logo
'Crunch time' for climate action, scientists warn – DW – 06/19/2025

'Crunch time' for climate action, scientists warn – DW – 06/19/2025

DW19-06-2025
The world is running out of time to rein in human-driven climate change, with top UN scientists warning that key indicators are now in uncharted territory.
The world is on course to crash through a dangerous warming threshold with key climate indicators shifting at an alarming rate, more than 60 top UN scientists have warned.
Bill Hare, CEO of think tank Climate Analytics, said Thursday it was "inevitable" that the world would breach the 1.5-degree Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) limit in around five years "unless emissions are reduced quickly."
"If emissions are reduced quickly, rapidly, as we know they can be, there is still a likelihood of exceeding a low overshoot of the 1.5 limit, and by low overshoot, I mean 1.6 degrees," he said during a press briefing at the UN interim climate negotiations in Bonn, Germany.
Unless action is taken now, Hare added, it would not be long before the world also "bust through 2 degrees."
Low rainfall and resulting water scarcity is one far-reaching impact of the global heating resulting from burning fossil fuels Image: Christoph Hardt/Panama Pictures/picture alliance
'We are already in crunch time'
The global surface temperature briefly exceeded the 1.5-degree limit in 2024, as greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation hit a new high. Coal, oil and gas account for more than 80% of global energy consumption, despite increasing investment in renewable energy.
Scientists have said crossing the 1.5 limit, first set in the 2015 Paris climate agreement by nearly 200 nations, would see a rise in extreme heat waves, devastating droughts and more intense storms. That increase has already been felt in recent years.
The Indicators of Global Climate Change report, out Thursday, says that to have a 50% chance of staying under the threshold, the world can only release 130 billion tons of planet-heating carbon dioxide. At the current rate of CO2 emissions, however, that "carbon budget" will likely be spent by 2028.
"We are already in crunch time for these higher levels of warming," co-author Joeri Rogelj, a professor of climate science and policy at Imperial College London, told journalists, adding there was a "very high chance" that the world would "reach and even exceed 1.5 C."
The report's authors said the findings should be taken as a reality check by global policymakers.
"I tend to be an optimistic person," said lead author Piers Forster, head of the University of Leeds Priestley Centre for Climate Futures in the UK. "But if you look at this year's update, things are all moving in the wrong direction."
Kumi Naidoo: 'Pessimism is a luxury we simply cannot afford'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Sea level rise has doubled
The report, a regular update between the landmark UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports released every five to seven years, also highlighted other concerning key climate indicators.
Sea level rise has doubled in recent years, up from around 1.8 millimeters per year between 1908 and 2018 to 4.3 mm since 2019, putting coastal cities and small island states at risk.
The Earth's energy imbalance, the difference between the amount of solar energy entering the atmosphere and the smaller amount leaving it, has nearly doubled in the last 20 years. Until now, 91% of human-caused warming has been absorbed by the oceans, but scientists said they don't know how much longer humanity can rely on them to soak up theis excess heat.
Rogelj said actions moving forward now could still "critically change" the rate of warming and limit the increasingly destructive effects of climate change.
"It's really the difference between just cruising through 1.5 C towards much higher levels of 2 C or trying to limit warming somewhere in the range of 1.5," he said.
Solar energy is booming, but countries have been reluctant to transition fully away from fossil fuels to clean energies Image: Jon G. Fuller/VW Pics/IMAGO
Global conflict, Trump's policies weaken climate efforts
But action on that front has taken a hit, with global concerns shifting to security and other pressing matters amid multiple ongoing conflicts. Climate experts have pointed out that President Donald Trump's move to target climate action and pull the US out of the Paris agreement could also weaken international efforts to tackle the problem.
"You need everybody on board doing the right thing, and this is very difficult," said Brazilian climate secretary Andre Correa do Lago, president of the upcoming COP30 climate summit, speaking with DW before the report was released.
Ahead of the summit in November, countries are due to submit their so-called nationally-determined contributions, or NDCs, outlining how much they plan to reduce their domestic emissions by 2035. Until now, only 22 countries have presented their targets.
"Most scientists think that with the numbers that are to appear, we probably are going to surpass 1.5," Correa do Lago said. "Depending on the NDCs, we will be able to evaluate which is the path that we are following."
Louise Osborne contributed to reporting from the COP30 preparatory talks in Bonn, Germany.
Edited by: Tamsin Walker
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI Robots Fill In For Weed Killers And Farm Hands
AI Robots Fill In For Weed Killers And Farm Hands

Int'l Business Times

time9 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

AI Robots Fill In For Weed Killers And Farm Hands

Oblivious to the punishing midday heat, a wheeled robot powered by the sun and infused with artificial intelligence carefully combs a cotton field in California, plucking out weeds. As farms across the United States face a shortage of laborers and weeds grow resistant to herbicides, startup Aigen says its robotic solution -- named Element -- can save farmers money, help the environment and keep harmful chemicals out of food. "I really believe this is the biggest thing we can do to improve human health," co-founder and chief technology officer Richard Wurden told AFP, as robots made their way through crops at Bowles Farm in the town of Los Banos. "Everybody's eating food sprayed with chemicals." Wurden, a mechanical engineer who spent five years at Tesla, went to work on the robot after relatives who farm in Minnesota told him weeding was a costly bane. Weeds are becoming immune to herbicides, but a shortage of laborers often leaves chemicals as the only viable option, according to Wurden. "No farmer that we've ever talked to said 'I'm in love with chemicals'," added Aigen co-founder and chief executive Kenny Lee, whose background is in software. "They use it because it's a tool -- we're trying to create an alternative." Element the robot resembles a large table on wheels, solar panels on top. Metal arms equipped with small blades reach down to hoe between crop plants. "It actually mimics how humans work," Lee said as the temperature hit 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees Celsius) under a cloudless sky. "When the sun goes down, it just powers down and goes to sleep; then in the morning it comes back up and starts going again." The robot's AI system takes in data from on-board cameras, allowing it to follow crop rows and identify weeds. "If you think this is a job that we want humans doing, just spend two hours in the field weeding," Wurden said. Aigen's vision is for workers who once toiled in the heat to be "upskilled" to monitor and troubleshoot robots. Along with the on-board AI, robots communicate wirelessly with small control centers, notifying handlers of mishaps. Aigen has robots running in tomato, cotton, and sugar beet fields, and touts the technology's ability to weed without damaging the crops. Lee estimated that it takes about five robots to weed 160 acres (65 hectares) of farm. The robots made by the 25-person startup -- based in the city of Redmond, outside Seattle -- are priced at $50,000. The company is focused on winning over politically conservative farmers with a climate friendly option that relies on the sun instead of costly diesel fuel that powers heavy machinery. "Climate, the word, has become politicized but when you get really down to brass tacks farmers care about their land," Lee said. The technology caught the attention of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the e-commerce giant's cloud computing unit. Aigen was chosen for AWS's "Compute for Climate" fellowship program that provides AI tools, data center power, and technical help for startups tackling environmental woes. "Aigen is going to be one of the industry giants in the future," said AWS head of climate tech startups business development Lisbeth Kaufman. "I think about Ford and the Model T, or Edison and the light bulb -- that's Kenny and Rich and Aigen." Aigen CEO Kenny Lee and CTO of Aigen Richard Wurden hope to win over typically conservative farmers with their climate-friendly tech AFP Aigen was chosen for Amazon Web Services' 'Compute for Climate' fellowship program that provides AI tools, data center power, and technical help for startups tackling environmental woes AFP

Fact check: Climate deniers misinterpret Antarctic ice study – DW – 06/26/2025
Fact check: Climate deniers misinterpret Antarctic ice study – DW – 06/26/2025

DW

time29-06-2025

  • DW

Fact check: Climate deniers misinterpret Antarctic ice study – DW – 06/26/2025

Satellite data shows that Antarctic ice sheets have grown in size, prompting claims that climate change is in reverse or even a hoax. But it's not that simple. A recent study has found that the Antarctic ice sheet mass has slightly increased in size in recent years, prompting a wave of claims on social media (such as here and here) that global warming may be reversing. Published in March 2025 by researchers at Tongji University in Shanghai, China, the study reported that the Antarctic ice sheet gained approximately 108 billion tons of ice annually between 2021 and 2023. This data focused on four glacier basins in the Wilkes Land-Queen Mary Land region of the eastern Antarctic ice sheet, has been misinterpreted by some climate skeptics as evidence that climate change is a "hoax." DW Fact Check looked at the numbers. Claim: Posts on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) have gone viral, with one stating, "Moral of the story: Never believe a climate alarmist," garnering over 270,000 views. Another viewed more than 55,000 times, claimed,"Scientists have had to pause the Climate Change Hoax Scam." DW Fact Check: Misleading One post even featured a GIF that the user believed showed new land emerging off the coast of Dubai due to falling sea levels — apparently unaware of the artificial Palm Islands constructed there between 2001 and 2007. The findings in the Chinese study are based on publicly available data from NASA's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment satellites, which have been measuring the Earth's gravitational field since 2002 and have documented changes in the planet's ice and water masses. The data may be correct, but its interpretation by conspiratorial social media users is not — a situation not helped by the researchers' decision to insert an increasing average trend curve next to the preceding decreasing curve depicting ice mass. "This is perfect fodder for people who are intentionally looking to spread disinformation," said Johannes Feldmann, a physicist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research near Berlin. Feldmann emphasized that climate science relies on long-term data — typically over 20 to 30 years — to identify meaningful trends. "Two, three or even five years are far too little to identify a long-term trend," he explained. Cherry-picking short-term data is a common tactic among climate change deniers. "There are always phases where the increase [in temperature] levels off a bit, which people suddenly take to mean: global warming has stopped, the trend is reversing," Feldmann added. "But it's never turned out to be true." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Antarctic ice sheet, like many natural systems, is subject to fluctuations. A 2023 study from the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom highlighted how meteorological events, such as unusually heavy or light snowfall, can temporarily affect ice mass and sea levels. Therefore, fluctuations such as those observed between 2021 and 2023 are to be expected. "We're dealing with a natural system that is subject to fluctuations — and this is nothing unusual," said Angelika Humbert, a glaciologist at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven, northern Germany. "We sometimes have years with a lot of snow and sometimes years with no snow at all, and it's the same for ice sheets." The Tongji University researchers themselves acknowledged this in a separate 2023 study, linking increased ice mass in eastern Antarctica to unusually high snowfall. "Given the warmer atmosphere, we know that these snowfall events could increase in the coming years," said Feldmann. "On the one hand, this means more snow could fall more often [on the ice sheets] but also that more could melt — because it's getting warmer. "This is all well-researched and will continue to be researched," he added. "There was a brief increase [in Antarctic ice mass], but it didn't come anywhere close to replacing the losses of recent decades. The long-term development we are observing is a large-scale loss of the Antarctic ice sheet."

Strikes on Iran nuclear sites could cause environmental harm – DW – 06/26/2025
Strikes on Iran nuclear sites could cause environmental harm – DW – 06/26/2025

DW

time26-06-2025

  • DW

Strikes on Iran nuclear sites could cause environmental harm – DW – 06/26/2025

Recent Israeli and US attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities could cause long-term environmental damage, including soil contamination. It is not yet known how many missiles and bombs were fired at Iranian nuclear and military facilities during 12 days of war. On June 22, the US attacked the Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites with 14 "bunker busting" bombs weighing 30,000 pounds (13,600 kilograms) each, along with 30 Tomahawk missiles. According to Gaukhar Mukhatzhanova from the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, the actual extent of the damage is still unclear. On June 23, she told DW that the UN's International Atomic Energy Commission (IAEA) has not yet been able to fully verify the effects of the attacks, particularly on the underground enrichment plant at Fordo. "We can see some damage on satellite images, but we don't know the actual extent and cost." The IAEA assumes that there is radioactive and chemical contamination at several sites. Thousands of centrifuges could have been damaged by the sudden power outages. The centrifuges work with the highly reactive uranium hexafluoride (UF6). Although no increased radiation levels have yet been measured outside the plants, a possible leakage of these substances poses considerable health and environmental risks. IAEA inspectors currently have no access to the affected nuclear facilities. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "There is a lot we don't know, and that is really the big problem," said Roozbeh Eskandari, an independent environmental researcher who has studied pollution in Iran for years. "Those responsible in Iran always claim that everything is under control. But now there is hardly any information about possible environmental dangers, not even for the people living in the immediate vicinity of the targets," Eskandari told DW. Eskandari points to a serious explosion that occurred at the end of April in the port of Bandar Abbas in southern Iran. The smoke caused by the combustion of chemical substances released large quantities of soot, nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO₂) and other pollutants, which caused a massive deterioration in air quality in the surrounding areas for several days. Similar clouds of smoke could also be seen in videos circulating on social media following attacks by the Israeli army on some missile installations in Iran. "These pollutants contaminate the soil. Soil contamination in military conflicts is one of the worst, yet most overlooked, environmental consequences of war," Eskandari added. Pollutants often remain in the topsoil for decades and impair soil quality, which leads to loss of fertility and problems with soil regeneration. Iran experienced these kinds of long-term ecological consequences after its eight-year war with Iraq from 1980 to 1988. The provinces of Khuzestan, Ilam, and Kermanshah in the west and southwest of the country, located on the border with Iraq, were the most affected at that time. Khuzestan, with its important oil refineries and industrial facilities, was heavily bombed. Many once-fertile fields became unsuitable for agriculture. Studies by local universities have also shown increased rates of cancer, respiratory diseases, and skin problems. The ecological destruction, coupled with the chronic mismanagement of the political system and the increasing impact of climate change, continue to have direct consequences today. According to the latest available government statistics, Khuzestan Province, home to ancient cities and a UNESCO World Heritage Site, has had the highest emigration rate of all Iranian provinces over the past 20 years. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store