'I've never been so scared as I was that day'
In their way were road blocks and hundreds of police officers determined to enforce an injunction preventing the festival goers reaching their destination, an injunction introduced as the free festival at Stonehenge had grown over the years.
What followed, according to some who witnessed it, was some of the worst violence involving police seen in the UK for decades. Both sides still dispute what happened, and the event was immortalised in song.
"I see a pregnant woman, lying in blood of her own.
"I see her children crying as the police tore apart her home."
So goes the 1991 song 'Battle of the Beanfield' by indie folk band The Levellers - their telling of the story of what happened on 1 June 1985. The album it was on sold more than 300,000 copies that year, adding fame to an already infamous incident.
There have long been calls for a public inquiry into what happened that day, with some still asking for one to be held, although the Home Office has said there are no such plans.
In the current era, where festivals like Glastonbury are surrounded by huge security fences and tickets sell out in minutes, it may be hard to picture the free festival gatherings of 40 and 50 years ago.
But from the early 1970s hundreds - then thousands - of people would make an annual pilgrimage to Stonehenge in the weeks building up to the solstice.
But as the size of the event grew - reaching 100,000 at its peak - so did the complaints. Of damage to the stones themselves, trespassing and vandalism.
Eventually the gathering became uncontrollable, in the eyes of the authorities, and an injunction was put in place to stop it.
The summer of 1985 was the first festival season where the injunction was in place, and a four-mile exclusion zone was set up around the stones at the end of May.
Tonnes of gravel was tipped across roads, and a ring of barbed wire surrounded Stonehenge.
But that did not deter some. About midday on 1 June, a convoy of about 140 vehicles headed for the stones on a route taking them south on the A338.
The violence erupted when police blocked the convoy - with some officers claiming vehicles were driven at them - and many of the festival-goers ended up in a beanfield near the A303, where hundreds were arrested during hours of confrontations with the police.
An ITV journalist who filmed the events said it was some of the worst violence he had ever seen.
Alan Lodge was part of the convoy. While the Home Office has told the BBC it has no plans to launch a public inquiry, he said he thinks it is a "splendid idea".
"I don't really think that anybody has learned any lessons," he said.
Mr Lodge had been going to free festivals with his family for years and decided to set up welfare provision at events at the time.
He remembers trying to discuss things with the police in the beanfield.
"I was trying to set up a line of communication so we could negotiate a way out of the situation," he said.
"[But] there was no middle ground to be found."
Helen Hatt also wants a public inquiry. She said she was left suffering from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after the violence broke out.
"So much harm was caused to so many people - children were traumatised for life," she said.
Her converted ambulance was part of the convoy.
"Police started smashing the windscreens of the vehicles at the front [of the convoy] and dragging people to ground, hitting them with truncheons.
"Somebody ran past me with a head wound and blood running down his face."
Just 19 at the time, she said her vehicle's windows were then smashed, and she was grabbed by the hair by two officers.
"I was in a tug-of-war with either side of my hair. I can remember how excruciating the pain of having both sides of hair pulled.
"I was screaming 'stop, stop, tell me what to do'. I had people in the ambulance with me, cowering."
At the time Ms Hatt was a festival entertainer called Bo Bo the Clown, and said she had trusted the police prior to June 1985.
But she described them as a "a wave of truncheon-wielding madmen" on that day.
"I had [vehicle] tax and MOT, so in my view I wasn't doing anything wrong. I was on my way to work as Bo Bo the clown. That was my mindset."
For their part, the police said officers were hit with missiles, and petrol bombs were also thrown in their direction.
There was one important witness to the incident - the Marquess of Ailesbury, who was then Lord Cardigan.
The owner of nearby Savernake Forest, he had encountered the convoy heading to Stonehenge and chatted with them.
"I wasn't alarmed. I must have had some contact with the police - they told me in no uncertain terms they weren't going to allow this convoy to get to Stonehenge."
The Marquess followed the convoy on his motorbike and then saw "one of the most awful things I'd ever seen".
He witnessed Ms Hatt, who he said was given no time to respond as the glass from her vehicle's windows shattered, with police holding her head and feet.
"I was offended by the sight - she wasn't armed, she wasn't threatening. She was just in the wrong place in the wrong time."
He later refused to give the police permission to access Savernake Forest, where other people who had been part of the convoy were sheltering.
Rose Brash - who had her six-month-old daughter with her remembers the ploughed-up beanfield and explained that while some people in the convoy were stopped on the road, most pulled off trying to escape.
She said people had tried to escape and police charged at them "en masse".
"I've never been so terrified as I was that day," she said.
Members of the press were also there to watch events unfold.
Kim Sabido was an ITN reporter who broadcast from the scene. He told the BBC "it was like World War Three in a way".
He saw vehicles from the convoy going "round and round", while the police moved forward "like a military operation".
The festival-goers wanted to get out, he said, but the police wanted to arrest them.
He said he did not see anything that would have provoked the police actions.
"The only thing you can say stepping back from it - they weren't giving themselves up to the police as the police were asking them."
More than 500 people were arrested in and around the beanfield that day.
During his reporting at the time, Mr Sabido called for a public inquiry into what had transpired, but he said he fears so long has now past that it would no longer be relevant.
He added that there should have been one shortly after the events in 1985, but believes the police approach to public order events has now changed and been "reassessed".
"I would be fascinated if something like that happened again, how police would react," he said.
"I think there would be an element of hesitation on behalf of the senior police officers… about how to try to pull back their approach."
Paul Howlett, who was with Wiltshire Police at the time, said: "I wouldn't for a minute suggest that everyone [at the festival] was violent or criminally inclined, but I think it's important to remember there's an element amongst them who were very anti-police, anti-establishment".
He recalls a supermarket being ransacked during the festivals, people camping in woodland and chopping down trees for fires, but also police having bricks thrown at the vehicle they were sitting in, hitting the windscreen.
Pete Russ - also a former Wiltshire Police officer - said officers sometimes struggled just to get onto the festival site if they needed to, such as when they once had a call about an injured child.
"There was a very angry mob - we literally had to flee the site. It was a no-go area for the police at that time," he said.
"If you've got 100,000 people with no form of control then clearly there's a massive danger to everyone involved."
Ms Hatt's view is that if the festival was a town of 100,000 people "you can guarantee there would be a criminal in it" but that it does not justify "terrorising" anybody there to find them.
For the Battle of the Beanfield in 1985, Mr Russ was instructed to drive a gravel truck and dump it on the A338 to block the path of the convoy.
Mr Russ said he saw violence towards officers and, in his view, force was justified.
"They [the police] only had truncheons and shields versus vehicles that weighed 10 to 15 tonnes."
The Marquess of Ailesbury said he did not see any of the vehicles being deliberately driven at officers.
More news stories for Wiltshire
Listen to the latest news for Wiltshire
Lionel Grundy, who has since died, was the deputy chief constable of Wiltshire Police at the time.
Speaking to the BBC in the early 2000s, he said offcers wanted to find the culprits behind bottles of petrol allegedly thrown at police, as well as petrol theft.
"I had reports they were starting engines and lining up vehicles. The manner they were forming themselves up looked like they were going to Stonehenge.
"I ordered my men to arrest the people in the field."
Nearly six years after the events of June 1985, a four-month trial into the actions of Wiltshire Police was held at Winchester Crown Court, after 24 members of the convoy sued the force for wrongful arrest, assault and criminal damage.
Both sides claimed victory afterwards. The police were cleared of wrongful arrest, but the convoy members were awarded £24,000 for damage to "persons and property".
The line was drawn under the Battle of the Beanfield, but it wasn't the end of the story.
For years afterwards, people trying to get to Stonehenge to celebrate the solstice would clash with police trying to stop them.
Wiltshire Police told the BBC that "much has changed" since 1985.
Supt Steve Cox, head of specialist operations, said: "I respect the fact that the events of that day in 1985 may be personally felt, and will have impacted on people in a variety of ways."
He said the force reflects on everything it does, and seeks to learn lessons from major events.
Adding that English Heritage now allows free access to Stonehenge to celebrate the solstice, he added: "We police the solstice celebrations at both Stonehenge and Avebury in the same proportionate way that we police any other public event.
"Public safety is our priority."
Follow BBC Wiltshire on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Carhenge's little-known link to 1980s incident
The battle scars of Stonehenge
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves eyes £5bn Bitcoin sale to help plug black hole
Rachel Reeves could be on the brink of a Bitcoin windfall worth billions as she battles to fill her budget black hole. The Home Office is working with police forces to sell off a hoard of seized cryptocurrency estimated to be worth at least £5bn in a move that could ease pressure on the beleaguered Chancellor. It plans to develop an official crypto storage system that would handle sales of Bitcoin and other digital currencies. The potential sell-off comes amid growing concerns about a black hole in the public finances, following Sir Keir Starmer's about-turns on welfare and the winter fuel allowance. Economists believe the Chancellor must find as much as £20bn in the autumn as she struggles to balance the books in the face of higher borrowing costs and weak growth. Stubborn inflation figures have threatened to keep interest rates high, raising the cost of borrowing. Ministers have indicated that taxes will have to rise to fill a budget black hole. Cryptocurrency sales are handled by law enforcement agencies, but the Treasury is understood to be monitoring the situation. A recent rise in the price of digital currencies promises to multiply the already significant sums involved. The total amount of seized cryptocurrency currently held by police is unknown. But a single raid in 2018 recovered 61,000 Bitcoin from the proceeds of a Chinese Ponzi scheme being stashed in Britain. Bitcoin's value hit $123,000 (£92,000) last week, making the stash worth more than £5.4bn, up 20-fold from its value when seized. Prices have surged as Donald Trump has ushered in a series of changes in the US to broaden access to and adoption of cryptocurrencies. Lawmakers in the US passed the country's first major national cryptocurrency legislation, known as the Genius Act, on Friday. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, has called for Britain to establish a national Bitcoin reserve, an idea that has been rejected by Labour. Home Office plans for a 'crypto storage and realisation framework' would allow law enforcement to securely store frozen digital currencies and sell them. It is unclear how much would accrue to the Treasury from any sales. However, in many criminal seizures the Treasury takes a substantial portion of the proceeds if sums cannot be returned to victims. In the case of the 2018 raid, Chinese victims of the investment fraud have asked for the Bitcoin to be returned. The public purse is in dire need of extra revenue as growth falters. Last week Richard Hughes, the chairman of the Office for Budget Responsibility, suggested higher taxes would not be enough to address a looming debt crisis. Experts said crypto seizures represented a potentially lucrative avenue for raising funds. 'There is oil under our feet in terms of digital assets, from an illicit perspective, that could have hundreds of millions of pounds coming back into the UK each year,' said Aidan Larkin, the chief executive of seizure company Asset Reality. Cryptocurrencies are increasingly used to evade financial controls and carry out investment scams, making them a key target for police seeking to stop criminal activity. Law enforcement agencies have sold Bitcoin seized from criminals in the past, but plans for a centralised system suggests ministers recognise the growing significance of cryptocurrency as a potential revenue source. Last week, the US Marshals Service said it had more than $3.4bn in seized Bitcoin. The Trump administration has vowed to create a strategic reserve using the cryptocurrencies. Tender documents from BlueLight Commercial, the Home Office's procurement body for law enforcement, said the contract would be worth up to £40m. The provider would be paid a commission based on cryptocurrency sales. The project's future is unclear after an updated notice said it had not received acceptable bids, although it is expected to continue in some form. Proceeds of crime that are not returned to victims are split between central government accounts and a pot for law enforcement programmes. The decision to sell Bitcoin is ultimately made by crime-fighting agencies. Bitcoin's price has doubled in the last year on the prospects of the Trump administration treating the digital currency favourably in contrast to a series of investigations launched by the Biden White House. Speaking in Las Vegas in May, Mr Farage said that he would establish a UK Bitcoin reserve if he was made prime minister as part of a plan for a cryptocurrency 'revolution'. Labour has rejected the idea, saying it is too volatile to store sovereign funds in. Analysis | Britain is sitting on billions in Bitcoin. Can it rescue Reeves? Selling crypto may offer a quick fix for the cash-strapped Chancellor – but it risks repeating a historic mistake Gordon Brown's decision to sell the majority of Britain's gold reserves in 1999 has been dubbed by some as one of the worst investment decisions ever made by the government. The 401 tonnes of gold the former chancellor sold at the market's nadir brought in $3.5bn, far from the $40bn it would be worth today. A quarter of a century later, one of Brown's successors is sitting on a potentially similarly sized goldmine of the digital variety, as well as another potentially perilous selling decision. Britain's Bitcoin stockpile, confiscated from various criminal enterprises, is today estimated in the billions, a development that has led to calls for Rachel Reeves to cash in to ease pressure on the public finances. The value of these holdings has soared after the price of Bitcoin recently hit a record high above $123,000 – double its level a year ago. While there is no estimate of the amount of cryptocurrency seized from criminals, a single raid in 2018 recovered a wallet containing 61,000 Bitcoin from Jian Wen, a takeaway worker who was jailed last year for money laundering. At the time of the raid, Bitcoin was worth around $6,000, with the total haul more than £300m. Today, it is worth more than £5.4bn according to Arkham Intelligence, a company that analyses cryptocurrency transactions. Last week, the US Marshals Service, an arm of the Department of Justice, said it had around $3.4bn in Bitcoin, although experts have said the US government's total haul is likely to be much higher. Publicly, the Treasury says it does not hold any Bitcoin. The proceeds of crime such as investment scams are managed by police and are first meant to be returned to victims. But this is often not possible and in reality 20 to 30pc is kept, says Aidan Larkin, the chief executive of Asset Reality, a company that specialises in seizing the proceeds of crime. Cryptocurrency prices fluctuate wildly and seizures are handled by local forces, making it impossible to know how much has been seized. But Larkin is adamant that the Treasury is in line for a potential windfall. 'If I'm in the Treasury, I'm thinking of this as our Norway oil moment. I do think digital assets will lead to a large windfall for government agencies and the public purse over the next five to 10 years,' Larkin says. Making crime pay Since 2019, £1.4bn has been seized and frozen from the proceeds of crime. 'We could double that by having a greater focus on digital assets,' Larkin says. Under current legislation, the proceeds of crime that are not returned to victims are split between frontline police agencies and the central government. Bitcoin's growing value has led to suggestions that Reeves should sell what Bitcoin she can, with Norman Lamont, the former chancellor, saying she should spend it 'right away'. However, in reality, selling crypto is more difficult than seizing it and untangling crypto-related crimes can take years. In the case of Jian Wen, victims of fraud have asked for their money back. The Home Office did not provide any update on the case. 'With the delays in court hearings that we're getting now, you have to seize it and then maintain it for a long time,' says Professor Michael Levi of Cardiff University, an expert on asset seizures. However, there are signs that the Government is taking steps to offload Bitcoin. A branch of the Home Office has sought bids for a 'crypto storage and realisation framework' that would centralise and organise the sale of various cryptocurrency seizures. The provider would earn up to £40m in commission when cryptocurrencies are sold, indicating that at least hundreds of millions of pounds worth are earmarked to be sold. If the Government were to confiscate the proceeds of Jian Wen's Bitcoin seizure, it could boost the Treasury's coffers by around £2.6bn, roughly half the cost of Sir Keir Starmer's recent benefits climbdown or a third of the cost of the Afghan data breach revealed last week. While the decision is meant to be taken by law enforcement, the sums at stake – and Bitcoin's famous volatility – suggest the Chancellor would take an interest. The Treasury is understood to be keeping tabs on the potential for a cryptocurrency windfall. A quick-fire sell-off could lead to accusations of selling too early, especially given Bitcoin's blistering rise over recent years. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, has said he would establish a Bitcoin reserve if made prime minister, following in the footsteps of ally Donald Trump, who has already ordered officials to create a reserve from seized cryptocurrency. Labour has recently turned down the idea, with Emma Reynolds, the Economic Secretary, saying that Bitcoin's volatility makes it 'less suitable as a reserve asset for the UK'. Yet, the strain on the public purse suggests Reeves could do with the money now. Bitcoin could provide a short-term boost to Britain and the Chancellor will just hope she is not repeating Brown's mistake. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Indian and Pakistani men arrested on suspicion of working illegally in Coventry
Two men have been arrested on suspicion of working illegally in Coventry. Both were detained in the city on Thursday (July 17). Officials from the Home Office teamed up with Coventry Police. One Pakistani and one Indian national were found to have breached the conditions of their visas by illegally working. At the time of writing, the Pakistani man had been detained, and the Indian national had been released under strict reporting conditions, the Home Office said. Both have been warned they will be removed from the UK. READ MORE: Coventry WHSmith undergoes major change after company sold for £76m On Wednesday (July 16), Immigration Enforcement (IE) and West Midlands Police targeted illegal working hotspots across Coventry and Birmingham. Together, they swooped on illegally modified e-bikes near Birmingham New Street Station. It led to the arrest of four men for working illegally, including one Eritrean and one Guinean. Both were failed asylum seekers with no right to work in the UK and have been placed on strict reporting conditions, pending travel documents being issued to facilitate their removal from the UK. Minister for Border Security, Immigration, and Asylum Dame Angela Eagle said: 'We will not stand for illegal working, which is why, under our Plan for Change, we have increased action nationwide, with visits and arrests up by around 50 per cent since coming into power.' She continued: 'People travelling to the UK illegally are sold a lie by the people smuggling gangs that they will be able to live and work freely in this country, when in reality they end up facing squalid living conditions, minimal pay, and inhumane working hours.' In the past year, more than 10,000 illegal working visits have been conducted, leading to 7,130 arrests across the UK. Of these, 1,151 people were arrested in the Midlands. Matthew Foster, from West Midlands Immigration Compliance and Enforcement, said: 'Illegal working will not be tolerated. It undercuts legitimate businesses, drives down local wages, and often traps vulnerable people in exploitation and poor conditions.' He added: 'We are stepping up enforcement across the UK, targeting the criminals and rogue employers who profit from this abuse. If you try to work illegally or help others to do so, we will track you down and hold you to account.' Sign up for our FREE daily newsletter here for all the latest news about Coventry.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Arrests as immigration raids target workers
More than 20 people have been arrested after immigration raids across the West Midlands. Delivery drivers suspected of working illegally were targeted by officers in Birmingham, Coventry and Hereford, the Home Office said. Images showed enforcement agents apprehending two men at New Street railway station on Wednesday, as people were stopped for allegedly using modified e-bikes. It comes amid a crackdown on undocumented workers operating in the so-called gig economy, as well as places like car washes, construction sites and nail bars. The two-day operation saw 21 foreign nationals taken into custody for a range of immigration offences, the government added. They included people from Eritrea, Guinea, Italy, India, Pakistan, Vietnam and Bangladesh. All of them now face being deported from the UK. Matthew Foster, who leads on immigration in the West Midlands, said illegal working was undercutting legitimate businesses and allowing vulnerable people to be exploited. "Those who choose to break the law by working illegally or employing illegal workers should expect to be caught and face the consequences," he said. The enforcement activity comes after ministers promised to get tough on illegal migration to "protect UK borders". Plans have included a focus on food delivery companies such as Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat to prevent illegal working. In June, the companies agreed to strengthen security checks following reports some asylum seekers were working illegally as couriers. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. More on this story Food delivery apps to tighten checks to stop illegal workers Illegal worker arrests in Midlands up by third Arrests during factory immigration raids Related internet links Home Office