More radioactive wasp nests found at former US nuclear bomb site
The Department of Energy (DOE) confirmed it is aware of the situation and stated that the nests have been sprayed, sealed in bags as radiological waste and properly disposed of. The SRS, which was established in the early 1950s, played a key role in producing plutonium and tritium for America's nuclear weapons program throughout the Cold War . A spokesperson for Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC), the contractor responsible for site cleanup, told the Daily Mail that teams recovered dead wasps after exterminating the nests.
The insects, according to the spokesperson, showed lower levels of contamination than the nests themselves. While the DOE insists there has been no leakage from nearby nuclear waste tanks, some scientists are urging caution. Dr Timothy Mousseau, a biologist at the University of South Carolina, told The New York Times that the contaminated nests suggest radioactive materials may be more widely dispersed across the area than previously believed.
'This is an indicator that there are contaminants spread across this area that have not been completely encased and protected,' Mousseau said, adding that the latest discoveries 'indicate that much greater effort must be made to assess the possible risks and hazards of what appears to be a significant source of radioactive pollutants.' SRMC said all four nests were found in F Tank Farm, an area toward the middle of the 310-square mile SRS boundary or more than five miles from the closest site boundary. The F-Area Tank Farm where the nest was found holds 22 massive underground tanks, each up to 100 feet wide and 23 feet deep, packed with between 750,000 and 1.3 million gallons of radioactive waste.
Legacy contamination refers to pollution that persists in the environment from past activities, even after the original sources of contamination have ceased. 'The main concern relates to whether or not there are large areas of significant contamination that have escaped surveillance in the past,' Dr Mousseau told the New York Times , adding that the nests are a 'red flag' that should be investigated further. While SRMC said dead wasps were recently recovered, the group admitted that none were recovered after the first nest was found.
However, the site's spokesperson stressed that 'nests do not pose a health risk to SRS workers, surrounding communities, or the environment. They added that the average person is exposed to about 620 millirem (mrem) of radiation each year from both natural and man-made sources. 'All of the nests were emitting less than one percent of the natural background radiation rate. Mrem is a unit of measurement for radiation dose equivalent for humans,' the spokesperson continued.
However, the watchdog group Savannah River Site Watch slammed the report as 'incomplete,' saying it fails to explain the source of the contamination, how wasps were exposed or if more radioactive nests may be hidden. Tom Clements, executive director of the group, told AP: 'I'm as mad as a hornet that SRS didn't explain where the radioactive waste came from or if there is some kind of leak from the waste tanks that the public should be aware of.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists reveal reason behind 'steep' increase in colon cancer cases among young people
Colon cancer incidence rates in the US shot up by almost 50 percent in a year, a new study has revealed. An investigation by the American Cancer Society (ACS) found that after a stable 15-year trend, diagnoses of local-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) rose steeply in adults aged 45 to 49 years old between 2019 and 2022 in the US. From 2021 to 2022, there was a 50 percent relative increase in diagnoses from 11.7 to 17.5 cases per 100,000 people. Local or early stage indicates the cancer is confined to the original site where it started, has not spread to other areas of the body and usually has no symptoms. If colon cancer is detected and treated in its early stages, the five-year survival rate is approximately 90 percent, while it is around 60 percent if it is diagnosed in its advanced stages. The cost of treatment also dramatically increases, with early-stage colon cancer costing around $40,000 to treat, while advanced stages can exceed $300,000. The study's lead author Elizabeth Schafer put the rise in early-stage colon cancer cases down to recommendations for younger average-risk adults to begin testing for earlier. While the disease is known to be linked to obesity, experts have noted that the disease also seems to also be occurring in fit and healthy patients. Some experts believe the explanation must lie in environmental factors young people have been exposed to more than previous generations. While no 'smoking gun' has been found, there are multiple theories. These include modern chemicals in diets, microplastics, pollution, and one recent study even pinned the surge on exposure to E. coli in food. The recommended age to begin CRC screening was lowered from 50 to 45 years by ACS in 2018 and the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) followed suit in 2021. The US already has a lower colon cancer screening age than some other Western nations, including Canada — where it is set at 50 years — and England — which lowered the age from 60 to 50 years in 2021. Early onset colorectal cancer has become the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men under 50 and the second-leading cause for women under 50 in the US. Over 50,000 Americans are expected to die from colorectal cancer this year, while 150,000 are predicted to be diagnosed with the disease. For the recent ACS study, published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), researchers analyzed CRC cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2022 among adults 20 to 54 years old in the 21 geographic areas of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Cases were sorted by age, where the cancer was located, and stage at diagnosis. Results showed that CRC incidence increased steadily by 1.6 percent annually since 2004 among adults 20 to 39 years old and by two percent to 2.6 percent per year since 2012 among adults 40 to 44 and 50 to 54 years old. However, in people 45 to 49 years old, an increase of one percent annually during 2004 to 2019 accelerated to 12 percent per year from 2019 to 2022. This steep increase was driven by the detection of early, local-stage tumors, which increased from 2019 to 2022 by 19 percent per year for colon cancer after previously stable rates and by 25 percent per year for rectal cancer after declining rates. Advanced-stage disease has continued to increase steeply over the past two decades. Incidence of advanced CRC increased from 1.7 to 2.9 percent annually since 2004 among adults under 45 years old and even more rapidly during the past decade in ages 45 to 54. In support of these findings, another ACS led study also published today in JAMA reports that CRC screening among US adults 45 to 49 years of age increased by 62 percent from 2019 to 2023. 'It's not only thrilling to see the increase in colorectal cancer screening among younger adults, but also how it likely ties into rises in earlier stage diagnosis as noted in the other ACS led paper,' said lead author Jessica Star, an associate scientist of cancer risk factors and screening surveillance research at the ACS. 'However, we still have a long way to go. Screening for colorectal cancer in ages 45-49 remains suboptimal and has not increased equitably by both educational attainment and insurance status.' For this study, scientists analyzed the data of more than 50,000 individuals from the National Health Interview Survey, comparing changes in CRC screening from 2019 to 2023 within age groups 40 to 44; 45 to 49; 50 to 54; 55 to 64; and 65 to 75 years old. The data were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and region. The researchers found up-to-date CRC screening was up 20 percent in 2021 and 37 percent in 2023. The study results showed that among 45- to 49-year-olds, colonoscopy screening increased by 43 percent and stool-based testing increased more than five-fold from 2019 to 2023. Screening increased significantly from 2019 to 2023 in every racial and ethnic group, but remained unchanged among individuals with less than a high school education and those who were uninsured. 'These studies further demonstrate the importance of people having access to comprehensive health insurance, which covers evidence-based preventive services,' said Lisa A. Lacasse, president of ACS's advocacy affiliate, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN). 'With more than 2 million people in America expected to be diagnosed with cancer in 2025, it's more important than ever to make sure that everyone can access necessary screenings. 'ACS CAN will continue to advocate at the state and federal level to expand access for all because it isn't just good policy, it's lifesaving.' Doctors say people with symptoms of colon cancer or those who are concerned about the disease and are under 45 years old may still be able to get screened on their health insurance. Insurance would consider screening tests for this group as diagnostic screenings - a test to investigate specific symptoms - rather than a preventative screening - a test done on someone without symptoms to catch a disease early. Out-of-pocket, a colonoscopy costs between $1,250 and $4,800 — although this varies significantly by state.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
‘Grave, growing, and underrecognized danger:' New report sheds light on plastic pollution
The 'underrecognized' and 'grave and growing danger' of pervasive global plastic pollution is a threat to human health throughout the course of our lives, a group of international researchers warned in a report released Monday. With production on track to nearly triple by 2060, plastic pollution is responsible for disease and death and is estimated to cost the U.S. some $1.5 trillion a year in health-related economic losses, they explained, with 8,000 metric tons of plastic waste invading our lands, our water sources, and even our own hearts and brains. In the environment, such waste can provide a habitat for mosquitoes to lay eggs in, spreading deadly infections such as malaria and dengue fever. In our oceans, it can carry bacteria that sickens marine life, choking and killing animals looking for food. Furthermore, airborne emissions from the fossil fuel industry's plastic production are drivers of climate change and expose people to hazardous chemicals. Some three-quarters of plastic chemicals have never been tested for safety, the authors said, even as an estimated 57 percent of plastic waste is burned in the open, leaving low-income and at-risk populations disproportionately in harm's way. 'There is no understating the magnitude of both the climate crisis and the plastic crisis,' Dr. Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician and epidemiologist at Boston College, said in a statement. 'They are both causing disease, death and disability today in tens of thousands of people, and these harms will become more severe in the years ahead as the planet continues to warm and plastic production continues to increase.' Landrigan and the report's other authors called for greater public awareness of the issue – as well as policy to prevent continued worsening of the plastic pollution crisis. Their findings were released in the British medical journal The Lancet ahead of United Nations talks in Switzerland this week, which aim to finalize the world's first plastic pollution treaty following previous failed attempts. ' Plastics are made from fossil fuels, contaminate food and water, are tied to many human illnesses, and impose steep costs for medical care and environmental damage,' Landrigan, the report's lead author, said. To track these and reduce exposures, the researchers announced they had launched an independent and global monitoring system. They said that worsening is not inevitable with action. 'We know a great deal about the range and severity of the health and environmental impacts of plastic pollution across the full life cycle of plastic,' said Landrigan. 'These impacts fall most heavily on vulnerable populations, especially infants and children. They result in huge economic costs to society. It is incumbent on us to act in response.'
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
What the heck is ‘scrumping'? Why humans are so good at digesting alcohol
Craving a glass of wine with your dinner? The dietary habits of our ape ancestors may be to blame. To better understand the relationship between humans and alcohol, researchers are studying the animals' fondness for fermented and fallen fruit, newly referred to as 'scrumping.' "Scrumping by the last common ancestor of gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans about 10 million years ago could explain why humans are so astoundingly good at digesting alcohol," Nathaniel Dominy, the Charles Hansen Professor of Anthropology at Dartmouth College, said in a statement. "We evolved to metabolize alcohol long before we ever figured out how to make it, and making it was one of the major drivers of the Neolithic Revolution that turned us from hunter-gatherers into farmers and changed the world,' he added. Fermentation is the process by which bacteria and other microorganisms break down sugars into substances such as alcohols or acids. All of the alcohol we drink is made this way. When you drink alcohol, you get drunk because you're consuming faster than your metabolism can handle. In apes, researchers said this doesn't seem to be the case. Geneticists previously reported that eating fermented fruit may have led to a biological change in the last common ancestor of humans and African apes that boosted their ability to metabolize alcohol by 40 times. However, no one had the data to test it, and scientists had not differentiated fruit in the trees from that on the ground when studying the primates since then. "It just wasn't on our radar," Dominy explained. "It's not that primatologists have never seen scrumping — they observe it pretty regularly. But the absence of a word for it has disguised its importance.' The team wanted to know what significance scrumping had for human evolution so analyzed previous research on dietary habits of orangutans, chimpanzees, and mountain and western gorillas in the wild. The studies included thousands of scans of the primates eating fruit. If an ape at ground level was recorded eating fruit known to grow in the middle or upper levels of the forest canopy, it was counted as scrumping. Of the three species, African apes were found to 'scrump' regularly, while orangutans did not. To better understand chimpanzees' alcohol consumption, the researchers will next measure the levels of fermentation in fruits in trees, versus that on the ground. The researchers said their findings confirm results of past research which had also found that the primary enzyme for metabolizing ethanol — found in alcoholic beverages — is relatively inefficient in orangutans and other non-human primates. The researchers believe that the African apes' ability to metabolize ethanol may let them safely consume a whopping 10 pounds of fruit each day. That level of intake suggests exposure to ethanol could be a significant component of chimpanzee life, and a major force of human evolution. Humans may have retained the social aspects that apes bring to scrumping, Catherine Hobaiter, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at St Andrews, said. "A fundamental feature of our relationship with alcohol is our tendency to drink together, whether a pint with friends or a large social feast," she added. "The next step is to investigate how shared feeding on fermented fruits might also influence social relationships in other apes."
