logo
Colorado lawmakers advance bill to cut tipped minimum wage in Denver, Boulder

Colorado lawmakers advance bill to cut tipped minimum wage in Denver, Boulder

Yahoo21-02-2025

An employee at the Briar Common Brewery + Eatery in Denver pours a beer for a patron on Jan. 7, 2021. (Moe Clark/Colorado Newsline)
Tens of thousands of servers, bartenders and other tipped workers in Denver and Boulder could face a significant pay cut under a bill being advanced by Colorado lawmakers who say the change is necessary to help a struggling restaurant industry.
Members of the House Business Affairs and Labor Committee voted 11-2 in favor of House Bill 25-1208 on Thursday night, after nearly six hours of testimony from supporters and opponents. Democratic state Reps. Bob Marshall of Highlands Ranch and Sheila Lieder of Littleton were the only 'no' votes.
The bill would dramatically increase the 'tip offset' — the dollar amount that employers can subtract from the minimum wage paid to tipped workers, as long as tips make up the difference — in cities and counties that have raised their local minimum wages above the statewide level. For a tipped restaurant employee in Denver, the minimum wage would fall from $15.79 to $11.79 per hour; at 40 hours a week, that could mean over $7,000 a year in lost pay.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Restaurant owners and business groups, who have lobbied for the change for years, say that high labor costs, combined with pandemic disruptions and inflationary pressures, have caused hundreds of local restaurants to close their doors and pushed many others to the brink.
'Labor costs, which used to be 25 to 30% of restaurants' costs, are now 50 to 60%,' Sonia Riggs, president of the Colorado Restaurant Association, told the committee. 'Menu prices can't keep pace or consumers stop dining out. It's like death by a thousand increases.'
Workers, labor unions and progressive groups, however, say the bill is a misguided, and potentially counterproductive, effort to help an industry that faces a variety of economic headwinds. The average restaurant server in the Denver metro area makes a little over $39,000 annually including tips, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. HB-1208's 'huge overnight pay cut' for those workers, said Caroline Nutter of the Colorado Fiscal Institute, attempts to balance the industry's books on the backs of its most vulnerable employees.
'We need to consider what slashing wages by almost $140 million a year might due to consumption, demand and revenue,' Nutter said. 'There are ways to address the issues that restaurants are facing. There must be a way to do this with workers at the table and without starting (by) cutting the wages of some of the lowest-paid workers in the state.'
The state's labor department says there are roughly 21,000 tipped employees who could be affected by the change. No amendments to the bill were made in Thursday's committee hearing, though several Democrats on the panel said they expected changes at a later stage. State Rep. Steven Woodrow, a Denver Democrat and one of the bill's sponsors, said he would continue talks with opponents, but something must be done to help an industry in 'crisis.'
'We have ideas on how we can make the policy more labor-friendly,' Woodrow said. 'We are looking for partners on the other side to have those conversations with. At this point, we've run up against fairly stiff opposition.'
Two major changes to Colorado's wage laws enacted over the last 20 years set state and local policymakers on a collision course with the restaurant industry.
In 2006, Colorado voters approved a constitutional amendment to raise the statewide minimum wage and adjust it annually based on inflation. The measure also fixed the state's tip offset at $3.02 per hour. Over time, the flat $3.02 tip credit has shrunk to a smaller and smaller percentage of the overall minimum wage — from over 40% in 2007, when the minimum wage was $6.85 an hour, to just 20% today, with the minimum wage set at $14.81.
And in 2019, Democratic lawmakers repealed a preemption law that banned cities and counties from setting their own, higher minimum wages. A handful of local jurisdictions — the cities of Denver, Boulder and Edgewater, along with unincorporated Boulder County — have done so.
If passed, by October of this year, HB-1208 would effectively exempt tipped workers from local minimum wage hikes, by requiring local governments to increase their tip credits by an amount equal to the difference between the local and state minimum wages. For example, in Denver, which has raised its minimum wage to $4.00 above the state's level, the tip credit would rise to $7.02. After one year, cities could raise or lower their tip credits by no more than 50 cents annually, within a certain range.
HB-1208 has divided local elected officials in cities with higher minimum wages. Denver City Council has taken a position against the bill, and several council members testified in opposition in Thursday's hearing.
'This is one of the most flawed pieces of legislation I've ever seen come through this building, and I don't say that lightly,' Denver City Council Member At-Large Sarah Parady told lawmakers. 'I am astounded, and as a local legislator insulted, by the idea that the state of Colorado would force its biggest and most expensive city to directly cut worker pay by thousands of dollars per year.'
But Mayor Mike Johnston supports the change, said Dominick Moreno, a former state senator and the mayor's deputy chief of staff for strategy. Moreno was a sponsor of the 2019 legislation allowing local governments to raise their minimum wage. The tip credit issue should have been settled at the time, he said, but the sides weren't able to come to an agreement.
'I think everyone understood at that time that we were kicking the can down the road, and that eventually something would need to be done to address this issue,' Moreno said. 'I think now you're seeing quite an untenable situation for the restaurant community.'
Marshall took issue with the abrupt wage cuts the bill would force, floating the possibility of a 'glide path' for local governments to comply with.
'This issue has been a long in coming, over eight years, piece by piece,' he said. 'And yet we're trying to cram down the workers in one year.'
While there's little doubt that restaurants have faced a variety of challenges in recent years, some opponents of HB-1208 dispute the prevailing narrative from bill sponsors and industry groups that Colorado's dining scene is in free fall.
'The restaurant industry in Denver isn't dying,' Matthew Fritz-Mauer, director of the labor division at the Denver Auditor's Office, told lawmakers. 'The sky is not falling. There is no reliable empirical support for this claim.'
A widely circulated statistic showing a 22% decline in the number of restaurant licenses in Denver since 2022, Fritz-Mauer said, is based on 'incomplete data' and doesn't account for a significant change in the city's licensing system in 2023. He cited BLS data showing stable employment figures for the industry as a whole.
Moreno acknowledged that changes to licensing procedures 'may have disrupted the numbers a little bit,' but said the mayor's office still finds the figures 'quite concerning.' Other proponents of HB-1208 said the BLS data, which includes workers in commissaries used by food trucks, caterers and online-only 'ghost kitchens,' doesn't accurately reflect the health of the hospitality industry.
Democratic state Rep. Alex Valdez of Denver, another HB-1208 sponsor, cited the recent closure of familiar spots around the state Capitol as proof that the bill is necessary.
'It's astounding to me that we had testimony from the auditor's office that there's no problem,' Valdez said. 'Everyone in Colorado can see the problem. Everyone in Denver can see the problem. It's a major problem.'
Analysts say per-person restaurant visits have steadily declined from their peak in the 1990s, part of a broader trend towards American adults spending more of their time alone or at home. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated those trends, and while revenues and employment in the foodservice sector at large have rebounded to pre-pandemic levels, that bounceback has been achieved through a shift away from full-service, independent restaurants towards large chains and expanded takeout and delivery service.
Dozens of local restaurant owners testified in support of HB-1208 on Thursday. Many of them said that changing the tipped wage would help their bottom lines, but not by much.
'It's everything. It's rent, cost of goods, labor,' said Jeff Osaka, a Denver restauranteur who said he's been forced to close one of his two remaining restaurants, Osaka Ramen. 'So this bill would help a fraction of that. This is a good stepping stone.'
But Jesse Thornton, an airport bartender and member of foodservice union Unite Here Local 23, said that after decades of extremely low pay, minimum wage hikes over the last decade have finally meant 'real wages' for restaurant employees for the first time. Rolling back those gains would be 'devastating' for workers who live paycheck to paycheck, he said.
'Restaurant owners would profit from this bill, and working Coloradans would not,' said Thornton. 'Tipped workers don't get raises unless the minimum wage goes up. That's a fact of the industry.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle after high drama
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle after high drama

CNBC

time14 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle after high drama

The Senate on Saturday cleared a key procedural hurdle to advance President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," bringing the massive spending legislation one step closer to passage after weeks of painstaking negotiations. The Senate vote delivered a boost for Republican Majority Leader John Thune's bid to get the bill to Trump's desk by July 4. But it was not without drama. The vote on the motion to proceed was open for hours on Saturday night, and only passed after three Republican holdouts gave in and voted yes. The hours of uncertainty underscored the tricky path forward for the massive package. The procedural vote tees up a final vote on the megabill in the Senate likely sometime Sunday or Monday. Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, are forcing the 940-page bill to be read out loud once it heads to full debate on the Senate floor Sunday. "We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it," Schumer wrote Saturday on X. While the package cannot officially pass the upper chamber until the final vote, the procedural vote was considered a big test for Thune. The vote comes after weeks of turmoil and tension over the massive package that exposed bitter policy disputes and emboldened some firm Republican holdouts. The sweeping domestic policy package will also have to be passed again in the House, which just narrowly passed its own version of the bill last month. Some House Republicans have already expressed opposition to key elements of the Senate version of the bill — most notably deep cuts to Medicaid — likely foreshadowing a close vote in the lower chamber. Both Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson hold narrow majorities in their respective chambers, meaning they can only afford to lose the support of a small number of Republican lawmakers to pass the package in a party-line vote. Meanwhile, Trump continues to urge lawmakers to get the package passed before Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline. "President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal," the White House said in a statement of administration policy on Saturday. This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

Senate Republicans put megabill on track for likely Monday passage
Senate Republicans put megabill on track for likely Monday passage

Politico

time23 minutes ago

  • Politico

Senate Republicans put megabill on track for likely Monday passage

Senate Republicans on Saturday took a crucial step toward passing their sweeping domestic policy bill, voting 51-49 to start debate on the legislation. Two GOP senators — Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina — joined Democrats to oppose advancing the cornerstone of President Donald Trump's second-term agenda. But several others came around after hours of last-ditch negotiations to keep the bill moving forward. The vote came after a daylong scramble by GOP leaders to win over several Republican senators who were viewed as undecided or had vowed to block debate over their opposition to pieces of the bill — including an extended negotiating session that unfolded withvarious senatorswhile the vote was underway. Now the chamber is on track to pass the bill sometime Monday. Democrats are forcing Senate clerks to first read the legislation out loud, which is expected to happen overnight, before a maximum 20 hours of debate plus a marathon series of amendment votes.

Michael Goodwin: Mamdani's mayoral primary victory sealed a headache for Dems – and proved they can't win no matter what
Michael Goodwin: Mamdani's mayoral primary victory sealed a headache for Dems – and proved they can't win no matter what

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Michael Goodwin: Mamdani's mayoral primary victory sealed a headache for Dems – and proved they can't win no matter what

Here's how you know Democrats are cursed: They lose even when they win. In a week where President Trump kept his promise to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities, forged a cease-fire in its war with Israel, scored a huge victory at the Supreme Court and saw the stock market hit a new historic high, Dems won . . . another giant headache. His name is Zohran Mamdani and his victory in New York's mayoral primary is already proving to be more of a problem than a solution to the Dems' woes. Advertisement His uber-progressive platform is so extreme that he's driving leading lefties to pretend to be moderates! Normally, winning the mayoral nomination is cause for party celebration because the Dem nominee usually prevails in deep blue Gotham, meaning more power, prestige and patronage. Besides, the 33-year-old Queens assemblyman routed bogeyman Andrew Cuomo and others with a campaign that boosted turnout among the kind of young voters who have been drifting away from the party. Top Dems dismayed Advertisement The hitch is that Mamdani's ideas, including giving away lots of free stuff, are so extreme that New York's Dem leaders are giving him the cold shoulder — and a slapdown. He's a true socialist who wants to freeze the rents on a million privately owned apartments and favors taxing homes owned by whites at higher rates than those owned by nonwhites. He promises government supermarkets, called for defunding the police and — naturally — taxing the 'rich.' If that weren't trouble enough, Mamdani is also a proven antisemite. Advertisement His history and agenda are prompting an outcry among even some fellow Dems and a budding effort to defeat him in the general election. They believe a Mamdani mayoralty would be good only if the goal is to boost Trump's popularity and help Republicans sweep next year's elections. In fact, some see Mamdani as so radioactive that they are refusing to endorse him, lest they get tarred with his brush. Zohran Mamdani's victory in New York's mayoral primary is already proving to be more of a problem than a solution to the Dems' woes. Derek French/UPI/Shutterstock Advertisement Gov. Hochul is rejecting a central promise of his platform, which is to impose big tax hikes on New York's highest earners and corporations. Hochul has rarely met a tax she doesn't want to raise, but the state's out-of-whack tax-and-spend structures already are making the Empire State the No. 1 exporter of residents to other states, a fact she cited in rejecting his tax plan. Hochul is facing a tough re-election campaign next year and obviously fears that throwing her lot in with Mamdani would be political suicide in the rest of the state, which is more moderate than the city. Another hurdle for many Dems is Mamdani's refusal to recognize Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people. He recently compounded that long-standing position, which includes support for the BDS movement, by defending the phrase 'globalize the intifada.' He claims it reflects 'a desperate desire for equality and equal rights and standing up for Palestinian human rights,' but that's nonsense, and the condemnations haven't stopped. The Washington Holocaust Museum called his argument 'outrageous and especially offensive' and Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, said the phrase is an 'explicit incitement to violence.' Manhattan Rep. Dan Goldman said the word 'intifada' is 'well understood to refer to the violent terror attacks against innocent Israeli civilians that occurred during the First and Second Intifadas.' Advertisement He added that 'if Mr. Mamdani is unwilling to heed the request of major Jewish organizations to condemn this unquestionably antisemitic phrase, then he is unfit to lead a city with 1.3 million Jews — the largest Jewish population outside of Israel.' Resistance by default Even Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who is normally as quiet as the proverbial church mouse, denounced Mamdani. 'The global intifada is a statement that means destroy Israel and kill all the Jews,' she said. Perhaps most important, the two New Yorkers who lead congressional Dems have withheld their support. Advertisement Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries congratulated Mamdani, but said only they looked forward to meeting him to discuss his ideas. Oh, to be a fly on the wall! At home and abroad, Trump has delivered big-ticket reforms that will have lasting benefits for America and its allies. From a national perspective, the larger problem is that Mamdani represents another manifestation of the left's compulsion to be rabidly against whatever Trump is for. Advertisement The recent resistance featured such bone-headed plays as Dems defending Central American gangsters Joe Biden let into the country and trying to undercut Trump's magnificent success against Iran by citing a leaked 'deep state' report that said damage to the nuclear facilities was minimal. Only later did we learn that the leakers said they had 'low confidence' in the accuracy of the report. Yet with each of these clashes, Dems in Congress and their media megaphones shout and pound the table as if the end of the world as we know it is near unless Trump is stopped. Like the boy who cried wolf, their hysteria is leading to national exhaustion — and now comes Mamdani's absurd agenda. Advertisement Perhaps his radicalism represents peak madness, but even if not, Trump Derangement Syndrome is losing much of its ability to shape the national mood. A prime example involves the many federal and state judges who jumped on the resistance bandwagon with rulings that are nakedly political efforts to thwart the president. They got a dramatic comeuppance with the Supreme Court decision last week that curtailed their overreach in most instances. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Bumps in the road None of this is to suggest Trump's tenure has been without flaws. His tariff zigzags have caused trade disruptions, anxiety over household budgets and led the Federal Reserve to hold off on lowering interest rates, a move that would benefit many in the beleaguered middle class he aims to help. Similarly, the president's promise to deport dangerous illegal aliens has seen its popularity undercut by cases where some of those rounded up had no criminal records. Still, these are relative bumps on the road for a presidency that already has had a string of extraordinary successes. At home and abroad, Trump has delivered big ticket reforms that will have lasting benefits for America and its allies. For example, getting NATO members to realize he was right about the need for them to pay more for the common defense is one thing, but getting them to agree to more than double their annual pledge, to 5% of their GDP, is extraordinary. Among other benefits, it's a huge rebuke to Russia's Vladimir Putin. At home, the violations of Jewish students' civil rights by elite universities would have persisted without Trump in the White House. The same can be said for his assault on the issue of biological men participating in women's sports and his effort to end public funding for the leftist indoctrination outfits known as PBS and NPR. Trump did not discover these and other cultural rots, which were long ago identified. His genius lies in having the courage to actually do something about them. For that reason alone, history will be on his side.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store