logo
UK's largest Jewish body suspends five members after criticism of Israel

UK's largest Jewish body suspends five members after criticism of Israel

The National25-06-2025
The UK's largest representative body for British Jews has suspended five of its members who wrote an open letter criticising Israel's military campaign in Gaza.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews investigated 36 members who signed the letter which was published in the Financial Times in April, and found them to be in breach of the code of conduct.
In the board's conclusions published on Tuesday, it said that the members had 'misled' the public in presenting the letter as an 'official document of the board as a whole'.
Five deputies who were seen to have promoted the letter further after its publication will be suspended for two years, with three of them given a change to shorten the suspension to six months. The remaining cosignatories were issued a formal caution.
The group of five were not named in the statement, but they are said to be surprised and hurt by the outcome, as they had hoped their letter would push the board to present a wider range of views within the community on the Israel-Gaza conflict.
The investigating panel stressed that the breach was not due to the 'content of the letter' but to the 'behaviour of the signatories', who had actively promoted it.
The panel also said its team had spent 'considerable time' contacting media outlets to correct the coverage of the letter, which had been portrayed as an official statement from the board.
'We are a democratic organisation that welcomes debate, diversity and free speech. Managing diversity of opinion within our organisation depends on our Code of Conduct,' said Michael Wegier, the board's chief executive.
'That code ensures deputies do not create misunderstandings about the position of the board or its members, do not bring the institution into disrepute, and treat one another and the institution with respect.'
The BoD's members are elected by their synagogues, charities and other Jewish organisations as representatives.
The letter caused significant outrage and debate when it was published, prompting a large number of complaints to the BoD.
Daniel Grossman, one of the letter's signatories who resigned from the board in May, said the decision risked undermining faith in the BoD – which has historically been the main representative of the Jewish community to the UK government.
'It will show to more deputies that change from within is quite futile, and if you try to speak out you get suspended,' Mr Grossman told The National.
The letter had led to more hardline support from the BoD for Israel's military campaigns in Gaza and Iran. 'If anything they've double down on their support,' Mr Grossman said, pointing to its recent statements on the escalation in Iran.
Though debates about the war are commonplace among British Jews, the 36 members were criticised for 'airing dirty laundry' in public. The tension shattered an image of unity which the Board of Deputies has sought to project.
The letter's supporters say it emerged out of frustration for the BoD's ardent support of the war, which they said was no longer representative for many British Jews.
They also pointed to growing support in Israel for a hostage deal with Hamas, including from the victims' families, and opposition to the Israeli military's resumption of hostilities when the first stage of the ceasefire ended in March.
The signatories in the April letter wrote that their 'Jewish values compel us to stand up and to speak out'.
'We know in our hearts we cannot turn a blind eye or remain silent at [the] renewed loss of life and livelihoods, with hopes dwindling for a peaceful reconciliation and the return of the hostages,' they said in the letter.
'Israel's soul is being ripped out and we, members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, fear for the future of the Israel we love and have such close ties to.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US consultancy firm involved in GHF aid scheme modelled plans to 'relocate' Palestinians
US consultancy firm involved in GHF aid scheme modelled plans to 'relocate' Palestinians

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US consultancy firm involved in GHF aid scheme modelled plans to 'relocate' Palestinians

A consulting firm involved in the scandal-plagued Gaza Humanitarian Foundation entered into a multimillion-dollar contract to develop the initiative and modelled a plan to "relocate" Palestinians from Gaza as part of its work, a Financial Times investigation has revealed. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) helped design and run the US and Israeli-backed scheme which aimed to supplant United Nations-led aid coordination mechanisms in Gaza. The chaotic roll out of the programme has seen 600 Palestinians killed and another 4,000 wounded by Israeli forces while attempting to access aid. The firm has disavowed its involvement in the project, claiming in a statement in June that it had initially provided "pro bono support" for the project, but two senior partners that led the work "failed to disclose" its full nature and had subsequently carried out "unauthorised work" on the project. It said that the partners have since been fired and an investigation has been launched into the firm's involvement in the scheme. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But according to sources familiar with the project who spoke to the Financial Times, the BCG were more enmeshed with the scheme than the firm has publicly acknowledged, with the company contracted to perform $4m worth of work over a period of seven months. Over a dozen BCG staff worked directly on the project, dubbed "Aurora", between October and late May. Senior figures at the firm were reported to have discussed the initiative, but the BCG said they were misled about the scope and nature of the work by the partners helming the project. 'My journey to get aid in Gaza was like Squid Game' Read More » "The lead partner was categorically told no, and he violated this directive. We disavow this work," the BCG said. The work included financial modelling for the post-war reconstruction of Gaza, commissioned by Israeli backers, with one scenario envisioning the "voluntary relocation" of Palestinians from the enclave. This would have involved paying out "relocation packages" to 500,000 people worth $9,000 per person to induce people to leave the territory. The model assumed a quarter of Palestinians would opt to leave Gaza, with three-quarters of them unlikely to return. It estimated the cost of forced expulsion of Palestinians to be $23,000 cheaper, per Palestinian, than the costs of providing support to them in Gaza during reconstruction. According to BCG, this side of the operation was conducted without the knowledge of senior management and against their instructions. Involvement in security operations The revelations also raise questions about BCG's involvement in developing the security aspect of the initiative. According to sources familiar with the early stages of BCG's work on the initiative, the firm was initially contracted by Washington-based security contractor Orbis to develop a feasibility study for a new aid operation on behalf of the Tachlith Institute, an Israeli think tank. BCG was chosen for the project because of its connections with Phil Reilly, a 29-year veteran of the CIA who worked at Orbis. He was a senior adviser to BCG's defence practice where the two fired partners, Matt Schlueter and Ryan Ordway, worked. Middle East Eye previously reported that Reilly served as a senior adviser at BCG for eight years, and began discussing Gaza aid with Israeli civilians while still in his advisory role in early 2024. The BCG did not answer MEE's questions regarding its involvement in the security operations to support GHF, what role it had played with the foundation and who had asked the firm to get involved initially. Reilly dropped his advisory role with BCG and went on to found Safe Reach Solutions (SRS), a private military company which became the main security provider for the GHF. According to the report, half a dozen staff shifted to "more detailed business planning" for the SRS and GHF. This work was helmed by the US defence practice, while the initial pro-bono phase was billed to BCG's social impact practice helmed by Rich Hutchinson. Ex-CIA officer running Gaza aid security advised Boston Consulting Group Read More » By January, the BCG was contracted by McNally Capital, a Chicago-based private equity firm which owns Orbis, to plan GHF's ground operations from Tel Aviv. The SRS signed an initial contract with the group worth over $1m to cover eight weeks of work to develop SRS's operations in Gaza, with travel approvals given by officials in BGC's risk management operation. The group told the Financial Times that it was "pleased to have supported the establishment of SRS as an important step toward meeting the full scope of the humanitarian need in Gaza". Funding sources for both GHF and SRS remain unclear. Both are registered in US tax havens, with scant details available in public records. A source previously told the Financial Times that the GHF had been pledged $100m from a country they refused to name. Reuters reported on Friday that UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to open bank accounts for the GHF, with the foundation's lack of transparency over its funding cited as being one of the main stumbling blocks in the discussions with the banks. A GHF spokesperson said it has "spoken about initial funding from Europe, but we don't disclose donors for their privacy". GHF's scheme has seen 400 aid distribution points across the enclave replaced by four militarised distribution sites, where millions are forced to risk death in the hope of receiving aid. Israeli troops have admitted to deliberately shooting and killing unarmed Palestinians waiting for aid in the Gaza Strip, following direct orders from their superiors.

UK High Court Refuses Bid to Halt Palestine Action Ban
UK High Court Refuses Bid to Halt Palestine Action Ban

UAE Moments

time13 hours ago

  • UAE Moments

UK High Court Refuses Bid to Halt Palestine Action Ban

The UK High Court has declined an urgent request to pause the government's designation of Palestine Action as a proscribed terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. The decision paves the way for the ban to take effect as scheduled, with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper expected to finalise the order imminently and the ban to take effect at midnight. Co-founder Huda Ammori challenged the ban, arguing that Palestine Action's non-violent direct action—such as spraying red paint on military aircraft and disrupting arms companies—should not be criminalised under terrorism legislation. Her legal team said that they will seek an "urgent appeal" to prevent a "dystopian nightmare".

BBC Staff Accuse the Broadcaster of Forcing Israeli PR
BBC Staff Accuse the Broadcaster of Forcing Israeli PR

UAE Moments

time20 hours ago

  • UAE Moments

BBC Staff Accuse the Broadcaster of Forcing Israeli PR

More than 400 media figures, including 111 current BBC journalists, have signed an open letter condemning the corporation for acting as 'PR for the Israeli government and military,' following a series of editorial decisions perceived to downplay Palestinian suffering and prioritize Israel's narrative. Core Allegations The letter claims the BBC's coverage 'falls short' of its own impartiality standards, failing to analyze UK government arms sales or airlifting narratives critical of Israel's actions . BBC's decision to shelf 'Gaza: Doctors Under Attack' and 'Gaza: Medics Under Fire'—films with harrowing footage of attacks on Palestinian medics—was seen as political censorship, driven by fear of appearing anti‑Israel. Staff condemned Sir Robbie Gibb—a BBC board member with close ties to the Jewish Chronicle and Conservative circles—accusing him of ideological interference in editorial affairs. Employee Testimonies An anonymous BBC insider said the following about the broadcaster: 'All too often it has felt that the BBC has been performing PR for the Israeli government and military.' Another insider also said, 'Opaque editorial decisions and censorship … we believe the role of Robbie Gibb … is untenable.' They also warn that staff are being 'gaslit' and that editorial standards are being suspended to accommodate political agendas. BBC's Response and Repercussions The BBC leadership has defended its editorial integrity, citing guidelines and internal checks for content decisions. However, these reassurances have done little to quell criticism. Critics, including prominent public figures like Miriam Margolyes and Mike Leigh, have called for Robbie Gibb's removal, arguing his presence undermines credibility. This revolt compounds other recent controversies: live-streaming anti‑IDF chants at Glastonbury, delayed removal of footage, and earlier suspensions of Gaza-related documentaries—all prompting over 400 current staff to demand an internal reckoning and renewed commitment to impartial reporting. This article was previously published on qatarmoments. To see the original article, click here

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store