market funds.There was an unusually high level of daily movement within 401(k) accounts in the second quarter. Out of the 61 trading days, activity tilted toward fixed income on 40 of those days. This marks the highest quarterly trading activity in five years, reflecting a significant shift in investor behavior.Rob Austin, head of thought leadership at Alight Solutions, explained the mindset:Interestingly, the tide began to shift again in June, when trading volumes dropped compared to April and May. Investor confidence seemed to be stabilizing slightly by then. New contributions to equities also inched up from 70% to 70.4%, showing a slow return of optimism.Among equity categories, international equities saw the highest net inflows, indicating some investors were looking for growth outside the U.S. despite earlier volatility.While institutional investors have dumped over $1 trillion in equities this year, retail and 401(k) investors have surprisingly held steady — investing around $50 billion per month on average. And according to Vanguard, a whopping 97% of their 401(k) participants didn't trade at all in 2025.Still, the data from Alight Solutions shows that a large segment of investors did actively rebalance, pulling money from riskier holdings in favor of more stable income-producing options.The trends from Alight Solutions contrast sharply with what Fidelity Investments reported for the first quarter. Fidelity saw more stable investor behavior, even amid economic uncertainty.Mike Shamrell, Vice President of Workplace Thought Leadership at Fidelity, said:But that optimism didn't carry over into Q2 — at least not for all 401(k) holders. While some continued to save steadily, a large group of investors felt compelled to take action as markets swung.This quarter's trading marks the most dramatic reallocation of 401(k) assets since 2020, highlighting a clear shift in investor sentiment. While it's not full-blown panic, the data shows a strong trend toward capital preservation and risk aversion — the biggest tilt of its kind in half a decade.Yet even with all the churn, the core story remains stable: most Americans are still saving consistently, staying invested, and trusting the long-term power of the market.The high volume of trades into fixed income could reflect a growing sensitivity to risk among retirement investors, especially those nearing retirement age. But experts often warn against making emotional or short-term decisions based on market noise.While Q2's volatility triggered active trading, it's worth noting that equities still outperformed fixed income during the quarter, according to Alight. This suggests that those who stuck with their stock-heavy portfolios may have actually come out ahead — reinforcing the idea that long-term discipline usually beats short-term reaction.Market swings are a natural part of investing, but data from Q2 shows many people still react emotionally to headlines and short-term noise. The lesson here may not be to avoid moving your money entirely — rather, it's about making measured, goal-driven adjustments and staying focused on your long-term financial health.Whether you're looking to rebalance or just trying to better understand what your 401(k) is doing, staying informed and checking in on your investment strategy regularly is always a smart move.A: Many 401(k) investors shifted to bonds to avoid market risk during recent volatility.A: The 401(k) Index showed the highest trading activity in 5 years, with a focus on conservative assets.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
What is the salary of Asia's richest man Mukesh Ambani, his wife Nita Ambani and children Akash Ambani, Isha Ambani, Anant Ambani?
Ambani family (File) Anant Ambani, the youngest son of billionaire Mukesh Ambani, has been appointed as an Executive Director at Reliance Industries, the family's main company. According to a notice sent to shareholders, Anant will now receive a salary between Rs 10 to 20 crore each year, along with many extra benefits, including a share of the company's profits. In 2023, all three of Mukesh Ambani's children—Akash, Isha, and Anant—were added to the board of Reliance Industries as non-executive directors. At that time, they did not get a salary. Instead, they were each paid Rs 4 lakh as sitting fees and got a profit commission of Rs 97 lakh for the year 2023–24. But now that 30-year-old Anant has become an Executive Director (as of April this year), he will start receiving a full salary, bonuses, and other perks as part of his new role in the company. Isha Ambani's salary Isha Ambani is a non-executive director at Reliance Industries and also serves as an Executive Director at Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL). As per a report by ET Hindi, she earns around Rs 35 lakh per month, which adds up to about Rs 4.2 crore per year. This figure does not include bonuses or dividends. Nita Ambani's salary Nita Ambani is the chairperson of Reliance Foundation and a member of the Indian Olympic Association. As a non-executive director on the Reliance Industries board, she is paid sitting fees and commission based on profits. In 2022–23, she earned Rs 6 lakh as sitting fees and Rs 2 crore as commission. In 2020–21, she received Rs 8 lakh as sitting fees and Rs 1.65 crore as commission. Mukesh Ambani's salary Mukesh Ambani, the chairman of Reliance Industries and Asia's richest man, has not taken any salary from the company for four years in a row. From 2008 to 2020, he used to earn Rs 15 crore per year. But after the COVID-19 pandemic, he chose to stop taking a salary until the company's earnings fully recover. In 2023–24, he again took no salary, perks, or allowances. Akash Ambani's salary Akash Ambani is a director at Reliance Retail Ventures Ltd. He is reported to have an estimated yearly income of Rs 5.6 crore. However, his exact salary details have not been made public. His net worth is estimated to be around $40.1 billion.


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
China's new plan to encourage more births is underwhelming
Local governments in China have tried mostly in vain to lift the country's shrinking birthrate with perks, cash rewards and housing subsidies. Now, the central government is stepping in. Beijing plans to pay a basic national subsidy of 3,600 yuan (about $500) per child each year until the age of 3, according to a central government decree released recently on local government websites. It is unclear when the subsidies would start. However, it is uncertain whether that is enough to reverse a trend that poses enormous challenges for China's economy and society. China's fertility rate—the number of children a woman has over her lifetime—is around one now, one of the world's lowest. Huang Wenzheng, chief researcher of YuWa Population Research Institute, a think tank that was involved in the policy discussions, said the planned subsidy is half or less of what Chinese demographers, economists and researchers proposed. Huang thinks that the planned spending—about 100 billion yuan, or less than 0.1% of China's GDP—must be 50 times higher to return the fertility rate to the replacement level of around 2.1. 'The mindset is still seeing the spending as costs, not investment in the future," said Huang, who had pushed Beijing to ease birth restrictions over the years, including the abolishment of the one-child policy in 2015. China's State Council, or cabinet, and the National Health Commission didn't reply to requests for comment. Bloomberg News reported earlier on the planned subsidies. The number of newborns in China had plunged for six straight years before a slight, short-term rebound last year following Beijing's end to Covid-19 restrictions. But only 6.1 million couples registered their marriages in 2024, a 21% fall from the previous year, the latest official data show, marking a record low since the government started releasing such statistics in 1986. The number of newborns will likely drop further this year, below nine million, demographers say, less than half the level of 2016, when China allowed couples to have two children for the first time since the one-child policy was implemented nationwide in 1980. Other countries, such as South Korea and Japan, also have low fertility rates. But China's problem is compounded by both fewer women having babies and those that do having fewer babies. Authorities have held up enticements offered by cities such as Tianmen in Hubei province as having produced the kind of baby boom leaders would like to see nationwide. But it isn't clear if the incentives there were decisive in prodding couples to have children. Skyrocketing costs of child rearing in China discourage couples from having children. So do health scares, such as a recent lead poisoning scandal at a private kindergarten in the western province of Gansu, where 233 children were found to have abnormal blood lead levels, the official Xinhua News Agency reported this month, citing local investigators. Police detained eight people who authorities said allowed kitchen staff to use industrial coloring to make pastry and other foods. 'If I bring a child into a world with poisonous milk formula and foods, why should I rush to have children," one commentator posted on social media. Beijing shows some signs of taking demographic challenges seriously, such as gradually delaying the retirement age, but policymakers seem to be adopting a halfhearted approach rather than a comprehensive one, said Ilaria Mazzocco, senior fellow at the Washington-based think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies. It is hard to see quick returns on policies to encourage births based on such efforts in other countries, such as South Korea and Japan, Mazzocco said. Beijing's expenditures on developing AI and other technologies it considers important for national security leaves less to spend on improving social welfare, which in the long term should help lift births, she said. China's industrial policy spending, including direct state subsidies to firms and tax incentives, was 1.7% of its GDP in 2019, far above other major economies, according to the most recent estimates by CSIS, a think tank. The trend likely continued following the pandemic, Mazzocco said. In China many young people are struggling to find jobs amid a cooling economy. And owing to falling births, it is particularly hard on kindergarten teachers. Kiki Wang, 28, a teacher from Jiangsu, was laid off last month. 'It's not that you are not a good teacher, it's just we don't have enough kids," she recalls her principal telling her. She says she doesn't know what to do next and is posting on social media for advice. More than 20,000 kindergartens closed last year in China, with nearly 250,000 teachers losing their jobs, government data show. In China, kindergartens are akin to preschools in the U.S., serving children ages 3 to 5. When Wang Lin, who has taught at a private kindergarten since she graduated from university five years ago, was invited to the principal's office for a talk last month, her heart sank. Several of her co-workers had already been laid off when the school in the central province of Anhui cut classes as it struggled to enroll children. Now it was her turn. No jobs were available at other schools, she said. After briefly considering a career as a vlogger, she is now thinking about applying for jobs at nursing homes, a growth industry in an aging China. 'I need to be realistic and find a stable job," she said. Write to Liyan Qi at


Fibre2Fashion
3 hours ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Australia's LEI up 0.3% in May, outlook mixed: TCB
The Conference Board's (TCB) Leading Economic Index (LEI) for Australia rose by 0.3 per cent in May 2025 to 114.1 (2016=100), following a 0.6 per cent gain in April. While this marks the second consecutive monthly increase, the LEI's six-month growth slowed to 0.3 per cent (November 2024–May 2025), down sharply from the 1.3 per cent expansion in the previous period (May–November 2024). 'The LEI for Australia increased again in May. All components, except sales to inventory ratio in non-farm sector and rural goods exports, contributed positively to the Index. Overall, the annual growth rate of the LEI continued to strengthen in May after turning positive in April,' said Allen Li, associate economist at The Conference Board. Meanwhile, the Coincident Economic Index (CEI)—which tracks current economic conditions—edged up by 0.1 per cent in May to 117.7, after a 0.3 per cent rise in April. The CEI posted a 0.6 per cent gain over the latest six-month period, also decelerating from 1.2 per cent in the preceding half-year. 'Following a lackluster 0.2 per cent q/q GDP growth in Q1 2025, The Conference Board expects Australia's real GDP to strengthen somewhat and to grow by 1.4 per cent overall in 2025,' Li added. Australia's LEI rose 0.3 per cent in May 2025, signalling continued growth but at a slower six-month pace of 0.3 per cent, down from 1.3 per cent. Most components contributed positively, except non-farm inventory sales and rural exports. The CEI rose 0.1 per cent, with six-month growth easing to 0.6 per cent. The Conference Board expects 1.4 per cent GDP growth for 2025 after a weak Q1. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (HU)