TSB to be sold to rival Santander for £2.65billion
Santander intends to integrate TSB into the Santander UK group, meaning it would become the second-largest bank in the country.
Bosses say the deal is 'aligned with Santander's long-term objectives'.
However, the final transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals and Sabadell shareholder approval.
The full transaction is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2026.
TSB already has a nationwide network of 218 branches and outlets, and a growing digital presence.
It serves around five million customers, with £34 billion in mortgages and £35 billion in deposits.
But with the latest buyout news, TSB combined with Santander would serve nearly 28 million retail and business customers nationwide.
Santander has in the past year entertained bids from both NatWest and Barclays for its UK retail arm.
Ana Botín, Banco Santander's executive chair, said: "The acquisition of TSB represents a continuing strategic commitment to our customers in the UK, offering a compelling opportunity that is financially attractive to our shareholders and aligned with Santander's long-term objectives.
"It strengthens our franchise in a core market through the acquisition of a low-risk and complementary business that adds to our diversification.
"We are creating a stronger and more competitive business across key products such as personal current accounts where the combined business will become the second largest bank in the UK by market share.
"The transaction will accelerate our path to greater profitability in the UK and helps achieve a return on tangible equity of 16% by 2028.
"The acquisition also reflects our commitment to growing profitably through disciplined capital allocation. This acquisition meets our goal of achieving a return on investment above 20% and EPS accretion from year 1, while consuming limited capital and having low execution risk.
Recommended reading:
Nationwide offering fresh £280 in free bonuses to thousands of customers
July Premium Bond winners have been announced - have you won £1 million
O2 customers unable to make or receive calls as network 'working to get this fixed'
"Furthermore, the transaction will not affect Santander's existing distribution policy and 2025 targets.'
CEO of Santander UK, Mike Regnier, said he hoped they could become "the best bank for UK customers".
He added: "This is an excellent deal for customers combining two strong and complementary banks, creating one of the most substantial banks in the UK and materially enhancing the competitiveness of the industry.
'At Santander UK we have momentum in our strategy to become the best bank for customers in the UK by investing in technology and service and improving our processes and efficiency."
Marc Armengol, TSB CEO, said: 'TSB is a truly special bank, run by a first-class team that deliver trusted service and support for customers, day in and day out.
"Today's announcement represents the next exciting chapter for this successful business, as part of Santander Group, a highly regarded banking group.
"I believe this will prove to be an excellent fit for our loyal customers.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Business news live: Bonds latest after yields rise and Microsoft cut 4% of workforce in AI push
The yields on UK ten year bonds rose sharply on Wednesday as Keir Starmer failed to guarantee the job of chancellor Rachel Reeves, resulting in higher borrowing costs, before stabilising after a Labour statement said Ms Reeves was 'going nowhere'. That didn't stop market speculation, as the pound also sank in reaction. Meanwhile, news across the business world saw TSB confirm it would be bought by Santander to create the UK's third-biggest bank, pending approval, and AstraZeneca's CEO has held conversations over moving the biggest firm on the London Stock Exchange to a US listing. Elsewhere, Microsoft are cutting 9,000 jobs as the race to employ AI for tasks continues, while Thursday also sees The Independent show how Trump tariffs are impacting small and medium businesses across the UK. The FTSE 100 was flat on Wednesday, despite several miners enjoying strong rises.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
My Revolut card was stolen in Benidorm... and they took out £1,450 cash: CRANE ON THE CASE
In May, I was on holiday in Benidorm when my phone was stolen out of my pocket. It had my Revolut bank card, which I use for free spending abroad, in the case. Whoever took the phone then used Apple Pay to transfer money from my Santander current account to Revolut. In the space of less than an hour, between 10:30pm and 11:30pm, they attempted to withdraw £2,950 at three different cash machines. Of this, £1,450 went through. I wasn't able to get my Revolut account frozen until four days after the card was stolen, as I didn't have my mobile phone to sign in to the app. I disputed the cash withdrawals and lodged a chargeback request but Revolut declined it. I wasn't given the chance to provide evidence or to speak to anyone. It said I was 'responsible for the transaction' and it wasn't fraudulent. B.B Helen Crane, This is Money's consumer champion, replies: Just as on busy high streets at home, thieves target bustling bars and beaches in holiday resorts in their quest to snatch phones. As I've reported before, these thieves aren't interested in the resale value of your mobile. They want to access your money apps and transfer out cash. You told me you feel silly to have left your card inside your phone case, but it's something plenty of us do. You also only had a few hundred pounds on it, as it was a secondary account used for holiday spending money. However, the thieves were able to use Apple Pay on your phone to transfer money from your main Santander account over to the Revolut card. It's unclear why some of the cash withdrawal attempts were declined. You reported the theft to Spanish police, but unfortunately money taken from an ATM is hard to trace. I'm often asked how it's possible for thieves to get into someone's phone, given they are normally protected by a passcode and facial recognition - as yours was. The answer is usually that the phone has been taken from their hand already unlocked, or that they have been 'shoulder surfed'. This means the criminal will observe you from a distance, usually in busy place like a bar, until they see you open your phone using the passcode. Once inside, they can turn off any facial or fingerprint recognition features. I urge anyone to look into features such as Apple's stolen device protection, and Android's theft detection lock, which can prevent this. Once you realised your phone was gone, you tried cancel your Sim card and block your Santander and Revolut accounts, using friends' phones. At this point you weren't aware the cash had gone missing, as you couldn't access your apps. It was still possible you may have simply lost the phone. Santander blocked your account when it received a phone call from the thief impersonating you - but Revolut was much more difficult and you didn't manage to freeze it until you returned home. Revolut is an online bank, and the only way for customers to contact it is to send a message through the app. Customer service can make outbound calls, but the number where you can speak to a real person isn't made available to users. It seems the attitude is, 'Don't call us, we'll call you.' It has an automated phone line to block cards, but you couldn't get this to work on holiday without access to the app and your phone. This line also can't connect you to a human agent. When I called, it said: 'If you are looking to speak to a human, then head over to our chat within the app.' You'd tried messaging here, but you said you thought the responses were from AI, and they weren't helpful. When you did get home, you initiated a chargeback with Revolut for the £1,450 - though this was also through an automated online process. After three days you received the response: 'After careful review, we found that your account activity around the time the transaction was made suggests that you're familiar with the charge. 'As a result, we can't treat this transaction as unauthorised or proceed with this claim.' This was on the basis that the thieves had used your Pin. You told me you thought they got this because they had been watching when you used the card at a bar earlier. You argued the transactions should have been blocked at the cashpoint, because it was a much larger amount than you had ever withdrawn on the card before. In the three months you'd had the account, you'd only spent £878 in total, and hardly any of this was taken out in cash. I contacted Revolut to see if it would be willing to reconsider, given how difficult it was for you to speak to someone and to suspend your account after the phone was stolen. It decided to look at your case again in June, and escalated this to the fraud team. It agreed to pay you back the £1,450 and also paid you £250 in compensation for the delay. However, it also emerged in my conversation with the bank that you had previously admitted to having the Pin for your Revolut card saved in the notes app in your phone. This used the same passcode as the one to get into your phone, which the thieves had. Storing the Pin in this way can be deemed 'gross negligence' by banks, and can mean that they are within their rights to decline your request for a refund, even if you have been defrauded. I understand it can be hard to keep on top of multitudinous Pins and passcodes, but this is truly an awful idea. We urge our customers to take care, remain vigilant to "shoulder surfers" and not store passcodes in unsecured places, for example their notes app There are various apps and tools that claim they can store such information securely, but in my opinion it's still not a good idea. If you really can't memorise the Pin, keep it at home, for example in a locked drawer, and definitely not anywhere near your phone or wallet. A Revolut spokeswoman said: 'We are very sorry to hear about B.B's case, or any instance where our customers are targeted by ruthless and highly sophisticated criminals. 'On further investigation of his case we have issued a full reimbursement for the stolen funds, in addition to a goodwill payment in recognition of the distress experienced in this case. 'Revolut works hard and invests heavily to protect and support customers. We have observed an increase in networks of criminals attempting to steal devices from unsuspecting individuals and we continue to take action to identify and prevent unauthorised access. 'As with all emerging threats, we urge our customers to take care, remain vigilant to "shoulder surfers" and encourage users to regularly update their passcodes, not to use the same passcode across multiple applications and not store passcodes in unsecured places, for example their notes app. I'm glad you've got your money back, and hope this serves as a warning to you and others to keep your details under lock and key. Movers stored my stuff in Bedfordshire, not London I put some things in storage from March 2023 until March 2025 after moving house. I used the company Jamvans because its website suggested my things would be kept in its London storage depot in Acton, near where I now lived. But in January 2024, I needed to get a coat out of storage to attend a funeral and was told my things were 40 miles away in Houghton Regis, Bedfordshire. In the end, I didn't get a call back to confirm I could get access, even though I gave the required 48 hours, so I never got the coat. I also selected a 35sq ft storage unit when I booked, but when I collected my things the unit was split into two and the other half was locked, presumably containing someone else's things. A 20ft crate was a cheaper option, but I was told I should take the 35ft and JamVans would downgrade it if needed. I asked to be reimbursed for the difference in cost but Jamvans declined. After I threatened to go to the Furniture Ombudsman, Jamvans offered me £180 compensation and to move my things to Acton. I didn't accept as I think the real difference was more than £400. E.C, London Helen Crane replies: On its website Jamvans describes itself as a 'London moving and storage company' and has a list of nine areas it serves, all of which are in the capital. Its selling point is that it collects your belongings from your home, and takes them to the storage unit - ideal for people like you who don't have a car. It mentions the Houghton Regis location on its website, but this is described as the head office whereas Acton is the 'London storage depot'. I agree this strongly suggests your things will be stored within the M25. The Houghton Regis location was extremely inconvenient for you as you don't have a car, and it doesn't have a train station. While an hour drive from Acton, taking public transport would be a 2.5-hour mission requiring multiple tubes, trains and irregular buses. One route I checked on Google Maps required a 17-minute walk passing through some areas 'not suitable for walking'. Then there is the issue with the size of the unit you were given. At the time you booked, you told me Jamvans' website claimed that it would bring one of its storage 'pods' - essentially a large wooden box - to your home, so you could check the size you'd chosen was suitable. You opted for a larger size than you thought you needed, and say you were told that if it was too big, your unit could be downgraded and the bill adjusted accordingly. But you said there was no pod brought to your home, and your things went directly in the van. You therefore ended up paying for a 35ft unit which you only used half of. In the first year, you paid £949 and in the second this went up to £1,113. Based on your research a 20ft unit would have cost £770 and then £897, a difference of £395. However, you say you were also charged an extra £8.75 per week in January and February 2025 which you don't think was correct, meaning you could be owed more than £450. Sadly, I wasn't able to raise any of this with Jamvans because the company has completely ignored my attempts to get in touch. I contacted it via email and on the phone over a period of several months. I was able to speak to one person who said management would call me back, but they never did. While companies aren't always pleased to hear from me, this level of stonewalling is rare. When it does happen, I feel it raises concerns about how well the firm responds to its own customers. You are now planning to take the case to the Furniture Ombudsman, as well as exploring a dispute resolution service. Do let me know how it goes.
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
High St set for more branch closures as Santander snaps up rival TSB in £2.9bn deal
Santander yesterday admitted that branches could be closed and jobs lost as it takes over rival TSB. The Spanish bank, led by Ana Botin, also hinted that the TSB brand could disappear from the High Street, though no decisions have yet been made. The comments came a day after TSB's Spanish owner Sabadell agreed to sell the lender to Santander in a deal worth up to £2.9billion. It is expected to complete at the start of next year. TSB employs 5,000 people operating out of 175 branches while Santander UK has 349 branches with 18,000 staff. Asked about closures and job losses, Santander's UK boss Mike Regnier said: 'There will be efficiencies that we expect to make.' Santander expects to shave 13 per cent off the combined costs of Santander UK and TSB as a result of the takeover. Regnier said that will 'come from a number of areas', which will include bringing two IT platforms into one as well as back office functions. Speaking to the BBC, he added: 'All of us have been reducing and trimming the size of our branch networks. 'There's no point having two branches in the same town serving the same customers so there will be opportunities. When we complete the integration – and that won't happen for a few years – at that point we'll take a look and make decisions then.' The comments are likely to alarm campaigners who say the closure of huge numbers of bank branches over recent years – as many customers shun them in favour of online banking – has left the vulnerable and elderly in limbo. TSB had more than 600 branches when the brand was revived and spun out of Lloyds Banking Group in 2014. It was bought for £1.7billion by Sabadell and since then has shrunk dramatically. Figures from consumer group Which? show TSB has shut 459 branches since 2015 while Santander has axed 493. The deal came despite persistent speculation this year that Santander planned to leave the UK. But Regnier yesterday reiterated its commitment to Britain, saying it had 'invested an awful lot in the UK' and the deal was a 'vote of confidence'. He said that the takeover would help accelerate its growth plan and 'create one of the strongest, most competitive banks in the UK'. Regnier said TSB was a powerful brand but that 'typically at Santander we tend to use the Santander brand on the High Street around the world. That's the approach we normally take.' Jenny Ross, Which? Money editor, said the deal 'could understandably be concerning for some TSB and Santander customers, particularly those who prefer to use a local branch for their banking'. She added: 'If this deal goes ahead, the Financial Conduct Authority must look closely at any planned branch closures to ensure that there is no risk of customers, especially those with disabilities, losing access to local banking services or cash.' Tax raid warning Santander UK boss Mike Regnier has sounded the alarm over higher banking taxes as Rachel Reeves tries to fill the black hole in public finances. He said: 'Something the sector has made clear to this Government and previous governments is the importance of a strong banking sector in supporting economic growth. We lend into the economy. Santander lends £7,500 for every person in the UK. That is what the economy needs to grow and if you don't have a strong banking sector you won't get that support and that lending. 'Putting taxes up etc: these are not things that support a future growing economy because you won't have as strong a banking sector.'
