
Pastor slams his own church for accepting Target donation amid boycott
Rev. Jamal Bryant, pastor of the New Birth Missionary Baptist Church just outside of Atlanta, is one of the driving forces behind a boycott of Target after the company scaled back its DEI commitments.
In a sermon, Bryant accused the National Baptist Convention of 'selling out' after the denomination accepted the donation from Target and accused the company of bypassing him in an effort to win back the support of Black consumers.
Target previously said the boycotts had done some damage to sales during a quarter call with analysts in May.
'You thought you were going to go around me and go to the National Baptist Convention and sell out for $300,000?' he said at his sermon Sunday. 'Are you crazy to think that we gonna' sell out for chump change? You must not know who we are!'
Bryant added in his sermon that he called the President of the National Baptist Convention, Rev. Boise Kimber, and demanded the organization stand with him and the boycott.
In a statement, Kimber said the church is 'working on a three-year plan' with Target that will 'be very beneficial to the Black community.'
'With the federal government making deep cuts in education, health care, and other essential services, we know the Black Church will be called upon to stand in the gap,' Kimber said. 'Our outreach programs serving both our congregants and the broader community must be fully resourced to respond to the need. I am proud to say we will answer the call.'
'Target's generous donation will help us provide scholarships, support senior citizens, and invest in entrepreneurship programs that uplift our people and the future,' he added.
In response to Bryant and other criticism, Target said it was 'proud' to be partnering with the church 'to make a meaningful impact in communities across the country by supporting access to education, economic development initiatives and entrepreneurship programs.'
The boycott was initially slated to last 40 days, but will continue until Target agrees to four demands put forward by the pastor.
The demands call for Target to fully commit to DEI at every level of the company, honor its previous pledge to invest $2 billion in the Black business community, deposit $250 million in 23 Black-owned banks, and partner with business programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities to support young entrepreneurs.
'Target is working hard to divide our community rather than stand on the principles of dignity and decency,' Bryant said in a follow up post on Instagram. 'We are working hard with the heads of the denominations to find resolve that shows solidarity. Stay out of target because we are standing on business. Together there's nothing we can't accomplish and we will fight on until victory is won!'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is an insult to the US Supreme Court
In January 2022, one year after Joe Biden assumed the White House, Justice Stephen Breyer of the US Supreme Court announced his impending retirement. Biden, who had selected the intellectually challenged Kamala Harris as his running mate two years prior, in large part on diversity grounds, sprang into action to fulfil a campaign promise to black political kingmaker Rep Jim Clyburn (D-SC) – that he would select a black woman for his first Supreme Court pick. And so the Biden White House foisted upon us Ketanji Brown Jackson – a hitherto obscure jurist, nominated because of her sex and race, but who ironically refused to provide a definition of the word 'woman' when asked about it at her US Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing. Curious, that! Alas, it has only been downhill from that rockiest of rocky starts. I pondered, at the time of Jackson's nomination, how a justice who knows she was selected on the basis of identity politics could be expected to fairly adjudicate cases that involve issues of race and sex? My concern proved prescient. Barely a year after her nomination, Justice Clarence Thomas – the Court's longest-serving member, who also happens to be black – excoriated Jackson's 'myopia' in his concurring opinion in Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v Harvard, which ended the systemic racism of 'affirmative action' in university admissions: 'Justice Jackson's race-infused world view falls flat at each step. Individuals are the sum of their unique experiences, challenges, and accomplishments. What matters is not the barriers they face, but how they choose to confront them. And their race is not to blame for everything – good or bad – that happens in their lives. A contrary, myopic world view based on individuals' skin colour to the total exclusion of their personal choices is nothing short of racial determinism.' As part of her SFFA dissent, notably, Jackson also made a 'mathematically absurd' claim about black infant mortality. Any decent law clerk – or any decent judge – would have caught on before publication. By missing the obvious, Jackson demonstrated precisely the sort of brazen nitwittery that should have cautioned political leaders away from allowing the search for one of the nine most important lawyers to be determined by identity politics. Yet as satisfying as Thomas's defenestration of Jackson in his SFFA concurrence was, Friday's fusillade from Justice Amy Coney Barrett in her majority opinion in Trump v CASA, a case addressing the contentious debate over the legitimacy of so-called nationwide injunctions, was if anything even more fulfilling. Barrett took a mighty, acerbic sledgehammer to Jackson's paean to unvarnished judicial supremacy. 'We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,' Barrett wrote. 'We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.' What's more, Jackson 'chooses a starting line of attack that is tethered neither to [historical] sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever'. And 'among its many problems, Justice Jackson's view is at odds with our system of divided judicial authority'. Perhaps most bitingly, Barrett mocked Jackson's glossing over the all-important inquiry as to the historical 'limits on judicial authority' as mere 'legalese' (Jackson's own ignominious word choice). In a word: brutal. Notably, all six of the Court's Republican-nominated justices, including the ever-mercurial chief justice, John Roberts, signed onto Barrett's opinion in full. Call it a pile-on. One cannot help but get the sense that Barrett, the normally mild-mannered former law professor and mother of seven, really just wanted to say: 'Justice Jackson is unfit to serve on this Court.' And maybe she should have done so. Because it happens to be true. The fact that Ketanji Brown Jackson was selected as a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States on the basis of her race and sex is offensive enough. But the fact she now routinely produces such intellectually indefensible balderdash that she is roundly mocked by her more senior colleagues, takes the level of offence to a different level. Simply put, serious countries do not elevate arguably unqualified dimwits to public positions of extraordinary prominence. The continued humiliation of Ketanji Brown Jackson at the nation's highest court – at the behest of her colleagues – is a lagging social indication. It is a warning that something has gone deeply wrong in how the world's pre-eminent superpower nominates the most prestigious constitutional officers and decides the most pressing constitutional issues. The America that just sent B-2 bombers to drop 14 'bunker buster' bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities is a serious place. The America that counts Ketanji Brown Jackson as a Supreme Court justice? Less so. Frankly, no one should be more offended at this appalling DEI idiocy than Jackson's fellow black women. Because Jackson was nominated explicitly due to the fact she is a black woman. Ah yes – but we can't possibly define what a woman is, can we? And therein lies the rub.


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump: I'll have fun with nut job Mamdani
Donald Trump said he'll 'have a lot of fun' with 'total nut job' Zohran Mamdani. Speaking on the White House's south lawn on Tuesday, the US president also said New Yorkers would be 'crazy' to elect the socialist as mayor. Mr Mamdani, 33, claimed victory over Andrew Cuomo, the former Democratic New York Governor, on election night last week in the Democratic mayoral primary. Final results will be announced later on Tuesday. 'I think we're gonna have a lot of fun with him,' Mr Trump, who was born in Queens, told reporters. 'Frankly, I've heard he's a total nut job. I think the people of New York are crazy. If they go this route, I think they're crazy. We will have a communist in the for the first time, really a pure, true communist'. Mr Trump branded the 33-year-old a 'communist lunatic'. Mr Mamdani, a self-described socialist Democrat, is a vocal supporter of Palestine who has been accused of inciting anti-Semitism by refusing to condemn the phrase 'globalise the intifada'. He has pledged to de-fund the police, abolish prisons, endorsed decriminalising prostitution and promised to block US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents' efforts to deport undocumented migrants. Mr Trump last week wrote on Truth Social: 'It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line. Mr Trump added: 'He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he's not very smart, he's got AOC+3, dummies ALL, backing him, and even our great Palestinian senator, cryin' Chuck Schumer, is grovelling over him. Yes, this is a big moment in the history of our country!' In another post, Mr Trump suggested that Mr Mamdani's appointment, along with other democrats, could 'screw' the country. He said: 'I have an idea for the Democrats to bring them back into 'play'.' 'The Democrats should nominate low IQ candidate, Jasmine Crockett, for president, and AOC+3 should be, respectively, vice president, and three high level members of the Cabinet – added together with our future communist mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, and our country is really SCREWED!' Mr Mamdani will compete against Eric Adams, New York's incumbent mayor, in November's general election. Mr Adams pulled out of the Democratic primary after public backlash to a now-dismissed federal corruption case brought against him, and will instead run as an independent. The city has not elected a Republican mayor since 2005.


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' passes Senate after Vance casts deciding vote
Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' has narrowly passed through the Senate after vice president JD Vance cast the deciding vote. The bill, a huge package of tax cuts and budget legislation, passed the upper chamber with no Democratic votes. Republicans Rand Paul, Susan Collins and Thom Tillis voted against the bill. Mr Vance was drafted in at the 11th hour to cast the tie-breaking vote, after hours of gruelling voting. The bill will now head back to the House of Representatives, who will review changes made to the legislation by Senators. Apprehension from Republicans Republican leaders had struggled to corral support during the record 24-hour 'vote-a-rama' amendment session on the Senate floor. In the House, Mr Trump's bill faces unified Democratic opposition and apprehension from Republicans with its proposed cuts to healthcare and food aid programs for poor Americans. The 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which is currently the subject of the latest tiff between the president and his former 'first buddy' Elon Musk proposes a $4.5 trillion extension of his first term tax cuts. The bill is controversial because it offsets the cuts with $1.2 trillion in savings, mainly targeting the Medicaid health insurance program. If it becomes law, it will strip coverage from an estimated 12 million low-income and disabled Americans. The bill is also unpopular because it rolls back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits. It also proposes providing a $350 billion cash injection for border security amid Mr Trump's mass migrant deportation program. The president made clear that the goal remains to get the bill through the House in the coming days and sign it into law by Friday, July 4, which is the American Independence Day holiday. 'It's going to get in, it's going to pass, and we're going to be very happy,' he told reporters as he arrived in Florida to view new migrant detention facilities.