
Heritage expert points to hotel 'salvation' of famous street
The 2008 financial crisis, with the collapse of the Royal Bank of Scotland and HBOS, sent shivers through the Edinburgh administration.
The result was a pre-Covid decade in which the city council, further incentivised by austerity, worked closely with Scottish Government agencies to monetise assets, particularly in the city centre, where the unique historic environment and sense of place offered exceptional investment opportunities.
Being 'open for business' reached its apotheosis in 2019 when a huge space deck for the Christmas market was allowed to be erected in East Princes Street without planning permission. The Cockburn Association, the city's civic trust, led public concern, expressed in the theme of a huge public meeting in January 2020, 'City for Sale'.
The most significant development since then was the opening in 2021 of the St James Quarter behind the east end of Princes Street. It is a private space where the public are invited as 'guests'. It exemplifies what happens when global investors control space and promulgate the narrative about the heart of a city.
READ MORE:
Back in 2007, the city council identified the need for a 'main flagship covered shopping centre' to 'maintain an intensely developed vibrant city centre character'. Stalled by the 2008 crash and then by Covid, the St James Quarter with its galleria and 850,000 square feet of new prime retail space, was a welcome replacement for the despised 1970s St James Centre – a glum mall. In their marketing hyperbole, it is a 'lifestyle destination'. The Quarter's website proclaims pride in developing 'a fully inclusive community', while boasting 'exclusive new stores, restaurants, bars, entertainment, and more'.
The W Hotel with its 'bundle of coiled ribbons, culminating in a pennant flying in the Edinburgh breeze', is part of this development. It now commands Edinburgh's historic skyline with Trump-like swagger.
The decline of Princes Street is a recurrent theme in Edinburgh chatter: trams, traffic and tartanry have all been bemoaned across the decades. However, the impact of the St James Quarter on what was the prime shopping street, was brutal. The developer, Nuveen, claims 'foresight' as one of its strengths, so presumably knew its £1 billion investment to generate rental income for pensioners in North America would create vacancies on Princes Street and drive it downmarket.
Conventional department stores are making way for mixed retail and hotel offerings. (Image: Getty Images) Salvation of sorts for Princes Street has come from the buoyant hotel industry. Profit margins on hotels have been over 20%, with Deloitte ranking Edinburgh ninth in Europe as a place for hotel investment. Therefore, hotels are filling vacant office buildings and some of the gaps on Princes Street, often with the promise of ground floor cafés and restaurants.
More are in the pipeline across the city centre, from Haymarket to St Andrew's Square. But, as the Cockburn Association has argued: 'Without robust intervention, Princes Street risks transforming into a corridor of mid-market hotels, global fast-food chains, and uninspired retail, with diminished upper-floor activity.'
The profitability of hotels has been boosted by the city's tourism, culture and events-led economic strategy. The historic environment and the qualities of the city centre as a place have been key assets to exploit. Festivalisation has seen not just a growth in the scale and number of festivals staged, but also an intensification, during the Fringe in particular, in the concentration of events in the Old Town.
This cultural agglomeration effect has infused the economic and social ecosystem of the city centre, a finite space physically constrained by the historical legacy of its streets and buildings. While cities such as Manchester have repopulated their centres, Edinburgh's traditional mixed resident community in the centre has been hollowed by short-term lets, a fate shared by other attractive historic cities.
A successful judicial review by the short-term let industry thwarted council plans to use planning and licensing powers to reclaim for permanent residence the thousands of homes lost to that industry.
Similarly, purpose-built student accommodation has gobbled up scarce city centre sites, as well as land around the fringes of the centre. This form of development is not required to contribute affordable housing. In the office sector, prime rents were predicted (pre-Trump) to achieve a healthy increase by 2028, though demand for 1500 to 3000 square feet offices remains weak.
In summary, what we are seeing across the city centre is polarisation and contestation. Edinburgh is fortunate in being an attractive location for investors, but it comes with a price – loss of affordable housing and pressure to commercialise public space and accommodate an ever increasing number of visitors in a confined historic area, while austerity rots the quality of the public realm.
Civic campaigning against the commercialisation of public space, led by the Cockburn Association, saw the council row back on the takeover of Princes Street Gardens by the events industry.
The Summer Sessions gigs have migrated to Ingleston, restoring tranquillity and public access to the gardens in August. Plans for a big wheel fairground attraction from July to January were rejected but show what may yet come. Might a sandy beach alongside a recreated Nor' Loch in Princes St Gardens generate more tourist income?
The Cockburn Association is planning a civic workshop in the autumn to produce a medium-term vision for the city. Civic greenspace, heritage conservation and streetscape enhancement are essentials, but, above all, ways need to be found to replenish the stock of affordable housing.
Professor Cliff Hague is past chairman of the Cockburn Association, Scotland's oldest independent conservation charity

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
To Whom it May Concern: Trump's tariff letters cause a stir among world leaders
Ninety trade deals in 90 days didn't happen early in President Donald Trump 's second term. 'Liberation Day' panicked the financial markets in April. And bespoke trade agreements with dozens of countries, he has said, takes too much time. 'There's 200 countries,'' the president acknowledged. 'You can't talk to all of them.'' So Trump repackaged his plan to slap tariffs on almost every nation in a series of unusual presidential letters to foreign leaders that set new thresholds not just for trade negotiations — but also for diplomatic style, tone and delivery. Most are fill-in-the-blank form letters that include leaders' names and a tariff rate. Words are capitalized using Trump's distinct social media style. A few typos and formatting issues appear throughout. They generally include an opening flourish of salutation, a grievance, the threat of a big jump in tariffs, a new deadline and an escape ramp allowing that 'we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter' if certain conditions are met. Rather than typical diplomatic talk of things like enduring mutual respect, Trump closes with, 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!' and 'Best wishes,' followed by his signature of three long strokes linked by and about 14 short ones. He appears to have paid special attention to his letters to Canada, with which he's been fighting and taunting for months, and Brazil, which he singled out for 50% tariffs apparently based on a personal grudge rather than economics. A negotiation tactic The good news for the leaders of foreign countries, Trump suggested, is that if he sent you a letter, he wants to negotiate. 'A letter means a deal,' he said during a Cabinet meeting. 'We can't meet with 200 countries.' But he's also managed to make his erratic trade policy baffling for American trading partners eager to negotiate a way to dodge his wrath. The president escalated a conflict he started with America's second-biggest trading partner and longstanding ally, raising the tariff -- effectively a tax — on many Canadian imports to 35% effective Aug. 1. On Saturday, Trump announced more tariffs still, this time on two of the United States' biggest trade partners: the European Union and Mexico, at 30% each. And it's far from clear that these tariffs would benefit Americans' bottom lines. Trump's threat to boost import taxes by 50% on Brazilian goods could drive up the cost of breakfast in the United States by making staples of the American diet, such as coffee and orange juice, more expensive. Reception has been ... spotty The response to the letters, which the White House says will also be mailed, has been mixed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney 's office issued a mild statement acknowledging the new Aug. 1 deadline and suggesting he would stay the course 'steadfastly defend(ing) our workers and businesses.' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, meanwhile, vowed retaliatory tariffs and ordered his diplomats to return Trump's letter if it ever physically arrives at the presidential palace in Brasilia. ' Respect is good," Lula told TV Record. 'I like to offer mine, and I like to receive it.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
How Trump plans to dismantle the Education Department after Supreme Court ruling
The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for the Trump administration to continue unwinding the Education Department, allowing it to move ahead with mass layoffs and a plan to outsource the department's operations to other agencies. The justices paused a lower court order that had halted nearly 1,400 layoffs and had called into question the legality of President Donald Trump 's plan to dismantle the department. Now, Trump and his education secretary, Linda McMahon, are free to execute the layoffs and break up the department's work among other federal agencies. Trump had campaigned on closing the department, and McMahon has said the department has one "final mission' to turn over its power to the states. 'The U.S. Department of Education will now deliver on its mandate to restore excellence in American education,' McMahon said Monday in a statement. McMahon is expected to move quickly — department lawyers have already previewed the plans in court filings. What happens with student loans, civil rights cases Trump and McMahon have acknowledged only Congress has authority to close the Education Department fully, but both have suggested its core functions could be parceled out to different federal agencies. Among the most important decisions is where to put management of federal student loans, a $1.6 trillion portfolio affecting nearly 43 million borrowers. Trump in March suggested the Small Business Administration would take on federal student loans, but a June court filing indicated the Treasury Department is expected to take over the work. The Education Department said it had been negotiating a contract with Treasury but paused discussions when the court intervened. That work is now expected to proceed in coming days. Under a separate arrangement, nine Education Department workers already have been detailed to Treasury, according to court filing. The department had also recently struck a deal to outsource the management of several grant programs for workforce training and adult education to the Department of Labor. The Education Department agreed to send $2.6 billion to Labor to oversee grants, which are distributed to states to be passed down to schools and colleges. Combining workforce training programs at Education and Labor would 'provide a coordinated federal education and workforce system,' according to the agreement. Additional agreements are expected to follow with other agencies. At her Senate confirmation hearing, McMahon suggested that enforcement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act could be handled by the Department of Health and Human Services. Civil rights work could be managed by the Justice Department, she said. Democracy Forward, which represents plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said it will pursue 'every legal option' to fight for children. 'No court in the nation — not even the Supreme Court — has found that what the administration is doing is lawful,' said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of the group, in a statement. Laying off staff Trump campaigned on a promise to close the agency, and in March ordered it to be wound down 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.' McMahon had already started a dramatic downsizing, laying off about 1,400 workers. Education Department employees targeted by the layoffs have been on paid leave since March, according to a union that represents some of the agency's staff. The lower court order had prevented the department from fully terminating them, though none had been allowed to return to work, according to the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. Without the lower court order, the workers would have been terminated in early June. The Education Department had said earlier in June that it was 'actively assessing how to reintegrate' the employees if courts did not rule in Trump's favor. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at


Economist
2 hours ago
- Economist
Fed up with Putin, Trump offers Ukraine arms and tariffs
Europe | Art of the U-Turn Photograph: Getty Images Jul 14th 2025 | Kharkiv | 5 min read A FTER HIS first post-election call with Vladimir Putin in February, Donald Trump gushed about the 'great benefits' of a rapprochement with Russia and seemed to relish the prospect of visiting the Kremlin. On July 14th he lost patience, announcing that America would resume supplies of Patriot air-defence missiles and other weapons, and threatening secondary tariffs of 100% on countries doing business with Russia if there was no peace deal within 50 days. 'We're very unhappy with Russia,' Mr Trump declared. Heat, drone attacks and recruitment drives are shrinking harvests Building walls, one brick at a time The NATO member is reconsidering its defences in the age of Trump The idea of renting prisons may be catching on Christian Stocker hopes competence will restore the centre-right's popularity Apart from Poland, central Europe's Visegrad Four face a slowdown