Shoppers in Great Yarmouth welcome anti-social behaviour powers
PSPOs also exist in the borough to tackle dog control and fouling, and a separate order to reduce car-derived anti-social behaviour on the sea front.The proposal had been due to be decided in January, but the decision was delayed for further work on the documents.Yasmin Harwood, who owns the Sweet Treats stall on the market, cited one homeless person causing a particular nuisance with her possessions.She said: "Shopping trolleys full of cardboard boxes, rubbish and human excrement [abandoned] down the passages."Men as well as females urinating down the passages, to much drinking in the town and nothing is being done."[It] 100% puts people off; I've walked past them in the passage seeing them doing it. I don't need to see it and the holidaymakers don't need to see it."
Market Cards owner Mel Wright says it is not pleasant to witness some of the anti-social behaviour that goes on in the town centre.Ms Wright said: "It's not just one-off things, it's every day or two or three times a day and it's very off-putting for members of the public to come up and have to witness some of these things."The powers will also help tackle those who ride bikes, e-scooters and electric bikes on pavements and through pedestrianised areas."It will be brilliant if they can do that [take action]," she said."Many of the residents are elderly; it's a danger for them and also the children running around."People are still using bikes and scooters; they don't care. They just go straight through people and someone is going to get seriously hurt, so hopefully they can sort it."
David Durrant, 64, from Wroxham, said: "I think it would be a good idea [to grant more powers]. We don't need it [anti-social behaviour]."His partner Jayne Cole, 63, said Great Yarmouth's reputation for anti-social issues causes them some conflict."We would come in more," she said."He would like to live here, but I won't live here. It was voted the worst town in Norfolk. Too much aggro."If the problems were tackled, she would consider about conceding to her partner's wish: "I'd think about it but at the minute, no."
Susan Bayfield, 69, from Great Yarmouth is frightened by cyclists and scooter riders using pavements and pedestrianised areas.She said: "I think they should [tackle it] because it's dangerous. The amount of times I've been nearly knocked down by people on bikes and scooters riding through, I think they should have more power to stop things going on."It's just not on. It never used to be like this."She said the level of antisocial behaviour puts her off using the town centre more often, and that she would if she felt more was being done to tackle it."You don't feel safe walking about the town half the time," she added.
Paul O'Neill, 40, works in the town centre. He said: "Even though signs have been put up by Boots [the Chemist] that say "dismount cycles", they aren't dismounting them."There's a lot of antisocial behaviour with young kids, under 16s in stores. There needs to be a lot more done about it, definitely."Asked if the new powers will work, if existing signage is not, he added: "I doubt it. I believe the street wardens they're the only people that can deal with it."
Councillor Wells added: "We regularly receive complaints about the increase of highly visible street drinking and people feeling intimidated by a range of other anti-social behaviour."We have listened to what people want for their community and this new order will be an important step in helping us ensure we have a safer and more welcoming environment that we know people want."This new Public Spaces Protection Order will enable council officers and the police to take swift action against offenders."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
2 days ago
- ITV News
Thanet Council threatens £100 fines for swearing in public after beach fights and town disorder
ITV Meridian's Tony Green reports from Ramsgate Fines of £100 for swearing in public are among measures that have been approved by a council in Kent as it attempts to crack down on public disorder. It follows a series of beach brawls and attacks on Thanet town centre. Councillors at Thanet Council have now approved a PSPO - a Public Spaces Protection Order. But the authority is being accused of exceeding its powers with the threatened fines for bad language, and critics include Kent's Police and Crime Commissioner. However, the leader of the council has called recent reporting on the order 'a mountain of nonsense' as they backed new plans to protect public spaces. At a cabinet meeting in Margate on Thursday evening, councillors complained of 'misleading' reporting about the new order. Labour councillor Heather Keen said: 'The importance of the PSPO, which has seven behaviours identified, has been overshadowed by the portrayal that Thanet is banning swearing. 'This is a disingenuous, inaccurate headline designed to grab attention. Let me be clear, Thanet is not banning swearing or preventing free speech. 'The reference to foul and abusive language only applies if it is causing harassment, alarm or distress to another person – not if it is casual swearing.' Cllr John Davis, Opposition leader, Thanet District Council (Con) An order was first brought in by Thanet in 2018, and similar orders exist in Canterbury and Dartford as well as elsewhere in the country, the meeting heard. Last summer, when the council attempted to renew and reword their PSPO, the proposal was rejected amid a threat of a legal challenge. They said that more work has been undertaken to ensure this is something their residents want. Within the report, the authors touch on concerns raised by Thanet residents, who said the current wording was too broad and may lead to young people and people from minority backgrounds being unfairly moved on or fined. There was also a concern that 'causing distress to others' could be used to target peaceful protests. Cllr Heather Keen, Cabinet Member for Communities at Thanet District Council, said: 'We've listened, and these measures are designed to reassure residents and set clear expectations around acceptable public behaviour in Thanet. "It crucially provides us with the tools to intervene earlier which we hope will successfully prevent situations from escalating. "The overwhelming support from local people, businesses and the police during the consultation process is evidence that these measures are welcomed. "Every year our residents tell us feeling safe is a top priority. "I'm proud to say that we've listened and hope this serves as a reminder that antisocial behaviour will not be tolerated in Thanet.'
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits could be slapped with £100 fine for 'foul language' in these four towns
A council in the southeast has ruled to implement an order that could see fines handed out for 'foul' language in four popular seaside towns - in a bid to help residents feel safe Brits could face fines for up to £100 for using abusive language in four seaside towns in an attempt to crack down on anti-social behaviour. This week, plans have been approved for Thanet District Council in Kent to enforce a new public space protection order (PSPO) in Birchington, Margate, Ramsgate, and Broadstairs. Under the new rules, it will be an offence to refuse to stop using certain language if asked to do so by an officer. The language that is set to be restricted by the order is described as "foul or abusive language [used] in a manner likely to cause harassment, alarm, or distress to a person within hearing or sight, judged by the standards of a 'reasonable person'." The council originally tried to introduce the order in July of last year, but the plans never went ahead after it faced the threat of a legal challenge from The Free Speech Union, a campaign group. A spokesperson said: "The Proposed Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) was approved at a Cabinet meeting on Thursday 24 July 2025. The PSPO was put forward with the aim of reducing antisocial behaviour in Thanet's main towns, and is similar to previous PSPOs in place between 2018 and 2024. "They mirror the same restrictions in place across many other districts and boroughs, including in other parts of Kent in line with powers under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.' They said that there was 'strong support' for the proposals in response to the public consultation. The order will also restrict gathering in anti-social groups, misusing public places, excreting bodily fluids, consuming alcohol, consuming legal psychoactive substances, and causing humiliation or degradation. In Birchington, Margate, Ramsgate, and Broadstairs, there will be signs put up explaining the rules of the order. If someone is found to be breaking the rules, they will be spoken to by enforcement officers - but if the behaviour continues, they could be slapped with a fine of up to £100. At a cabinet meeting on Thursday, councillors said that claims from the media that the order would be a blanket ban on swearing were 'a mountain of nonsense'. Heather Keen, the Labour councillor, said these claims were "disingenuous, inaccurate and designed to grab attention". She confirmed that the order did not apply to 'casual swearing', the BBC reported. Commenting on the order's approval, Keen said: "We've listened and these measures are designed to reassure residents and set clear expectations around acceptable public behaviour in Thanet.' She explained that the order will provide authorities with 'the tools to intervene earlier which we hope will successfully prevent situations from escalating'. Keen added: "The overwhelming support from local people, businesses and the police during the consultation process is evidence that these measures are welcomed. Every year our residents tell us feeling safe is a top priority.'
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Thanet District Council passes abusive language crackdown order
Thanet District Council (TDC) has passed a Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) as part of a crackdown on anti-social behaviour in the of the order, which also covers tourist hotspots such as Margate, Ramsgate and Broadstairs, makes it a fineable offence not to refrain from using foul and abusive language if requested by police or a council a cabinet meeting in Margate on Thursday, councillors blasted recent media reports that the authority was trying to enforce a blanket swearing ban, calling them "a mountain of nonsense".Labour councillor Heather Keen called the reports "disingenuous, inaccurate and designed to grab attention". "Let me be clear, Thanet is not banning swearing or preventing free speech," she said."The reference to foul and abusive language only applies if it is causing harassment, alarm or distress to another person - not if it is casual swearing."It was also stressed during the meeting that such a PSPO is not new, one having existed in the area since is it unique, with similar orders existing in places like Canterbury and Dartford, along with other parts of the country, the meeting in August 2024 TDC's attempts to renew and reword their PSPO was met with threat of a legal challenge from campaign group The Free Speech Union, which cited concerns about potential human rights then put the proposed amendments up for public consultation, and Keen described the measures of the new order as having received "overwhelming support" from local people and businesses. "Every year our residents tell us feeling safe is a top priority and we've listened to that," she said.A TDC spokesperson added: "The PSPO will become into force following the required legal notice period and signs will be displayed at key locations to explain the rules."Enforcement officers will engage with anyone found to be committing antisocial behaviour in the first instance, with fines issued only if the behaviour continues."
