Watch: Israel kills Hezbollah commander Hussein Ali Muzhir in southern Lebanon; vows to continue targeting threats
Videos circulating online confirmed that the IDF killed Hussein Ali Muzhir, a senior fire control commander for Hezbollah in the Zahrani sector.
Who was Hussein Ali Muzhir?
Hussein Ali Muzhir was a senior fire control commander for Hezbollah in the Zahrani sector of southern Lebanon.
He was responsible for directing several rocket attacks on Israel and was recently working to rebuild Hezbollah's artillery capabilities in the region, violating agreements between Israel and Lebanon.
The IDF confirmed his death in a targeted strike and said it "will continue to operate in order to remove any threat posed to the state of Israel."
The IDF also eliminated several senior Hamas and Hezbollah operatives in southern Lebanon.
One of them, Mehran Mustafa Ba'jur, was a key Hamas figure involved in planning attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF soldiers, the IDF confirmed.
In another operation, the IDF killed Ali Abd al-Hassan Haidar, a senior member of Hezbollah's elite Radwan Force, during an airstrike in Deir Kifa, southern Lebanon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
93 Palestinians Killed As Israeli Forces Open Fire Near Aid Convoys, Says Gaza Agency
Last Updated: The attacks mark yet another bloody episode in the war-torn enclave where famine, displacement, and civilian casualties have become routine. At least 93 Palestinians were killed and dozens more wounded on Sunday after Israeli forces allegedly opened fire on crowds scrambling for humanitarian aid in multiple parts of Gaza, according to the territory's civil defence agency. The attacks mark yet another bloody episode in the war-torn enclave where famine, displacement, and civilian casualties have become routine. The heaviest toll came in northern Gaza, where 80 people were reported dead as trucks carrying aid were mobbed by starving civilians. Nine others were killed near Rafah — a southern city already reeling from earlier strikes — while four more died in Khan Yunis, the civil defence agency told AFP. The UN World Food Programme (WFP) confirmed that its 25-truck convoy was caught in the chaos, saying it encountered 'massive crowds of hungry civilians which came under gunfire" soon after crossing into Gaza near Gaza City. Disputed Claims and Growing Alarm Israel's military disputed the death toll, saying its soldiers fired only 'warning shots" in response to what it described as immediate threats. However, Palestinian eyewitnesses described the events as a massacre. 'The tanks were firing shells randomly… Israeli snipers were shooting as if they were hunting animals in a forest," said Qasem Abu Khater, 36, who witnessed the carnage in Gaza City. With media restrictions and limited access, AFP said it could not independently verify the casualty figures or full details of the incidents. But humanitarian agencies expressed growing alarm over what they describe as a pattern of deadly attacks on civilians seeking aid. According to the UN, nearly 800 aid-seekers have been killed since late May, often along convoy routes. Church Hit, Pope Condemns 'Barbarity' Sunday's violence came days after an Israeli strike hit Gaza's Holy Family Church, killing three people. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed regret to Pope Leo XIV, calling the strike accidental. But Pope Leo, in his Angelus prayer, decried the 'barbarity" of war and slammed continued attacks on civilians and places of worship. In a rare move, Catholic Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem Pierbattista Pizzaballa visited Gaza and held mass at the bombed church, highlighting the increasingly desperate conditions. Humanitarian Space Shrinking Rapidly With 87.8% of Gaza now under evacuation orders or militarised zones, more than 2.1 million civilians are confined to just 12% of the territory, the UN's humanitarian agency OCHA reported. Essential services have collapsed, and people are 'squeezed into fragmented zones" with no guarantee of food, shelter, or medical care. The Israeli army issued a new displacement order Sunday, warning residents in Deir el-Balah to evacuate ahead of imminent operations. Eyewitnesses described families fleeing with children on donkey carts and no clear destination. 'They threw leaflets at us… We don't know where we are going. We don't have shelter or anything," a displaced resident told AFP. UN Official Expelled, Accused Of 'Lies' In a separate development, Israel revoked the residency permit of Jonathan Whittall, head of the UN OCHA office in Israel, after he repeatedly criticised the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar accused Whittall of 'spreading lies" about the war. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
NDTV
44 minutes ago
- NDTV
Netanyahu Suffers Dehydration After Eating Spoiled Food, Recovering At Home
Tel Aviv: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is recovering at home after being diagnosed with intestinal inflammation caused by spoiled food, his office announced on Sunday. He was examined overnight by Prof Alon Hershko of Jerusalem's Hadassah-Ein Kerem Medical and is receiving treatment with intravenous fluids for dehydration. His condition is described as good. Following doctors' orders, Netanyahu will rest at home for the next three days while continuing to conduct state affairs. The incident up follows a series of health issues for Netanyahu, 75, including a routine colonoscopy in May and prostate surgery in December. Both times, Justice Minister Yariv Levin served as acting Prime Minister while Netanyahu was sedated. In March, Netanyahu underwent hernia surgery under full anesthesia and later missed work due to the flu. In 2023, he had a pacemaker implanted after doctors diagnosed a long-standing heart conduction problem. That surgery came days after he was hospitalized for dehydration, though doctors later linked the incident to an undiagnosed heart issue. Netanyahu's most recent public medical report, issued in January 2023, described him as in a "completely normal state of health," with no signs of arrhythmia and the pacemaker functioning properly. The document, however, was not an official government health report but rather a summary compiled by his personal medical team. Despite government protocols urging prime ministers to release annual health summaries, Netanyahu issued no such report between 2016 and 2023, and none has been released this year. Those protocols are not legally binding, and he cannot be compelled to disclose his medical history. Following the prostate surgery, Netanyahu made headlines when he left the Hadassah Ein Kerem Medical Center over the objections of his doctors to personally cast his vote over the "Trapped Profits Law." It passed by a vote of 59-58. Netanyahu was accompanied by his physician, Dr. Zvi Berkowitz in the Knesset plenum.
The Print
44 minutes ago
- The Print
What India can learn from Israel about atmanirbharta in defence
Israel's journey toward defence self-reliance was driven by a combination of existential urgency and a national culture of innovation. When Israel was born, it immediately faced a multi-front military conflict. These wars forged a mindset of necessity-driven invention, unlike India, whose military objectives were shaped by the non-alignment philosophy and a focus on civilian industry. Yet, despite these restrictions and existential threats, Israel rapidly transformed itself into a defence innovation powerhouse, exporting nearly $15 billion in advanced weaponry in 2024, while India continues to rely heavily on arms imports to meet its needs. Understanding this divergence reveals key lessons on strategy, institutional design, and national resolve, which India must learn to become a global powerhouse. India and Israel became independent countries less than a year apart — in August 1947 and May 1948, respectively. Almost immediately, both countries had to wage a war to safeguard their sovereignty and territorial integrity due to their inimical neighbours. As independent states, both countries inherited nascent economies, fragile infrastructure, limited heavy industries, and immediate security threats. In fact, Israel was probably in a more critical situation as it faced a UN arms embargo on all parties involved in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, which limited its access to military equipment. This was particularly so during the Nehruvian years, when the Armed Forces were seen as a necessary evil and priority was given to the development of the civilian industrial sector at the cost of a firm military foundation. Israel, on the other hand, saw military capability as essential to survival. Every war from 1948 through 1967, 1973, and right up to the ongoing conflict in Gaza, has been a catalyst for innovation, with battlefield necessity spurring not only rapid development of weapons systems, but also new tactics, techniques, and procedures. The urgency to upgrade our defence preparedness has returned to the fore, more so after Operation Sindoor. Limited foreign imports are being considered to plug critical gaps, including the possibility of inducting a foreign-made fifth-generation fighter aircraft. Inaugurating a workshop and exhibition held at the Manekshaw Centre in Delhi on 16 July, Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan said, 'In today's warfare, you can't win with yesterday's weapon system.' It is logical then that tomorrow's wars cannot be fought with weapon systems based on today's technology. We need a transformative change in our systems. Two contrasting defence sectors Israel carried out institutional integration of its military, academic, and private industrial capabilities, resulting in a tightly coordinated ecosystem. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) worked in close tandem with universities, startups, and defence firms such as Elbit Systems, Rafael, and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). This tri-sector collaboration allowed rapid prototyping, battlefield testing, and iterative refinement. Mandatory conscription ensured military-civilian integration while early support from the Jewish diaspora in terms of funds and know-how also helped. This aspect of a strong civil-military-industry interface has been repeatedly stressed upon by Edward N Luttwak and Eitan Shamir in their book The Art of Military Innovation. The result was world-class systems such as the Iron Dome, Trophy active protection system, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and satellite systems. By contrast, India's defence sector remained largely insulated. Dominated by public-sector entities like DRDO, HAL, and OFB, it followed bureaucratic, slow-moving processes with limited commercial incentives or accountability. Weak feedback loops between users (the military) and designers (DRDO), along with little to no synergy between academia, industry, and the military, further hindered progress. Most importantly, procurement must transition from least-cost (L1) models to highest-performance (T1) evaluations. Emphasising metrics such as lifecycle cost, operational performance, and indigenisation will incentivise innovation and discourage a process-over-product mindset. The L1 system has been the bane of our procurement, encouraging companies to give the bare minimum to win contracts. Except for the Armed Forces, no stakeholder truly has skin in the game. Israel's export success in defence is also a reflection of its strategic necessity. With a small domestic market incapable of sustaining mature industries, Israel pursued exports aggressively. In 2024, Israeli defence exports hit a record $14.8 billion, with 48 per cent comprising rockets, missiles, and air defence systems. These sales — to Europe and other friendly countries — not only validated Israeli technology but also funded future R&D. India, despite its large Armed Forces, has lacked a similar export essentiality, and its fledgling defence industry has struggled to translate capacity into mass production or compete globally, resulting in continued reliance on imports. Also read: A letter to Defence Minister, with lessons from American fighter pilot John Boyd: Jaithirth Rao The real challenge India has initiated policy reforms aimed at shifting this paradigm. Programmes like Make in India, the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020, and the Strategic Partnership Model have opened doors for private sector participation in defence, raised FDI limits, and corporatised legacy PSUs. Notably, Reliance Defence's recent partnerships with Germany's Rheinmetall and Diehl Defense to produce advanced ammunition and guided shells domestically mark significant milestones. Similarly, the indigenous helicopter gunship and sniper rifle developments reflect gradual progress. India's defence exports, estimated at Rs 21,083 crore in FY 2023-24, to over 100 countries, underscore a nascent export orientation, though much of it remains aspirational. Israel's success is an off-shoot of existential necessity, an integrated ecosystem, a culture of innovation, and export-driven development. India must build upon the momentum by deepening private sector involvement, institutional reform, procurement refocus, and nurturing human capital, to genuinely realise Atmanirbharta in defence. This requires bold structural transformation, sustained political support, and clear strategic direction, with an emphasis on defence preparedness. In this context, it would be worthwhile to recollect what French President Emmanuel Macron said in his speech on the eve of Bastille Day 2025: 'To be free in this world, you must be feared. To be feared, you must be powerful.' India's challenge is not of capability, but of unity and resolve. A focused, innovation-driven, user-integrated defence ecosystem is achievable if the government empowers rather than restrains; the military leads rather than watches; and the industry builds rather than waits to be spoon-fed. India has the necessary talent, demand, and environment to build one of the world's best indigenous defence ecosystems. We just have to put it all together. General Manoj Mukund Naravane PVSM AVSM SM VSM is a retired Indian Army General who served as the 28th Chief of the Army Staff. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
